![]() |
|
|||||||
| sponsored links |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Italy, Rome
Posts: 1,511
|
well
i have a question i think that i 'm fool , but still can't understand well i have a 350 & 30D they are cropped 1.6 well the 5d is a full format well i keep in consideration these 2 lens CANON EF - S 10 - 22MM F / 3.5 - 4.5 USM Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM a seller told me they have the same wide range,because he told me 10*.16 =16 and 22*16=35 well what i can not understand is : well a CANON EF - S 10 - 22MM on a 30D is a 16-35 right? a Canon EF 16-35mm on a 30D is a 25-56 right? well they have different wide range so they are different on a cropped format? please could someone easy teach me best regards
__________________
canon 5d markII,24L & 24ts , 35L ,17-40L,24-70L,70-200 2.8ISL,50 1.4,85 1.4 , canon eos 3 ,eos 5 ,t90 , ae program and some very sweet fd lenses 3 analogic Hasselblad and 2 anologic Mamiya |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 | |
|
"flat out embarrassing"
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,895
|
Quote:
16-35mm is a 16-35mm lens, regardless of sensor format. However, your field of view (or angle of view) depends on sensor format. So... 10-22mm on 1.6x sensor gives a FOV of 16-35mm. 16-35mm on 1.6x sensor gives a FOV of 25-56mm. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
Posts: 12,487
|
Yes, 10-22 on a 1.6x crop body come out to 16-35. And, 16-35 comes out to 25-56. What is a 50D? Haven't heard of that one.
__________________
GEAR LIST http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...&postcount=842 |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
Yes, you are basically correct.
10-22mm on 1.6x crop camera has the same angle of view as 16-35mm on a Full Frame camera. The difference is only in maximum aperture. Just the same, 16-35mm on FF, will have the same angle of view as 26-56mm on 1.6x crop camera.
__________________
What we see depends mainly on what we look for. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
"flat out embarrassing"
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
|
if you have a 1D 1.3x
if you have a1Ds or 5D 1.0x if you have a 40D 400D 30D 40Detc 1.6x so if u have a canon 40d with a 100mm lens you get the same magnification as 160mm (100x1.6)
__________________
Canon 50D [] Canon 40D [] Sigma 50 f1.4 EX [] Sigma 10-20 EX [] Sigma 70-200 f2.8 EX [] Canon 17-40 L [] Canon 100-400 L [] Canon 430EX flash [] My Site http://www.urban-photography.co.uk FlickR http://www.flickr.com/photos/l_glass/ Urbex Blog http://l-glass.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Italy, Rome
Posts: 1,511
|
Quote:
so the seller told me rubbish, foolishness if i want such range i have to buy CANON EF - S 10 - 22MM the seller told me that CANON EF - S 10 - 22MM & Canon EF 16-35mm on a cropped have the same wide range
__________________
canon 5d markII,24L & 24ts , 35L ,17-40L,24-70L,70-200 2.8ISL,50 1.4,85 1.4 , canon eos 3 ,eos 5 ,t90 , ae program and some very sweet fd lenses 3 analogic Hasselblad and 2 anologic Mamiya Last edited by mantra : 18th of November 2007 (Sun) at 12:09. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
isn't this answer a stickie yet?
|
the 16 on a crop doesn't, the 16 on a FF does. It's only complicated if you make it. Relax and don't think on it too much. That's seriously what gets people, they over think it.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Italy, Rome
Posts: 1,511
|
Quote:
so this canon reseller is a jerk ,i will never buy nothing by him
__________________
canon 5d markII,24L & 24ts , 35L ,17-40L,24-70L,70-200 2.8ISL,50 1.4,85 1.4 , canon eos 3 ,eos 5 ,t90 , ae program and some very sweet fd lenses 3 analogic Hasselblad and 2 anologic Mamiya |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Aiea, Hawaii
Posts: 112
|
Hi everyone,
If I'm not mistaken, the EF-S 10-22 f/3.5-4.5 lens is a digital only design that is specifically for APS-C sensors. I read somewhere that EF-S lens cannot be used on FF 35mm cameras because the lens fits closer to the sensor. Hence, the 1.6x crop factor is moot. I think this lens is actually a true 10-22mm super wide for the APS-C sensor cameras.
__________________
My Gear |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | ||
|
Wait, all that time and all I get is "Cream of the Damn Crop" ?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Aiea, Hawaii
Posts: 112
|
Thank you Law Dog,
This is good information that I did not understand . . . so the question I still have (please speak slowly for me ); is this a super-wide lens for the 1.6x's or not?
__________________
My Gear |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
"flat out embarrassing"
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
Posts: 18,508
|
Quote:
The 10-22 on an APS-C camera and the 16-35 on a 35mm film camera are both considered ultra-wide lenses when used on those respective formats. Unfortunately, Canon (and probably other lens manufacturers as well) does label the 16-35 as ultra-wide in their advertising, but without defining the camera format for which it is truly an ultra-wide lens. I use a Canon EF 16-35 f/2.8L on my 20D, and it certainly is not an ultra-wide on that body.
__________________
Skip Douglas A few cameras and over 45 years behind them ..... ..... but still learning all the time. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stupid Canon and the stupid Err 99 | kimpav | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 18 | 7th of June 2007 (Thu) 19:18 |
| stupid question. | RacEcaR | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 1 | 25th of May 2007 (Fri) 18:03 |
| I must be stupid, really stupid (B&H) | EOS Man | The POTN Lounge | 6 | 23rd of May 2007 (Wed) 12:28 |
| Stupid question, but not so stupid. (300D vs. 20D) | trevor51590 | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 33 | 1st of September 2006 (Fri) 21:36 |