Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 20 May 2008 (Tuesday) 11:09
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Canon EF 200mm f/2 L IS USM

 
renaissance_myth
Senior Member
renaissance_myth's Avatar
707 posts
Joined Nov 2012
Singapore
Post has been edited 1 month ago by renaissance_myth.
Nov 25, 2017 14:27 |  #4801

Hi guys,

Would like to ask some noob questions here so please bear with me.

My daughter is growing up real fast and I would like to Capture portraits and moments that are all too fleeting. I currently using a 1D4 and have no immediate intention to change to a Ff camera.

Looking at the magical pictures here I have 3 options:-

1. Sell my 50L and 300L is mk1 for the 200 f2
2. Buy the 135L
3. Use the 300 for portraits

I would like to hazard a guess that the 200 f2 would be the best but charts and dxo stuff aside, how discernible is it in the real world?

Thank you for helping this excited new father!

P.s stalking this thread is not helping my resolve :lol:


"Dear God, please let me master light"
my flickr (external link) account

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Columbia
Member
33 posts
Joined Nov 2017
International Space Station
Post has been last edited 1 month ago by Columbia. 2 edits done in total.
Nov 25, 2017 14:44 as a reply to renaissance_myth's post |  #4802

If you look at comparisons of the 200/2 and the 70-200/2.8 IS II @ 200mm the difference is there but very, very minimal.

I would think that the fast versatility and prime-like quality of the 70-200 f2.8L IS II would exceed the slight edge in bokeh and make a fantastic choice for energetic kids and portraits. Also a hell of a lot cheaper and much smaller.

Edit: I don't think selling off multiple focal lengths to buy one prime is a good idea unless you have redundancy at those focal lengths.




LOG IN TO REPLY
ma11rats
Senior Member
ma11rats's Avatar
Joined Feb 2013
Az
Post has been edited 1 month ago by ma11rats.
Nov 25, 2017 16:39 |  #4803

renaissance_myth wrote in post #18503936 (external link)
Hi guys,

Would like to ask some noob questions here so please bear with me.

My daughter is growing up real fast and I would like to Capture portraits and moments that are all too fleeting. I currently using a 1D4 and have no immediate intention to change to a Ff camera.

Looking at the magical pictures here I have 3 options:-

1. Sell my 50L and 300L is mk1 for the 200 f2
2. Buy the 135L
3. Use the 300 for portraits

I would like to hazard a guess that the 200 f2 would be the best but charts and dxo stuff aside, how discernible is it in the real world?

Thank you for helping this excited new father!

P.s stalking this thread is not helping my resolve :lol:

Being as the 135L is so cheap these days(I think there's 2 under $700 on here right now) I'd buy that. It's extremely light, very sharp, has very quick AF for your moving kid(I find it works very well in AI SERVO), and has very good separation of subject to background at f2. IF you feel you really want to stand further away from them while you shoot, you shouldn't have a hard time selling it and making your money back to purchase the 200f2. Being on a 1.3x body, you're going to have to stand pretty darn far away with either the 200 or 300. Playing around at a park won't be an issue but you'll be yelling posing directions if your plan is to take actual portraits with either of those lenses. 135L @ 175mm FOVCF already requires you stand pretty far back for full body.
Then you'd have a 50,135,300 giving you a great range of FL to use on all sorts of types of work.

There is someone(FTB I think) selling a used 200f2 for pretty damn cheap($4200ish). Not sure if he sold it yet.


www.matthewbeutelphoto​graphy.com (external link)
5D, 6D, 80D, 35f2IS, T 85f1.8VC, T 24-70f2.8VC, T 17-50f2.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
MalVeauX's Avatar
Joined Feb 2013
Florida
Post has been last edited 1 month ago by MalVeauX. 3 edits done in total.
Nov 25, 2017 16:49 |  #4804

renaissance_myth wrote in post #18503936 (external link)
Hi guys,

Would like to ask some noob questions here so please bear with me.

My daughter is growing up real fast and I would like to Capture portraits and moments that are all too fleeting. I currently using a 1D4 and have no immediate intention to change to a Ff camera.

