Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
Thread started 07 Dec 2007 (Friday) 06:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

40D & CF Cards

 
wayne_eddy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,924 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 14
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Perth, 'straya
     
Dec 07, 2007 06:27 |  #1

I just purchased a 40D and was wondering what would be the best CF to get?

Is the 40D CFII compatible?

Any brands ppl have had issues with?

Thanks

Wayne


wayne eddy
[I'm calibrated - are you?]
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
madferrit
Goldmember
Avatar
1,043 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: London, UK
     
Dec 07, 2007 06:30 |  #2

Personally I would go for a brand I can trust, rather than something non-branded. Sandisk seems to be the popular choice. But buy it from a reputable place, as there are many fakes out there on ebay.

The other thing you might want to look at is card speed. Overall answer is that any CF card will be fine for your 40D.


My Canon can.. I just need to find out how :rolleyes:

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=298914

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonydee
Goldmember
Avatar
2,009 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Tokyo
     
Dec 07, 2007 10:40 |  #3

I bought a 2GB Lexar Professional 300x (45MB/sec) to start, then 4GB and 8GB IOData 133xs. In practice, using a Digital Kiss X (400D) I don't notice the difference when using the Lexar, so I just leave the 8GB in. Really, 3fps RAW ~= 30MB/sec, so that speed falls between the two cards, so it should make a little difference but I wouldn't worry about it unless you shoot sports or moving wildlife and are really worried about missing the moment. The 2GB Lexar cost as much as the 4GB IOData card. No problems at all with any of them, with 10000 pics shot on these cards. Cheers, Tony


5D and too much glass. Mamiya 645E.
http://www.picasaweb.c​om/anthonypon (external link) recent work

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
33,173 posts
Gallery: 72 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3479
Joined May 2002
Location: Northern Indiana
     
Dec 07, 2007 10:45 |  #4

tonydee wrote in post #4457407 (external link)
I bought a 2GB Lexar Professional 300x (45MB/sec) to start, then 4GB and 8GB IOData 133xs. In practice, using a Digital Kiss X (400D) I don't notice the difference when using the Lexar, so I just leave the 8GB in. Really, 3fps RAW ~= 30MB/sec, so that speed falls between the two cards, so it should make a little difference but I wouldn't worry about it unless you shoot sports or moving wildlife and are really worried about missing the moment. The 2GB Lexar cost as much as the 4GB IOData card. No problems at all with any of them, with 10000 pics shot on these cards. Cheers, Tony

You cannot realize the full speed of the Lexar cards, only a select set of electronics can utilize the UDMA capabilities of the Lexar, as an FYI. I am not sure what the normal speeds of the Lexars are without UDMA though, probably very, very close to that of the Sandisk.


Past Equipment | My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
carianoff
Senior Member
Avatar
611 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Detroitish, Michigan
     
Dec 07, 2007 10:47 as a reply to  @ tonydee's post |  #5

SanDisk Ultra II at least. But for a little more you can get the Extreme III, which boasts better read/write speed, comes with a carrying case and has a Ducati logo on the box.


My Flickr (external link)
My Arsenal & Info

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberPet
Hiding Under a Rock
Avatar
4,052 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Piteå, Sweden
     
Dec 07, 2007 11:00 |  #6

I use Sandisk Extreme III on my 30D and 40D. Not sure if there's a speed difference from the Sandisk Ultra II's, but they are starting to get hard to get hold of anyway. I have a few 4 GB's, a few 2 GB's and a few 1 GB's (totally around 40 GB, but I shoot weddings in Raw, so I need more than I use).


/Petra Hall
Click here to view my geeky gear list
I shoot as much as possible in available light... sometimes, my flash is available – Joe Buissink

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
::John::
Cream of the Crop
8,544 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Canberra, Australia
     
Dec 07, 2007 14:13 |  #7

CyberPet wrote in post #4457522 (external link)
I use Sandisk Extreme III on my 30D and 40D. Not sure if there's a speed difference from the Sandisk Ultra II's, but they are starting to get hard to get hold of anyway. I have a few 4 GB's, a few 2 GB's and a few 1 GB's (totally around 40 GB, but I shoot weddings in Raw, so I need more than I use).


