LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Need Lens Advice for a Beginner shooting soccer

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 10 Sep 2007 (Monday) 08:46   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
Terri ­ G.
Mostly Lurking
Joined Sep 2007
16 posts
Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

Hi, I'm new here. I've been reading through your posts for a couple of days and am so glad I found this message board. There is a lot of talent and great advice here.

I could really use some help on which lens to get for shooting youth and college soccer. I have an XT and a limited budget (under $1,000.) Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Post #1, Sep 10, 2007 08:46:11




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
bigjon0107
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2006
895 posts
Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

Are the games going to be played during the day or at night?

Post #2, Sep 10, 2007 08:59:26


Jon Eilts
Gear List
SportsShooterexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Terri ­ G.
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Joined Sep 2007
16 posts
Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

bigjon0107 wrote in post #3899412external link
Are the games going to be played during the day or at night?

Actually, both. The youth games are all during the day. Some of the college games are in the evening.

Post #3, Sep 10, 2007 09:02:10




LOG IN TO REPLY
Palladium
Goldmember
Joined Dec 2005
3,895 posts
Not the Left Coast but the Right Coast - USA
[MORE/SHARE]

Terri G. wrote in post #3899424external link
Actually, both. The youth games are all during the day. Some of the college games are in the evening.

get the 300mm F4 IS - great for daylight and nothing in your budget will be great for night but colleges should have better lighting so you'll be kinda OK at night.

Your other option close to your budget is the 70-200mm f2.8.

Post #4, Sep 10, 2007 09:06:48


For Sale: Gitzo GT3541LS & 3 Lens Sigma 24mm, Sigma 50mm, Canon 28mm http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​391911

LOG IN TO REPLY
bigjon0107
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2006
895 posts
Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

Well, working with a budget, I would say go for the 70-200 2.8L w/ a 1.4 TC. You would have to buy both of them used to stick close (ya, it will be a little over about $1200) to your budget. The nice part with that is you can have a f/2.8 lens for the night stuff, but thrown on the TC for the day games, and you have a 280mm f/4 lens.

A second option would be the 300 f/4 L IS. It would not have the night performance as the 70-200 would, but it is under your budget and is a quality piece of glass.

Thats just my 2 cents, i am sure there will be a bunch of opinions as well.

Post #5, Sep 10, 2007 09:09:52


Jon Eilts
Gear List
SportsShooterexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
dmwierz
Goldmember
dmwierz's Avatar
Joined May 2005
2,376 posts
Chicago Area, IL
[MORE/SHARE]

Terri,

If you're shooting at night, you really only have one choice that will keep you under the $1,000: the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 . This will be a bit short for covering much of the pitch, but you need the f/2.8 due to the low light. You'll be able to add a 1.4X TC and be almost long enough during the day, at a f/4.0 .

If you are only shooting during the day, lotsa options open up, from the Sigma 50-500 f/4-f/5.6 to a used Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS (excellent soccer lens, BTW), to the Sigma 100-300 f/4.5-6.7. My personal rec would be the Canon.

Post #6, Sep 10, 2007 09:18:32 as a reply to bigjon0107's post 19 minutes earlier.


http://www.denniswierz​bicki.comexternal link
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/dmwierzexternal link

Dennis "
Yeah, well, sometimes nothin' can be a real cool hand."

LOG IN TO REPLY
tsaraleksi
Goldmember
tsaraleksi's Avatar
Joined Sep 2006
1,653 posts
Greencastle/Lafayette Indiana, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

I've had a great deal of success with both the 70-200 and the 300 F4 for soccer. Recently I've been using the 300 F4 much more, though I think I'll leave the 70-200 on a second body to catch close up action.

Post #7, Sep 10, 2007 09:31:52


--Alex Editorial Portfolioexternal link
|| Elan 7ne+BG ||5D mk. II ||1D mk. II N || EF 17-40 F4L ||EF 24-70 F2.8L||EF 35 1.4L || EF 85 1.2L ||EF 70-200 2.8L|| EF 300 4L IS[on loan]| |Speedlite 580EX || Nikon Coolscan IV ED||

LOG IN TO REPLY
Terri ­ G.
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Joined Sep 2007
16 posts
Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

dmwierz wrote in post #3899533external link
Terri,

If you're shooting at night, you really only have one choice that will keep you under the $1,000: the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 . This will be a bit short for covering much of the pitch, but you need the f/2.8 due to the low light. You'll be able to add a 1.4X TC and be almost long enough during the day, at a f/4.0 .

If I were to go with the Sigma, would I need to get the Sigma TC to work with it or would the Canon work?

Post #8, Sep 10, 2007 09:48:05




LOG IN TO REPLY
dmwierz
Goldmember
dmwierz's Avatar
Joined May 2005
2,376 posts
Chicago Area, IL
[MORE/SHARE]

Terri G. wrote in post #3899682external link
If I were to go with the Sigma, would I need to get the Sigma TC to work with it or would the Canon work?

