Canon Digital Photography Forums  

P.O.T.N. SUPPORT SHOP IS OPEN, check it out now!

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Equipment Talk' section > Canon G-series Digital Cameras
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25th of December 2004 (Sat)   #1
Superbaldguy
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Germany, N.S.
Posts: 355
Default Speedlite 220EX vs. Sunpak PZ40X

I'd like to get an external flash for my G6, but the 420EX and 550EX are simply too big and cumbersome. The G6 is the ultimate available-light digicam (with its fast f/2~f/3 aperture) and I rarely have use for a flash, anyway, except for fill work at close distances. If I have anything really important to shoot with a bigger bounce flash, I'll use my EOS film system and 540 EZ.

So, I'd like a smaller, throw-in-the-bag unit for those times when I'd like something morso than the dinky built-in flash. I like the 220EX as it will work with the Off-Camera Shoe Cord (I have two of those!), meaning I can get it off the camera, but it can't bounce; the Sunpak PZ40X has bounce.

What would you suggest? These flashes are about the same in cost. I assume you can dial in the flash exposure compensation with the 220EX.
Superbaldguy is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 27th of December 2004 (Mon)   #2
Superbaldguy
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Germany, N.S.
Posts: 355
Default Re: Speedlite 220EX vs. Sunpak PZ40X

Another related issue is whether or not the Sunpak could be adjusted by the flash exposure compensation on the G6 (I doubt it). If not, I will stick with the Canon flash as this feature is invaluable for fill-in situations which is the main reason for having the smaller flash unit.
Superbaldguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th of December 2004 (Thu)   #3
Superbaldguy
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Germany, N.S.
Posts: 355
Default Re: Speedlite 220EX vs. Sunpak PZ40X

Opinions are in short supply on the Sunpak, anywhere, so I decided to get the 220EX. I didn't need a super-powerful flash unit, just one that could supplant the built-in one and provide adequate fill-in coverage at close distances.

I already have the 540EZ for my EOS film camera system, where I certainly need a unit with more power and flexibility
Superbaldguy is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 30th of December 2004 (Thu)   #4
pradeep1
Goldmember
 
pradeep1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 2,317
Default Re: Speedlite 220EX vs. Sunpak PZ40X

Sorry SuperBaldGuy, I thought this was the same post as before where I could only offer you a meager opinion on battery and capacity.

I second your choice of using the 220EX for your stated purpose. I'd check the 540EZ out at this link if you have not already:

http://www.botzilla.com/photo/strobeVolts.html

But I don't think the 220EX will be able to use the G6's FEC, so that may be an issue for you. Check out this link:

http://eosdoc.com/manuals/flash/ETTLDx/
__________________
Pradeep Satyaprakash

Please view my portfolio.
pradeep1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th of December 2004 (Thu)   #5
Superbaldguy
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Germany, N.S.
Posts: 355
Default Re: Speedlite 220EX vs. Sunpak PZ40X

No problem.

Too bad the 540EZ couldn't work on a digital camera.
Superbaldguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st of December 2004 (Fri)   #6
figueira
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 33
Default Re: Speedlite 220EX vs. Sunpak PZ40X

Quote:
Originally Posted by Superbaldguy
I like the 220EX as it will work with the Off-Camera Shoe Cord (I have two of those!), meaning I can get it off the camera, but it can't bounce; the Sunpak PZ40X has bounce.
Ok, it has no bounce... but you can bounce it if you are holding it off-camera with your hands or with a proper arm... and point it to the ceiling, walls, whatever....
figueira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st of December 2004 (Fri)   #7
Superbaldguy
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Germany, N.S.
Posts: 355
Default Re: Speedlite 220EX vs. Sunpak PZ40X

Yes, I could do that although its modest power would mean using higher ISO's.

The nice thing about the Canon Speedlites are the little touches - like auto power shutdown after 90 seconds and instant on if you touch the shutter release........
Superbaldguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sunpak pz40x ll Spireite Small Flash and Studio Lighting 0 25th of December 2005 (Sun) 12:36
help with my speedlite 220ex davrosxuk Canon G-series Digital Cameras 1 6th of June 2005 (Mon) 08:25
Sunpak PZ40X or Canon 420ex Mogwyth Small Flash and Studio Lighting 2 13th of September 2004 (Mon) 19:23


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.