Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 03 Jun 2008 (Tuesday) 03:11
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

OEM Lens Hoods

 
drisley
"What a Tool I am"
Avatar
8,866 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Nov 2002
     
Jun 03, 2008 03:11 |  #1

I'm thinking of getting a new lens hood for my 24-70L, and noticed they are really expensive (nearly $60 plus shipping).

I found some "OEM" hoods on ebay for $10 plus shipping and they look identical, except for the test on the outside.

Has anybody bought any of these, and how do they compare to the originals?
(plastic quality, black velvety lining, etc)


1D Mark III - 5D Mark IV - 24-70/2.8L - 70-200/2.8L Mark II - Samyang 14/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
yankees3791
Senior Member
418 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Jun 03, 2008 06:02 |  #2

i bought a hood from ebay and i don't think I would buy another one...the plastic that they use is very cheap and there is no lining in the inside....they feel like that if you squeezed it, it would break


Shutterfly (external link)
Gear List and Feedback
Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ANGUS
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,897 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia...
     
Jun 03, 2008 06:06 |  #3

Whats OEM mean?


Angus
| 1D MkIV | 1D MkIII | 5D MkII | 15FE | 16-35 f2.8 L | 24-70 f2.8 L | 70-200 f2.8 IS L II | 35 f1.4 L | 135 f2 L | 300 f2.8 IS L | 580 EX II | 580 EX II |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stoosh
Member
97 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Sydney Australia
     
Jun 03, 2008 06:07 |  #4

Original equipment manufacturer

Means its made by Canon rather than a generic eBay style hood


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ANGUS
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,897 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia...
     
Jun 03, 2008 06:08 |  #5

Stoosh wrote in post #5648727 (external link)
Original equipment manufacturer

Means its made by Canon rather than a generic eBay style hood

Thanks but then why does the OP refer to the fakes as OEM?


Angus
| 1D MkIV | 1D MkIII | 5D MkII | 15FE | 16-35 f2.8 L | 24-70 f2.8 L | 70-200 f2.8 IS L II | 35 f1.4 L | 135 f2 L | 300 f2.8 IS L | 580 EX II | 580 EX II |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pridash
Goldmember
Avatar
3,584 posts
Likes: 31
Joined Jul 2007
Location: London, UK - Where 30 degrees celcius is considered a heatwave and liable to result in death.
     
Jun 03, 2008 06:31 |  #6

Stoosh wrote in post #5648727 (external link)
Original equipment manufacturer

Means its made by Canon rather than a generic eBay style hood

I think it's actually the opposite - not made by Canon, hence the cheaper cost!


Pradeep (but most people call me PJ)

Flickr (external link) | Website (external link)
Stop obsessing about gear and focus on your own art and creativity. Nurture and love the artist inside yourself.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dpds68
Goldmember
Avatar
1,464 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2008
Location: Trinidad and Tobago W.I.
     
Jun 03, 2008 06:52 |  #7

Err as far as I know OEM= Original Equipment Manufacturer


Gripped Canon 7D,20D,XT / Tamron 17-50mm 2.8, Canon 85mm f1.8 , 70-200 2.8L,EF50mm1.8 II,Sigma 150-500mm OS, Sigma 105mm 2.8 Macro, Sigma 10-20mm 4-5.6
Vivitar285Hv x2,Canon430EX,Nissin Di866,CTR-301P Triggers,
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/dpds68/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
martinsmith
Senior Member
Avatar
679 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: S Glos, UK
     
Jun 03, 2008 06:53 |  #8

From Wikipedia.....

Original equipment manufacturer, or OEM, is an ambiguous and abstruse phrase that refers to containment-based re-branding, where a company uses a component of another company in its product, or sells the product of another company under its own brand. OEM refers to the company that originally manufactured the product. e.g: a factory Minhas Gloves Industries produces boxing gloves for its customer named Everlast, with specific design and labels, and Everlast company distributes those products under as its own (brand named) products.


[SIZE=1]ms-imaging (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canadian ­ Techdiver
Senior Member
Avatar
726 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Its Summer I am underwater scuba diving Silly.
     
