LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Exposing To The Right

FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk
Thread started 12 Mar 2008 (Wednesday) 18:34   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
Amfetamyne
Senior Member
Amfetamyne's Avatar
Joined Aug 2007
113 posts
New York City
[MORE/SHARE]

OK people, you've been instrumental in helping me become a better photographer, so I'm coming to the well yet again.

Having read "Understanding Exposure" (among others) and just finishing Ansel Adams "The Negative," I'm taking much better shots, and actually thinking about the artistic quality of what I'm trying to capture. But a new wrinkle has appeared.

Exposing to the right....

So, thusfar, I've been exposing to get my histograms looking more like a bell curve, rather than bunched to one side or another, but I've been reading here about "exposing to the right" to increase my camera's dynamic range and thus getting better, lower-noise photos at all ISOs.

Here's my question: generally, how do you properly set up one's exposure to achieve a proper right-biased shot?

And since I shoot RAW exclusively, how would I even know when I'm properly shooting the image, exposed to the right, since the histogram as I understand it, is based off of a jpeg conversion of the shot taken?

Little help in demystifying this for me.

Thanks y'all!

Post #1, Mar 12, 2008 18:34:06


Canon EOS-1Ds Mk II | EOS-5D | EOS-1DMkII | EF 17-40 f/4L | EF 28-70 f/2.8L | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM | EF100mm Macro f/2.8 | EF 50 f/1.8 MkII | Speedlite 580ex II | RS80-N3
blogexternal link | flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
dekalbSTEEL
Goldmember
dekalbSTEEL's Avatar
Joined Feb 2007
1,793 posts
NIU town, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=66836

Post #2, Mar 12, 2008 21:35:32


Grippy 30D, Tokina 300f4, Sigma 18-50f2.8, Canon 70-200f4L, thrifty50mkI, PM7500DX
Jon Gee Photography.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Amfetamyne
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Amfetamyne's Avatar
Joined Aug 2007
113 posts
New York City
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks, but I saw that thread. Sadly, it didn't help me. It was very theoretical. And focused (to me at least) on the "why's" rather than the "hows."

Post #3, Mar 12, 2008 21:54:54


Canon EOS-1Ds Mk II | EOS-5D | EOS-1DMkII | EF 17-40 f/4L | EF 28-70 f/2.8L | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM | EF100mm Macro f/2.8 | EF 50 f/1.8 MkII | Speedlite 580ex II | RS80-N3
blogexternal link | flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ronmayhew
Goldmember
ronmayhew's Avatar
Joined Feb 2005
1,475 posts
Gainesville, Georgia, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

This may be too simple of an answer, but I just make my histogram fill the window as far to the right as possible without getting any clipping, i.e. running off of the right side of the graph.
Do this by increasing exposure, lower shutter speed, open apperature or increase ISO as needed for the effect desired.
(I'm still a newb too!)
Additional adjustments to the right, or left are then made in Adobe Camera Raw and CS3.

Post #4, Mar 12, 2008 22:18:41


flickrexternal link
Canon: 40D, 16-35L, 50mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.8, 100mm f/2.0, 75-300mm IS, 35-350L :cool:, 135mm f/2.0L, Pro9000 .
Sigma: 70-200mm f/2.8; Alien Bees: B1600
Tamron: 17-50mm, 28-75mm, 90mm fMacro,

LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
tzalman's Avatar
Joined Apr 2005
12,598 posts
Gesher Haziv, Israel
[MORE/SHARE]

Amfetamyne wrote in post #5103305external link
Here's my question: generally, how do you properly set up one's exposure to achieve a proper right-biased shot?

And since I shoot RAW exclusively, how would I even know when I'm properly shooting the image, exposed to the right, since the histogram as I understand it, is based off of a jpeg conversion of the shot taken?

Little help in demystifying this for me.

Thanks y'all!

You need to do a little research on your camera. First download this application, Rawnalyze, which will show you a histogram of the RAW file:
http://www.cryptobola.​com/PhotoBola/Rawnalyz​eGuide.htmexternal link
Then shoot a series of shots with gradually increasing exposure. Copy them to the computer and then compare the camera's histogram and "blinkie" display to Rawnanalyze. You will learn how much jpg clipping is still within the extra headroom of the RAW. Also, if you have a camera that shows separate color channel histograms, you will notice that the green channel most resembles the RAW. That is because the white balancing of the jpg pushs the values of the red and blue channels up, sometimes to the point of clipping, while the green is relatively unchanged.

Post #5, Mar 13, 2008 07:01:38


Elie / אלי
I look at the world and I notice it's turning, while my guitar gently weeps.
With every mistake we must surely be learning, still my guitar gently weeps.
Paul Harrison
Siteexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Amfetamyne
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Amfetamyne's Avatar
Joined Aug 2007
113 posts
New York City
[MORE/SHARE]

tzalman wrote in post #5106463external link
You need to do a little research on your camera. First download this application, Rawnalyze, which will show you a histogram of the RAW file:
http://www.cryptobola.​com/PhotoBola/Rawnalyz​eGuide.htmexternal link
Then shoot a series of shots with gradually increasing exposure. Copy them to the computer and then compare the camera's histogram and "blinkie" display to Rawnanalyze. You will learn how much jpg clipping is still within the extra headroom of the RAW. Also, if you have a camera that shows separate color channel histograms, you will notice that the green channel most resembles the RAW. That is because the white balancing of the jpg pushs the values of the red and blue channels up, sometimes to the point of clipping, while the green is relatively unchanged.

