Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 30 Aug 2007 (Thursday) 13:57
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Review

 
Mrvile
Senior Member
Mrvile's Avatar
541 posts

Joined Jun 2007

Cleveland, OH
MORE INFO

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

-Lens Review-

I've been reading the forums lately and have noticed that this lens gets a lot of hate from people who haven't even used it. Well I'm part of the elite group of people who have switched from the 70-200/4L to this lens and I don't regret the decision one bit. I was thinking of upgrading this lens to something a step up the other day but I couldn't think of a single lens that would fit the bill. Sigma 70-200/2.8? Only goes to 200mm and doesn't have IS. Sigma 100-300/4? It's too big and would be much harder to handhold without IS. Canon 300/4L IS? It's a great lens but it doesn't zoom, plus it has older gen IS. Canon 200/2.8L? No IS, only 200mm, and doesn't zoom. Canon 70-300IS DO? Ha!

Looks like the 70-300IS is the perfect lens for me.

Let's get started with the review.

The lens is fairly light at 1.4lb and pretty compact at 5.6" x 3" (8.5" at max zoom/focus), though it does feel well-built (but not quite up to L or EX standards). It has 15 elements in 10 groups, 8 aperture blades for smoother bokeh, a 58mm filter ring, and a zoom-lock switch to prevent lens creep. The IS is 3-stop Image Stabilization in two modes, one for vertical and horizontal correction and one for just vertical correction for action/panning shots. Finally, the lens features a UD element - normally only found in Canon's L-grade lenses - which is why this lens is sometimes referred to as a hidden L-lens. And while it does have USM, it does not have the ring-type USM found on L-lenses and other performance lenses like the 85/1.8 or 17-55/2.8IS, but I will talk about the AF later. The lenses focuses up to 4.9ft, which results in a max magnification of 1:4 at 300mm, the same magnification as the 300/4L IS.

Here are some pictures of the lens itself:
IMAGE: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a214/Mrvile/Can%2070-300/734.jpg

IMAGE: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a214/Mrvile/Can%2070-300/731.jpg

IMAGE: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a214/Mrvile/Can%2070-300/732.jpg

IMAGE: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a214/Mrvile/Can%2070-300/733.jpg

Now I'll talk about the lens in use. As you've noticed, the lens extends while zooming, extends while focusing, and rotates while focusing. Yuk. Also, the lens does not have full-time manual override, so if you want any manual correction you'll need to switch to MF mode. DO NOT try to turn the focus ring while in AF, this is bad for the lens. Now that the bad is out of the way, the lens feels great while in use. The zoom ring is smooth and damped, the focus ring is a bit loose in MF mode (but still easy to use) and all the switches work fine. The IS works great, stabilizing both the lens itself and the image in the viewfinder which makes for easier tracking/framing and focusing.

The AF of this lens is generally where it tends to fall back into second place against the 70-200/4L, and because this lens doesn't have ring-USM, the AF is a little loud and slower than that of the 70-200. However, it is pretty accurate and for everything other than very fast paced sports or extremely low light use, it works fine. Hell, the lens even works great for action shots...in these next examples I was tracking a couple friends on a jetski going 60mph, AI-Servo, continuous drive mode. The lens kept up, and did a great job at that:

300mm, f/5.6, ISO-200, 1/1250s:
IMAGE: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a214/Mrvile/Can%2070-300/tracking.jpg

100% crop:
IMAGE: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a214/Mrvile/Can%2070-300/trackingcrop.jpg

Continued in post #2...

Aug 30, 2007 13:57

Eric
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Review

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Mrvile
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Mrvile's Avatar
541 posts

Joined Jun 2007

Cleveland, OH
MORE INFO

Finally, here's what you guys wanted to see. The lens (or at least my copy) is super sharp, even wide open, and do most of my shooting at 300mm f/5.6. I didn't post any shots at anything shorter than 300mm but you can expect even better performance at shorter focal lengths. I won't say much more; I'll let the images speak for themselves:

100% crop, 300mm, f/5.6, ISO-400, 1/400s:

IMAGE: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a214/Mrvile/Can%2070-300/f56crop.jpg

100% crop, 300mm, f/8, ISO-400, 1/200s (IS doing its job):
IMAGE: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a214/Mrvile/Can%2070-300/f8crop.jpg

100% crop, portrait mode, 300mm f/5.6, ISO-400, 1/1600s:
IMAGE: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a214/Mrvile/Can%2070-300/vertcrop.jpg

I had originally purchased this lens to use as an insect lens, and because of its attractive focal range, high max magnification, and IS, this is a great lens to shoot butterflies and dragonflies with.

