Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 14 Oct 2007 (Sunday) 17:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2nd Shooter Agreement/Terms?

 
amonline
Goldmember
Avatar
3,558 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
     
Oct 14, 2007 17:14 |  #1

I was just wondering what you guys' terms are with your second shooter. Do you pay them? If so, what's the going rate? Are you covering their use of images through your contract? Etc, etc...

Any info you can lend would be nice. I have a partner that I want to utilize this spring and am just trying to see what's customary. Thanks!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
stathunter
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,606 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Aug 2006
Location: California & Michigan
     
Oct 14, 2007 18:35 |  #2

Allow them to tag along, carry your stuff, take fantastic pictures, clean your eqipment and only when they deliver the pictures in a format that is reasonable pay them $20 for gas and a Tim Horton's gift certificate.


Scott
"Do or do not, there is no try"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightUser
Senior Member
Avatar
286 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Oct 14, 2007 18:52 as a reply to  @ stathunter's post |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

Anytime I help a certain fellow pro when he needs it, he pays me $200.00 to set up his lights, take them down and also 2nd. shoot with him and give him the images and he lets me use them for my portfolio and he sells and gets the money so he makes sure we both benefit.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amonline
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,558 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
     
Oct 14, 2007 19:26 |  #4

I'd like to hear more guys!

LightUser, you're pretty much right in line with my thinking. While I'm gearing up to use a partner, he will be doing the same for me and I'm just looking ahead at what's fair to the both of us when backing each other. What you stated is exactly what I had in mind. So, I'm guessing his contract covers usage of "all" wedding images for personal use? (ie: portfolio)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nikonthree
Senior Member
Avatar
316 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Savannah, GA
     
Oct 14, 2007 20:10 |  #5

In my experience, a second shooter paid between 125-200 flat fee, manages equipment, and shoots.

Shots are property of the principle photographer, usable for second shooter's portfolio and website (everyone wins this way as the second shooter will strive for better shots, so he/she can use them for themselves)

BTW- There was a pretty good/recent thread going on the DWF about this subject, you might look there for input as well


-Rich R.
Concept-A Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gateruner
Senior Member
Avatar
358 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Katy, Texas
     
Oct 14, 2007 20:15 |  #6

nikonthree wrote in post #4123956 (external link)
In my experience, a second shooter paid between 125-200 flat fee, manages equipment, and shoots.

Shots are property of the principle photographer, usable for second shooter's portfolio and website (everyone wins this way as the second shooter will strive for better shots, so he/she can use them for themselves)

This is exactly how we work. However, we add that the second has to wait 30 days before posting any images anywhere just to keep the B & G from seeing them somewhere other than our site by some odd chance. I dont think it is to much to ask.


Scott { Website (external link) } {Blog (external link)}
5D x 4, Canon 30D x 2, Canon G12, 70-200 2.8L is x2, 17-55 IS, 24-70 2.8L x2, 85 1.2, 50 1.2, Canon 1.4 TX, 18-55 kit lens, Vert Grip x 2, Bogen Pro Mono, 580 EX x 2, 430EX, 28 gig memory, Pelican 1564 & a bunch of older Canon/Pentax stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Mireles
Senior Member
259 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: San Diego
     
Oct 15, 2007 00:30 |  #7

I always pay my second shooter/assistant. I always work with a second and have a regular crew that I work with. Our studio retains the copyright to all images although we do allow the second to use images for non-competing purposes.

For the legal implications of hiring an assistant/second shooter, you can check out http://photographersto​olkit.com/Resources.ht​ml (external link). I have an article on associates and assistants posted there.

There's also a contract for assistants/second shooters and another for independent contractors. If you don't specify that you own the copyright to the images, your second shooter will own the copyright and could technically create problems unless you resolve them beforehand in writing. A good second shooter contract is actually far more complicated than a standard wedding contract since there are so many more issues to deal with such as copyright, noncompete, taxes, etc. Unlike a wedding client, you may deal with a second over many times and they'll have intimate knowledge of your business. Best to think ahead and protect yourself.

John


www.photographerstoolk​it.com (external link)
Sign up for my free Photographer's Business Coach newsletter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
notapro
Goldmember
Avatar
2,540 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Southwestern Ontario
     
Oct 15, 2007 13:25 |  #8

John Mireles wrote in post #4125376 (external link)
I always pay my second shooter/assistant. I always work with a second and have a regular crew that I work with. Our studio retains the copyright to all images although we do allow the second to use images for non-competing purposes.

For the legal implications of hiring an assistant/second shooter, you can check out http://photographersto​olkit.com/Resources.ht​ml (external link). I have an article on associates and assistants posted there.

