Canon Digital Photography Forums  

P.O.T.N. SUPPORT SHOP IS OPEN, check it out now!

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Equipment Talk' section > Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18th of November 2007 (Sun)   #1
mantra
Senior Member
 
mantra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Italy, Rome
Posts: 1,511
Default stupid question of a stupid guy(me)("Stupid Wide" angle zoom)

well
i have a question
i think that i 'm fool , but still can't understand

well
i have a 350 & 30D they are cropped 1.6
well the 5d is a full format

well i keep in consideration these 2 lens
CANON EF - S 10 - 22MM F / 3.5 - 4.5 USM
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM

a seller told me they have the same wide range,because he told me 10*.16 =16 and 22*16=35

well what i can not understand is :
well a CANON EF - S 10 - 22MM on a 30D is a 16-35 right?
a Canon EF 16-35mm on a 30D is a 25-56 right?

well they have different wide range so they are different on a cropped format?

please could someone easy teach me


best regards
__________________
canon 5d markII,24L & 24ts , 35L ,17-40L,24-70L,70-200 2.8ISL,50 1.4,85 1.4 , canon eos 3 ,eos 5 ,t90 , ae program and some very sweet fd lenses
3 analogic Hasselblad and 2 anologic Mamiya
mantra is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 18th of November 2007 (Sun)   #2
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
 
LightRules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,895
Default Re: stupid question of a stupid guy(me)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mantra View Post
well what i can not understand is :
well a CANON EF - S 10 - 22MM on a 30D is a 16-35 right?
a Canon EF 16-35mm on a 30D is a 25-56 right?

well they have different wide range so they are different on a cropped format?
10-22mm is a 10-22mm lens, regardless of sensor format.
16-35mm is a 16-35mm lens, regardless of sensor format.

However, your field of view (or angle of view) depends on sensor format.

So...

10-22mm on 1.6x sensor gives a FOV of 16-35mm.
16-35mm on 1.6x sensor gives a FOV of 25-56mm.
LightRules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th of November 2007 (Sun)   #3
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
 
gasrocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
Posts: 12,487
Default Re: stupid question of a stupid guy(me)

Yes, 10-22 on a 1.6x crop body come out to 16-35. And, 16-35 comes out to 25-56. What is a 50D? Haven't heard of that one.
gasrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 18th of November 2007 (Sun)   #4
Hermeto
Cream of the Crop
 
Hermeto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 6,657
Default Re: stupid question of a stupid guy(me)

Yes, you are basically correct.

10-22mm on 1.6x crop camera has the same angle of view as 16-35mm on a Full Frame camera.
The difference is only in maximum aperture.

Just the same, 16-35mm on FF, will have the same angle of view as 26-56mm on 1.6x crop camera.
__________________
What we see depends mainly on what we look for.
Hermeto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th of November 2007 (Sun)   #5
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
 
LightRules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,895
Default Re: stupid question of a stupid guy(me)

Quote:
Originally Posted by gasrocks View Post
Yes, 10-22 on a 1.6x crop body come out to 16-35. And, 16-35 comes out to 25-56. What is a 50D? Haven't heard of that one.
I don't see any mention of a 50D anywhere.

EDIT: I see it now, in his sig.
LightRules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th of November 2007 (Sun)   #6
grimey121uk
Member
 
grimey121uk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bolton UK
Posts: 721
Default Re: stupid question of a stupid guy(me)

if you have a 1D 1.3x
if you have a1Ds or 5D 1.0x
if you have a 40D 400D 30D 40Detc 1.6x

so if u have a canon 40d with a 100mm lens
you get the same magnification as 160mm (100x1.6)
__________________
Canon 50D [] Canon 40D [] Sigma 50 f1.4 EX [] Sigma 10-20 EX [] Sigma 70-200 f2.8 EX [] Canon 17-40 L [] Canon 100-400 L [] Canon 430EX flash []
My Site http://www.urban-photography.co.uk
FlickR http://www.flickr.com/photos/l_glass/
Urbex Blog http://l-glass.blogspot.com/
grimey121uk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th of November 2007 (Sun)   #7
mantra
Senior Member
 
mantra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Italy, Rome
Posts: 1,511
Default Re: stupid question of a stupid guy(me)

Quote:
Yes, 10-22 on a 1.6x crop body come out to 16-35. And, 16-35 comes out to 25-56. What is a 50D? Haven't heard of that one.
by the way the 50D is a film camera ,don't know the name in the usa market


so the seller told me rubbish, foolishness
if i want such range i have to buy CANON EF - S 10 - 22MM

the seller told me that CANON EF - S 10 - 22MM & Canon EF 16-35mm on a cropped have the same wide range
__________________
canon 5d markII,24L & 24ts , 35L ,17-40L,24-70L,70-200 2.8ISL,50 1.4,85 1.4 , canon eos 3 ,eos 5 ,t90 , ae program and some very sweet fd lenses
3 analogic Hasselblad and 2 anologic Mamiya

Last edited by mantra : 18th of November 2007 (Sun) at 12:09.
mantra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th of November 2007 (Sun)   #8
_aravena
isn't this answer a stickie yet?
 
