Canon Digital Photography Forums  

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Equipment Talk' section > Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16th of September 2007 (Sun)   #1
julie249
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 27
Default Tamron vs. Canon Lenses

I have decided to upgrade from a Rebel XTi to a 40D. I am fairly new to photography, therefore, unfamiliar with lens options. I mostly take portrait, close up photography of my children. I like the background blurred out in alot of the pictures. The store I am purchasing from recommended a tamron 17-35 mm lens - he said it would let in more light than my canon 18-55 mm lens and give a crisper picture. He also said it would blurr out the background easily. I will also purchase another telephoto lens in the future - but any recommendations for now. Should I consider a canon IS lens? Thanks
julie249 is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 16th of September 2007 (Sun)   #2
GTRacer
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 9
Default Re: Tamron vs. Canon Lenses

To be very honest, you should stick with the XTi since you are fairly new to photography. You can then spend the rest on some lenses.
1) 50mm f/1.8 is pretty much standard for portraiture, although some prefer the 85mm or something wider.

2) As for telephotos, the Canon 70-200 F/4L is very good, I'm unfamiliar with other tele zooms from other companies but apparently they're very good.
GTRacer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th of September 2007 (Sun)   #3
FREEZE
Member
 
FREEZE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Manitoba Canada
Posts: 607
Default Re: Tamron vs. Canon Lenses

I'm using a rebel xt. The lenses that are usualy on my camera are theTamron 28-75 (look around on the net you won't find many bad reviews,slower focus speed being the major complaint)and the 70-200f4. I own the kit lens and the 50mm1.8 hardly ever use them. For a budget lens that is sharp and has a constant 2.8 the tamron 28-75 is the way to go!
__________________

Freeze
FREEZE is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 16th of September 2007 (Sun)   #4
runninmann
what the heck do I know?
 
runninmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Michigan-U.S.A.
Posts: 7,728
Default Re: Tamron vs. Canon Lenses

The Tamron does offer a wider aperture than the kit lens, since it is f/2.8-4.0. So, it will let in more light. However, that alone is not enough to guarantee that you will get the degree of blur that you desire. That is also dependent on the spatial relationship among camera, subject and background.
__________________
My Gear
runninmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th of September 2007 (Sun)   #5
pieq314
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,100
Default Re: Tamron vs. Canon Lenses

I second the suggestion of sticking to XTi.

For lenses, I would recommend

1. Canon 50mm f/1.8 for indoor.

2. Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 when you need zoom.
__________________
Canon 1D Mk III/5D2, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX, Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS, Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX, Canon 85/1.8, Canon 100/2.8 IS macro, Canon 135/2, Sigma 150-500 OS, Canon 500 f/4 IS
pieq314 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th of September 2007 (Sun)   #6
troutfisher
Senior Member
 
troutfisher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: West Yorkshire UK
Posts: 1,518
Default Re: Tamron vs. Canon Lenses

Why upgrade the camera? spend the extra cash on better glass.Decide what you shoot most/want to shoot and by lenses accordingly
__________________
Chris
Canon 5D Mk2,Canon 7D, Canon 24-105L F4 IS,Canon 580 EX, ,Canon 100-400L IS, Canon 17-40L,Canon 60mm Macro,Canon 24mm TS-E Mk2 ,G12
troutfisher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th of September 2007 (Sun)   #7
julie249
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 27
Default Re: Tamron vs. Canon Lenses

Quote:
Originally Posted by pieq314 View Post
I second the suggestion of sticking to XTi.

For lenses, I would recommend

1. Canon 50mm f/1.8 for indoor.

2. Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 when you need zoom.
I'm borrowing the XTi from my mother - therefore I need to get a camera of my own. Do you think the 40D is too much camera for me? What are your reasons for staying with an XTI? The one I am shooting with only has 6 mega pix, so I definately want more. But I also don't want to get the XTi and want to upgrade in a few months. Thanks for all of your input.
julie249 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th of September 2007 (Sun)   #8
Jim_T
Goldmember
 
Jim_T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Woodlands, MB, Canada
Posts: 3,166
Default Re: Tamron vs. Canon Lenses

I think the bottom line is to buy what you can afford...