100% crop, 300mm, f/5.6, ISO-400, 1/2000s:
IMAGE: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a214/Mrvile/Can%2070-300/macrocrop2.jpg

The 70-300IS is one of the most "perfect" lenses I've owned, with almost all the things I want in a lens and nothing I don't really need for a great price. I can't even find a $1000+ lens that fits my needs as well as this one does. But in the end, it's all about what you shoot, and since I don't need things like fast aperture or a bomb shelter build, the 70-300IS is a true winner. For everyone who is still deciding between this lens or the 70-200/4L: I refuse to acknowledge that the 70-200 is any sharper than the 70-300 (I've seen first-hand performance of both lenses with my own eyes and hands) so weigh out the rest of your priorities and go with the one that suits your own needs better. That's all there is to it.

Thanks for reading, I hope this review helped.
Aug 30, 2007 13:57

Eric
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Review

LOG IN TO REPLY
Mrvile
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Mrvile's Avatar
541 posts

Joined Jun 2007

Cleveland, OH
MORE INFO

My growing 70-300IS gallery:

IMAGE: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a214/Mrvile/DSLR%20Photos/bugs/beeinbed2.jpg

IMAGE: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a214/Mrvile/DSLR%20Photos/bugs/harvestman1.jpg

IMAGE: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a214/Mrvile/DSLR%20Photos/bugs/dragonflybike.jpg

IMAGE: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a214/Mrvile/DSLR%20Photos/bugs/skipper1.jpg

IMAGE: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a214/Mrvile/DSLR%20Photos/bugs/butterfly3.jpg

IMAGE: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a214/Mrvile/DSLR%20Photos/misc/tubing1.jpg
Aug 30, 2007 13:58

Eric
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Review

LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick_C
Goldmember
Nick_C's Avatar
4,042 posts

Joined Jul 2006

Tin Mine Country (Cornwall UK)
MORE INFO

Good job!

I think sometimes its frowned upon simply because its NOT an L lens, sure it doesnt have this & that but at the end of the day the images it produces are first rate & identical in sharpness, colour & contrast to my other L lens.

Too add to your review, it also works wonders with kenko tubes as I recently discovered, I was amazed at how closely it compared to a true macro lens, the 24-105L however was not very good with tubes, I was suprised it being an L lens, but it sufferered from edge softness & high CA, however the 70-300IS is FANTASTIC with tubes.

Have a look (100% crops from the bottom left edge)

Sigma 50mm Macro Lens:

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm2.static.fl​ickr.com/1210/99383162​9_cba584b2a3.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


Canon 70-300IS with Kenko Tubes:

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm2.static.fl​ickr.com/1095/99383158​5_3168dcd540.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


Considering the 70-300IS has been put up against a prime lens which is noted to be one of the sharpest 50mm primes around (see FM) & not only that but a dedicated macro lens with its floating focus elements & what not, im amazed to see hardly any significant differences, these are edge crops as well.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm2.static.fl​ickr.com ...88633672_04f363bdf6​_o.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


I actually ended up sending the macro lens back for a refund, the 70-300IS has a much greater working distance & a set of tubes can easily be put in my bag, rather than another lens.
Aug 30, 2007 14:32



LOG IN TO REPLY
sparksdjs
Senior Member
332 posts
Joined May 2001

Seattle, WA
MORE INFO

This is a great lens, especially at its price (faster would be nicer but that's more $).

http://www.pbase.com ...s/image/73850222/or​iginalexternal link

http://www.pbase.com ...s/image/73850220/or​iginalexternal link

Other samples at http://www.pbase.com/s​parksdjs/700_300is&pag​e=allexternal link

Dave

Aug 30, 2007 20:53 as a reply to Nick_C's post 6 hours earlier.

Canon 40D | 15-85IS | 17-85IS | 18-55IS | 70-300IS | Canon 10-22mm | 100mm f/2.8 macro | 85mm f/1.8 | 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 70-300 APO DG | 580EX II | Canon G12 | 270EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
QX56
Senior Member
QX56's Avatar
772 posts

Joined Jul 2007

Warren,Michigan.
MORE INFO

Great lens and nice photo all .

Aug 30, 2007 21:09

1D MK III,40D,G12.1Ds mk3.
24-70L,100-400L ,70-200F2.8LIS,85L,180L macro.18-200EF-S.8-15mmL.
Raynox DCR250,Kenko set extesion tube,ST-E2.
28-200,75-300,KenKo 2X TC,430EX,580EX II,Metz45 CL1.

LOG IN TO REPLY
atrapasueños
Member
atrapasueños's Avatar
45 posts

Joined Jun 2007

Mexico City.
MORE INFO

Thank you very much for the review, it helps me a lot. I was really hesitating of buying this lens, but with this definitely I will buy it.

Regards!

