![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
I notice on my 18-55 there's a dot just after 24 on the focal length indicator on the lens. EXIF shows it has 27mm focal length, is there a significance to the dot?
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Trapped Inside the Penta-prism
Posts: 626
|
it indicates where the lens is compacted most. at 55 it extends, and at the dot it is smalles. the flag is usually when the compactness is achieved at the end of the focal range.
__________________
I tried to write my signature, but my pen ran out and I put a big scratch on my monitor |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
|
I looked on mine and it's the spot were the lens is most retracted.
__________________
-Adrian [ Flickr ] [ Tumblr. ] [ Full Gear List ] [ EOS 5Dc|EOS 30D|Canonet QL17 G-III|Olympus OM-1|Canon 35mm f/2.0|Canon 50mm f/1.8 II|Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM|Sigma 24-60mm f/2.8|430EX ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
|
yeah the flag is the beginning of the focal range on mine so it indicates 18
Mine isn't most retracted at the dot though, it's most around 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
|
I just read a review saying 28 mm is the most common wide angle focal length, could this be a 28mm indicator?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 420
|
28mm is a lovely focal length, but that is the equivalent for an ef-s lens is approx 17mm if i remember right.
Adam |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 8,809
|
This would be my guess. My 24-105 has a dot at what looks to be 28, but its most retracted at 24.
__________________
connecticut wedding photographer |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
|
I agree that its the (approximate) spot where the lens is its shortest physical length. I also realized that I don't have a manual for that lens. Apparently the kit didn't come with one. Unfortunately this is my only zoom lens (1 going on 5), but I see from pictures that the 24-70 and 17-55 both have the flags on them and the 24-70 has a dot as well (right next to the flag at the short end of the focal length). The 70-200 series do not seem to have any of these markings. I will be very interested to hear an explanation for all of this if there is one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
Either way the theory it is the shortest physical lengths doesnt seem to work across lenses, plus when you contract the lens focusing also affects the length |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
My Sigma 17-70 also has a white dot just between the 24 and 35. This lens only gets longer as it zooms out from 17 to 70. (the shortest physical length is at 17)
__________________
Mike Sowsun.......... G1x / 5D Mk III / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF Extender 1.4x II / 580EX II / 430EX II (x2) Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Last edited by msowsun : 24th of April 2008 (Thu) at 17:21. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Goldmember
|
Quote:
The 70-200Ls are all internal focus lenses, so they wouldn't need a dot to determine the shortest physical length.
__________________
There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs. ~ Ansel Adams Gear |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In a semi-civilized small town in southeastern Arizona.
Posts: 12,755
|
Quote:
The lens instruction sheet came with our camera-lens kit, but does not specifically say anything about the dot. When I carefull set the lens to the dot, the measured focal length (on our lens) is 27.6mm. This lens has very high tolerances, however, and I would not be surprised at anything between 26mm and 30mm. On the EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM lens, there is a little "flag" just left of the 35mm marking, between the numbers "28" and "35". This flag is really a square dot indicating the position of 28mm, with a small line extending to the number "28". These dots and similar tricks are used on some lenses to include numbers that simply will not fit, as numbers, in their proper positions. These dots or "flags" have absolutely nothing to do with the extension of the lens. Hope this helps.
__________________
If you think your lense has an aperature, you really are an amature. Last edited by 20droger : 24th of April 2008 (Thu) at 17:10. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
|
20droger was correct about the dot
Official canon response... "The dot on the lens shows where 28mm is located." |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
"After 40 years still not housebroken, I still piddle on the carpet"
|
Quote:
That's what I've been assuming... -js
__________________
"Be seeing you." 50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash I do not piddle on the carpet! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| orderpicture dot com - Anyone use this? | slezak | Presentation | 7 | 21st of October 2009 (Wed) 13:40 |
| ExpoDisc vs. Dot-Line Corp. WB Lens Cap | DD974 | Accessories & Storage | 1 | 6th of April 2008 (Sun) 19:37 |
| Whats this DOT on my lens? | vincewchan | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 11 | 8th of November 2007 (Thu) 17:43 |
| Dot! | rhid78 | People | 7 | 20th of August 2007 (Mon) 02:31 |
| LIttle Red Dot | mdgphoto | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 12 | 4th of January 2007 (Thu) 10:51 |