Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 07 Feb 2008 (Thursday) 17:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

How to prevent glasses' reflection from lights?

 
zwollenaar
Senior Member
Avatar
265 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 32
Joined May 2006
Location: California
     
Feb 07, 2008 17:03 |  #1

I'm using flashes with umbrellas to shoot portrait for a church program and confronting with the reflections from eye-glasses on subject.

The light sources in the room are:

- On stand flashes (power 1/4 at fill light on lens axis level, 1/8 at key light and 1/8 at background light with Curtis' gel)
- 3 rows of fixed fluorescent lights from ceiling 8-9 foot height.

My camera manual settings are at f/8, shutter speed 1/25, ISO 200.

Would someone tell me how to avoid the reflection on the subject's glasses? Your suggestions are greatly appreciated.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Jim ­ M
Goldmember
1,645 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Aug 2006
     
Feb 07, 2008 18:39 |  #2

The fluorescents shouldn't be too much of a problem and neither should the background light. The others you will just have to move around until they aren't reflecting in the glasses or have the subjects turn and tilt their heads until the reflections are under control. Sometimes, if the hair hides the ear pieces, you can tilt the glasses a little so the reflections are not seen. Of course, there is always the old trick of taking the lenses out of the frames if you want to go to extremes. This whole exercise will be harder if you are using flash ("speedlights") without modeling lights. With modeling lights you can see what is happening before you take the picture.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,400 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Feb 07, 2008 19:57 |  #3

Glass reflects the flash. I've asked clients to tip their head a bit one way or another which can help somewhat. Non-reflective glass just gives a different color reflection.

Here's an idea I just thought of (I'm tired so beware) but if you took a shot with the glasses on and then took one as close to it as possible without the glasses you might have the info to fix it a lot easier.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bieber
Goldmember
Avatar
1,992 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Bradenton, FL
     
Feb 07, 2008 20:33 |  #4

You have to consider the different angles that can go from your lens to the glass, and then reflect straight to the light source---that's what's causing your glare---and then keep the light out of it. A simple option is to have your main light on the same side as the camera, and no fill


EOS 20D w/ BG-E2 grip
Nifty fifty, EF 28mm f/2.8, EF 70-200mm f/4L USM
Speedlights SB-25/SB-26/580EX, Pocket Wizards and such
My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Feb 07, 2008 21:22 as a reply to  @ bieber's post |  #5

This is where side lighting really comes in handy. It can be tricky to find a balance between the lighting you're trying to create and having the source of illumination at enough of an angle off to the side to prevent or reduce the reflection. Raising the light further up can help also but you always have to watch the modeling and the eyes to make sure you're still creating pleasing lighting while reducing glare.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bieber
Goldmember
Avatar
1,992 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Bradenton, FL
     
Feb 07, 2008 21:29 |  #6

GASP, Robert, you went to the dark side?

And anyways, if you're _really_ desperate, you could use polarizing filters on both the light and lens, but that'll make you lose a good four or five stops of light and give kind of an icky look to the skin, because you also get no direct reflection at all from it. Not immediately useful, probably, but something to keep in mind for the future.


EOS 20D w/ BG-E2 grip
Nifty fifty, EF 28mm f/2.8, EF 70-200mm f/4L USM
Speedlights SB-25/SB-26/580EX, Pocket Wizards and such
My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Feb 07, 2008 21:41 as a reply to  @ bieber's post |  #7

Dark side, Robert? I know you're just playing (or maybe not) but it was not a quick spontaneous decision for me. I've been weighing things out since the release of the 40D and after a lot of thought, research and then finally shooting with a D300 the choice was easy for me, but it did take me about 3 full months of making myself crazy to made my decision.

I recognize that each brand has strong points but for me, making the switch made a lot of sense. Nikon has the better offering for me and my shooting style. I had more reasons to switch than to stay with Canon.

This does not mean that I am anti-Canon and as I've stated in other threads, POTN is still my home :D and will continue to be, regardless of which camera I use.

Switching is not for everyone but it made perfect sense for me.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bieber
Goldmember
Avatar
1,992 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Bradenton, FL
     
Feb 07, 2008 22:17 |  #8

Oh, I know what you mean: it just wouldn't do to let you by without catching some crap about it ;)


EOS 20D w/ BG-E2 grip
Nifty fifty, EF 28mm f/2.8, EF 70-200mm f/4L USM
Speedlights SB-25/SB-26/580EX, Pocket Wizards and such
My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
40,111 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 1990
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Feb 07, 2008 23:11 |  #9

bieber wrote in post #4874030 (external link)
GASP, Robert, you went to the dark side?.

First he abandons AB, then he buys the 'other brand'. Next thing you know, he will have converted to Scientology?! :cool:


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support http://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,400 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Feb 07, 2008 23:39 |  #10

Wilt wrote in post #4874523 (external link)
First he abandons AB, then he buys the 'other brand'. Next thing you know, he will have converted to Scientology?! :cool:

Mr. Cruise will be all over your case....


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Feb 07, 2008 23:40 |  #11

Wilt wrote in post #4874523 (external link)
First he abandons AB, then he buys the 'other brand'.

:cool: Best 2 decisions I've made in a long time Wilt :D


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Village_Idiot
GREATEST POTN MEMBER EVER
Avatar
3,694 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Durt Burg, WV
     
Feb 08, 2008 08:26 |  #12

bieber wrote in post #4874030 (external link)
GASP, Robert, you went to the dark side?

And anyways, if you're _really_ desperate, you could use polarizing filters on both the light and lens, but that'll make you lose a good four or five stops of light and give kind of an icky look to the skin, because you also get no direct reflection at all from it. Not immediately useful, probably, but something to keep in mind for the future.

Wouldn't a polarizer only remove polarized light? So if it's a direct flash, you'll still get the glare from the flash?


My village called. I was told that they missed me.

Speedotron users, untie!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Village_Idiot
GREATEST POTN MEMBER EVER
Avatar
3,694 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Durt Burg, WV
     
Feb 08, 2008 08:34 as a reply to  @ Village_Idiot's post |  #13

My diagram. Discuss.

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i5.photobucket.​com/albums/y162/yzfwv/​FOA.jpg (external link)


The black angles from the camera are from a wider lens, say 35mm. Light 1 is in the "family of angles" from the lens so it will cause a reflection from the glass where as light 2 isn't, so it will light what's on the other side of the glass without causing glare.

The green angles represent a telephoto lens, like at 70mm focal length. Light 1 and light 2 are outside of the "family of angles" created by the focal length of the lens so therefor neither one will create glare on the glass.

That's why sometimes a telephoto lens can be desireable.

My village called. I was told that they missed me.

Speedotron users, untie!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snowboarderx
Member
Avatar
178 posts
Joined Dec 2005
     
Feb 08, 2008 08:45 |  #14

θi = θr (Angle of incidence = Angle of reflection)

which means the angle the light hits the glass is the angle the light will reflect from the glasses, light is like a pool ball, just move around and you'll find that you can see if you have a reflection.


Equpiment - My eye, my brain and my index finger - the rest doesn't matter.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,400 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Feb 08, 2008 10:50 |  #15

Now all we have to figure out is the curvature of the lens which I believe changes with the prescription.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

5,398 views & 0 likes for this thread
How to prevent glasses' reflection from lights?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Roberto Betta
615 guests, 290 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.