Index  •   • New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing
Thread started 31 Dec 2007 (Monday) 13:40
PREV/NEXT

Convert 35mm film negatives to digital?

 
Coffeenut
Hatchling
8 posts
Joined Jun 2007

Stafford, Va
MORE INFO

Is it possible to have old 35mm film negatives converted into a positive digital format? I'm sure everyone has old film pics they would feel safer stored in digital. It must be possible - I just haven't looked for this service before. Any recommendations would be appreciated.

Dec 31, 2007 13:40

Cliff
Canon 40D, 300D
EF 24-105 f/4L IS USM, EF 70-300 f/4-5.6, EF 28-135 IS USM, EF-S 18-55 f/3.5-5.6

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
stugotzo
Member
221 posts
Joined Nov 2006

Tampa Bay Area, Florida
MORE INFO

Film scanner. Depends on your needs. But, you can pick them up fairly cheap now (under $200). Like anything else, you could spend 10x more than that for something with more resolution and faster, better software, etc.

Just Google "Film scanners".

Dec 31, 2007 13:49

Tampa Photographerexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
V8Rumble
Senior Member
V8Rumble's Avatar
496 posts

Joined Oct 2007

White Rock, BC
MORE INFO

I would say its safer to have your film negatives stored they way they are. Digital pictures disappear when a hard drive crashes or a dvd gets scratched. Negatives in a box stay in a box.

But it is still good to have a digital copy of old favorites. Easier to share with others. Film scanners are what you are looking for.

Dec 31, 2007 13:56

30D | 18-50 EX | 30 EX | 55-250 | 150-500 OS HSM

LOG IN TO REPLY
Coffeenut
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
8 posts
Joined Jun 2007

Stafford, Va
MORE INFO

True -poor choice of words. I was thinking safer more in terms of redundancy.

Thanks for the replies, I will look into the film scanners.

Dec 31, 2007 14:09

Cliff
Canon 40D, 300D
EF 24-105 f/4L IS USM, EF 70-300 f/4-5.6, EF 28-135 IS USM, EF-S 18-55 f/3.5-5.6

LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Roberts
revolting peasant
Bill Roberts's Avatar
3,079 posts

Joined Apr 2006

UK
MORE INFO

V8Rumble wrote in post #4603560external link
I would say its safer to have your film negatives stored they way they are. Digital pictures disappear when a hard drive crashes or a dvd gets scratched. Negatives in a box stay in a box.

But it is still good to have a digital copy of old favorites. Easier to share with others. Film scanners are what you are looking for.

You've got a very valid point there, but on the other hand the actual slides or negatives can degrade over time.

I've recently scanned my slides because they were showing signs of mould and the colour was deteriorating quite badly. Admittedly some of them were over 40 years old, and although kept in reasonable conditions I'd probably developed them myself and can't guarantee I'd made a good enough job of washing them! (that's a nice way of saying maybe I had other things on my mind at 16) :lol:

I figured that if I had a digital version at least they couldn't deteriorate any further and I could use PP to clean them up somewhat. A decent film scanner with digital ICE and ROC can make quite a difference. Keep the originals but a digital copy is well worth having as well.

Cheers
Bill

Dec 31, 2007 14:29

BiLL

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
mai_lin
Senior Member
637 posts
Joined Nov 2007

Rhode Island
MORE INFO

I had a large project I was working on for a fashion calendar - I had to scan in 80 film negatives using a film scanner.

Next time (who am I kidding, there won't be a next time - we're digital only submissions now) I'll send them out for someone else to do it - it was that much of a PITA.

Just a word of warning - I agree that storing them in a box is good for now, unless you have a lot of time you feel like wasting.

Dec 31, 2007 20:08 as a reply to Bill Roberts's post 5 hours earlier.

http://DeCesariPhotogr​aphy.comexternal link
Canon EOS 5Dmk II and 40D

Canon EF 20-35mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM, Canon EF 50mm f/1.4, Canon EF 85 f/1.8 USM, Speedlite 580EX II :D
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com ...Excalibur_3200_W_S_​2.htmlexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
lauderdalems
Senior Member
750 posts
Joined Jun 2006
MORE INFO

Remember by converting them to digital, you also have a backup copy that can be stored in another location. It's not very easy to make a 'copy' of a negative (esp since I no longer have a chemical darkroom)

Dec 31, 2007 20:13

www.joechance.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
CRE@TE
Goldmember
CRE@TE's Avatar
1,676 posts

Joined Feb 2005

Vancouver, BC, Canada
MORE INFO

I bought a Epson Perfection 4490 Photo scanner. It scans prints, negatives (35mm and medium format) and slides.