_aravena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Back in the 757
Posts: 12,366
Default Re: stupid question of a stupid guy(me)

the 16 on a crop doesn't, the 16 on a FF does. It's only complicated if you make it. Relax and don't think on it too much. That's seriously what gets people, they over think it.
__________________
POTN CRUMPLER MAN!!!
My Site ~ Gear List ~ Bag Reviews
_aravena is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th of November 2007 (Sun)   #9
mantra
Senior Member
 
mantra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Italy, Rome
Posts: 1,511
Default Re: stupid question of a stupid guy(me)

Quote:
Originally Posted by _aravena View Post
the 16 on a crop doesn't, the 16 on a FF does. It's only complicated if you make it. Relax and don't think on it too much. That's seriously what gets people, they over think it.

so this canon reseller is a jerk ,i will never buy nothing by him
__________________
canon 5d markII,24L & 24ts , 35L ,17-40L,24-70L,70-200 2.8ISL,50 1.4,85 1.4 , canon eos 3 ,eos 5 ,t90 , ae program and some very sweet fd lenses
3 analogic Hasselblad and 2 anologic Mamiya
mantra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th of November 2007 (Sun)   #10
ATI058
Member
 
ATI058's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Aiea, Hawaii
Posts: 112
Default Re: stupid question of a stupid guy(me)

Hi everyone,
If I'm not mistaken, the EF-S 10-22 f/3.5-4.5 lens is a digital only design that is specifically for APS-C sensors.

I read somewhere that EF-S lens cannot be used on FF 35mm cameras because the lens fits closer to the sensor. Hence, the 1.6x crop factor is moot. I think this lens is actually a true 10-22mm super wide for the APS-C sensor cameras.
__________________
My Gear
ATI058 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th of November 2007 (Sun)   #11
CyberDyneSystems
Wait, all that time and all I get is "Cream of the Damn Crop" ?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Providence RI
Posts: 37,437
Default Re: stupid question of a stupid guy(me)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATI058 View Post
Hi everyone,
If I'm not mistaken, the EF-S 10-22 f/3.5-4.5 lens is a digital only design that is specifically for APS-C sensors.

I read somewhere that EF-S lens cannot be used on FF 35mm cameras because the lens fits closer to the sensor.
This part is true ATI

Quote:
Hence, the 1.6x crop factor is moot. I think this lens is actually a true 10-22mm super wide for the APS-C sensor cameras.
This part is not. Somewhere down the line many people have made this mistaken assumption, and it continues to be spread. But as the lens states clearly, and as pointed out earlier in the the thread all EF or EF-s lenses use only the actual focal length in mm of the optic. They do not anywhere offer in the specs the FOV effect from a crop sensor.
CyberDyneSystems is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th of November 2007 (Sun)   #12
ATI058
Member
 
ATI058's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Aiea, Hawaii
Posts: 112
Default Re: stupid question of a stupid guy(me)

Thank you Law Dog,

This is good information that I did not understand . . . so the question I still have (please speak slowly for me); is this a super-wide lens for the 1.6x's or not?
__________________
My Gear
ATI058 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th of November 2007 (Sun)   #13
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
 
LightRules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,895
Default Re: stupid question of a stupid guy(me)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATI058 View Post
so the question I still have (please speak slowly for me); is this a super-wide lens for the 1.6x's or not?
T-h-e 10-22 l-e-n-s w-o-u-l-d b-e c-o-n-s-i-d-e-r-e-d a s-u-p-e-r w-i-d-e a-n-g-l-e l-e-n-s , y-e-s!
LightRules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th of November 2007 (Sun)   #14
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
 
SkipD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
Posts: 18,508
Default Re: stupid question of a stupid guy(me)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATI058 View Post
Thank you Law Dog,

This is good information that I did not understand . . . so the question I still have (please speak slowly for me); is this a super-wide lens for the 1.6x's or not?
The EF-S 10-22, mounted on an APS-C camera (such as a 40D, etc.) provides the same field of view as the EF 16-35 would when mounted to a 35mm film (or "full-frame" DSLR) camera body.

The 10-22 on an APS-C camera and the 16-35 on a 35mm film camera are both considered ultra-wide lenses when used on those respective formats.

Unfortunately, Canon (and probably other lens manufacturers as well) does label the 16-35 as ultra-wide in their advertising, but without defining the camera format for which it is truly an ultra-wide lens. I use a Canon EF 16-35 f/2.8L on my 20D, and it certainly is not an ultra-wide on that body.
__________________
Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 45 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.
SkipD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th of November 2007 (Sun)   #15
ATI058
Member
 
ATI058's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Aiea, Hawaii
Posts: 112
Default Re: stupid question of a stupid guy(me)

Quote:
Originally Posted by LightRules View Post
T-h-e 10-22 l-e-n-s w-o-u-l-d b-e c-o-n-s-i-d-e-r-e-d a s-u-p-e-r w-i-d-e a-n-g-l-e l-e-n-s , y-e-s!
Oh . . . now I get it
__________________
My Gear
ATI058 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stupid Canon and the stupid Err 99 kimpav Canon EOS Digital Cameras 18 7th of June 2007 (Thu) 19:18
stupid question. RacEcaR RAW, Post Processing and Printing 1 25th of May 2007 (Fri) 18:03
I must be stupid, really stupid (B&H) EOS Man The POTN Lounge 6 23rd of May 2007 (Wed) 12:28
Stupid question, but not so stupid. (300D vs. 20D) trevor51590 Canon EOS Digital Cameras 33 1st of September 2006 (Fri) 21:36


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:13.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.