Similar - Sandisk Extreme III 3 x 4Gb. Ultra II 2 x 2Gb, 2 x 1Gb and a couple of 512Mb cards used on the 40D and the 5D. Only ever had one card failure and the pictures were recovered through some free software found via POTN. Card was reformatted and has never failed since (touches wood).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
andrewhuxman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,601 posts
Likes: 4307
Joined May 2005
Location: Rockford Illinois
     
Dec 07, 2007 14:16 |  #8

Sandisk Extreme III 12 GB and your good to go.Even though I have plenty of 2 GB which are not large enough at all.


A little L goes a long way.

Canon 5D4, 7D2, 7D, 40D, gripped,16-35MM 2.8L,24-105MM F4L,70-200MM 2.8 IS USM L,500MM F4L
www.machtwomedia.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
toasted1
Hatchling
Avatar
7 posts
Joined Dec 2007
     
Dec 07, 2007 14:54 |  #9

IMHO Kingston rules in the service department... They are having a sale on the website... just picked up a 133x 16gb for my New Zealand trip... Watch out with using a micro drive cf card with the live view... it will overheat the card and destroy it... btw live view rocks, try using the picture zoom button, it digitally zooms 10x to allow manual focus... i can get super sharp exposures...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rnsmomma
Hatchling
8 posts
Joined Mar 2009
     
Apr 13, 2009 20:23 |  #10

does it matter if the card is a 233x for my 40D?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roastpuff
Member
Avatar
143 posts
Joined Jul 2008
     
Apr 13, 2009 20:36 |  #11

rnsmomma wrote in post #7724136 (external link)
does it matter if the card is a 233x for my 40D?

It would depend on what you were doing. If you're planning to do a lot of high-speed burst shots (sports events, similar etc) then yes it would probably matter. If it's mostly portraits or something less fast-paced it wouldn't matter as much thanks to the fairly good buffer on the 40D.

I found that since getting my 5D2 I'm less worried about speed thanks to my huge buffer even when shooting full-size RAW files. However, on my friend's old 5D Classic I would bump into the buffer limit when shooting fencing bouts and have to wait for the buffer to clear into the card - this was on a Sandisk Ultra II.

On my XSi, the buffer would take a long time to clear when shooting RAW burst mode, and when I got Sandisk Extreme III SDHC cards it helped a lot as it was writing a lot faster compared to the regular Kingston Class 6 SDHC cards.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
griptape
Goldmember
2,037 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Home
     
Apr 13, 2009 20:49 |  #12

rnsmomma wrote in post #7724136 (external link)
does it matter if the card is a 233x for my 40D?

The buffer will flush a little faster, so you'll be able to get a few more shots out of burst mode before the fps slows down, and it will transfer to your computer much quicker through a card reader. Whether those benefits are worth the extra cost is up to you (it is to me, I still have a few slower 16GB and 8GB cards, but a the transfer speed to my PC leads me to using one of my 266x 8GB cards most of the time).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wayne_eddy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,924 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 14
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Perth, 'straya
     
Apr 14, 2009 04:49 |  #13

Now I'm up for a new CF card in time for my trip to Japan in a few weeks.

Some electronic devices will not recognise large storage cards.

Is there a max limit for the size (in GIG) the 40D will take?

thanks,

Wayne.


wayne eddy
[I'm calibrated - are you?]
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
low ­ orbit
Goldmember
Avatar
1,730 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Christchurch, NZ
     
Apr 14, 2009 05:17 |  #14

You're better off IMO to have several smaller cards than one large one Wayne. That way if a card fails (doesn't happen often but it happens) then you won't lose all your shots. For a 40D I'd go 8 gig and maybe a few 4's?

Cheers.


Shoot as if it were film

Find my photographs here - updated June 2014 (external link)
GKPE Chatter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CanonDad
Member
Avatar
39 posts
Joined Apr 2009
     
Apr 14, 2009 05:24 |  #15

Yep, dont go for too much more than 4GB.
For the file sizes of a 40D you'd get enough shots on 4GB to keep you happy. Any more and risk losign ALOT of shots.


: My Gear :
. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

12,374 views & 0 likes for this thread
40D & CF Cards
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Nidge
709 guests, 389 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.