Index  •   • New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing
Thread started 23 Mar 2008 (Sunday) 22:32
PREV/NEXT

Good image size for the web?

 
dakota367
Member
108 posts
Joined Nov 2007

Cameron Park, Ca
MORE INFO

Im using a 40D and I am uploading my images as jpegs to gallery2, what is an appropriate images size and quality.

Thanks,
Dakota Knutson

Mar 23, 2008 22:32

DKP

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
dakota367
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
108 posts
Joined Nov 2007

Cameron Park, Ca
MORE INFO

no ideas...

Mar 23, 2008 22:38

DKP

LOG IN TO REPLY
dakota367
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
108 posts
Joined Nov 2007

Cameron Park, Ca
MORE INFO

bump?

Mar 23, 2008 23:23

DKP

LOG IN TO REPLY
andrew748
Goldmember
andrew748's Avatar
1,365 posts

Joined Jan 2008

Surrey
MORE INFO

what's gallery 2?

do they have an faq?

for here i like to keep to 800 x 600

Mar 23, 2008 23:24

www.andrew748.comexternal link
drawers full of slightly mouldy Leica kit, a couple of newish Japanese bits, nearly every cheap Chinese flash modifying toy ever sold on ebay and sooooo many batteries the TSA have me on a no fly list ;)

LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
tim's Avatar
49,604 posts

Joined Nov 2004

Wellington, New Zealand
MORE INFO

Geez have some patience. Try 1000x666, or 500x333 if you don't want people to make a good print from the web. Keep files around 100kb if you can.

Mar 23, 2008 23:30

NZIPP Qualified Professional wedding photographer.
Wellington Wedding Photographerexternal link ~ Camera and Lens Reviewsexternal link ~ Photographers Tech Supportexternal link
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
xairsoft808x
Member
192 posts
Joined Dec 2007

Honolulu, Hawaii
MORE INFO

tim wrote in post #5177795external link
Geez have some patience. Try 1000x666, or 500x333 if you don't want people to make a good print from the web. Keep files around 100kb if you can.

wow really 100kb? hmm i guess i could compress my stuff more huh?

Mar 24, 2008 00:12

-Chad

Gear Bag
My Siteexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
tim's Avatar
49,604 posts

Joined Nov 2004

Wellington, New Zealand
MORE INFO

Well maybe a bit more for 1000 pixels wide. Just keep it small enough that it downloads reasonably quickly. The easiest way to reduce file size is to include less pixels in the image.

Mar 24, 2008 00:18

NZIPP Qualified Professional wedding photographer.
Wellington Wedding Photographerexternal link ~ Camera and Lens Reviewsexternal link ~ Photographers Tech Supportexternal link
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Ved
Junior Member
20 posts
Joined Feb 2008
MORE INFO

You could opt for the bigger and include a watermark too, if it's for potential buyers?

Mar 24, 2008 03:20 as a reply to tim's post 3 hours earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
xairsoft808x
Member
192 posts
Joined Dec 2007

Honolulu, Hawaii
MORE INFO

well yeah i do put the pics up for purchase on smug so i ve been compressing to ~500kb

Mar 24, 2008 03:29

-Chad

Gear Bag
My Siteexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
tim's Avatar
49,604 posts

Joined Nov 2004

Wellington, New Zealand
MORE INFO

If they're going to be printed then that's an entirely different scenario.

Mar 24, 2008 03:58

NZIPP Qualified Professional wedding photographer.
Wellington Wedding Photographerexternal link ~ Camera and Lens Reviewsexternal link ~ Photographers Tech Supportexternal link
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

LOG IN TO REPLY
bildeb0rg
Goldmember
bildeb0rg's Avatar
1,793 posts

Joined Oct 2006

uk
MORE INFO

dakota367 wrote in post #5177521external link
Im using a 40D and I am uploading my images as jpegs to gallery2, what is an appropriate images size and quality.

Thanks,
Dakota Knutson

If they are right click protected (smugmug pro) then hurl them up as big as you like. You're unlikely to run out of space. If you are worried about people "stealing" them off your site/host then go 640x480 at around 100mb. Or even watermark them if you are really concerned.

Mar 24, 2008 05:19



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
tim
Light Bringer
tim's Avatar
49,604 posts

Joined Nov 2004

Wellington, New Zealand
MORE INFO

If someone can see something they can print it. Well, I can. Watermarks are the most effective way I think.

Mar 24, 2008 05:38

NZIPP Qualified Professional wedding photographer.
Wellington Wedding Photographerexternal link ~ Camera and Lens Reviewsexternal link ~ Photographers Tech Supportexternal link
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

LOG IN TO REPLY
John_B
Cream of the Crop
John_B's Avatar
6,766 posts
GALLERY: 3 photos
Joined Sep 2006

Hawaii
MORE INFO

dakota367,
Of course its up to you :)

I personally have my photos around 600 x 400px which on average looks like a 4 x 6" on monitors. Any larger and people with low resolution monitors or slow internet connections (yes they still exist) will suffer. Also larger files are easier to print and break copyright laws.

I agree with tim in that watermarks/signatures are the best way to protect your photos. Sites like SmugMug are easy to steal photos by just turning off javascript setting in your internet browser.

Mar 24, 2008 06:38

60D, 40D, Lenses and Accessories & DMC-ZS40 <-- click to seeexternal link
JohnBdigital.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Keith ­ R
Goldmember
2,856 posts
Joined Aug 2006

Blyth, Northumberland, NE England
MORE INFO

A real "how long is a piece of string"?" question.

It depends on what you're shooting, what your intentions for your Gallery are, how it is laid out, who the target audience is... and so on.

You might also want to look at the forum rules about bumping messages...

Mar 24, 2008 09:26



LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan-o
Goldmember
Dan-o's Avatar
3,531 posts

Joined Apr 2006

So. Cal.
MORE INFO

If they are right click protected (smugmug pro) then hurl them up as big as you like

I wouldn't recommended relying on this. Try "Print Screen" with a full size image from Smug. Paste into CS3 and crop out the image. See what you end up with. The image left is very usable.

Upload full size to Smug and water mark them. Smug will grey out certain quality prints if there isn't an image that will print in that quality. For instance if you just upload a low res image and somebody wants to buy a large print or large digital download, they will not be able to.

Mar 24, 2008 10:02

Danny.
DMunsonPhotoexternal link
Cycling Illustratedexternal link
FaceBook Pageexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY

1,358 views & 0 likes for this thread
Good image size for the web?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF    •   JUMP TO FORUM    •   FORUM RULES    •   Index    •   New Posts    •   RTAT    •   "Best Of"    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.1version 1.1
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00176 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is bcbrooks
1001 guests, 852 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014