Looking at the magical pictures here I have 3 options:-

1. Sell my 50L and 300L is mk1 for the 200 f2
2. Buy the 135L
3. Use the 300 for portraits

I would like to hazard a guess that the 200 f2 would be the best but charts and dxo stuff aside, how discernible is it in the real world?

Thank you for helping this excited new father!

P.s stalking this thread is not helping my resolve :lol:

If you really want to be with your daughter and capture moments and memories, you want to be up in it, connected, part of it, and be able to hand it to someone else so you can have yourself with your daughter too. Keep your 50L. You'll use it more than any other lens with a child that you currently have.

Or, you can run 20+ feet away all the time just to get an obliterated background. Babies don't like being outside without a parent holding them for quite a few years. You'll spend a LOT more time inside, in close quarters. Keep that 50L.

In 2~3 years, you may want a telephoto when she's walking and able to do stuff outside.

By all means, get a medium telephoto, like the 135L or 200L, they're awesome and for formal portraits you'll love what they render, but they are not going to do much for you for the first 2 years of your daughter's life. You have plenty of time!

Come over to the Family Photojournalism Thread, see what it looks like to have kids. Changed how I shoot completely for every day memories. We still do formal stuff that is nice, using things like the 135L, etc, but still, that's not every day. And you will want to remember the special every day stuff, not just the posed stuff.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
47,966 posts
Gallery: 78 photos
Joined Apr 2003
Rhode Island USA
Nov 25, 2017 21:10 |  #4805

renaissance_myth wrote in post #18503936 (external link)
Hi guys,

Would like to ask some noob questions here so please bear with me.

My daughter is growing up real fast and I would like to Capture portraits and moments that are all too fleeting. I currently using a 1D4 and have no immediate intention to change to a Ff camera.

Looking at the magical pictures here I have 3 options:-

1. Sell my 50L and 300L is mk1 for the 200 f2
2. Buy the 135L
3. Use the 300 for portraits

I would like to hazard a guess that the 200 f2 would be the best but charts and dxo stuff aside, how discernible is it in the real world?

Thank you for helping this excited new father!

P.s stalking this thread is not helping my resolve :lol:


I would absolutely positively without question advise getting the 135mm for about $800.00!!!

I have owned TWO 200mm f/1.8s and currently own the f/2.
And yet, my 2006 vintage 135mm has seen orders of magnitude more time on my cameras than the other 3 combined!

No it is not the equivalent of one of these dream machines, but it is so close on so many levels while at the same time being MUCH more useful, portable, usable in more situations.

Get the 135mm!
(Sorry to post this in the 200mm thread, but it's the plain truth!)


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
FTb
Senior Member
Joined Jun 2014
Nov 26, 2017 00:52 |  #4806

Logic -- hard to beat the 135 f2. Love it.

Emotion -- hard to beat the 200mm f2. Love it.

Pick yer poison



My flickrexternal link
Favorite lenses: Canon 16-35 f/4 L IS, 50/1.2L, 85/1.2L II, 135/2L, 70-200L IS II, TS-E 17mm f/4L

LOG IN TO REPLY
renaissance_myth
Senior Member
renaissance_myth's Avatar
707 posts
Joined Nov 2012
Singapore
Post has been last edited 1 month ago by renaissance_myth. 3 edits done in total.
Nov 26, 2017 06:53 |  #4807

Thank you all for your insights. I have not personally used the 135L or the 200L f2 but going through the two lenses' sample pictures (mostly taken on FF cameras) they do look quite similar to me with the 200L being more 'creamy'? no examples on the 1.3 crop that I can see so far.


I use mostly the 24L or the Samyang 14mm f2.8 for indoor pictures that show more of the environment and the 50L is only for if I want closeups.


Where I am from its USD$570 (135L) vs USD$4300(200L) used.

I guess its really down to logic vs emotion and how I can stomach that rate of diminishing return :-P


"Dear God, please let me master light"
my flickr (external link) account

LOG IN TO REPLY
scobols
Goldmember
scobols's Avatar
Joined Dec 2006
Waconia, MN
Nov 26, 2017 07:28 |  #4808

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #18504145 (external link)
I would absolutely positively without question advise getting the 135mm for about $800.00!!!

