Canon Digital Photography Forums  

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Sharing Knowhow' section > RAW, Post Processing and Printing
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25th of July 2007 (Wed)   #46
davidcrebelxt
Goldmember
 
davidcrebelxt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Missouri, USA
Posts: 3,003
Default Re: DPP vs. Lightroom

Quote:
Originally Posted by lowcrust View Post
Obviously "initial conversion". That's what people were talking about, right? All that talk about Adobe reverse-enigeneering and that. I asked for examples of straight conversion without post processing so that I can see this for myself. I've only used DPP briefly but never experienced or noticed this phenomena.
Sorry, wasn't sure what you meant... I based my reply on this part of the question:

"But if someone makes a statement that "my cr2 file will be better processed by DPP than LR" "

When people make those statments I take it to mean they like the final output better from one or the other.

That garyjean link was good... I see an even bigger colorshift with my camera using ACR than what they show... Candy apple reds sometimes go dull orange using the default settings.
__________________
David C.
Equipment: Canon Dig. Rebel XT; 18-55mm EF-S; 28-105mm EF; 50mm 1.8 EF
Sigma ef-500 DG ST, Elements, Gimp, Lightroom
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dcrebelxt
davidcrebelxt is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 26th of July 2007 (Thu)   #47
René Damkot
Moderator
 
René Damkot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
Posts: 39,854
Default Re: DPP vs. Lightroom

Quote:
Originally Posted by lowcrust View Post
Yeah, I actually mentioned in my first post that I did see your thread, René.

Oops. All the LR vs. DPP threads must have gotten me confused
__________________
"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams

Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.

MySpace
Get Colormanaged
Twitter

PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
René Damkot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th of July 2007 (Fri)   #48
Collin85
Cream of the Crop
 
Collin85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney/Beijing
Posts: 8,164
Default Re: DPP vs. Lightroom

Guys, I'm back.

Went and got CS3. Now I understand it uses ACR 4.0+ for it's RAW files, which is pretty much exactly what Lightroom boasts, right? I'm VERY pleased with the abundance of tools available, especially the highlight recovery tool.

I went and did a few tests to see ACR vs. DPP myself, and now I get what people meant by 'punchier results' and 'better colours' with DPP. I straight converted some RAW files with CS3 and did it with the same files with DPP (made sure to negate all those PS settings prior to converting) and the result differences are definitely noticable.

A few silly questions:

1) Does the ACR 4.0+ RAW plugin in CS3 contain more tools than Lightroom? I'm very impressed with the ACR plugin in CS3.

2) Suppose I wanted to use tools like highlight recovery which are not available in DPP. Assume I have CS3 and DPP, but not LR.

What should I do? Should I do the all the necessary adjustments in DPP, do the initial conversion to TIFF/JPEG and then use the highlight recovery tool in CS3..
or should I just bite it hard and not use DPP at all for that particular shot. In other words, do all the work with ACR and then do the RAW conversion there instead?
Pretend time isn't an issue here. For instance, I know the former process mentioned would be pretty damn time-intensive, but I'm just looking for advice at the moment regarding methodology.

3) From my trip, there were some shots which were just blown highlights galore (mainly skies). I guess some shots I didn't view valuble enough to bother with bracketed exposures for HDR composition later on, but now that I think about it.. I shouldn't of been so negligent.

My question is, is there some function/tool in CS3 which just allows me to select/highlight all the areas of an image which is pretty much white. I thought perhaps I could even just apply a consistent light blue over all of those areas.. would atleast look much much better than pure white.

Thanks guys.
__________________
Col | Flickr

Sony A7 + Leica 50 Lux ASPH, Oly E-M5 + 12/2
Canon 5D3, 16-35L, 50L, 85L, 135L
Collin85 is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 27th of July 2007 (Fri)   #49
Curtis N
Master Flasher
 
Curtis N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
Posts: 19,130
Default Re: DPP vs. Lightroom

Hopefully this will clarify, rather than confuse.
Quote:
Originally Posted by In2Photos View Post
While DPP offers the Picture Style adjustments I find that I don't use them (mainly because I use an XT and they were not available to me).
You can use DPP's picture styles, whether or not your camera supports them. So I could make a 20D file look like a 30D file, simply by choosing the picture style.

Regardless whether you have a "picture styles" camera or the older models with separate adjustments for contrast, sharpness and saturation, DPP's initial rendering will use the camera's settings. A DPP conversion without adjustment will be theoretically identical to a JPEG produced by the camera.

Since non-Canon software ignores these camera settings, their output will always be different if you're doing a straight conversion without adjustment.