Thank you for that very useful piece of advice! I'm going to download that package today...

Along those same lines, you're saying that the green channel more accurately represents the the histogram for the RAW capture for a given image? I have a 1DmkII, so I can definitely look at the RGB histogram instead of the brightness one going forward.

Post #6, Mar 13, 2008 09:31:46


Canon EOS-1Ds Mk II | EOS-5D | EOS-1DMkII | EF 17-40 f/4L | EF 28-70 f/2.8L | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM | EF100mm Macro f/2.8 | EF 50 f/1.8 MkII | Speedlite 580ex II | RS80-N3
blogexternal link | flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
tzalman's Avatar
Joined Apr 2005
12,598 posts
Gesher Haziv, Israel
[MORE/SHARE]

Amfetamyne wrote in post #5107161external link
Thank you for that very useful piece of advice! I'm going to download that package today...

Along those same lines, you're saying that the green channel more accurately represents the the histogram for the RAW capture for a given image? I have a 1DmkII, so I can definitely look at the RGB histogram instead of the brightness one going forward.

The sensor array is less sensitive to red and blue than to green. With most light sources which are a mixture of wavelengths, the green filtered pixels get more exposure and are, therefore, the first ones to reach saturation. (The exceptions are monochromatic light sources, like lasers, or light reflected off an object that has a highly saturated primary color - a red rose, for instance, reflects relatively little green or blue light.) To compensate for this uneven spectral response a typical white balance for sunlight might apply these multipliers: Rx2.0, Gx1.05 and Bx1.4. The green is hardly touched. During RAW conversion, you can prevent the WB from causing clipping by reducing "exposure" and boosting the middle and shadow tones with "fill light" or an adjustment curve, if neccessary.

Post #7, Mar 13, 2008 10:10:16


Elie / אלי
I look at the world and I notice it's turning, while my guitar gently weeps.
With every mistake we must surely be learning, still my guitar gently weeps.
Paul Harrison
Siteexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
tdodd
Goldmember
tdodd's Avatar
Joined Jun 2006
3,729 posts
Essex, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

Amfetamyne wrote in post #5103305external link
And since I shoot RAW exclusively, how would I even know when I'm properly shooting the image, exposed to the right, since the histogram as I understand it, is based off of a jpeg conversion of the shot taken?

Little help in demystifying this for me.

Thanks y'all!

It is based off the embedded jpeg image, but you have some control over how useful and accurate that jpeg will be for producing a "raw" histogram. Very simply, shoot with Neutral picture style and leave all adjustments for sharpness/contrast/sat​uration at defaults. That way the jpeg will not be artificially "enhanced" to look so much like the butchered mess that a "Standard", or God forbid, "Landscape" jpeg becomes.

EDIT : Also, make sure you use the RGB histogram, to check whether you've blown a single colour channel without blowing the others. Don't bother with the "brightness" histogram.

Post #8, Mar 13, 2008 10:11:48




LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Moderator
PhotosGuy's Avatar
Joined Feb 2004
69,108 posts
S. E. Michigan
[MORE/SHARE]

Technically, "Expose to the right" is the way to bump up exposure for subjects that aren't "bright", like maybe a dark blue flower in a mostly green background:
exposing to the right question.

I shoot a lot of cars with bright chrome that has highlights that I don't want to keep, so I use this & allow those highlights, but not all highlights, to blow out.
Need an exposure crutch?

Understanding Histogramsexternal link

A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO INTERPRETING RGB HISTOGRAMSexternal link

Post #9, Mar 13, 2008 10:19:56


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1280 pixels on any side.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Amfetamyne
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Amfetamyne's Avatar
Joined Aug 2007
113 posts
New York City
[MORE/SHARE]

Thank you all very much!! I'm going to try to digest the info that you've provided me...There's a lot to learn!

Post #10, Mar 14, 2008 14:17:56 as a reply to PhotosGuy's post 1 day earlier.


Canon EOS-1Ds Mk II | EOS-5D | EOS-1DMkII | EF 17-40 f/4L | EF 28-70 f/2.8L | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM | EF100mm Macro f/2.8 | EF 50 f/1.8 MkII | Speedlite 580ex II | RS80-N3
blogexternal link | flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Wilt is an old fart who has extensive experience with many brands and many formats of cameras, and extensive lighting knowledge of both studio lighting and speedlights
Wilt's Avatar
Joined Aug 2005
33,492 posts
SF Bay area, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

After giving thought to the previous 'expose to the right' points, consider this very important spin-off after your read of The Exposure...

If a scene has more dynamic range than can be captured in your digital image (or film), YOU have to decide if you will sacrifice highlight details in order to capture shadow detail, or if you will sacrifice shadow details in order to capture highlight detail, or something in between. To simply 'shoot to the right' blindly assumes that the scene all fits within the dyamic range of the sensor, but it well may not fit!

So that is where Adam's concepts of exposure come into play. YOU pick the levels that are important to retain, then choose your exposure to meet those needs, and to hell with the lost shadows and lost highlights (or hope that you can get back some of the range in post processing RAW...but keep in mind a lost highlight cannot be recovered even in PP)

Post #11, Mar 14, 2008 14:51:58


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost!
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention
Keep POTN alive and well with member support http://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)


LIST NEARBY THREADS
941 views & 0 likes for this thread
Exposing To The Right
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00289 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
868 guests, 564 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is ozaero

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.