Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 21 Jan 2008 (Monday) 17:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Kenko 1.5 TC

 
BSBXTi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,563 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: NJ, USA
     
Jan 21, 2008 17:50 |  #1

This has probably been brought up before, but I searched and couldn't find anything, so here is my question: I would like to know how well this teleconverter work with the canon 400mm 5.6. I know about the loss of autofocus and how you loose a stop of light. I'm just interested in how the image quailty holds up. There are times when I want to get a pictular bird in frame without cropping so heavily! :D

Thanks,

Brenton


Brenton Biggs
My Galleries --->
www.alluringnatureimages.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Sp00ks
Goldmember
Avatar
1,654 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
     
Jan 21, 2008 17:55 |  #2

I don't have the 400mm 5.6 but I must say I don't care for the I/Q when attached to my 70-200 f2.8. I haven't mounted it in a year. I am picky and I don't believe mine is the Pro version but I will probably never use it again. My $.02


http://www.shutterup.n​et (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BSBXTi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,563 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: NJ, USA
     
Jan 21, 2008 17:57 |  #3

Interesting! thanks Spooks!


Brenton Biggs
My Galleries --->
www.alluringnatureimages.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfong
Member
124 posts
Joined Jun 2003
     
Jan 23, 2008 01:52 |  #4

Beware that the Kenko 1.5 TC( as oppose to the 1.4 TC) MAYBE unsuitable for a FF camera.

Ken




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,431 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Jan 23, 2008 05:17 |  #5

Get the 1.4x not the 1.5x - difference in IQ.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
smcclelland
Goldmember
Avatar
2,686 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Jan 23, 2008 08:07 |  #6

Haven't tested it on a 400 5.6 but I've mated it to my 100-400 and it still AF's nicely, hunts slightly if the light really dims. I picked up the Pro version which is supposed to have better optics than the standard, it also doesn't seem to report on either my 100-400 or 70-200. I didn't notice any significant IQ loss on my 70-200 f4 but then again I wasn't pixel peeping to extremes.


Shawn | Flickr (external link) | Blog (external link)
There used to be Canon gear here but it disappeared.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
Avatar
9,909 posts
Joined Jun 2005
     
Jan 23, 2008 10:11 |  #7

I have all three Kenkos: 1.4x Pro DG (black), 1.4x Pro (white), 1.5x DG (black). The "Pro" units are only very slightly better optically than the 1.5x. The 1.5x is very similar to the black Tamron 1.4x "F" model, which is also very good. IMO the 1.5x is a very good TC, and you can get them used (sometimes) at a bargain price.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
badams
Senior Member
Avatar
699 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Southern Oklahoma
     
Jan 23, 2008 10:55 |  #8

I love my 1.5x, but I have the 100-400. As stated above you still get AF with it.


Everyday use: 7D2, 1.4x v3 Canon TC (sometimes the 2x v2 Canon TC), Canon 500mm f4 L IS USM; 6D, 24-105L
http://www.southernokp​hotography.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wallybud
Taking the "Walk of Shame"
Avatar
2,980 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Apr 24, 2008 21:51 |  #9

WIll the kenko pro 1.4 autofocus on the 400 5.6 (i assume the 1.5 will AF on the prime if it does on the 100-400)?


-Walt-
Life is good. Do What You Like. Like What You Do.
GEAR LIST
Take | In | Life Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
Avatar
9,909 posts
Joined Jun 2005
     
Apr 24, 2008 21:54 |  #10

wallybud wrote in post #5398800 (external link)
WIll the kenko pro 1.4 autofocus on the 400 5.6 (i assume the 1.5 will AF on the prime if it does on the 100-400)?

The 40D is really picky, more so than its siblings, when going beyond f5.6 (with pins taped). It's hit and miss: some get it to work, others don't. I wouldn't count on it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wallybud
Taking the "Walk of Shame"
Avatar
2,980 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Apr 24, 2008 22:24 |  #11

so IF i consider it...I should just go for best IQ in a 1.4tc and then if its a hit keep it, if not back to amazon it goes?


-Walt-
Life is good. Do What You Like. Like What You Do.
GEAR LIST
Take | In | Life Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
Avatar
9,909 posts
Joined Jun 2005
     
Apr 24, 2008 22:36 |  #12

wallybud wrote in post #5399051 (external link)
so IF i consider it...I should just go for best IQ in a 1.4tc and then if its a hit keep it, if not back to amazon it goes?

Hard to say. I don't get AF with my 40D + 100-400 IS + 1.4x TC set up. I do get it with my 20D.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wallybud
Taking the "Walk of Shame"
Avatar
2,980 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Apr 24, 2008 22:41 |  #13

well Ive heard mixed things likeee...

a non reporting tc will do the same "damage" to the motor as taping the pins on a reporting tc. even though there seems to be no record of anything happening to a lens motor du to taping the pins(that i can find) Its just "assumed that its harmful" Id only be using it to GET THE SHOT if i need the reach....soo i assume your talking about having the pins taped on your 20d and 40d??


-Walt-
Life is good. Do What You Like. Like What You Do.
GEAR LIST
Take | In | Life Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
Avatar
9,909 posts
Joined Jun 2005
     
Apr 24, 2008 22:43 |  #14

wallybud wrote in post #5399164 (external link)
well Ive heard mixed things likeee...

a non reporting tc will do the same "damage" to the motor as taping the pins on a reporting tc. even though there seems to be no record of anything happening to a lens motor du to taping the pins(that i can find) Its just "assumed that its harmful" Id only be using it to GET THE SHOT if i need the reach....soo i assume your talking about having the pins taped on your 20d and 40d??

I generally keep the pins taped on my TCs. But that's just my preference.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wallybud
Taking the "Walk of Shame"
Avatar
2,980 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Apr 24, 2008 22:47 |  #15

ok sounds good...ill keep my fingers crossed...thanks a lot!


-Walt-
Life is good. Do What You Like. Like What You Do.
GEAR LIST
Take | In | Life Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

3,638 views & 0 likes for this thread
Kenko 1.5 TC
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ppahv
740 guests, 371 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.