Note that the camera isn't the final word when it comes to serious photography. Most dedicated photographers will spend much more on lenses than they do on the camera....
Jim_T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th of September 2007 (Sun)   #9
Elbee19
Member
 
Elbee19's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 732
Default Re: Tamron vs. Canon Lenses

I don't think the 40D is too much camera at all. I would however suggest your purchasing decision not be based on megapixels though. There are other elements to the camera that are more important than megapixels such as focusing speed, burst speed, etc. and once you get more comfortable and gain more experience with your photography skills you will determine which elements are most important to you.

Considering your start point with photography, I don't anticipate you needing to upgrade the XTi within a few months. Having said that though, if your finances allow you the opportunity to purchase the 40D then I would recommend that because if photography does become a more serious hobby for you or even greater, then you wouldn't be as likely to seek an upgrade if you had the 40D.

I think for someone just coming into the dslr world, you will find the XTi a very capable camera. You will hear many people say purchase the XTi and put the money saved into purchasing a nice lense. I agree with this strategy but still contend that if finances are not an issue then definitely look to get the 40D and don't look back!
__________________
Cheers,
LeBaron
************************************************** *************************************
Canon 1DMKiii/5D/40D/30D | Canon EF 70-200 mm f/2.8L IS USM | Canon 17-40 F4L USM | Canon 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 | Canon 50mm 1.8
Elbee19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th of September 2007 (Sun)   #10
pieq314
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,100
Default Re: Tamron vs. Canon Lenses

Quote:
Originally Posted by julie249 View Post
I'm borrowing the XTi from my mother - therefore I need to get a camera of my own. Do you think the 40D is too much camera for me? What are your reasons for staying with an XTI? The one I am shooting with only has 6 mega pix, so I definately want more. But I also don't want to get the XTi and want to upgrade in a few months. Thanks for all of your input.
Do you mean you do not have a camera yet? Or you have a 6MP camera now?

If you do not have DSLR yet, then, 40D is a better camera than XTi (aka 400D). But if you already have XTi, then, it should be good enough (and you can upgrade when you feel you out grow it, but not before). So if your budget allows, get 40D. Otherwise, XTi is good enough.

What is equally (or more) important is your lens collection. They will eventually cost more than the camera itself. In other words, when figuring out your initial budget (that is, you can delay some lens purchase to the future), be sure to include some lenses.
__________________
Canon 1D Mk III/5D2, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX, Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS, Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX, Canon 85/1.8, Canon 100/2.8 IS macro, Canon 135/2, Sigma 150-500 OS, Canon 500 f/4 IS
pieq314 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th of September 2007 (Sun)   #11
ed rader
"I am not the final word"
 
ed rader's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: silicon valley
Posts: 21,874
Default Re: Tamron vs. Canon Lenses

Quote:
Originally Posted by julie249 View Post
I have decided to upgrade from a Rebel XTi to a 40D. I am fairly new to photography, therefore, unfamiliar with lens options. I mostly take portrait, close up photography of my children. I like the background blurred out in alot of the pictures. The store I am purchasing from recommended a tamron 17-35 mm lens - he said it would let in more light than my canon 18-55 mm lens and give a crisper picture. He also said it would blurr out the background easily. I will also purchase another telephoto lens in the future - but any recommendations for now. Should I consider a canon IS lens? Thanks
while the tamron 17-35 is a very good lens it has been superceded by the tamron 17-50, which gives you more reach (portrait ability) and a constant f2.8.

the only reason to choose the 17-35 is if you are using a FF or 1.3 crop camera because the 17-50 will only work on a 1.6 crop.

my guess is the store is trying to unload a 17-35 on you because they no longer sell well. in fact i paid about $450 for my 17-35 and lately i've been seeing them go for under $300.

