![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
User is banned from forums
|
Does anyone have the Tokina 50-135? Can you post samples or give an opinion/review of it?
Thanks! |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
User is banned from forums
|
Nothing?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
User is banned from forums
|
Nada?
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
|
I don't own it, but are you aware of this review? http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/len...5_28/index.htm
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
User is banned from forums
|
Yeah- seen it. Thanks though!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,784
|
I asked the same question on a different thread yesterday, I was not aware of your thread here.
So far I've no replies. I suppose it's a relatively new lens and third party which means it may be a while before we get a lot of user experience. There is one user review over on Fred Miranda, and the PhotoZone review mentioned above.
__________________
Newfoundland Wedding Photographer |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bethlehem PA
Posts: 480
|
reviving old thread..
i think this lens is underrated. i feel that it is a solid lens which produces excellent IQ photos. sharpness is excellent. i did a couple of shots at 50mm f/2.8, f/4 and 135mm f/2.8, f/4. http://eyusuf.smugmug.com/gallery/4154372 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
User is banned from forums
|
How's the build and the AF on it Eyusuf?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bethlehem PA
Posts: 480
|
the build is fantastic. very professional and feels solid in your hand.
AF is a bit loud (that is you are spoiled rotten with canon USM) but nothing terrible. the tamron 17-50 is louder. AF accuracy is also excellent. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
"flat out embarrassing"
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,895
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 164
|
Popular Photography tested this lens and their reslts showed its fantastically sharp. Check their site, look under revews, its there.
__________________
"High Key" is NOT overexposed, and "Low Key" is NOT underexposed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
|
I was the first owner of eyusuf's 50-135..
I know how nice it is.. It's hard to explain it really. The lens itself is the real deal.. IF you shoot crop, like most of us do, you really won't find a better everyday portrait lens. (EF 70-200's are telephoto only on crops.. too long for studio and normal portraiture work). The lens itself has no flaws, I may have had a perfect copy.. but I have owned more than one Tokina and both have been awesome. I have been quietly supportive of tokina product for a while. Sadly underrated. Anyone sitting on the fence should try this lens.. short and incredibly solid with a 67mm filter, usable in most situations you want sharp pics with creamy bokeh. Don't doubt it.. find one and try it.. your rebel or XXd body will not find crisper pics in the same range without a set of primes.. Enjoy it eyusuf. everyone else.. try one... really
__________________
3 canon bodies. Some primes. Some zooms. 3 Flashes. A sturdy tripod. A decent monopod. A pelican case. 2 bags. Same as everyone else. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bethlehem PA
Posts: 480
|
real world shot taken with this lens.
f/2.8, 1/80s, 90mm, handheld. available window light. no sharpening. 100% crop from the pic straight from the camera. http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/638/cropac7.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
|
wow eyusuf. wow! more please?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bethlehem PA
Posts: 480
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tokina 50-135mm f/2.8 | mritchy | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 4 | 11th of May 2009 (Mon) 15:12 |
| Canon 28-135mm vs. Tokina 50-135mm | dgirl33 | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 1 | 18th of March 2009 (Wed) 10:55 |
| Does anyone have the Tokina 50-135mm? | J.Bat | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 2 | 6th of February 2009 (Fri) 00:13 |
| Tokina 50-135mm 2.8 | popnlock247 | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 15 | 22nd of October 2008 (Wed) 07:41 |