![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
|
Something doesn't seem right. Why is the base of the clouds so straight?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 141
|
Don't really like it, you are too far from the subject.
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
That aside, I love the composition and the clouds: I'm not a huge fan of the processing on the rest of the image, but it's pretty nice overall.
__________________
-Alex (Flickr) Gear: Canon AE-1P with a Tokina 50-250 zoom and some shorter lenses Canon 20D & 60d, Sigma 18-125 OS, Tamron 70-300 VC, Canon 50 1/8. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
|
*grin* Fair enough: the short version: Clouds form when water vapor condenses onto particles -- basically dust -- in the atmosphere. However, in order to condense, the temperature has to be below a certain point (which depends on a lot of factors), and there has to be enough of it. As you rise away from sea level, the temperature tends to lower, and as an air-mass rises, it expands and cools. That means that, frequently, you'll get a situation where warm, moist air rises and expands until it hits just the right point, at which point it forms a cloud: if the temperature differential is sharp enough, you can end up with clouds that have almost perfectly flat bottom edges. I'm really not sure why it happens more in some places than others, but it does seem to be that way.
Incidentally, this is also why you tend to get clouds "piled up" along mountain ranges -- wind moving against them brings moisture up the side of the mountain until it condenses. Now, back to discussing the actual picture. Having looked more at the larger version, I like the processing more than I did at first glance. The closer trees, grass, and the post on the left still seem a little odd to me, but I like the picture overall more than I did originally.
__________________
-Alex (Flickr) Gear: Canon AE-1P with a Tokina 50-250 zoom and some shorter lenses Canon 20D & 60d, Sigma 18-125 OS, Tamron 70-300 VC, Canon 50 1/8. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 788
|
I like the PP. It would help if more of the grassy area was cropped out, to concentrate more on your subject. Over all, I like it alot.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| *not another train track post!* | zero9243 | Transportation | 4 | 21st of February 2008 (Thu) 19:21 |
| The train track shot | cocheese20 | Transportation | 2 | 15th of November 2006 (Wed) 23:54 |
| Train track spagetti | greg20d | Transportation | 4 | 9th of May 2006 (Tue) 13:37 |
| Another B&W Train Track | dharris | Nature & Landscapes | 20 | 8th of September 2005 (Thu) 09:53 |