LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


24-70mm Vs. 24-105mm

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 19 Apr 2008 (Saturday) 12:48   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
JeanBaptiste
Member
JeanBaptiste's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
30 posts
South London, Surrey
[MORE/SHARE]

I'm thinking of investing in some top quality glass to replace my kit lens (18-55mm). I'm considering either the 24-70 or 24-105. The latter seems more obvious since it is both cheaper and longer, however I've heard it can be slightly inconsistent at the long end concerning IQ. Would anyone who's had experience with both care to shed some light on the case, just with a few pros and cons of each?

Olivier

Post #1, Apr 19, 2008 12:48:32


Olivier
Flickr: Photos from oliviert17external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Grentz
Goldmember
Grentz's Avatar
Joined Apr 2007
2,874 posts
Midwest, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

Welcome to POTN!

This is THE most debated topic on this forum, search a bit and you will find more information than you could read in a lifetime. Some recent ones to look in:

http://photography-on-the.net ...ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105
http://photography-on-the.net ...ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105
http://photography-on-the.net ...ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105
http://photography-on-the.net ...ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105
http://photography-on-the.net ...ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105
http://photography-on-the.net ...ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105
http://photography-on-the.net ...ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105
http://photography-on-the.net ...ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105
http://photography-on-the.net ...ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105
http://photography-on-the.net ...ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105
http://photography-on-the.net ...ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105


There is a lot of info on these 2, it just gets repeated a lot. So look in some of the threads and most of your questions should be answered. There is not one that is better than the other and both are a compromise over the other, that is what makes this debate so hard.

Post #2, Apr 19, 2008 12:55:32


Search.TechIslands.comexternal link - Photography Shopping Search Engine

www.TechIslands.comexternal link - News and Reviews

My Gear List - 60D

LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
JeffreyG's Avatar
Joined Jan 2007
14,420 posts
Detroit, MI
[MORE/SHARE]

Thank god someone finally asked this question.

Since you own the 18-55, I think the first question you need to ask yourself is if you ever use the range from 18mm to 23mm. Most people find they need that wide range on their main walkabout lens. If that is you, then you should be looking at the better lenses that cover the 17mm to XXmm range like the EF-S 17-55, Tamron 17-50 etc.

If you are one of the people who can live with 24mm and up, then the salient differences are that the 24-70 is 1 stop faster, 35mm shorter and 50% heavier. The biggest IQ issue of the 24-105 is poor corners at 24mm which does not affect a 1.6X body.

Post #3, Apr 19, 2008 12:55:48


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/external link
Commercial sports:http://girbach.zenfoli​o.com/external link
I use a Canon 5DIII and 1DIV and a Panasonic GF-1

LOG IN TO REPLY
terriyaki
Senior Member
terriyaki's Avatar
Joined Mar 2007
528 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

What do you like to shoot? What types of shooting conditions do you think you'll find yourself most in?

I'd also seriously consider adding the 17-55/2.8 IS to your short list of lenses to get as well.

Post #4, Apr 19, 2008 12:56:21


X100S | 5D | 35 | 85 | 430EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
elChivo
Senior Member
elChivo's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
102 posts
Munich, Germany
[MORE/SHARE]

Search ftw:

http://photography-on-the.net ...ight=24-70mm+Vs.+24-105mm

http://photography-on-the.net ...ight=24-70mm+Vs.+24-105mm

http://photography-on-the.net ...ight=24-70mm+Vs.+24-105mm

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=304681

and many more I guess

Post #5, Apr 19, 2008 12:56:26


1D Mark III // 70-200 f/2.8 L IS // 17-40 f/4 L // 50 f/1.4 // Speedlite 580EX II
My
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
JeanBaptiste
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
JeanBaptiste's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
30 posts
South London, Surrey
[MORE/SHARE]

Sorry guys, didn't realise quite how debated this topic was :oops:
As you say it's down to shooting style and user preferences. Thanks for the links, I'd better start reading.

Post #6, Apr 19, 2008 13:06:34


Olivier
Flickr: Photos from oliviert17external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Tareq's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
16,858 posts
Ajman - UAE
[MORE/SHARE]

Get both as i did to stop my inner debating ;-)a

Post #7, Apr 19, 2008 16:29:04


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/external link
Gear List
Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
deadpass
Goldmember
deadpass's Avatar
Joined Jun 2006
3,348 posts
tempe, az
[MORE/SHARE]

Tareq wrote in post #5362908external link
Get both as i did to stop my inner debating ;-)a

that's the best way to do it really.

