Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Weddings & Other Family Events
Thread started 12 Aug 2007 (Sunday) 18:10
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Wide enough?

 
turbo212003
Senior Member
turbo212003's Avatar
852 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Kansas
Aug 12, 2007 18:10 |  #1

Do you think the Canon 17-55mm 2.8 is wide enough?

I'm renting lenses I think I need for my upcoming wedding in Sept.

Right now, I have a 28-135mm(which I don't think is wide enough)
Then I'm getting a 70-200mm F/4L(it's an outdoor wedding)

What do you guys think?


Gear List
http://www.grantwphoto​.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
tim's Avatar
50,642 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Wellington, New Zealand
Aug 12, 2007 18:15 |  #2

Yes, it is, I haven't used my 12-24 since I got the 17-55 maybe a year ago. I'm considering breaking out the 12-24 for some creative stuff though, after seeing Lloyd's photos.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

LOG IN TO REPLY
squeaky_clean
Member
166 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Aug 12, 2007 19:30 |  #3

For my style I found it wasn't QUITE wide enough, although it is a wonderful lens and was great 90% of the time. But that other 10% it just simply wasn't wide enough.




LOG IN TO REPLY
RobKirkwood
Goldmember
1,123 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Nottingham, UK
Aug 13, 2007 05:38 as a reply to squeaky_clean's post |  #4

Shot my first wedding 18 months ago primarily with a 28-135 IS on a 20D. Indoors it was a struggle at times to get far enough back. But the biggest problems with this lens are it gets to f5.6 quite early in the zoom range, and it tends to be soft at the 135mm end. The IS is handy, of course, but we replaced the lens before we did our second wedding (bought a 17-55 IS and a 24-105 IS).

I think 17-55 is plenty wide enough on a crop camera - the 17-55 and 70-200 ranges are a great combination for a wedding. Yeah you can always find uses for wider, but, unless you're going for dramatic perspectives, they're a small percentage of shots.

Rob




LOG IN TO REPLY

772 views & 0 likes for this thread
Wide enough?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Weddings & Other Family Events


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00083 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.01s
Latest registered member is FFFCFF
1035 guests, 495 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016