![]() |
|
|||||||
| sponsored links |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 163
|
Hi Gang,
Do you think using the canon prime 85mm 1.2 fully open for a full body shot, (not head shoulders) will kill the shot? quick and easy question i hope Thanks NicholasBB |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: S. E. Michigan
Posts: 64,377
|
"Full body" arranged how & how far from the camera? Shoot a few tests & see what you get.
__________________
FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything... Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers. www.FrankCizek.com Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET! Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 163
|
Hi Photos guy,
Well pose i would assume would have to be fairly flat , front on considering the DOF issues at 1.2, distance, well basically to get her in the view finder full body, or perhaps above the knee., im guessing ill have to be about 10meters or so back, but great idea... test shots!!, but again thanks for the tip, and anyone else who have some ideas or experience with this lens, id love to hear from you. NicholasBB |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
ugly when I'm sober
|
Have you looked at the image archive for the 85L? There's a few full body shots there shot wide open. http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...d.php?t=224258
__________________
www.mikegreenphotography.co.uk Gear UK South Easterners flickr Blog 5∞px Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? ::: A closed mouth gathers no foot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
|
I'm not sure what you mean by "kill the shot"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
|
My guess is he wants her completely infocus, I could be wrong though.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience. 5D, 20D, 70-200mm 2.8L, 100mm 2.8 macro, 50mm 1.8, 75-300mm 4-5.6 III, Kit Lens, 580EX II, Canon Pixma Pro 9500. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Goldmember
|
If your talking about DOF, then it's just down to the distance from the subject. Focal length itself isn't really an issue.
__________________
My Gear If you saw a man drowning and could either save him or take a picture... What kind of film would you use? - Anonymous |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 163
|
"My guess is he wants her completely infocus, I could be wrong though."
Exactly, im a bit woried that with the narrow of depth of field, i would loose alot of sharpeness, I think if the pose was fairly flat, it might not be an issue, but again would not be such a flatering pose right? NicholasBB |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 163
|
Hi Again,
i had a look at the link for the images taken by the prime 85mm 1.2 telephoto, most of the photos loaded, but there is no full body shots. at the most there was a photo taken by andmy172 that is shot just above the waist. Several of the photos did not load or seem to be removed. Thanks anyway, NicholasBB |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Fatal attraction.
|
You do not say what camera you will be using or what size print you will be making, both of which affect DOF. However, with an 85 mm. on a 1.6 crop camera in portrait orientation you will need a distance of about 7 meters for a full length shot. According to http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html the total DOF will be 0.3m., 0.15m. front and back. Stopping down to f/1.8 would give you better performance from the lens and another 0.15 of DOF.
__________________
Elie / אלי "If you presume to love something, you must love the process of it much more than you love the finished product." John Irving, 5/2012. "In theory there is no difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is." Yogi Berra Site |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 163
|
Quote:
Camera type is Canon 40d. For prints I aiming to acheive nice crisp A4 size. Will be shooting RAW and largest file size. Your comments are an excellent guide which a pretty easy for me to get my head around. I have to be honest, technical aspects realy do confuse me. lol Anyway, ill battle on, trying to get the best shots i can for the upcoming shoot. I look forward to posting the results for the people who have given me help to see. I am also realy nervous about this too, but ill be ready for honest feedback. Cheers, NicholasBB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Don't get pissy with me
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 32,718
|
Why don't you just make it easier on yourself and stop the lens down. At least then you can pose her in ways (yeah, that's plural) that actually make sense and do her body justice.
__________________
Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A bit more HS Volleyball with the 85mm 1.8 wide open | QUASIPHOTO | Sports | 10 | 12th of September 2006 (Tue) 23:51 |
| Shootin wide open with my 85mm- my kids:) | chilli710 | People | 23 | 12th of May 2006 (Fri) 19:46 |
| Lacewing - full body shot | nitsch | Macro | 7 | 4th of January 2006 (Wed) 23:13 |
| here is a wide open shot 100-400, is this OK? | summerwind4 | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 6 | 21st of October 2005 (Fri) 15:28 |
| Damselfly. full body shot. | Bald Eagle | Macro | 35 | 28th of July 2005 (Thu) 20:29 |