What makes Lightroom worth the $$$ (to some people) is not its RAW conversion quality or its wholesale editing capability. Any decent RAW converter will do these things. It's the extra wiz-bang features for printing, slideshows and web presentation that are incredible time-savers. The other day it took me only a few minutes to print a contact sheet and create a PDF slideshow for a client. Time is money.
__________________
"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible | Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash | How to Use Flash Outdoors | Excel-based DOF Calculator
Curtis N is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th of July 2007 (Fri)   #50
René Damkot
Moderator
 
René Damkot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
Posts: 39,854
Default Re: DPP vs. Lightroom

Quote:
Originally Posted by Collin85 View Post
Should I do the all the necessary adjustments in DPP, do the initial conversion to TIFF/JPEG and then use the highlight recovery tool in CS3.
That's what I do: Do a 'base' conversion in DPP, then use ACR for a darker version, recovering the highlights. Then I blend the two in PS, masking the darker layer, so only the highlights are visible.
__________________
"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams

Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.

MySpace
Get Colormanaged
Twitter

PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
René Damkot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th of July 2009 (Wed)   #51
johnj2803
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 849
Default Re: DPP vs. Lightroom

sorry to revive this thread but i am new to all these, I have been using DPP 3.6.1 with all my RAW files and have been pleased with it. the only bummer i have is the ability of organizing my photos. I am a mac user and I am fond of iphoto and the way it organizes my pictures.

that is why i tried lightroom 2.4.

the question here is, with the updated versions of these 2 softwares, what is "better" for our images. or do all the comments stated here still hold true. DPP good output than LR. but more options in LR. or did i get them all mixed?
__________________
My flickr
johnj2803 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th of July 2009 (Wed)   #52
René Damkot
Moderator
 
René Damkot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
Posts: 39,854
Default Re: DPP vs. Lightroom

IMHO, DPP is better, at least where sharpening and NR is concerned.
LR might have an edge color wise, but that would be just in some very difficult circumstances. Otherwise, both are fine.

If you don't do sharpening / NR in the raw converter, then I wouldn't hesitate to say: go for LR.

Why not download the trial?
__________________
"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams

Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.

MySpace
Get Colormanaged
Twitter

PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
René Damkot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th of July 2009 (Wed)   #53
johnj2803
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 849
Default Re: DPP vs. Lightroom

Quote:
Originally Posted by René Damkot View Post
IMHO, DPP is better, at least where sharpening and NR is concerned.
LR might have an edge color wise, but that would be just in some very difficult circumstances. Otherwise, both are fine.

If you don't do sharpening / NR in the raw converter, then I wouldn't hesitate to say: go for LR.

Why not download the trial?

i have the trial on now and i'm liking it! I even have plug ins for flickr and facebook! but the one thing that really is annoying is the sharpening, i would really like to do it easily with LR. is there a way to do it by batch? can't seem to find the sharpen tool!
__________________
My flickr
johnj2803 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th of July 2009 (Wed)   #54
tonylong
do I really have to respond?
 
tonylong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
Posts: 52,967
Default Re: DPP vs. Lightroom

Sharpening and noise reduction are in the Details panel a ways down the Development module. LR also has "output sharpening" that can be applied to prints as well as exported files, although not with the controls you can use in the Develop module.

LR2 also has some ability to localize sharpening using adjustment brushes.

It's probably pretty accurate, though, that better sharpening and noise reduction results can be gotten either through Photoshop or specialized applications. Photoshop has excellent sharpening tools and noise reduction apps have been developed that work well with LR2. For me, I use LR noise reduction and sharpening for most of my Web images but have Photoshop and Noise Ninja on hand for critical needs.
__________________
Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase
Wildlife project pics here, Biking Photog shoots here, "Suburbia" project here! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here
tonylong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th of July 2009 (Wed)   #55
René Damkot
Moderator
 
René Damkot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
Posts: 39,854
Default Re: DPP vs. Lightroom

LR > Develop Module > Detail tab. Here's how it works:
http://lightroom-news.com/lightroom-...te/sharpening/
__________________
"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams

Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.

MySpace
Get Colormanaged
Twitter

PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
René Damkot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th of July 2009 (Wed)   #56
philmar
Goldmember
 
philmar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 4,634
Default Re: DPP vs. Lightroom

Disclaimer - I use CS4, not LR.

I assume LR has the same ability to do local adjustments to files with exposure, clarity, saturation, sharpness ect.

THAT alone would be a reason to use it over DPP (I haven't used DPP in 3 years so I apologise if it now has that ability). The ability to do local adjustments directly to the RAW file is a HUGE advantage. Highlight recovery is another reason why I never look at DPP any more (I once prefered it to CS2, but that changed with CS3). The ability to tweak individual colors is HUGE as well.