Dec 31, 2007 20:20

I got stuff for taking pictures. :o When things are unclear - It's time to refocus. :rolleyes:
My Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/7605380@N08/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
cgratti
Lord_Malone, your still a newb...
cgratti's Avatar
3,315 posts

Joined Feb 2004

E-A-G-L-E-S - EAGLES
MORE INFO

-

http://www.epson.com ...BVCookie=yes&oid=53​540925external link

-

Dec 31, 2007 23:44


Canon 30D

Canon 10D
Canon 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 II USM
Apple iMac G5



LOG IN TO REPLY
DozerLYP
Cream of the Crop
DozerLYP's Avatar
6,570 posts

Joined Jul 2006

Hollywood FL
MORE INFO

i need a film scanner too, but i need one that would scan negative 2 1/2" x 4 1/4" like this.

IMAGE: http://i109.photobucket.com/albums/n56/dozerlyp/IMG_0187.jpg

Jan 07, 2008 18:45

My Gear, My Zenfolioexternal link, Meyhemexternal link And GO VOTE Flash galleryexternal link ---------------> Anyone of you has Multiple Personality Disorder
Home Improvement
Custom Brushes!

LOG IN TO REPLY
Shooting
Goldmember
Shooting's Avatar
1,493 posts

Joined Jan 2008
MORE INFO

As soon as you scan them, burn them to cd or dvd and then it don\'t matter if your hard drive crashes, etc..you will still have them.

Jan 07, 2008 19:19 as a reply to DozerLYP's post 34 minutes earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
GonzoMD
Member
53 posts
Joined Apr 2007
MORE INFO

Shooting wrote in post #4653545external link
As soon as you scan them, burn them to cd or dvd and then it don\'t matter if your hard drive crashes, etc..you will still have them.

But be careful not to rely too heavily on a single backup copy -- recordable cd/dvd media deteriorate, with lifespans in the 5-10 yr. range, depending on who you ask.

Jan 07, 2008 19:28



LOG IN TO REPLY
DozerLYP
Cream of the Crop
DozerLYP's Avatar
6,570 posts

Joined Jul 2006

Hollywood FL
MORE INFO

i know, i will upload them to zenfolio too, so they'll be there forever.

but i need a scanner first, any suggestion...

Jan 07, 2008 21:11

My Gear, My Zenfolioexternal link, Meyhemexternal link And GO VOTE Flash galleryexternal link ---------------> Anyone of you has Multiple Personality Disorder
Home Improvement
Custom Brushes!

LOG IN TO REPLY
JDB
Senior Member
400 posts
Joined Dec 2005

Anaheim, CA
MORE INFO

I use an epson v700 with the medium-format film holder and AN glass from www.betterscanning.comexternal link for my 220 film, and a borrowed Canon FS4000US for 35mm. I'd love to get a proper film scanner that can do medium format, but I don't shoot enough film to justify the cost.

That said, the V700 is pretty versatile, and the scan quality is decent (I must say that the holder and glass from Betterscanning.com made a pretty big difference); it may not be on par with a proper film scanner, but the price isn't either. PM me if you'd like me to send you some samples.

Jan 07, 2008 22:30

www.JasonBoulanger.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
randomlinh
Senior Member
randomlinh's Avatar
992 posts

Joined Jul 2006

Maryland
MORE INFO

I was thinking of getting an epson 4490, $100 for a refurb unit direct from epson (or a new V350, not sure what to get/how much i'm willing to put into this). I'm starting to get back into b+w film, and with my first experience w/ ritz getting them digitized (I have no where else to go really), I want to look at doing it myself.

Another option my friend did was slap a 500D on his 70-200 and fired away w/ a makeshift light table essentially. I was considering a 250D on my 85 to try it out. A hell of a lot faster, and his results looked pretty good. I'm only aiming at maybe 8x10's at most (if at all...). Has anyone tried this or have any resources for tips/suggestions?

Jan 19, 2008 22:38



LOG IN TO REPLY

9,395 views & 0 likes for this thread
Convert 35mm film negatives to digital?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF    •   JUMP TO FORUM    •   FORUM RULES    •   Index    •   New Posts    •   RTAT    •   "Best Of"    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.1version 1.1
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00088 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is KEB1990
582 guests, 525 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014