Post #8, Apr 19, 2008 16:33:11


a camera
http://www.deadpass.co​mexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
johncloo
Member
Joined Jul 2006
55 posts
Virginia Beach, VA
[MORE/SHARE]

Tareq wrote in post #5362908external link
Get both as i did to stop my inner debating ;-)a

That is my next step as well. Though I will admit that the 24-70 has yet to be removed from my 20d since I bought it. It has been a great lens. I spent weeks reading other posts here about the two lenses, and it finally came down to visiting my local store where they let me try them both on my camera. Bought it right on the spot. Good luck with your decision!

Post #9, Apr 19, 2008 19:20:41


John
Canon EOS 40D, Rebel XT, G12, 100HS
EF 24-70 f/2.8 L SOLD
EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS, EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS
Speedlite 580EXhttp://...

LOG IN TO REPLY
Orlandoech
Senior Member
Orlandoech's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
667 posts
Salt Lake City, UT
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

I would never chose an f/4 lens over an f/2.8 even if it did have IS. But thats just me.

Post #10, Apr 19, 2008 19:21:04


Orlandoech Automotive Photography - www.Orlandoech.comexternal link - My Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
The_Camera_Poser
Goldmember
Joined Dec 2006
3,012 posts
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

what do you like to shoot?

I just looked at your Flickr- I'd DEFINITELY go for the 24-70- you have a lot of shallow depth-of-field shots and action shots- the 24-70 is better for those IMHO. I adore my 24-105 and would never trade it for a 24-70/2.8, but I am 90% a landscape photographer and therefore don't need f/2.8, but do need IS.

A possible compromise is to go for the 24-105 AND either a Sigma 30/1.4 EX or a Tamron 17-50/2.8, which will be roughly the same price and weight as a 24-70 on it's own.

Cheers

Post #11, Apr 19, 2008 19:39:30




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
JeanBaptiste
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
JeanBaptiste's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
30 posts
South London, Surrey
[MORE/SHARE]

TBH there's no real thing I tend to shoot, although the speed and bokeh that the 24-70 offers is probably more my style. As you can see I often shoot wide open, so it looks like the 24-70 is the more obvious choice.

Thanks for taking the time to help me guys.

Olivier

Post #12, Apr 19, 2008 20:07:38


Olivier
Flickr: Photos from oliviert17external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Cathpah
Goldmember
Cathpah's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
4,245 posts
Maine.
[MORE/SHARE]

I would say your biggest concern shouldn't be inconsistencies in one particular lens....but rather whether or not you want/need the 2.8 aperture. I know I do. it all depends on your shooting subject and style. shooting low light? wanting to blur out the background? etc.

read the other threads and you'll get the idea. way back when, i bought a 24-105. Eventually swapped it for a 24-70 and it was the best move I ever made.

Post #13, Apr 19, 2008 20:11:42


Fashion + Beautyexternal link | Travelexternal link | Architectureexternal link | Mayhem | Twitter | Facebook | Blogexternal link
the all important tools of the trade
My name is Jeff, and I'm addicted to shadows. "Hiiiiii Jeff."

LOG IN TO REPLY
monokrome
Goldmember
monokrome's Avatar
Joined Jan 2008
1,184 posts
NoVa
[MORE/SHARE]

Tareq wrote in post #5362908external link
Get both as i did to stop my inner debating ;-)a

I did, now I keep thinking which one I want to get rid of the fund a 24L. :confused:

Post #14, Apr 19, 2008 20:11:52



S5IS

LOG IN TO REPLY
DStanic
Cream of the Crop
Joined Oct 2007
6,140 posts
Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

I kinda hate to bring this up in an "L" thread... but for wayyy cheaper you can get a Sigma 24-60 or 24-70 f/2.8, which have excellent quality at a fraction of the price (24-60 is going for $220 on amazon... THE best value for a f2.8 lens for sure!).

That being said, I'd love to have a 24-105 for my outdoor shooting. I really enjoyed the range of my 17-85 f/4-5.6 IS but wanted better sharper pics.

I can't justify the 17-55 IS being worth $1000 when it's built quality is the same or lower then my Sigma EX lens.


I need a FF, ya think??

Post #15, Apr 19, 2008 20:17:42


Canon 60D, 30D
Tamron 28-75 2.8, Tamron 17-35, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 85mm 1.8
Sony NEX 3n, kit lenses and 35mm 1.8 OSS

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
2,272 views & 0 likes for this thread
24-70mm Vs. 24-105mm
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.0008 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.01s
761 guests, 532 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is LudeMurph

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.