Jun 03, 2008 06:55 as a reply to  @ dpds68's post |  #9

For as long as I have been in Engineering OEM= Original Equipment Manufacture and we do a lot of service parts for automotive and have to tag them as OEM.... and we were the original... I think that others can manufacture an OEM if they manufacture to orginal specs... This could just mean dimensions so it could be a different plastic.

Maybe he found some Test OEM canons rather then the cheap ones that are readily avaliable.


Camera gear: YEP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Roberts
revolting peasant
Avatar
3,079 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: UK
     
Jun 03, 2008 07:03 |  #10

I've heard varying reports about the 3rd party lens hoods. Some people seem quite happy with them and they certainly are cheaper. Others complain about the quality of the materials and the fit. My personal opinion is that whenever possible I'll use the OEM (ie Canon in this case) lens hood. I know the price is ridiculously high for what it is, but it's likely to last for years and I'd rather have something that was designed for a specific lens and pretty much guaranteeed to fit.

cheers


BiLL

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Vendee
Senior Member
Avatar
355 posts
Likes: 60
Joined May 2007
     
Jun 03, 2008 07:13 |  #11

drisley wrote in post #5648356 (external link)
I'm thinking of getting a new lens hood for my 24-70L, and noticed they are really expensive (nearly $60 plus shipping).

I found some "OEM" hoods on ebay for $10 plus shipping and they look identical, except for the test on the outside.

Has anybody bought any of these, and how do they compare to the originals?
(plastic quality, black velvety lining, etc)

I've used the cheap ebay hoods. I didn't have any problems with them. They were not felt lined like the Canon ones but I wouldn't pay Canon prices for something that they should really have supplied with the (sometimes expensive) lens.


| EOS 6D| EOS 3 |EF 24-105mm f/4L|EF 70-200mm f/4L IS |EF 40mm f/2.8 STM | EF 50 f/1.8 II | Speedlite 430EX II |Pentax MX |Pentax ME Super|Pentax K1000|Kiev 4A|Yashica 24
My stuff:- www.giverin.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,608 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Likes: 387
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Jun 03, 2008 07:40 |  #12

yankees3791 wrote in post #5648711 (external link)
i bought a hood from ebay and i don't think I would buy another one...the plastic that they use is very cheap and there is no lining in the inside....they feel like that if you squeezed it, it would break

guess you never felt the 100-400 hood. yea it feels like a 50cent piece of crap that would snap in half if you sneeze on it to hard


My gear
Canon 7D Mark II, Canon 35 f2 IS, Sigma 50 1.4 EX, Canon 100mm f2, Tamron 70-200 2.8 G2, Sigma 150-600 C, Shanny SN600C flash, Tascam DR-05 v2
Fuji X-T1, Fuji X-T2, Fuji 18-55 2.8-4 OIS, Fuji 35 f2, Fuji 55-200 3.5-4.8 OIS
Sony RX100 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
simon_says
Senior Member
306 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Jun 03, 2008 07:56 |  #13

It's just a hood. And it's usually the first part that gets banged up and scratched. I would have no problems using a knock-off hood - especially if it was much cheaper than a branded version. It's not a complicated item - it's essentially just molded plastic - and I would consider them expendable.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ef2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,135 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
     
Jun 03, 2008 07:59 |  #14

I bought one for my 17-85, and it was so loose and flimsy that it probably offered no kind of physical protection. Canon made ones are sturdier but not by much!


5D Mk III
Canon 580EX
Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L | 24mm f/3.5L | 50mm f/1.4 | 100mm f/2.0 | 100mm f/2.8 Macro | 135mm f/2.8 SF | 70-200mm [COLOR=black]f/2.8L IS | 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,523 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Jun 03, 2008 09:06 |  #15

In my FD days I loved rubber collapsible hoods. I haven't had as much joy with EF lenses, at least zooms. I did try a 77mm rubber hood on the 24-70, but since it attaches to the part that zooms in and out, you lose one of the great things about that lens - the fact that the lens hood is always the perfect length for the focal length used.

I believe there are knock-offs out there that fit the Canon bayonet fitting, but they're quite generic if anything.

I'd suck it up and get the real thing, at least for this lens. It's funny like that.


La Vida Leica! (external link)LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1v-HS/1d Mk IIn w/E-1 & Op/Tech straps
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,394 views & 0 likes for this thread
OEM Lens Hoods
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johnowens
685 guests, 349 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.