Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk 
Thread started 15 Jun 2008 (Sunday) 11:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

what causes the blue haze and how to prevent it?

 
rx7speed
Goldmember
1,204 posts
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jun 15, 2008 11:01 |  #1

I've noticed when taking some nature shots of something off in the distance I usually get this blue haze that ends up comming between me and the subject how is it one gets to cut through that?


digital: 7d 70-200L 2.8 IS MKII, 17-55 2.8 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
eddarr
There's Moderators under there....
Avatar
8,907 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Las Vegas
     
Jun 15, 2008 11:33 |  #2

It's just stuff in the air catching light waves. You can use a quality UV filter on the lens to help remove the haze.


Eric

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
primoz
POTN Sports Photographer of the year 2005
Avatar
2,532 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Anywhere where ski World cup makes its stop
     
Jun 15, 2008 13:10 |  #3

Easiest way to eliminate there is to choose right timing. If you are shooting wide open spaces like Grand Canyon for example in middle of summer when it's +35c, then you will have it. If you come on cold(er) day, after some storm, when air is clean, you won't have this.
So only real option is to take such photos when it's right weather. Yes I know, it's damm hard to do this, when you are on holidays, and you have just one day to spend on location. But unfortunately that's reason why 99.9% of great landscape photos are done when people invest A LOT of time into one single photo.


PhotoSI (external link) | Latest sport photos (external link)http://www.photo.si (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Moderator
Avatar
75,178 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2033
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Jun 15, 2008 21:50 |  #4

You might notice less haze in the early morning, which can also give you some nice side light.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,523 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Jun 16, 2008 11:53 |  #5

Other than waiting for better weather (and thus atmospheric conditions) a UV filter will help a little bit. A circular polarizer will probably help more. Other than that, you're at the weather's mercy. Getting there early in the morning will help some as the air is cooler and should have less humidity as well.


La Vida Leica! (external link)LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1v-HS/1d Mk IIn w/E-1 & Op/Tech straps
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WaltA
Goldmember
Avatar
3,853 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 108
Joined Feb 2006
Location: White Rock, BC, Canada
     
Jun 16, 2008 12:23 |  #6

Yeah, I'd suggest the Circular Polarizer as well. Had a bright sunny morning here at the beach but as soon as the sun got above the mountains we got a blue haze over the water.

I experimated with a number of filters (UV/HAZE etc) and got mediocre results. Then I put the CP on and took shots with it turned various ways and it did a presentable job of getting rid of the haze. At least better then the other filters.


Walt
400D, 5D, 7D and a bag of stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rx7speed
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,204 posts
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jun 16, 2008 12:27 |  #7

have a UV filter though it is a cheapy at best. the ol' canon uv-1 I think it is. seems to do nothing I just prefer it cause I would rather clean/scratch/damage that then the real lens. the circular polerizer didn't seem to do much on that.

the other question I have is would any color correcting filters help reduce the haze at all?


and other then that just early rise, cool, dry weather is best right?


digital: 7d 70-200L 2.8 IS MKII, 17-55 2.8 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,523 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Jun 16, 2008 12:53 |  #8

UV filters help in some cases, like at the beach or up in the mountains - though this is largely only true with film. Most digital cameras block UV at the sensor, making a UV relatively pointless, save for protection purposes. So you probably won't see any difference.

Color correcting filters will only change the color of the haze.  :p


La Vida Leica! (external link)LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1v-HS/1d Mk IIn w/E-1 & Op/Tech straps
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
Jun 17, 2008 00:49 |  #9

Take a few shots without the UV filter and see if that makes a difference. I think some skylight filters can cause a blue color cast.
Upload a typical example you are seeing here so we can see as well.


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,523 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Jun 17, 2008 06:16 |  #10

^ That's weird, because skylight filters are warm-toned.


La Vida Leica! (external link)LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1v-HS/1d Mk IIn w/E-1 & Op/Tech straps
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DrPablo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,568 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Jun 17, 2008 07:21 |  #11

Double Negative wrote in post #5731653 (external link)
Color correcting filters will only change the color of the haze. :p

Yes and no! Haze is caused mostly by scatter of visible blue light (and to a much lesser degree UV light). The scatter is caused by suspended particles or water in the air.

It's very well known that filters that block blue light will increase sharpness and decrease haze. Ansel Adams has some great examples of this in The Negative, with some extreme examples using IR film and IR pass filters.

