Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Critique Corner
Thread started 15 Jun 2008 (Sunday) 18:44
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Quicksilver -- time exposure shot

 
Bill634
Member
193 posts
Joined May 2008

Quebec, Canada
MORE INFO

I used a tripod and time exposure to take this extreme low light ( almost dark) shot shortly after I first bought my EOS 30D. I thought it turned out well but it hasn't gotten much response anytime I've entered it in photo contests. I'd like to hear some constructive criticism because this type of photography really appeals to me.

IMAGE: http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk249/Bill634/QuicksilverStream.jpg
Jun 15, 2008 18:44



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
thebeatnut
Member
196 posts
Joined Jun 2008
MORE INFO

Your other option could be a much longer exposure. A friend of mine took a shot in the dark of water rather like this and left it on bulb for 15 minutes. It really brought the colours out.

Jun 17, 2008 15:23



LOG IN TO REPLY
luigis
Goldmember
luigis's Avatar
1,399 posts

Joined Jun 2008

Buenos Aires, Argentina
MORE INFO

Hi Bill, this is also the kind of pictures that I love to make so nice to find a friend.
I like your picture a lot, it is a very nice long exposure shot, I like the cold temperature original more than the warmer edit.
I think that from very good to great the picture is missing either a subject like a big rock or something in the middle of the stream or to go the other extreme a more featureless background to make it more pure and smooth.
Just my 2 cents it is a high scoring picture to me.

Luigi

Jun 17, 2008 15:33

www.luisargerich.comexternal link
Landscape Photography & Astrophotography
Follow me on Twitterexternal link
My Awesome Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
griptape
Goldmember
2,036 posts
Joined Feb 2007

Home
MORE INFO

luigis wrote in post #5739719external link
I think that from very good to great the picture is missing either a subject like a big rock or something in the middle of the stream or to go the other extreme a more featureless background to make it more pure and smooth.
Luigi

I completely agree. You simply don't have a subject (or at the very least contrast against your subject so you can tell what your subject is and isn't). Water and rocks aren't very interesting. We've all seen water and rocks. I'm not trying to be harsh, but it looks like a dirty, muddy looking place that I would try to avoid stepping in rather than something I'd go out of my way to look at.

Jun 17, 2008 16:45



LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill634
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
193 posts
Joined May 2008

Quebec, Canada
MORE INFO

I appreciate the input from all of you, thanks. This particular spot appeals to me because of the distinctive geological formations in the rock. Far from being dirty or muddy the water is absolutely crystal clear. The edit by 'LeuceDeuce' brightens the image and brings out more detail but the actual rock color is more accurate in the original. I guess that's why I wanted to shoot the scene at nightfall...to try and get that sort of surreal water quality while maintaining the deep colors in the rock. I originally entered the photo in a contest with the name 'Warlock Brook' since I was aiming for a slightly spooky feel. It definitely doesn't work for everyone. A semi-pro friend immediately 'dissed' it as too dark also. As for lack of a clear subject, I have trouble with that at times. I tend to think of it as a mini-landscape where the sum of the parts is the subject. I plan to shoot it again with my new 17-55 F2.8 lens. This was done the 17-85.

Jun 17, 2008 20:06



LOG IN TO REPLY
LeuceDeuce
Goldmember
LeuceDeuce's Avatar
2,362 posts

Joined Oct 2007

Vancouver BC, Canada
MORE INFO

Well if anything, at least editing it got people to talk about it :)

Since you've elected to remove your original I'll remove the edit. I guess you're done with feedback.

Jun 17, 2008 20:10 as a reply to Bill634's post 4 minutes earlier.

my website: Light & Shadowexternal link
my flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill634
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
193 posts
Joined May 2008

Quebec, Canada
MORE INFO

Since you've elected to remove your original I'll remove the edit. I guess you're done with feedback.

Huh? Not at all LeuceDeuce, I didn't remove the original. It's showing up fine on my PC. I welcome your edit and anyone else's. The changes you made don't quite match what I had in mind when I shot the image but you took time to work on it and I am grateful for the input.

Jun 18, 2008 14:14 as a reply to LeuceDeuce's post 18 hours earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
LeuceDeuce
Goldmember
LeuceDeuce's Avatar
2,362 posts

Joined Oct 2007

Vancouver BC, Canada
MORE INFO

Bill634 wrote in post #5746564external link
Huh? Not at all LeuceDeuce, I didn't remove the original. It's showing up fine on my PC. I welcome your edit and anyone else's. The changes you made don't quite match what I had in mind when I shot the image but you took time to work on it and I am grateful for the input.

Yeah I just saw that. Last night I was getting the red X, and assumed you took it off your host site.

Jun 18, 2008 15:15

my website: Light & Shadowexternal link
my flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

726 views & 0 likes for this thread
Quicksilver -- time exposure shot
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Critique Corner

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.33version 1.33
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00121 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is dotlyc
644 guests, 625 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015