Canon Digital Photography Forums  

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Equipment Talk' section > Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11th of March 2008 (Tue)   #1
TripleOne
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 35
Default 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Macro

I already have the 50 1.8. Now considering of either disposing the 1.8 and get the 1.4 or keep the 1.8 and get the 60 macro. What i'm looking for in those 2 lenses are sharpness and bokeh. With my 50 1.8, sometimes i get very nice pics but sometimes not, especially in low light.

Both the 1.4 and Macro will be used mainly as potrait lens but i also want to do some close up/macro like flowers and other tiny subject but not insects (the too close working distance for the 60 2.8 doesnt bother me)

Anybody got sample pics of 50 1.4 @ 2.8 vs the EFS 60 @ 2.8? I want to compare the sharpness and which one got creamier bokeh?

I prefer those 50/60 mm focal length, so the 85 1.8 or Tamron SP90/EF100mm macro are out of question
TripleOne is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 13th of March 2008 (Thu)   #2
TripleOne
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 35
Default Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Macro

Anyone?
TripleOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th of March 2008 (Thu)   #3
silvex
Cream of the Crop
 
silvex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 7,226
Default Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Macro

I would then get the EF-S 60 due to your interest in macro. It is one of canon's sharpest lens.
__________________
.
-Ed
CPS Gold Member.
Canon Gear
SilvexPhoto.com
silvex is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 13th of March 2008 (Thu)   #4
TripleOne
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 35
Default Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Macro

Quote:
Originally Posted by silvex View Post
I would then get the EF-S 60 due to your interest in macro. It is one of canon's sharpest lens.
Thanks, anymore input from others?
TripleOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th of March 2008 (Thu)   #5
basroil
Cream of the Crop
 
basroil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
Posts: 8,015
Default Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Macro

50 1.4@2.8 is marginally sharper than 60 @2.8 . the best thing you can do is keep the 50 and buy the 50, and then take a screwdriver to the 1.8 version. you switch the mount around and then you have a fully functional super macro lens. i've seen the instructions posted in a really old thread, so it's doable.
__________________
I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List
basroil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th of March 2008 (Thu)   #6
Sfordphoto
Goldmember
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,564
Default Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Macro

If you're going to do macro work, no question, get the 60mm
__________________
Gear
Sfordphoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th of March 2008 (Thu)   #7
n1as
Goldmember
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: VT
Posts: 2,213
Default Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Macro

I have both. I've shot comparison shots and the 60 is very sharp wide open. I'm on the wrong computer right now so I can't look at the photos so I'll do this from memory.

At distances below 20 feet or so, the 60 is noticeably sharper than the 50 at apertures of f/4 and faster. At long (landscape) distances the 50 is equal to the 60 but you have to be stopped down to 5.6 to see it.

So, for sharpness, the 60 beats the 50 at wide apertures.

Focus speed of the 60 is pretty fast. I shot a basketball game with it and it focused as fast and accurate as the 50 does. Pretty impressive for a "macro".

I was --> <-- this close to selling the 50 f/1.4 and just using the 60 but the shallow DOF of the 50 gives it a capability that the 60 can't match.

My 50 is currently at Canon to address front focus and softness wide open. We'll see how it does when I get it back. When I did my focus tests, I was using manual focus in live view (40D) since I knew the 50 was front focusing a bit.
__________________
- Keith -

http://darwinphoto.zenfolio.com

n1as is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th of March 2008 (Sun)   #8
silvex
Cream of the Crop
 
silvex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 7,226
Default Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Macro

Try this 50f1.4 vs 60f/2.8 macro

http://the-digital-picture.com/Revie...=0&FLI=0&API=2
__________________
.
-Ed
CPS Gold Member.
Canon Gear
SilvexPhoto.com
silvex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th of March 2008 (Sun)   #9
sebr
Goldmember
 
sebr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sweden/France
Posts: 4,565
Default Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Macro

I have never owned the 60 macro, but the 50/1.4 is my most used lens. I was also hesitating between the 50 and the 60, but was convinced to get the 50 on this forum and I am glad I got the 50.
The wider max. aperture of the 50 makes a huge difference in terms of light and bokeh, and as a result the 50 is a much better portraits. It does not offer 1:1 magnification, but it works well for flowers.
__________________
Sebastien
5D mkIII ; 17-40L ; 24-105L ; 70-200L II ; 70-300L ; 35L ; Σ85/1.4 ; 135L ; 100macro ; Kenko 1.4x ; 2x mkIII ; 580EXII
M ; 22/2.0 STM ; EF adapter ; G7 X
Benron Tripod; ThinkTank, Lowepro and Crumpler bags; Fjällräven backpack
sebr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th of March 2008 (Sun)   #10
therealmr
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 517
Default Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Macro

The bokeh of the 50 f/1.4 at f/2.2, coupled with sharpness is amazing. Since you're going to be using it for portraits - you won't be dissappointed

Sorry to say I don't have a comparison between it and the 60mm macro.
therealmr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th of March 2008 (Sun)   #11
EcoRick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,863
Default Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Macro

I have both lenses. I suggest you get the 60 2.8 since you already have the 50mm range covered. They're both great lenses, however the macro feature of the 60mm makes it a fun lens.
__________________
Gear: Canon 1Ds MkII, 35L, 85L, 135L, 24-105L
EcoRick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th of March 2008 (Sun)   #12
Rubberhead
Senior Member
 
Rubberhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Carolina's Lowcountry
Posts: 1,898
Default Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Macro

slivex,
Great comparison. The 60mm EF-S was taken on a 30D, while the 50 f/1.4 was taken on a Mark II. I switched to the XTi for the 60mm EF-S and the comparison actually favors the EF-S lens.

TripleOne,
At or above about f/2.0, the IQ of the 50mm f/1.8 and 50mm f/1.4 are about identical. Neither is very sharp wide open.

I'd suggest keeping the 1.8 and getting the 60mm f/2.8.
__________________
EQUIPMENT: 40D | Rebel XT | EF 70-200mm f/4L IS | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 28-135mm IS | EF-S 18-55mm IS | EF 50mm 1.8 - flickr
Rubberhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th of March 2008 (Mon)   #13
TripleOne
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 35
Default Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Macro

Thanks guys for the tips. I'm more towards the 60mm now.

N1as & Ecorick, is the EFS 60's focusing fast for non-macro shot?
TripleOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of January 2010 (Wed)   #14
ontopofm
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 300
Default Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Macro

sorry to bring this thread back but do you guys put a UV filter on either of these lenses? or the 85mm f1.8?
ontopofm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of January 2010 (Wed)   #15
silvex
Cream of the Crop
 
silvex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 7,226
Default Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Macro

IMHO UV filters are just a gimmick by salesmen. I used to fall for that but not anymore. There are lots of threads about filters vs no-filters.
__________________
.
-Ed
CPS Gold Member.
Canon Gear
SilvexPhoto.com
silvex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CANON Macro Ring Lite MR-14EX + sigma 150mm macro Bushman Small Flash and Studio Lighting 0 7th of October 2007 (Sun) 21:36
Macro Lens without Macro, Help! (Tamron AF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 LD Macro Autofocus) janapriya Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 6 21st of May 2007 (Mon) 22:47
Sigma 150 macro verses canon 100 usm macro cougar37 Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 11 21st of March 2006 (Tue) 13:19
EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro vs. EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro vs. EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro mephetic436 Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 10 27th of November 2005 (Sun) 14:22
Macro Work $ Lens Options. 70-200 IS, 100mm Macro, 100-400L MadMesh Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 4 8th of August 2005 (Mon) 12:00


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:46.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.