![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
User is banned from forums
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Boston
Posts: 72
|
Has anyone used the EF 100f/2.8Macro on a FF body for portraits? I have heard that it is incredibly sharp (like all macros), and I am looking for a longer portrait lens than my 50f/1.4 so I can put a little distance between myself and the subject. The 50mm is just a bit short for me on a FF when I am not taking full-body portraits, and trying for upper-body & head-shots. I was contemplating the 85f/1.8, but I have heard that for just slightly more, I can get the 100 macro and use it for portraits as well as macro work. Any sample portraits taken with this lens would be appreciated. ... I've already seen the thread on the 85f/1.8, and know that is a great portrait lens - I just want to see what the 100 macro can do before I make my decision. Since I already have the 50f/1.4, I already have a decent short FL portrait prime. ... I just need to add a longer FL to my bag. Thanks!!!
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
"Escargot on the Hoof"
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, the land of the politicaly corrupt and innept
Posts: 2,848
|
__________________
I'm just a simple maker of love charms and tokens,who occasionally takes a picture or two. Gear list: more toys than I need, Fewer than I want. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
|
Wow! Great examples! I have the lens. Now I need a FF! haha
__________________
Canon 1D Mark II | 7D | 30D | 17-55 f2.8 IS | 35mm f1.4L | 50mm f1.4 | 100mm f2.8 Macro | 135mm f2L | 70-200mm f2.8L IS | 300mm f2.8L IS | 300mm f4L IS | 400mm f5.6L | Canon 1.4X & 2X | Canon 580EXII/580EX/420EX http://www.jpegcity.com http://www.pbase.com/wtaccord |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Goldmember
|
I use mine for portraits as well, but on a crop body. I'll get some examples up.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
User is banned from forums
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Boston
Posts: 72
|
Jarrad -- Wow. Pretty sharp. If I didn't know those were taken with a 100Macro, I would have guessed the 85f/1.8. Did you sharpen much??
I'd love to see more examples!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
|
I use this lens on my crop body and love it for portraits. Very sharp and a good background blur.
__________________
50D & XTi w/Grip - Kit 18-55mm,75-300mm,EF 24-85 IS, 50mm 1.8, 100mm 2.8 macro, 100-400L,580ex,RC-1,(2) AB400s, RF602s ,SoftBox/Barndoors/Brolly Box/Sekonic L-308S Lightmeter empty wallet Kuanyu.zenfolio.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: B.C., Canada
Posts: 801
|
Quote:
The last image was sharpened a bit more than the others. The first two were only lightly selectively sharpened. I've had an 85 1.8. This Macro was noticeably sharper. It's an exceptionally sharp lens. No need to worry about that. ![]()
__________________
.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 173
|
Both shot with the 100mm 2.8 Macro
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
|
Thnaks all - looks like it's the lens for me... just need a little money now....hopefully not too long..!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
|
This is with FF and the 100mm at F2.8
![]() and this at f4 ![]() It's a great all round lens
__________________
EOS 5D with grip, EOS 50D + grip, EOS 20D, 24-105mm f4 is usm L, 100/2.8 macro usm, 50/1.4 standard18-55 EFS, ST-E2, 430EX & 530EX small gold/silver umbrella, Spyder 3 Elite for monitor calibration. http://www.modelmayhem.com/640705 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
It is very sharp wide open however, this can be considered an issue with some portrait work where you might want to flatter the subject A macro lens is very convenient for general work where the ability to get very close-in gives great flexibility. I would say that if your only application is portrait you are probably better to go for the 85/1.8.
__________________
My Photography Home Page RSS Feed MP-E, EF 100mm, EF 180mm : The Macro Dark Unholy Trinity : Bow down before their darkness and despair! Gear List FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters Macrophotography by LordV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
User is banned from forums
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Swimming, cycling or running ... somewhere in California
Posts: 1,460
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
|
Thnaks. I do want macro possibility too, and as it's on a FF the length I think will be ok - I think I'll go for it!
Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
|
Not FF,(30D) but sure is sharp.2nd is crop of 1st. Shot wide open at f2.8.
__________________
Tim Bartender - "So, you guys are dictionary salesmen." Roy Munson - "You would be punctilious in assuming that." Last edited by tmonatr : 18th of April 2008 (Fri) at 00:00. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB In canada ef 100f/2.8 macro | Tyreman | Classifieds: Buy | 2 | 1st of July 2007 (Sun) 05:36 |
| Macro Portraits | Epphoto | Macro | 18 | 14th of November 2006 (Tue) 19:18 |
| Macro for portraits | dovbaer | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 5 | 9th of December 2005 (Fri) 13:21 |
| Trying out the 60/2.8 Macro for Portraits | RonSmith | People | 4 | 6th of August 2005 (Sat) 19:31 |
| Velvia 100 (not 100F)...when? | Ken Fong | General Photography Talk | 5 | 5th of May 2005 (Thu) 14:24 |