Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Wildlife
Thread started 12 Mar 2008 (Wednesday) 20:15
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Horse photo For C&C

 
digirebelva
Goldmember
digirebelva's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
Appomattox, Virginia
Mar 12, 2008 20:15 |  #1

I actually submitted this photo to a stock site and it was turned down. Reason given was
Reason: Blurry: Image is not very crisp or is blurred when viewed at full size
Is it just me or are they not looking at the same image

here is the link to the full size image
http://i272.photobucke​t.com ...186/spudmiser/Musta​ng.jpg (external link)

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.

When it ceases to be fun, it will be time to walk away
Website (external link) | Fine Art America (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
nwyman
Cream of the Crop
nwyman's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
Maryland Eastern Shore
Mar 12, 2008 21:43 |  #2

it looks nice and sharp to me (but I'm not really all that qualified). Did they have some requirement as to .dpi? Any of the contests or things like that that I've seen usually request a dpi of 300 or so, so they can reproduce the shot in print.


EOS 6D, SX50HS, Tamron 150-600
C&C welcome and invited

LOG IN TO REPLY
catacon
Senior Member
348 posts
Joined Mar 2008
St. Louis, MO
Mar 12, 2008 22:06 as a reply to nwyman's post |  #3

Looks pretty nice to me.


5DmkII | Gripped 5DC | Canon 17-40mm f/4L | Σ 85 f/1.4 | Σ 50 f/1.4 | 430EX II

No power in this verse can stop me!

LOG IN TO REPLY
ronmayhew
Goldmember
ronmayhew's Avatar
1,476 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Gainesville, Georgia, USA
Mar 12, 2008 22:42 |  #4

Well, the background is pretty blurry.


flickrexternal link
Canon: 40D, 16-35L, 50mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.8, 100mm f/2.0, 75-300mm IS, 35-350L :cool:, 135mm f/2.0L, Pro9000 .
Sigma: 70-200mm f/2.8; Alien Bees: B1600
Tamron: 17-50mm, 28-75mm, 90mm fMacro,

LOG IN TO REPLY
digirebelva
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
digirebelva's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
Appomattox, Virginia
Mar 13, 2008 05:14 as a reply to ronmayhew's post |  #5

The background should be blurry, so the main subject pops at you.


EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.

When it ceases to be fun, it will be time to walk away
Website (external link) | Fine Art America (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
mdw
Senior Member
mdw's Avatar
486 posts
Joined Mar 2008
The Netherlands
Mar 13, 2008 06:12 |  #6

Yeah, it seems sharp. But somehow, when I look at the picture in full size, it is strange to look at. I think its the composition and the way the horse looks, but it doesn't feel comfortable to look at the picture.

Edit: I keep looking at the spot just below and behind his ear, which is not as sharp as the eye and should have attracted all the attention.

Not sure if I made my point here... :-|


Roger
Copyright © PixelBalance Photographyexternal link
My photos are not stock

Canon 50D l Canon 70-200mm f/4L l 50mm f/1.8 l Canon 100mm f/2.8 l Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 XR DI II LD

LOG IN TO REPLY
cleverer
Senior Member
cleverer's Avatar
254 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Southern pines, nc
Mar 13, 2008 17:18 |  #7

<s>hmmm...i'll dissent, it looks terribly soft to me. Look specifically up at the eye--there should be much more definition there.</s>
Cute pony though!

ETA: did not click on the original, I'll agree with everybody else :)


Facebookexternal link| Webexternal link | Instagramexternal link | Exclusively Canon

LOG IN TO REPLY
JEDprime
Senior Member
253 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Dawson Creek, British Columbia, Canada
Mar 13, 2008 18:38 as a reply to cleverer's post |  #8

It seems soft to me. DOF too shallow maybe?


Music and Photography
http://www.jasonedward​dudley.com/external link
http://www.alamy.com ...D07/1/Jason%20Dudle​y.htmlexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
jra
Cream of the Crop
jra's Avatar
6,491 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Ohio
Mar 13, 2008 20:00 |  #9

Interesting...my first thought when I looked at the pic (before even readying what you typed) was that the photo was out of focus. Upon closer examination, I guess it's really not that bad...maybe could use a dose of sharpening. On the other hand, I agree with the above post that suggests that the photo is somehow "strange" to look at. I think it has something to do with the angle of the horses head and the composition.....it just doesn't seem "right"


Jason
www.secondglimpse.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
poloman
Cream of the Crop
poloman's Avatar
5,442 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Southern Illinois
Mar 13, 2008 21:05 |  #10

Did you send them a link to the full sized image or the downsized image. The larger image is a lot better. It is still a really small image.
I think there is a bit of motion blur in it.
No surprise as your shutter speed of 1/100 is not really very fast for your focal length of 70mm.
Doing a high pass sharpening really helped the image...


"All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my right hand!" Steven Wright

LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosByCynthia
Member
PhotosByCynthia's Avatar
139 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Medford, Wisconsin
Mar 13, 2008 21:10 as a reply to poloman's post |  #11

It appears to be blurry to me as well. My eyes kind of feel strained trying to focus on it.


Cynthia Johnson
Canon 20D, 40D, Canon 100mm 1:2.8, Canon 70-200mm 1:2.8 L IS USM, Canon 75-300mm 1:4-5.6, Canon 28-135mm 1:3.5-5.6 IS, Canon 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6
My Websiteexternal link ~ My Galleryexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
digirebelva
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
digirebelva's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
Appomattox, Virginia
Mar 19, 2008 08:56 |  #12

Thanks for the comments guts and gals..I just wanted to see if it was them or me...appears to be me...so I will try the high pass sharpening as was mentioned and see how much it helps...Again thanks for the C&C


EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.

When it ceases to be fun, it will be time to walk away
Website (external link) | Fine Art America (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
cesstrelle
Senior Member
cesstrelle's Avatar
322 posts
Joined Jan 2005
SW Florida
Mar 19, 2008 11:51 |  #13

It appears fairly sharp in the linked version, but not sure what the requirements of the site are....it could use a smidgen of sharpening though in my opinion. Also, do you have a shot where both of his ears are forward? The way this was shot gives the horse a nervous appearance, maybe worried about the camera or something behind him. Although when people are looking for stock photos they look for all kinds....and this could be something someone is looking for....But usually the shots that sell have the horse looking alert with both ears forward. Hope this helps :)


Heatherexternal link
Canon 7D, Canon 6D, Canon 50D, Canon XTi, 100-400 f4/5.6 USM IS L, 100mm 2.8 macro, 18-55mm kit lens, 10-22mm, 50mm 1.4

LOG IN TO REPLY
Billiie
Senior Member
441 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Mar 19, 2008 17:51 as a reply to cesstrelle's post |  #14

Hmm.. it's sharp in the linked version, but not the attached one.


Every time someone tells me how sharp my photos are, I assume that it isn't a very interesting photograph. If it were, they would have more to say. ~Author Unknown

LOG IN TO REPLY
digirebelva
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
digirebelva's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
Appomattox, Virginia
Mar 19, 2008 20:40 |  #15

Billiie wrote in post #5150131external link
Hmm.. it's sharp in the linked version, but not the attached one.

Thats because I had to cut it down so much to get the forum to accept it..Lost a bit of quality wouldnt you say..

For future reference, what max. size can I submit that will be correctly reduced by the forum when submitted?


EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.

When it ceases to be fun, it will be time to walk away
Website (external link) | Fine Art America (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,510 views & 0 likes for this thread
Horse photo For C&C
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Wildlife


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00253 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is alessandro
925 guests, 437 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016