There's also a contract for assistants/second shooters and another for independent contractors. If you don't specify that you own the copyright to the images, your second shooter will own the copyright and could technically create problems unless you resolve them beforehand in writing. A good second shooter contract is actually far more complicated than a standard wedding contract since there are so many more issues to deal with such as copyright, noncompete, taxes, etc. Unlike a wedding client, you may deal with a second over many times and they'll have intimate knowledge of your business. Best to think ahead and protect yourself.

John

Just curious how you define "non-competing purposes" Would that include his/her own portfolio or website as these are marketing tools? If so, do you pay them more than the ~$200 that I understand to be the norm?

I think it would be difficult for me to agree to those terms as a second. I would want to own the copyright on my images, and I'd expect the to be paid a fairly high price for that. Do most people have this type or agreement with their seconds?


Amanda

Ontario Wedding Photographer  (external link)| My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Big ­ Mike
Goldmember
Avatar
1,023 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Edmonton
     
Oct 15, 2007 13:38 |  #9

I may be doing some second shooting with an established pro in my area. We just did one, as a trial, and it went well. I think we agreed upon a price that is around $33 per hour, based on a 15 hour wedding job. The photos are theirs, to use and sell etc, but I'd have to ask again, if I would be allowed to use them for my own promotion. I think she said that, in the past, they didn't allow that (or they paid less) but I think we can come up with an agreement that is satisfactory to everyone. I think the idea of not posting them before the client gets then, is a good one. I would even add a logo, label or watermark, to specify that I took the photo while working for their company.


Instructor at The Canadian Photography Learning Centre (external link).
Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
notapro
Goldmember
Avatar
2,540 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Southwestern Ontario
     
Oct 15, 2007 14:22 |  #10

Big Mike wrote in post #4128278 (external link)
I may be doing some second shooting with an established pro in my area. We just did one, as a trial, and it went well. I think we agreed upon a price that is around $33 per hour, based on a 15 hour wedding job. The photos are theirs, to use and sell etc, but I'd have to ask again, if I would be allowed to use them for my own promotion. I think she said that, in the past, they didn't allow that (or they paid less) but I think we can come up with an agreement that is satisfactory to everyone. I think the idea of not posting them before the client gets then, is a good one. I would even add a logo, label or watermark, to specify that I took the photo while working for their company.

I always assumed that in most cases the second held the copyright and could use them for their portfolio, etc. I do see the potential problem that the hiring company is facing with seconds possibly undercutting their prices and selling to the couples, but I would hope for a middle ground.


Amanda

Ontario Wedding Photographer  (external link)| My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Big ­ Mike
Goldmember
Avatar
1,023 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Edmonton
     
Oct 15, 2007 14:31 |  #11

Well, if someone did go behind the primary photographer's back like that...not only would it be extremely bad practice...but it would probably be career suicide.

I think what someone would be worried about is more the image side of it. As an established pro, you don't necessarily want images of your wedding clients, being splashed around by another photographer...especia​lly if you had anything to do with the photos in question.


Instructor at The Canadian Photography Learning Centre (external link).
Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thebrewer
Senior Member
Avatar
786 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Mohawk Valley, NY
     
Oct 16, 2007 01:08 |  #12

notapro wrote in post #4128561 (external link)
I always assumed that in most cases the second held the copyright and could use them for their portfolio, etc. I do see the potential problem that the hiring company is facing with seconds possibly undercutting their prices and selling to the couples, but I would hope for a middle ground.

A second shooter may have little no rights to the photos depending on the agreement (which you should have in writing) or payment arrangement.

Do a quick google search on 'work for hire' and photo. (I am not a lawyer)

Your agreement should clear these things up before you shoot or hire a second shooter.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liza
Cream of the Crop
11,386 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Mayberry
     
Oct 16, 2007 06:34 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

The second shooter ideally uses his/her own equipment and while they may use the images for their portfolio, I retain copyright since it's a work for hire situation. They earn $100 for the day. My assistant (aka my son) earns $50 for the day to tend to the equipment.



Elizabeth
Blog
http://www.emc2foto.bl​ogspot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bcap
MR. PP
Avatar
7,364 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Niagara, Ontario
     
Oct 16, 2007 07:11 |  #14

The main photog usually likes to have lots of photos taken of them, so make sure you do that.


Bryan
Bryan Caporicci's Personal Blog (external link)
Niagara Falls, Ontario Wedding and Portrait Photographer - Bryan Caporicci Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stathunter
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,606 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Aug 2006
Location: California & Michigan
     
Oct 16, 2007 07:35 |  #15

Bryan is the Robin-- of batman and robin ---of second shooters from what I understand. Go Bryan.........go bryan........go bryan. :)


Scott
"Do or do not, there is no try"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

13,248 views & 0 likes for this thread
2nd Shooter Agreement/Terms?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is apaulavicius
593 guests, 277 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.