Index  •   • New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 11 Mar 2008 (Tuesday) 23:01
PREV/NEXT

50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Macro

 
TripleOne
Member
35 posts
Joined Jun 2007
MORE INFO

I already have the 50 1.8. Now considering of either disposing the 1.8 and get the 1.4 or keep the 1.8 and get the 60 macro. What i'm looking for in those 2 lenses are sharpness and bokeh. With my 50 1.8, sometimes i get very nice pics but sometimes not, especially in low light.

Both the 1.4 and Macro will be used mainly as potrait lens but i also want to do some close up/macro like flowers and other tiny subject but not insects (the too close working distance for the 60 2.8 doesnt bother me)

Anybody got sample pics of 50 1.4 @ 2.8 vs the EFS 60 @ 2.8? I want to compare the sharpness and which one got creamier bokeh?

I prefer those 50/60 mm focal length, so the 85 1.8 or Tamron SP90/EF100mm macro are out of question

Mar 11, 2008 23:01



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
TripleOne
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
35 posts
Joined Jun 2007
MORE INFO

???Anyone?

Mar 13, 2008 01:51



LOG IN TO REPLY
silvex
Cream of the Crop
silvex's Avatar
7,250 posts

Joined Sep 2006

Southern California, USA
MORE INFO

I would then get the EF-S 60 due to your interest in macro. It is one of canon's sharpest lens.

Mar 13, 2008 02:02

.
-Ed
CPS Platinum Member.
Canon Gear
SilvexPhoto.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
TripleOne
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
35 posts
Joined Jun 2007
MORE INFO

silvex wrote in post #5105662external link
I would then get the EF-S 60 due to your interest in macro. It is one of canon's sharpest lens.

Thanks, anymore input from others?

Mar 13, 2008 10:24



LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
basroil's Avatar
8,015 posts

Joined Mar 2006

STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
MORE INFO

50 1.4@2.8 is marginally sharper than 60 @2.8 . the best thing you can do is keep the 50 and buy the 50, and then take a screwdriver to the 1.8 version. you switch the mount around and then you have a fully functional super macro lens. i've seen the instructions posted in a really old thread, so it's doable.

Mar 13, 2008 10:30

I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Sfordphoto
Goldmember
2,564 posts
Joined Feb 2008
MORE INFO

If you're going to do macro work, no question, get the 60mm

Mar 13, 2008 13:49

Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
n1as
Goldmember
2,213 posts
Joined Oct 2007

VT
MORE INFO

I have both. I've shot comparison shots and the 60 is very sharp wide open. I'm on the wrong computer right now so I can't look at the photos so I'll do this from memory.

At distances below 20 feet or so, the 60 is noticeably sharper than the 50 at apertures of f/4 and faster. At long (landscape) distances the 50 is equal to the 60 but you have to be stopped down to 5.6 to see it.

So, for sharpness, the 60 beats the 50 at wide apertures.

Focus speed of the 60 is pretty fast. I shot a basketball game with it and it focused as fast and accurate as the 50 does. Pretty impressive for a "macro".

I was --> <-- this close to selling the 50 f/1.4 and just using the 60 but the shallow DOF of the 50 gives it a capability that the 60 can't match.

My 50 is currently at Canon to address front focus and softness wide open. We'll see how it does when I get it back. When I did my focus tests, I was using manual focus in live view (40D) since I knew the 50 was front focusing a bit.

Mar 13, 2008 16:29 as a reply to Sfordphoto's post 2 hours earlier.