Terri,

"Traditional" thought says don't mix manufacturers, but I know several folks who use the Canon TC on Sigma lenses, and I've used my Canon 1.4X on my Sigma 120-300 with no problems at all.

Dennis

Post #9, Sep 10, 2007 09:51:20


http://www.denniswierz​bicki.comexternal link
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/dmwierzexternal link

Dennis "
Yeah, well, sometimes nothin' can be a real cool hand."

LOG IN TO REPLY
Aaagogo
Goldmember
Aaagogo's Avatar
Joined Oct 2006
2,403 posts
Daytona Beach, FL
[MORE/SHARE]

I faced the same problem as you have, but thankfully I had a chance to play with the sigma 70-200 2.8 before I make a decision.

for night soccer shoots, definitely a F2.8 lens, I've a 30D and even cranking up the ISO to 1000, i'm still getting 1/80 or 1/100 shutterspeed on M.

when the game ended, I set to F4 just to check the shutter speed, at 1600 and H, the shutterspeed is around 100-125, but the noise... hmmm

reach wise, didn't realise that 200mm is still short, even on a cropped body. and I was positioned in the "pros" area, behind goal line near towards corner flag.

so i realised and experienced why people what the big white lens, not because they are pretty, it's because they are designed to do what needs to be done, fast and long reach, so i'm going to bite the bullet and get the 300 and 70-200

but I think 1st thing is speed, and then reach.

Post #10, Sep 10, 2007 10:20:36


http://photography-on-the.net ...p?p=4655753&postcou​nt=953 Your 1st 10,000 images are your worst
One photo out of focus is a mistake, ten photo out of focus are an experimentation, one hundred photo out of focus are a style

LOG IN TO REPLY
Big ­ WIll
"Slight breach of etiquette"
Big WIll's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
2,363 posts
Chester & Bucks UK
[MORE/SHARE]

Also look at the Kenko 300 1.4x Converter.

Post #11, Sep 10, 2007 10:41:05


Computers blur the boundaries... We are being released from the suddenness of photography, the suddenness of the shutterhttp://www.photography​-on-the.net ...p?p=1606920&postcou​nt=132

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
jpwone
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2006
182 posts
Christchurch, Dorset
[MORE/SHARE]

Going to be a bit controversial here but a very good lens for night time soccer is the Canon 200mm F2.8. Add a 1.4 TC for day time. The beauty of the prime is that it is light and has very fast and accurate focusing. I used the Sigma 70-200 F2.8 for a period and it was fine in the day but at night the focussing could be very slow at times. The Canon 200mm was significantly faster at acquiring focus at night.

With anything under 400mm you cannot really shoot from one end of the pitch to the other. Accept this and just shoot the action which nicely fills the frame (or requires minimal cropping) and that over fills the frame. It is surprising what you can get when you only have one focal length on the camera. It really does force you to frame tight. There will be plenty of action come your way during a game so don''t worry about getting every bit of it just get the images which suit your focal length.

For day time you could also consider the Canon 70-200mm F4. The non-IS version is very good (the IS version is said to be better but you will get very very good results with the non-IS) and focuses very fast.

Canon 70-200 F4 approx $600
Canon 200mm F2.8 approx $650

TC 1.4 Kenko Pro approx $200

My combination would be the 200mm and the 1.4 TC. This will give you 200mm for night games and 280mm for daytime.

Post #12, Sep 10, 2007 10:56:34


John
Club Photographer - Christchurch FCexternal link
Sports and Eventsexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Big ­ Hands
Goldmember
Joined Mar 2005
1,464 posts
Southern California
[MORE/SHARE]

I will have to advise against using the 70-200 f/2.8L with a teleconverter for shooting soccer. My experiences doing so were not favorable. While the range was more useful, my keeper rate took a frustrating turn for the worse. The AF speed was noticeably slower and the accuracy not as precise resulting in more 'out of focus' frames.

I use the 70-200 f/2.8L almost exclusively (I occasionally use my 400 f/5.6L) for shooting HS soccer and routinely come away with about 1,000 shots. I've shot well over 50,000 frames of soccer using this combo over the past two years. I'm sure there are others that have shot more frames of soccer, but I think 50,000 frames using that combo alone would give me some idea of it's usefulness for that purpose.

I can't cover the whole pitch with just that one lens, but neither can anyone else cover the entire pitch at f/2.8. The perfect soccer lens does not exist. That would be a lens that covers both ends from behind the goal line (if necessary), a nice large f/2.8 aperture (larger would be even better :~)... ) and very good image quality.

The Sigma 50-500 has a fantastic range for soccer, but honestly, that's about it. The Canon 100-400L IS comes closer, but the small aperture is not going to cut it for discerning users and has almost no chance of night time success.

The Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 is probably a slightly more useful range than the 70-200 f/2.8L, but it does cost well over $2,000 (closer to $2,500 and easily twice the cost of a Canon f/2.8L) and results (due to autofocus issues) are arguably mixed, especially using Canons 1.6x bodies. AND, it doesn't really cover the entire pitch either. On a crop body, it's good for about 2/3 of it while the 70-200 is good for only slightly over half when shooting from behind the goal.

If you take the position that you accept what action comes to you in the near half of the pitch, the 70-200 f/2.8L will net you more than enough shots to get more than enough keepers. To be honest, even when I do use my 400 to shoot action at the far end of the pitch, many times it is obscured due to the players that are closer getting in the way of the shots.

I think that the best bang for the buck (especially condisering your budget) on a crop body would be a 70-200 f/2.8 from either Canon or Sigma. An f/4 aperture in the 70-200 range for shooting soccer left me cold. I sold mine (which I bought exclusively for shooting soccer) and happily spent twice as much to get the benefit of the f/2.8 aperture and would do it again.

As for night time shooting, that depends heavily on the quality of light at the stadiums you'll be shooting at and to some degree, your own post processing skills and resources.

JMHO

Regards,
Jeff

Post #13, Sep 10, 2007 11:45:00


Canon 20D w/grip, 300D, Powershot SX100 w/HF-DC1 flash, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L, 85 f/1.8, 17-55 f/2.8 IS, 50 f/1.8, 580EX and some other stuff...

LOG IN TO REPLY
DaveL
Senior Member
DaveL's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
827 posts
Southern NH
[MORE/SHARE]

[QUOTE=jpwone;3899992]​Going to be a bit controversial here but a very good lens for night time soccer is the Canon 200mm F2.8. Add a 1.4 TC for day time. The beauty of the prime is that it is light and has very fast and accurate focusing. I used the Sigma 70-200 F2.8 for a period and it was fine in the day but at night the focussing could be very slow at times. The Canon 200mm was significantly faster at acquiring focus at night.


actually, that's a very nice option if the OP has a tight budget. If you
search the forum you can find a great thread on the 200 f/2.8 prime...

Post #14, Sep 10, 2007 11:58:45


Canon 6D, 1D MKIII, 1D Classic
Canon 300 2.8L IS, 28-70L,16-35L II, 85mm 1/8, 50mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8L IS
Cheap Ebay strobes, softboxes
Gibson Guitars
Marshall Amps

LOG IN TO REPLY
pigtailpat
Senior Member
Joined Apr 2007
982 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I only did 1 soccer game, with my niece's team, and let me tell you, it's not for the faint of heart - day or night. I did my one game with the 70-200 f/2.8 IS, and I found it to be short.

The game is a very fast moving game with lots of running and kicking, and for that reason alone, you will need a 2.8 or faster lens.

I suggest that you save more money in the pot to be able to afford the sigma 120-300 f/ 2.8 IS ($2200 at sigma4 less brand new, $2700 at B & H - some say you can buy used around $1800-$1900 - I've been looking for a couple of weeks now - I haven't come across one yet). 300 is still alittle on the short side for soccer, but realistically, you want to spend $6500.00 and up on a 400 f/2.8? Didn't think so. You can put an extender on the sigma (several folks here tell me that you can use the canon extender on the sigma), to get 420 at f4. That's pretty reasonable for day use. You can use the f/2.8 at night, but it will be very difficult for night stuff, even at f/2.8. I, myself, am saving for the sigma and hope to get one for next LL season.

For night games, once you are able to save more money towards a separate lens for night work (and use the f/2.8 in the meantime), what I am suggesting is that you get perhaps the 85 1.2 L (this lens also comes in a non-L 1.8 version), or the longer 135 f/2 (??). I know these are terribly, terribly short, but these are faster lenses which will serve better at night, but you will be sacrificing focal length and will have to wait for action to come to you. I've tried shooting at night with an f/2.8 with a 30D, and I have to push the iso really high to 1600 (even tried some with 3200) to get a decent shutter speed, and then you have to deal with noise. Night action shots are tremendously hard, unless you have a 1-d series camera. I pretty much have given up and won't shoot night ball games.

I know these suggestions are way over your budget, but I am trying to save you the headache of buying inadequate equipment, then realizing your mistake, then you're losing money on selling it off to be able to buy the right equipment.

Post #15, Sep 10, 2007 12:22:37 as a reply to Big Hands's post 37 minutes earlier.


1D-IIN, 30D, sigma 120-300, 24-105 IS f4 L, 70-200 IS f2.8 L, 50 1.4, 580 EX, Bogen 680B/3229

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
2,296 views & 0 likes for this thread
Need Lens Advice for a Beginner shooting soccer
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00084 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1047 guests, 863 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is Colly4more

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.