![]() |
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
|
__________________
WWW.DOWNHILLNEWS.COM 1D MARK IIn, and a 40 D, 16-35 F2.8 II L, 70-200 F2.8 L IS, SIGMA 15mm F2.8 FISHEYE, 24-70 F2.8 L, 580 EX II, and a 580 EX flash.[/color] |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
|
LOL! 5K.
__________________
DAVID ALAN DARBY // MAC CONVERT // Raging and unapologetic L'coholic constantly Striving To Measure Up to the Quality of My Gear! Too Many Bodies, Way Too Much Glass, Not Enough Time . . . BUY THE BEST, BUY IT ONCE, GO TAKE PICTURES! |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
__________________
DAVID ALAN DARBY // MAC CONVERT // Raging and unapologetic L'coholic constantly Striving To Measure Up to the Quality of My Gear! Too Many Bodies, Way Too Much Glass, Not Enough Time . . . BUY THE BEST, BUY IT ONCE, GO TAKE PICTURES! |
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#19 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,025
|
jeeezzz! that much for a lens that isnt really sharp... i wasn't thinking it would be anything over 1K!!! it will have to be th 85 f1.2 then |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 800
|
mzivitins, did you look at the link I posted? It's plenty sharp for f/1.0, but if you're looking for ultimate sharpness, you're looking at the wrong aperture.
Sharpness isn't everything. The Canon 50 f/0.95 is a sweet lens, I think. Not very sharp, but I like the images it makes. I'd love one converted to M-mount, to stick on an M8 or M6. 50 f/0.95 on Leicas: http://www.flickr.com/photos/moaan/tags/f095/
__________________
Ryan Flynn Photography The Blog 5D x 2 | 24 f/1.4L | 35 f/1.4L | 50 f/1.2L | 85 f/1.2L II | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 45 TS-E |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
Yes! Yes! Yes!, I almost bought a .95 on an old Canon 7s. I just couldn't force myself to pull the trigger on that one. Waiting and lurking and perhaps another will come around.
__________________
DAVID ALAN DARBY // MAC CONVERT // Raging and unapologetic L'coholic constantly Striving To Measure Up to the Quality of My Gear! Too Many Bodies, Way Too Much Glass, Not Enough Time . . . BUY THE BEST, BUY IT ONCE, GO TAKE PICTURES! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
Already have the 85 f/1.2, fabulous lens BTW, and don't want or need the 50 f/1.2, as the 1zip is just as good at 1.2 and above, at least mine is anyway. Also the 50 1.4 is almost as good as the 50 1.2 @ 1.4 and above.
__________________
DAVID ALAN DARBY // MAC CONVERT // Raging and unapologetic L'coholic constantly Striving To Measure Up to the Quality of My Gear! Too Many Bodies, Way Too Much Glass, Not Enough Time . . . BUY THE BEST, BUY IT ONCE, GO TAKE PICTURES! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 800
|
David, I think there's on for sale on FM.com with the 7s, for like $1200?
I'd love something around or under f/1.0
__________________
Ryan Flynn Photography The Blog 5D x 2 | 24 f/1.4L | 35 f/1.4L | 50 f/1.2L | 85 f/1.2L II | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 45 TS-E |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Goldmember
|
Hey David, does the 50 f/1L have a free-spinning focus ring like the 85L?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Member
|
sharp, sharp, sharp, sharp ...
I have red somewhere here a good opinion about sharpness ... People forget other things in photography. And we often see now lots of very sharp and useless staff Last edited by AndreyD : 27th of February 2008 (Wed) at 07:22. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Member
|
A little something for you nay sayers who badmouth the 50 f/1.zip.
For your consideration are 2 images below. Both 100% crops. One shot with a 50mm f/1.0 @ f/1.2 and the other shot with the 50mm f/1.2 @ 1.2. Tell us which is which. Post 1 of 3. 2 more parts to follow.
__________________
DAVID ALAN DARBY // MAC CONVERT // Raging and unapologetic L'coholic constantly Striving To Measure Up to the Quality of My Gear! Too Many Bodies, Way Too Much Glass, Not Enough Time . . . BUY THE BEST, BUY IT ONCE, GO TAKE PICTURES! Last edited by dfindr : 28th of February 2008 (Thu) at 01:51. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
I say first one is f/1.0L and second is f/1.2L
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| super fast spider...... | MrEd | Macro | 4 | 11th of June 2007 (Mon) 10:34 |
| New 'super-fast' CF cards pointless? | sando | Accessories & Storage | 18 | 24th of January 2007 (Wed) 13:10 |
| WTB: Canon Zoom Super Wide Angle EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Autofocus Lens | StealthLude | Classifieds: Buy | 0 | 15th of November 2006 (Wed) 19:23 |
| 300D plus USM... fast enough for motorsports? | Lens or Camera? | KevC | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 8 | 20th of June 2006 (Tue) 17:52 |
| Canon Zoom Super Wide Angle EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Autofocus Lens | mal | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 6 | 7th of April 2005 (Thu) 07:12 |