I have owned TWO 200mm f/1.8s and currently own the f/2.
And yet, my 2006 vintage 135mm has seen orders of magnitude more time on my cameras than the other 3 combined!

No it is not the equivalent of one of these dream machines, but it is so close on so many levels while at the same time being MUCH more useful, portable, usable in more situations.

Get the 135mm!
(Sorry to post this in the 200mm thread, but it's the plain truth!)

I 100% agree with this. I own both and they each have their place. For chasing small children, especially indoors, it's for sure the 135.

Scott


www.scottbolster.comexternal link
facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Talley's Avatar
10,158 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Joined Dec 2011
Houston
Nov 26, 2017 08:08 |  #4809

scobols wrote in post #18504298 (external link)
I 100% agree with this. I own both and they each have their place. For chasing small children, especially indoors, it's for sure the 135.

Scott

Chasing small children inside = 85mm

It’s easy to say 135 for those who have never used the 200...

Use the 200 and you’ll see why it favors over the 135.

It’s not for the weak though.


5D4 |12mm 2.8 FE | 16-35L 2.8 III | Σ 35A | Σ 50A | Σ 85A | 200 F2 IS | 1.4xIII
X-T20 | X-E3 | 18/2 | 35/1.4 | 56/1.2 | 18-135
My Gear Archive

LOG IN TO REPLY
arthurbikemad
Member
arthurbikemad's Avatar
71 posts
Joined Sep 2016
Post has been edited 1 month ago by arthurbikemad.
Nov 27, 2017 00:53 |  #4810

scobols wrote in post #18504298 (external link)
I 100% agree with this. I own both and they each have their place. For chasing small children, especially indoors, it's for sure the 135.

Scott

I agree, hire a 200L, as great as it is it has its drawbacks! Dally life with a 200L is counter productive at times, min focus distance being one of them, the 135 is a cracking lens, the 135 has a similar look to the 200L if that's what you want, I'm guessing that's why people have recommended the 135.




LOG IN TO REPLY
zeus77
Senior Member
zeus77's Avatar
Joined Aug 2015
Croatia
Nov 30, 2017 04:26 |  #4811

135L is sure great lens but 200L is some other beast. You can not compare that two lens in terms of sharpness, af tracking, render, contrast and look "character". Tru is that 135 gonna be better for chasing children :-) but 200l is truly best lens I have ever use in any terms :-):-)




LOG IN TO REPLY
arthurbikemad
Member
arthurbikemad's Avatar
71 posts
Joined Sep 2016
Dec 13, 2017 02:53 as a reply to zeus77's post |  #4812

TRUE! And given the cost of the 200L you may as well add a 135 to the cart while you're there :D




LOG IN TO REPLY
scobols
Goldmember
scobols's Avatar
Joined Dec 2006
Waconia, MN
Dec 18, 2017 12:31 |  #4813

The lens has been shelved for a few weeks but I was able to get it out again this weekend.

IMAGE: http://www.scottbolster.com/potn/20171217-IMG_4797.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.scottbolster.com/potn/20171217-IMG_4709_1.jpg

www.scottbolster.comexternal link
facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
zyndurai
Senior Member
zyndurai's Avatar
Joined Apr 2009
Dec 22, 2017 01:00 |  #4814

I use mine to chase my children. Just not as often as the 135L, which I use for other than my children.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

The blue tint from his hat was caused by him coloring the entire hat with a highlighter/marker since he decided he wanted a blue hat instead.
HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

My flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
zyndurai
Senior Member
zyndurai's Avatar
Joined Apr 2009
Dec 22, 2017 01:08 |  #4815

Occasionally of the wife:

IMAGE: https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5545/13979870760_860d411a17_b.jpg

Almost five years ago for the big brother

IMAGE: https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8356/8340447667_57aab2f235_b.jpg

My flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,307,890 views & 898 likes for this thread
Canon EF 200mm f/2 L IS USM
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00184 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
Latest registered member is Plainjane2003
910 guests, 463 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017