So using an orange #23 filter or a red #25 or even a yellow #15 will dramatically sharpen the image, because the scattered blue light is blocked.

Yes, this will indeed change the color of a color picture. But you could consider taking two photos on the tripod -- one with no filter and then another with a filter like a red #25. Then take the image shot with the red #25, desaturate it (no need to do channel mixer), adjust the levels and contrast, and copy it to the clipboard. Then take the full color image, paste the B&W image on top, and set the blending mode to Luminosity. (Alternatively, perhaps better, you could convert the color image to LAB colorspace, go to Channels, select the Lightness channel, and paste the B&W image over this channel).

This takes the sharpness from a red-filtered shot and uses that image as a tone map. So the detail and sharpness will come from that shot, the color will come from the full color shot. The distant detail will still look 'blue' unless you color-correct it, but at least you'll rescue some detail.


Canon 5D Mark IV, 24-105L II, 17 TS-E f/4L, MPE 65, Sigma 50 f/1.4, Sigma 85 f/1.4, 100 f/2.8L, 135 f/2L, 70-200 f/4L, 400 L
Film gear: Agfa 8x10, Cambo 4x5, Noblex 150, Hasselblad 500 C/M

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,523 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Jun 17, 2008 08:16 |  #12

^ That's an excellent explanation and you're totally right. I guess I oversimplified my statement a bit, heh. Blocking the blue light and layering like that would definitely bring out some otherwise lost details.

I'll have to try that next time I'm out. I was shooting with the 300mm f/2.8L IS and 1.4x/2x over the weekend and the haze was insane. I haven't prepared/purchased any filters for it yet - on distant shots the haze really showed (click for larger/info):

IMAGE: http://litpixel.com/ee/images/thumb/_1D_3414.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://litpixel.com …=34&ee_lang=eng​&u=1682,12  (external link)

La Vida Leica! (external link)LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1v-HS/1d Mk IIn w/E-1 & Op/Tech straps
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DrPablo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,568 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Jun 17, 2008 10:32 |  #13

You might go cheap and get a gel filter kit, like from Lee. I use 4x4 inch filters for my large format lenses, and the kit isn't very expensive -- one kit (which you can order from B&H or Calumet) comes with a yellow/green #8, a yellow #11, an orange #15, and a red #23, and it comes with a plastic filter holder. The only trick is keeping the filters free of scratches. That would certainly be cheaper than finding a filter to fit a monster like the 300/2.8.


Canon 5D Mark IV, 24-105L II, 17 TS-E f/4L, MPE 65, Sigma 50 f/1.4, Sigma 85 f/1.4, 100 f/2.8L, 135 f/2L, 70-200 f/4L, 400 L
Film gear: Agfa 8x10, Cambo 4x5, Noblex 150, Hasselblad 500 C/M

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,523 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Jun 17, 2008 10:38 |  #14

^ Yes, but there's no way to use those 4x4 filters on the 300/2.8. ;)

The best I can do is cut some gels myself from a Rosco pack (which I'll very likely do) and pick up a Canon 52mm Drop-In Circular Polarizer PL-C.


La Vida Leica! (external link)LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1v-HS/1d Mk IIn w/E-1 & Op/Tech straps
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DrPablo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,568 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Jun 17, 2008 10:47 as a reply to  @ Double Negative's post |  #15

Whoa, that front element is 5" -- that's even more than my Schneider 90/5.6 Super Angulon XL, which takes 105mm filters.

You're right, a Rosco gel would work. You could also check KEH for used 5" filters, because they do exist.

For these purposes I'd probably err on the side of a #11 or #15 filter rather than a very dark red one. A yellow #15 works nicely for routine haze. I don't know if it would work to shoot a neutral gray target to color balance after shooting through a color filter -- but if so, I'd probably stay away from something like a red #25 or #29, i.e. something that blocks everything shorter than ~ 650 nm wavelength. You're more likely to have recoverable color if you're just blocking blue.


Canon 5D Mark IV, 24-105L II, 17 TS-E f/4L, MPE 65, Sigma 50 f/1.4, Sigma 85 f/1.4, 100 f/2.8L, 135 f/2L, 70-200 f/4L, 400 L
Film gear: Agfa 8x10, Cambo 4x5, Noblex 150, Hasselblad 500 C/M

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

6,157 views & 0 likes for this thread
what causes the blue haze and how to prevent it?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Summers
719 guests, 340 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.