But still - think about it...LOCAL ADJUSTMENTS to files...NON-destructively.

DPP has the overwhelming price advantage tho....but you still will need at least Elements.
__________________
A photo I took HERE published in National Geographic Time on your hands? Then HERE'S plenty more photos to nibble on:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/phil_marion/sets/
MY STUFFS 5DIII, 30D, 24-70 L, 24-105 L, EF 10-22, 70-200 f4 IS L, 100 mm f2.8, macro, Tamron 150-600, Nifty 50 mm f1.8, Canon 1.4x TC, 430EX AND A HUGE CREDIT CARD BILL!!!
philmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th of July 2009 (Wed)   #57
philmar
Goldmember
 
philmar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 4,634
Default Re: DPP vs. Lightroom

oh...it's an old revived thread? OK - disregard my previous comments.
__________________
A photo I took HERE published in National Geographic Time on your hands? Then HERE'S plenty more photos to nibble on:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/phil_marion/sets/
MY STUFFS 5DIII, 30D, 24-70 L, 24-105 L, EF 10-22, 70-200 f4 IS L, 100 mm f2.8, macro, Tamron 150-600, Nifty 50 mm f1.8, Canon 1.4x TC, 430EX AND A HUGE CREDIT CARD BILL!!!
philmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th of July 2009 (Wed)   #58
johnj2803
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 849
Default Re: DPP vs. Lightroom

Quote:
Originally Posted by philmar View Post

But still - think about it...LOCAL ADJUSTMENTS to files...NON-destructively.
you can do this with the new DPP
__________________
My flickr
johnj2803 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th of July 2009 (Wed)   #59
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
 
tzalman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
Posts: 12,551
Default Re: DPP vs. Lightroom

Quote:
I assume LR has the same ability to do local adjustments to files with exposure, clarity, saturation, sharpness ect.

THAT alone would be a reason to use it over DPP (I haven't used DPP in 3 years so I apologise if it now has that ability). The ability to do local adjustments directly to the RAW file is a HUGE advantage. Highlight recovery is another reason why I never look at DPP any more (I once prefered it to CS2, but that changed with CS3). The ability to tweak individual colors is HUGE as well.

But still - think about it...LOCAL ADJUSTMENTS to files...NON-destructively.
Yep, that's why I bid a tearful farewell to DPP.
Quote:
you can do this with the new DPP
YOU CAN? I have 3.6.0. I've heard that there is a 3.6.2 but didn't realize that such an enormous addition would be accompanied by such a modest version number change. Is it easy to apply the masks?
__________________
Elie / אלי
"If you presume to love something, you must love the process of it much more than you love the finished product." John Irving, 5/2012. "In theory there is no difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is." Yogi Berra
Site
tzalman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th of July 2009 (Thu)   #60
Mike55
Goldmember
 
Mike55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 4,206
Default Re: DPP vs. Lightroom

Quote:
Originally Posted by Collin85 View Post
Guys, I'm back.

I went and did a few tests to see ACR vs. DPP myself, and now I get what people meant by 'punchier results' and 'better colours' with DPP. I straight converted some RAW files with CS3 and did it with the same files with DPP (made sure to negate all those PS settings prior to converting) and the result differences are definitely noticable.
Really? I've run endless tests on landscapes and notice no difference when DPP and LR2 are set to neutral or faithful picture modes. See the examples here:


In this test, the latest version of LR2 beats DPP with default settings in detail:

http://camerablognetwork.com/2009/06...ith-canon-50d/

and in this one, I really don't notice any color weakness:

http://camerablognetwork.com/2008/08...pp-showdown-2/


What was your subject matter?
__________________
6D | 70D | 24-105 L IS | 17-40 L | 300 F4 L IS | 50 1.8 II | 1.4x II | LR5 | HV30 | bug spray | wilderness
Gallatin National Forest, Montana/Lassen Volcanic NP Campgrounds
Mike55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
lightroom vs photoshop/dpp ben4633 RAW, Post Processing and Printing 4 27th of June 2007 (Wed) 20:55
Edited RAWs in DPP showing in Lightroom PhilN RAW, Post Processing and Printing 2 29th of April 2007 (Sun) 16:48
Lightroom Presets to Emulate DPP? PhilN RAW, Post Processing and Printing 2 29th of April 2007 (Sun) 07:51
DPP vs. LIGHTROOM drogos RAW, Post Processing and Printing 6 3rd of March 2007 (Sat) 20:08
what are you using, cs2, lightroom, dpp? mwalker649 RAW, Post Processing and Printing 20 15th of February 2007 (Thu) 19:25


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.