Aug 30, 2007 21:21

Rebel XTi
Powershot SD1000

LOG IN TO REPLY
Souwalker
Goldmember
1,128 posts
Joined Dec 2005

Sydney, Australia
MORE INFO

I use this lens too with my 350D soon to be replaced by the 40D. I took it for a spin 2 weeks ago dduring my 2 daughter's final netball games of the season. I was very happy with the results.
Anyone interested I can post the link.
I got this lens in July as a birthday gift from my brother-in-law who was visitng me from overseas. He got one same time as well....
pat

Aug 31, 2007 01:49 as a reply to atrapasueños's post 4 hours earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
david888lee
Senior Member
david888lee's Avatar
802 posts

Joined Jun 2007

Irvine, California
MORE INFO

Souwalker wrote in post #3831946external link
I use this lens too with my 350D soon to be replaced by the 40D. I took it for a spin 2 weeks ago dduring my 2 daughter's final netball games of the season. I was very happy with the results.
Anyone interested I can post the link.
I got this lens in July as a birthday gift from my brother-in-law who was visitng me from overseas. He got one same time as well....
pat

i would like to see your gallery

Aug 31, 2007 01:55

Canon 50d | Canon Xti | Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS | Sigma 30 f/1.4

[-=Feedback=-] [flickr] external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Gluck
Member
Gluck's Avatar
213 posts

Joined Oct 2006

Maryland
MORE INFO

Thank for the review, I have been going back and forth for weeks, this lens or spend another few hundred on the 70-200F4IS, I dont shoot action so I think this lens will fit the bill. Now I wish BH would get the hood in stock so I can order the darn thing!

Aug 31, 2007 13:05

My Zenfolioexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
jonnypb
Member
187 posts
Joined Feb 2007

UK
MORE INFO

Nick_C wrote in post #3828153external link
the 70-300IS is FANTASTIC with tubes.

do you get greater zoom if used with tubes or is the image basically just magnified so you can focus closer to the subject?

thanks

Aug 31, 2007 15:27


http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=373472

LOG IN TO REPLY
wimg
Cream of the Crop
wimg's Avatar
6,590 posts

Joined Jan 2007

Netherlands, EU
MORE INFO

jonnypb wrote in post #3835715external link
do you get greater zoom if used with tubes or is the image basically just magnified so you can focus closer to the subject?

thanks

The latter. You can focus closer with tubes, at the expense of infinity focus.

Kind regards, Wim

Aug 31, 2007 15:53

5D Mk II, 1D Mk III, with a gaggle of primes, GF-2 with 3 primes and 3 zooms, G10, an accessory plague, and some analog stuff

LOG IN TO REPLY
Mrvile
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Mrvile's Avatar
541 posts

Joined Jun 2007

Cleveland, OH
MORE INFO

jonnypb wrote in post #3835715external link
do you get greater zoom if used with tubes or is the image basically just magnified so you can focus closer to the subject?

thanks

The magnification you get also differs per focal length. With the same set of tubes on, you'll get more magnification at the 70mm end than at the 300mm end. Tubes have a greater effect on shorter focal lengths.

Aug 31, 2007 17:36

Eric
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Review

LOG IN TO REPLY
Zorro23
Member
Zorro23's Avatar
49 posts

Joined Sep 2007

Johannesburg, South Africa
MORE INFO

Hi there,

I'm a new user to this site and was wondering if i could get some "pointers" please...
I have a 400D with a newly aquired 70-300 IS USM. Looking at what has been posted here (excellent shots !!!) it doesn't compare to the shots i'm getting. I'm quite fussy when it comes to taking pics and always aim for the "crystal clear shots" - i'm sure we all do..I have been trying to shoot at 300mm but the shots i'm getting are quite blurred even with my slightly shaky hands and IS on.
Is it just trial and error that i carry on practising till i hit a sweet spot wrt accurate shots ? Is there a preferred setting on the camera that i should use ?

Zorro

Sep 04, 2007 00:08



LOG IN TO REPLY
Mrvile
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Mrvile's Avatar
541 posts

Joined Jun 2007

Cleveland, OH
MORE INFO

Zorro23 wrote in post #3856449external link
Hi there,

I'm a new user to this site and was wondering if i could get some "pointers" please...
I have a 400D with a newly aquired 70-300 IS USM. Looking at what has been posted here (excellent shots !!!) it doesn't compare to the shots i'm getting. I'm quite fussy when it comes to taking pics and always aim for the "crystal clear shots" - i'm sure we all do..I have been trying to shoot at 300mm but the shots i'm getting are quite blurred even with my slightly shaky hands and IS on.
Is it just trial and error that i carry on practising till i hit a sweet spot wrt accurate shots ? Is there a preferred setting on the camera that i should use ?

Zorro

Well first make sure that you diagnose the problem correctly. Go outside in bright sunlight (to make sure your shutter speed is really high, 1/500+), set the lens to 300mm, f/5.6, ISO-200, and take a picture of something bright and contrasty. This is the most basic way to test a lens for sharpness. This takes lens shake out of the picture.

If you're still getting blurry shots, do a simple focus test by shooting a page from a book or something at an angle, and make sure that what is in focus is what you focused on (use a single AF-point and use the centermost one). This takes AF out of the picture.

If you're still getting blurry shots, chances are you have a bad copy. So try the first two things are report back to us!

Sep 04, 2007 01:03

Eric
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Review

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

21,276 views & 0 likes for this thread
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Review
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.33version 1.33
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00136 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
Latest registered member is Jack Dempsey
618 guests, 490 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015