LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 USM

FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 29 Sep 2006 (Friday) 23:56   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
lmitch6
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2005
539 posts
California
[MORE/SHARE]

Hey all,

In case anyone is looking at this lens, here are a couple images from mine (picked it up today):

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/lmitch/25607385​9/external link

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/lmitch/25607382​7/external link

Post #1, Sep 29, 2006 23:56:00


Galleriesexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
sonnyc
Cream of the Crop
Joined Jun 2005
5,078 posts
san jose
[MORE/SHARE]

I used to have this lens for a short period and sold it as I already have the Tokina 12-24. A few people knocked this lens for its IQ but I found it to be pretty good and 20mm is plenty wide.

Here's a almost portrair shot :)

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.sonnycao.co​m ...9ers-8-15-06/IMG_6639.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Post #2, Sep 30, 2006 00:12:45


Sonny
websiteexternal link|Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
mrfourcows
Goldmember
mrfourcows's Avatar
Joined May 2006
2,108 posts
london
[MORE/SHARE]

4x4rock wrote in post #2055970external link
I used to have this lens for a short period and sold it as I already have the Tokina 12-24. A few people knocked this lens for its IQ but I found it to be pretty good and 20mm is plenty wide.

Here's a almost portrair shot :)

NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.sonnycao.co​m ...9ers-8-15-06/IMG_6639.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

:shock: haha

Post #3, Sep 30, 2006 00:19:32


gear | flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
lmitch6
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2005
539 posts
California
[MORE/SHARE]

Dang, wish I could have found a test subject like that! :-) So far, I think it'll fall under the category of underrated lenses. I find my copy to be plenty sharp and a good performer!

Post #4, Sep 30, 2006 00:48:08


Galleriesexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
mrfourcows
Goldmember
mrfourcows's Avatar
Joined May 2006
2,108 posts
london
[MORE/SHARE]

do you find the f/2.8 limiting?
or do you use it only in good lighting?

Post #5, Sep 30, 2006 04:03:51 as a reply to lmitch6's post 3 hours earlier.


gear | flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
lmitch6
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2005
539 posts
California
[MORE/SHARE]

I don't do a lot of low light shooting, but I was tinkering around with it last night in my living room, which is lit by one lamp. At f/2.8, a bump in ISO seemed prudent to get a good shutter speed. So, depending on the light levels on is shooting under, it isnt' that limiting.

Post #6, Sep 30, 2006 09:52:09


Galleriesexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
ed rader's Avatar
Joined May 2005
22,035 posts
silicon valley
[MORE/SHARE]

Jaetie wrote in post #2056421external link
do you find the f/2.8 limiting?
or do you use it only in good lighting?

personally i'd have a hard time buying an f2.8 prime unless it was an unusual length like, say, 15mm.

ed rader

Post #7, Sep 30, 2006 13:37:14


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/external link
http://erader.zenfolio​.com/external link
5D3, SL1, 16-35L f4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-300L, 100-400L, 35f2 IS, 24mm f2.8 ef-s, 15mm FE (sigma), 270ex II, gitzo, markins, benro

LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
cdifoto's Avatar
Joined Dec 2005
34,036 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

ed rader wrote in post #2057900external link
personally i'd have a hard time buying an f2.8 prime unless it was an unusual length like, say, 15mm.

ed rader

My thoughts as well. For me, the point of a prime is that extra speed.

Post #8, Sep 30, 2006 13:38:52


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it hereexternal link. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid!

LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
ed rader's Avatar
Joined May 2005
22,035 posts
silicon valley
[MORE/SHARE]

cdi-ink.com wrote in post #2057906external link
My thoughts as well. For me, the point of a prime is that extra speed.

an exception is if you shoot mostly or only with primes, which i believe the OP does.

ed rader

Post #9, Sep 30, 2006 13:56:36


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/external link
http://erader.zenfolio​.com/external link
5D3, SL1, 16-35L f4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-300L, 100-400L, 35f2 IS, 24mm f2.8 ef-s, 15mm FE (sigma), 270ex II, gitzo, markins, benro

LOG IN TO REPLY
lmitch6
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2005
539 posts
California
[MORE/SHARE]

ed rader wrote in post #2057971external link
an exception is if you shoot mostly or only with primes, which i believe the OP does.

ed rader

That's me. I only shoot primes. I started with them 20-odd years ago, and do my best work with them. Now, I'm not anti-zoom, but I do prefer the smaller size and lighter weight of a prime to a zoom of comparable image quality. Another thing is that my shooting doesn't necessitate having every focal length, 20mm to 85mm is my 'zone' so to say.

Post #10, Sep 30, 2006 14:27:59


Galleriesexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
KevC
Goldmember
KevC's Avatar
Joined Jan 2005
3,154 posts
to
[MORE/SHARE]

I wonder how the Sigma 20mm f/1.8 compares. It's more than stop faster... I'd really appreciate the speed.

I love the 20mm focal length... it'd be useful both on a 1.6x and 1.3x crop body for me =)

Post #11, Sep 30, 2006 15:22:55


Too much gear...
take nothing but pictures .... kill nothing but time .... leave nothing but footprints

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
lmitch6
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2005
539 posts
California
[MORE/SHARE]

I dunno about the Sigma. I looked at some reviews on Fred Miranda and it seems kind of hit or miss. I don't trust reviews much though, I like to try things out for myself before making a judgement. One recurring thing I see on that one is the 82mm filter diameter, those filters are kinda pricey!

Post #12, Sep 30, 2006 18:31:04


Galleriesexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Quad
Goldmember
Quad's Avatar
Joined Nov 2005
1,872 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

lmitch6 wrote in post #2058891external link
I dunno about the Sigma. I looked at some reviews on Fred Miranda and it seems kind of hit or miss. I don't trust reviews much though, I like to try things out for myself before making a judgement. One recurring thing I see on that one is the 82mm filter diameter, those filters are kinda pricey!


But then what filters do you need. UV for protection for those who crawl through rose bushes. A polarizer will work in far too funky a manner to be much more than a special effects filter. What other filters do people use anymore?

I would like to try the Sigmas myself from everything I have read wide open it is a soft focus lens and so wide open helps with focus then you stop down to 2.8 or so for a sharp pic. I agree that reviews are to be held with caution. The 20 Canon seems to get slagged a lot as well. The photos above and by the OP look fine over the web at least.

Post #13, Sep 30, 2006 22:30:42




LOG IN TO REPLY
lmitch6
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2005
539 posts
California
[MORE/SHARE]

Well, I'm 'old school' I guess, in that I still use filters quite a bit. A polarizer of course, and I keep a set of ND filters. The only filters I've dropped since my film days are colored filters for Black & White photography. I know a lot of people use photoshop for filter effects these days, but I shot film for much longer than digital, so 'old habits die hard', so to speak.

Post #14, Sep 30, 2006 23:01:21


Galleriesexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Dante ­ King
"Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister
Dante King's Avatar
Joined Jan 2005
9,134 posts
San Anselmo, California
[MORE/SHARE]

Jaetie wrote in post #2056000external link
:shock: haha

Damn, that 20mm makes her breasts look HUGE!

Post #15, Oct 01, 2006 00:45:39


Dante
I am not an Lcoholic. Lcoholics go to meetings!
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
93,992 views & 0 likes for this thread
Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 USM
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00082 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
786 guests, 562 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is Fairy Isabella

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.