Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 10 Sep 2007 (Monday) 08:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Need Lens Advice for a Beginner shooting soccer

 
Terri ­ G.
Mostly Lurking
16 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Texas
     
Sep 10, 2007 08:46 |  #1

Hi, I'm new here. I've been reading through your posts for a couple of days and am so glad I found this message board. There is a lot of talent and great advice here.

I could really use some help on which lens to get for shooting youth and college soccer. I have an XT and a limited budget (under $1,000.) Any advice would be greatly appreciated.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
bigjon0107
Senior Member
897 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Texas
     
Sep 10, 2007 08:59 |  #2

Are the games going to be played during the day or at night?


Jon Eilts
Gear List
SportsShooter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Terri ­ G.
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
16 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Texas
     
Sep 10, 2007 09:02 |  #3

bigjon0107 wrote in post #3899412 (external link)
Are the games going to be played during the day or at night?

Actually, both. The youth games are all during the day. Some of the college games are in the evening.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Palladium
Goldmember
3,905 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Not the Left Coast but the Right Coast - USA
     
Sep 10, 2007 09:06 |  #4

Terri G. wrote in post #3899424 (external link)
Actually, both. The youth games are all during the day. Some of the college games are in the evening.

get the 300mm F4 IS - great for daylight and nothing in your budget will be great for night but colleges should have better lighting so you'll be kinda OK at night.

Your other option close to your budget is the 70-200mm f2.8.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bigjon0107
Senior Member
897 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Texas
     
Sep 10, 2007 09:09 |  #5

Well, working with a budget, I would say go for the 70-200 2.8L w/ a 1.4 TC. You would have to buy both of them used to stick close (ya, it will be a little over about $1200) to your budget. The nice part with that is you can have a f/2.8 lens for the night stuff, but thrown on the TC for the day games, and you have a 280mm f/4 lens.

A second option would be the 300 f/4 L IS. It would not have the night performance as the 70-200 would, but it is under your budget and is a quality piece of glass.

Thats just my 2 cents, i am sure there will be a bunch of opinions as well.


Jon Eilts
Gear List
SportsShooter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmwierz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,376 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: Chicago Area, IL
     
Sep 10, 2007 09:18 as a reply to  @ bigjon0107's post |  #6

Terri,

If you're shooting at night, you really only have one choice that will keep you under the $1,000: the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 . This will be a bit short for covering much of the pitch, but you need the f/2.8 due to the low light. You'll be able to add a 1.4X TC and be almost long enough during the day, at a f/4.0 .

If you are only shooting during the day, lotsa options open up, from the Sigma 50-500 f/4-f/5.6 to a used Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS (excellent soccer lens, BTW), to the Sigma 100-300 f/4.5-6.7. My personal rec would be the Canon.


http://www.denniswierz​bicki.com (external link)
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/dmwierz (external link)

Dennis "
Yeah, well, sometimes nothin' can be a real cool hand."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tsaraleksi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,653 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Greencastle/Lafayette Indiana, USA
     
Sep 10, 2007 09:31 |  #7

I've had a great deal of success with both the 70-200 and the 300 F4 for soccer. Recently I've been using the 300 F4 much more, though I think I'll leave the 70-200 on a second body to catch close up action.


--Alex Editorial Portfolio (external link)
|| Elan 7ne+BG ||5D mk. II ||1D mk. II N || EF 17-40 F4L ||EF 24-70 F2.8L||EF 35 1.4L || EF 85 1.2L ||EF 70-200 2.8L|| EF 300 4L IS[on loan]| |Speedlite 580EX || Nikon Coolscan IV ED||

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Terri ­ G.
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
16 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Texas
     
Sep 10, 2007 09:48 |  #8

dmwierz wrote in post #3899533 (external link)
Terri,

If you're shooting at night, you really only have one choice that will keep you under the $1,000: the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 . This will be a bit short for covering much of the pitch, but you need the f/2.8 due to the low light. You'll be able to add a 1.4X TC and be almost long enough during the day, at a f/4.0 .

If I were to go with the Sigma, would I need to get the Sigma TC to work with it or would the Canon work?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmwierz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,376 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: Chicago Area, IL
     
Sep 10, 2007 09:51 |  #9

Terri G. wrote in post #3899682 (external link)
If I were to go with the Sigma, would I need to get the Sigma TC to work with it or would the Canon work?

Terri,

"Traditional" thought says don't mix manufacturers, but I know several folks who use the Canon TC on Sigma lenses, and I've used my Canon 1.4X on my Sigma 120-300 with no problems at all.

