LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Wide enough?

FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Weddings & Other Family Events
Thread started 12 Aug 2007 (Sunday) 18:10   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
turbo212003
Senior Member
turbo212003's Avatar
Joined Oct 2006
852 posts
Kansas
[MORE/SHARE]

Do you think the Canon 17-55mm 2.8 is wide enough?

I'm renting lenses I think I need for my upcoming wedding in Sept.

Right now, I have a 28-135mm(which I don't think is wide enough)
Then I'm getting a 70-200mm F/4L(it's an outdoor wedding)

What do you guys think?

Post #1, Aug 12, 2007 18:10:00


Gear List
http://www.grantwphoto​.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
tim
Light Bringer
tim's Avatar
Joined Nov 2004
49,505 posts
Wellington, New Zealand
[MORE/SHARE]

Yes, it is, I haven't used my 12-24 since I got the 17-55 maybe a year ago. I'm considering breaking out the 12-24 for some creative stuff though, after seeing Lloyd's photos.

Post #2, Aug 12, 2007 18:15:50


NZIPP Qualified Professional wedding photographer.
Wellington Wedding Photographerexternal link ~ Camera and Lens Reviewsexternal link ~ Photographers Tech Supportexternal link
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

LOG IN TO REPLY
squeaky_clean
Senior Member
Joined Mar 2007
166 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

For my style I found it wasn't QUITE wide enough, although it is a wonderful lens and was great 90% of the time. But that other 10% it just simply wasn't wide enough.

Post #3, Aug 12, 2007 19:30:28




LOG IN TO REPLY
RobKirkwood
Goldmember
Joined Jul 2005
1,116 posts
Nottingham, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

Shot my first wedding 18 months ago primarily with a 28-135 IS on a 20D. Indoors it was a struggle at times to get far enough back. But the biggest problems with this lens are it gets to f5.6 quite early in the zoom range, and it tends to be soft at the 135mm end. The IS is handy, of course, but we replaced the lens before we did our second wedding (bought a 17-55 IS and a 24-105 IS).

I think 17-55 is plenty wide enough on a crop camera - the 17-55 and 70-200 ranges are a great combination for a wedding. Yeah you can always find uses for wider, but, unless you're going for dramatic perspectives, they're a small percentage of shots.

Rob

Post #4, Aug 13, 2007 05:38:37 as a reply to squeaky_clean's post 10 hours earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
575 views & 0 likes for this thread
Wide enough?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Weddings & Other Family Events



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00094 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.01s
888 guests, 760 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is Severed Heads

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.