so if you are going to get a tamron the 17-50 or the 28-75 are much better choices ... tho the former would be a better replacement for the kit lens.

the xti and 40d are both 10mp. personally i'd get the 40d or a 30d (if you want to save $) before i got the xti.

ed rader
__________________
Utah Road Trip 2014 http://erader.zenfolio.com/p36870292

5D3, SL1, 16-35L f4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-300L, 100-400L, 35f2 IS, 15mm FE (sigma), 270ex II, gitzo, markins, benro
ed rader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th of September 2007 (Sun)   #12
JCH77Yanks
Senior Member
 
JCH77Yanks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: BKNY
Posts: 1,282
Default Re: Tamron vs. Canon Lenses

Quote:
Originally Posted by julie249 View Post
I'm borrowing the XTi from my mother - therefore I need to get a camera of my own. Do you think the 40D is too much camera for me? What are your reasons for staying with an XTI? The one I am shooting with only has 6 mega pix, so I definately want more. But I also don't want to get the XTi and want to upgrade in a few months. Thanks for all of your input.
You could get a 30D instead, the prices on those are coming down now that the 40D is on the shelves. I waited until the XTi was on the shelves for a few months before I scored my XT at a great price.
__________________
Joe Halliday
7D | XT | 10-22 | 24-105 f/4L | 28 1.8 | 50 1.4 | 85 1.8 | 580EXII | 430EXII | 430EX | Flickr| 500px |

Dial "M" for Manual.
JCH77Yanks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th of September 2007 (Sun)   #13
Dragos Jianu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Romania, Bucharest
Posts: 1,764
Default Re: Tamron vs. Canon Lenses

Ideally the Nikon D80 + NIkkor 50mm f/1.4 and a SB600 which together with the D80 allows wireless flash. If you want to stick with Canon get/keep the XTi and get a 50mm f/1.4 + Speedlite 430EX.The Tamron 17-35 is too short for portraits and at f/4 it's not nearly enough to give you the DoF you would need.
__________________
Dragos Jianu PHOTOGRAPHY
5Dc | 35L 85LII 100Macro | 580EX II 430EX
E-PM1 | OMZ 17 2.8 | OMZ 45 1.8

Last edited by Dragos Jianu : 16th of September 2007 (Sun) at 13:06.
Dragos Jianu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th of September 2007 (Sun)   #14
DerekW
Senior Member
 
DerekW's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sarnia Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,209
Default Re: Tamron vs. Canon Lenses

Note that the OP doesn't own the Xti, she is borrowing it.
So, if you can affors the 40D and a good lens, go for it. If you have a budget (whatever that is ), get an XTi and good glass. You need something that is fast and works in low light, and is wide enough for close ups. I am a zoom guy, so I would say any of the 17ish-55ish f2.8 lenses. But sometimes indoor you may want something like a prime (no zoom, use your feet or crop it afterwards) with 1.8-1.2 aperture.
BTW, I sold my tamron 17-50 for a Canon 17-55 IS, IMHO it was a worthwhile upgrade, but I'm a caffein-a-holic, so I might be shakier than some
DerekW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th of September 2007 (Sun)   #15
nwa2
Senior Member
 
nwa2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 1,127
Default Re: Tamron vs. Canon Lenses

Which quality of Tamron is it? Is it one of their better lenses?

I have a Tamron 70-300 LD, and frankly it is pretty poor. Terrible Chromatic Aberrations.
__________________
Canon 7D; 40D:
There are many tomorrows', but only one today!!
[size=1][color=Black]

http://imagesix.wordpress.com/
nwa2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTB: Sigma, Tamron, or Canon Lenses disboifan Classifieds: Buy 1 15th of February 2007 (Thu) 00:43
Canon Lenses Made By Tamron? CoolToolGuy Canon EOS Digital Cameras 25 22nd of March 2004 (Mon) 17:31
Tamron XR Di Lenses (Canon 10D) tonywms Canon EOS Digital Cameras 4 4th of November 2003 (Tue) 11:03


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.