Dennis


http://www.denniswierz​bicki.com (external link)
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/dmwierz (external link)

Dennis "
Yeah, well, sometimes nothin' can be a real cool hand."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Aaagogo
Goldmember
Avatar
2,403 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
     
Sep 10, 2007 10:20 |  #10

I faced the same problem as you have, but thankfully I had a chance to play with the sigma 70-200 2.8 before I make a decision.

for night soccer shoots, definitely a F2.8 lens, I've a 30D and even cranking up the ISO to 1000, i'm still getting 1/80 or 1/100 shutterspeed on M.

when the game ended, I set to F4 just to check the shutter speed, at 1600 and H, the shutterspeed is around 100-125, but the noise... hmmm

reach wise, didn't realise that 200mm is still short, even on a cropped body. and I was positioned in the "pros" area, behind goal line near towards corner flag.

so i realised and experienced why people what the big white lens, not because they are pretty, it's because they are designed to do what needs to be done, fast and long reach, so i'm going to bite the bullet and get the 300 and 70-200

but I think 1st thing is speed, and then reach.


http://photography-on-the.net …p?p=4655753&pos​tcount=953 Your 1st 10,000 images are your worst
One photo out of focus is a mistake, ten photo out of focus are an experimentation, one hundred photo out of focus are a style

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Big ­ WIll
"Slight breach of etiquette"
Avatar
2,363 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Chester & Bucks UK
     
Sep 10, 2007 10:41 |  #11

Also look at the Kenko 300 1.4x Converter.


Computers blur the boundaries... We are being released from the suddenness of photography, the suddenness of the shutterhttp://www.photography​-on-the.net …p?p=1606920&pos​tcount=132

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jpwone
Member
182 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Christchurch, Dorset
     
Sep 10, 2007 10:56 |  #12

Going to be a bit controversial here but a very good lens for night time soccer is the Canon 200mm F2.8. Add a 1.4 TC for day time. The beauty of the prime is that it is light and has very fast and accurate focusing. I used the Sigma 70-200 F2.8 for a period and it was fine in the day but at night the focussing could be very slow at times. The Canon 200mm was significantly faster at acquiring focus at night.

With anything under 400mm you cannot really shoot from one end of the pitch to the other. Accept this and just shoot the action which nicely fills the frame (or requires minimal cropping) and that over fills the frame. It is surprising what you can get when you only have one focal length on the camera. It really does force you to frame tight. There will be plenty of action come your way during a game so don''t worry about getting every bit of it just get the images which suit your focal length.

For day time you could also consider the Canon 70-200mm F4. The non-IS version is very good (the IS version is said to be better but you will get very very good results with the non-IS) and focuses very fast.

Canon 70-200 F4 approx $600
Canon 200mm F2.8 approx $650

TC 1.4 Kenko Pro approx $200

My combination would be the 200mm and the 1.4 TC. This will give you 200mm for night games and 280mm for daytime.


John
Club Photographer - Christchurch FC (external link)
Sports and Events (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Big ­ Hands
Goldmember
1,464 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Southern California
     
Sep 10, 2007 11:45 |  #13

I will have to advise against using the 70-200 f/2.8L with a teleconverter for shooting soccer. My experiences doing so were not favorable. While the range was more useful, my keeper rate took a frustrating turn for the worse. The AF speed was noticeably slower and the accuracy not as precise resulting in more 'out of focus' frames.

I use the 70-200 f/2.8L almost exclusively (I occasionally use my 400 f/5.6L) for shooting HS soccer and routinely come away with about 1,000 shots. I've shot well over 50,000 frames of soccer using this combo over the past two years. I'm sure there are others that have shot more frames of soccer, but I think 50,000 frames using that combo alone would give me some idea of it's usefulness for that purpose.

I can't cover the whole pitch with just that one lens, but neither can anyone else cover the entire pitch at f/2.8. The perfect soccer lens does not exist. That would be a lens that covers both ends from behind the goal line (if necessary), a nice large f/2.8 aperture (larger would be even better :~)... ) and very good image quality.

The Sigma 50-500 has a fantastic range for soccer, but honestly, that's about it. The Canon 100-400L IS comes closer, but the small aperture is not going to cut it for discerning users and has almost no chance of night time success.

The Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 is probably a slightly more useful range than the 70-200 f/2.8L, but it does cost well over $2,000 (closer to $2,500 and easily twice the cost of a Canon f/2.8L) and results (due to autofocus issues) are arguably mixed, especially using Canons 1.6x bodies. AND, it doesn't really cover the entire pitch either. On a crop body, it's good for about 2/3 of it while the 70-200 is good for only slightly over half when shooting from behind the goal.

If you take the position that you accept what action comes to you in the near half of the pitch, the 70-200 f/2.8L will net you more than enough shots to get more than enough keepers. To be honest, even when I do use my 400 to shoot action at the far end of the pitch, many times it is obscured due to the players that are closer getting in the way of the shots.

I think that the best bang for the buck (especially condisering your budget) on a crop body would be a 70-200 f/2.8 from either Canon or Sigma. An f/4 aperture in the 70-200 range for shooting soccer left me cold. I sold mine (which I bought exclusively for shooting soccer) and happily spent twice as much to get the benefit of the f/2.8 aperture and would do it again.

As for night time shooting, that depends heavily on the quality of light at the stadiums you'll be shooting at and to some degree, your own post processing skills and resources.

JMHO

Regards,
Jeff


Canon 20D w/grip, 300D, Powershot SX100 w/HF-DC1 flash, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L, 85 f/1.8, 17-55 f/2.8 IS, 50 f/1.8, 580EX and some other stuff...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DaveL
Senior Member
Avatar
872 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Southern NH
     
Sep 10, 2007 11:58 |  #14

[QUOTE=jpwone;3899992]​Going to be a bit controversial here but a very good lens for night time soccer is the Canon 200mm F2.8. Add a 1.4 TC for day time. The beauty of the prime is that it is light and has very fast and accurate focusing. I used the Sigma 70-200 F2.8 for a period and it was fine in the day but at night the focussing could be very slow at times. The Canon 200mm was significantly faster at acquiring focus at night.


actually, that's a very nice option if the OP has a tight budget. If you
search the forum you can find a great thread on the 200 f/2.8 prime...


Canon 5D MKIII, 6D, 1D Classic
Canon 70-200 f/2.8L II, 70-200 f/4L IS, 28-70L, 16-35L II,
Alien Bees B800 strobes, softboxes, pocket wizard X's
Gibson Guitars
Marshall Amps

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pigtailpat
Senior Member
982 posts
Joined Apr 2007
     
Sep 10, 2007 12:22 as a reply to  @ Big Hands's post |  #15

I only did 1 soccer game, with my niece's team, and let me tell you, it's not for the faint of heart - day or night. I did my one game with the 70-200 f/2.8 IS, and I found it to be short.

The game is a very fast moving game with lots of running and kicking, and for that reason alone, you will need a 2.8 or faster lens.

I suggest that you save more money in the pot to be able to afford the sigma 120-300 f/ 2.8 IS ($2200 at sigma4 less brand new, $2700 at B & H - some say you can buy used around $1800-$1900 - I've been looking for a couple of weeks now - I haven't come across one yet). 300 is still alittle on the short side for soccer, but realistically, you want to spend $6500.00 and up on a 400 f/2.8? Didn't think so. You can put an extender on the sigma (several folks here tell me that you can use the canon extender on the sigma), to get 420 at f4. That's pretty reasonable for day use. You can use the f/2.8 at night, but it will be very difficult for night stuff, even at f/2.8. I, myself, am saving for the sigma and hope to get one for next LL season.

For night games, once you are able to save more money towards a separate lens for night work (and use the f/2.8 in the meantime), what I am suggesting is that you get perhaps the 85 1.2 L (this lens also comes in a non-L 1.8 version), or the longer 135 f/2 (??). I know these are terribly, terribly short, but these are faster lenses which will serve better at night, but you will be sacrificing focal length and will have to wait for action to come to you. I've tried shooting at night with an f/2.8 with a 30D, and I have to push the iso really high to 1600 (even tried some with 3200) to get a decent shutter speed, and then you have to deal with noise. Night action shots are tremendously hard, unless you have a 1-d series camera. I pretty much have given up and won't shoot night ball games.

I know these suggestions are way over your budget, but I am trying to save you the headache of buying inadequate equipment, then realizing your mistake, then you're losing money on selling it off to be able to buy the right equipment.


1D-IIN, 30D, sigma 120-300, 24-105 IS f4 L, 70-200 IS f2.8 L, 50 1.4, 580 EX, Bogen 680B/3229

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

3,338 views & 0 likes for this thread
Need Lens Advice for a Beginner shooting soccer
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Formentor75
624 guests, 390 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.