- Keith -
http://darwinphoto.zen​folio.comexternal link
http://www.darwinphoto​vt.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
silvex
Cream of the Crop
silvex's Avatar
7,250 posts

Joined Sep 2006

Southern California, USA
MORE INFO

Try this 50f1.4 vs 60f/2.8 macro

http://the-digital-picture.com ...&SampleComp=0&FLI=0​&API=2external link

Mar 16, 2008 17:45

.
-Ed
CPS Platinum Member.
Canon Gear
SilvexPhoto.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sebr
Goldmember
sebr's Avatar
4,624 posts

Joined Jan 2007

Sweden/France
MORE INFO

I have never owned the 60 macro, but the 50/1.4 is my most used lens. I was also hesitating between the 50 and the 60, but was convinced to get the 50 on this forum and I am glad I got the 50.
The wider max. aperture of the 50 makes a huge difference in terms of light and bokeh, and as a result the 50 is a much better portraits. It does not offer 1:1 magnification, but it works well for flowers.

Mar 16, 2008 19:04

Sebastien
5D mkIII ; 17-40L ; 24-105L ; 70-200L II ; 70-300L ; 35L ; Σ85/1.4 ; 135L ; 100macro ; Kenko 1.4x ; 2x mkIII ; 580EXII
M ; 22/2.0 ; EF adapter
Benron Tripod; ThinkTank, Lowepro and Crumpler bags; Fjällräven backpack

LOG IN TO REPLY
therealmr
Senior Member
519 posts
Joined Feb 2008
MORE INFO

The bokeh of the 50 f/1.4 at f/2.2, coupled with sharpness is amazing. Since you're going to be using it for portraits - you won't be dissappointed

Sorry to say I don't have a comparison between it and the 60mm macro.

Mar 16, 2008 19:17

http://www.simkinsphot​ography.com/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
EcoRick
Goldmember
1,863 posts
Joined Nov 2006

Chicago, IL
MORE INFO

I have both lenses. I suggest you get the 60 2.8 since you already have the 50mm range covered. They're both great lenses, however the macro feature of the 60mm makes it a fun lens.

Mar 16, 2008 22:02 as a reply to therealmr's post 2 hours earlier.

Gear: Canon 1Ds MkII, 35L, 85L, 135L, 24-105L

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Rubberhead
Goldmember
Rubberhead's Avatar
1,899 posts

Joined Feb 2006

South Carolina's Lowcountry
MORE INFO

slivex,
Great comparison. The 60mm EF-S was taken on a 30D, while the 50 f/1.4 was taken on a Mark II. I switched to the XTi for the 60mm EF-S and the comparison actually favors the EF-S lens.

TripleOne,
At or above about f/2.0, the IQ of the 50mm f/1.8 and 50mm f/1.4 are about identical. Neither is very sharp wide open.

I'd suggest keeping the 1.8 and getting the 60mm f/2.8.

Mar 16, 2008 22:22

EQUIPMENT: 40D | Rebel XT | EF 70-200mm f/4L IS | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 28-135mm IS | EF-S 18-55mm IS | EF 50mm 1.8 - flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
TripleOne
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
35 posts
Joined Jun 2007
MORE INFO

Thanks guys for the tips. I'm more towards the 60mm now.

N1as & Ecorick, is the EFS 60's focusing fast for non-macro shot?

Mar 17, 2008 04:25



LOG IN TO REPLY
ontopofm
Senior Member
300 posts
Joined Aug 2009

CA
MORE INFO

sorry to bring this thread back but do you guys put a UV filter on either of these lenses? or the 85mm f1.8?

Jan 06, 2010 00:41

Phuc
Flickrexternal link
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
silvex
Cream of the Crop
silvex's Avatar
7,250 posts

Joined Sep 2006

Southern California, USA
MORE INFO

IMHO UV filters are just a gimmick by salesmen. I used to fall for that but not anymore. There are lots of threads about filters vs no-filters.

Jan 06, 2010 00:56

.
-Ed
CPS Platinum Member.
Canon Gear
SilvexPhoto.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY

3,554 views & 0 likes for this thread
50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Macro
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF    •   JUMP TO FORUM    •   FORUM RULES    •   Index    •   New Posts    •   RTAT    •   "Best Of"    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.1version 1.1
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00128 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is stonycreekphoto
925 guests, 720 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014