![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
i have about a hundred photos that i am very pleased with and would like to put several of them in a frame. they look great on my computer screen but once i print them they just look kind of dull and not nearly as dramatic and colorful as i expected. i have used several different printers and none seem to be all that different. below is my workflow that i generally use.
DPP correct white balance/adjust contrast/brightness/and saturation. will use trimming tool when neccesary. most are left in raw format. from here i am ussually happy with the way they look. i may sharpen some and then send to print. should i only correct wb save to tiff and do all other editing in paint shop pro? is my monitor not calibrated and even if it were how do i know it is set to the labs printer? also would the picture being larger on the monitor have anything to do with the way that i am looking at the pic from a perspective compared to a 4x6 print?
__________________
Gripped 5D Canon 400 5.6L, 135L, 85 1.8, 35-80 converted to macro, strobe lights, modifiers, 430EX Flash Manfrotto tripod, grip head, giottos ball head |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
There's Moderators under there....
|
Make sure the sRGB profile is embedded into the images. Printing in aRGB will almost always give you a washed out print.
You should get your monitor calibrated. When you embed the profile into the image then they know what color space to print with. If you monitor is not calibrated then they will print to sRGB but it still won't match what you see on the screen. A little light reading for you. http://photography-on-the.net/forum/....php?p=3740438 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"I'm the original idiot"
|
A printed image will always appear to be "duller than the same image on your monitor. To get some sort of handle on how much duller, always view an image in proof mode and if required make final tweaks there before sending to the printer.
Another important but not much mentioned point is that ink jet printers spray minute quantities of ink at an absorbent surface, where on contact it spreads and blurs. Although paper and printer advances have improved this, it is still vital to apply a final sharpening prior to printing. A correctly sharpened image ready for printing will appear to be totally oversharpened on screen. How much final sharpening should you apply? Only the final print can tell you that, but if the sharpening is apparent in the finished print, then it's been too much! If your system was calibrated and you used a reputable printing house, they should be able to offer advice on profiling for their machinery. Without this basic step you will always be making a big leap into the unknown every time you send files off for prints. Richard |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
|
after checking several prints alongside my monitor it seems they are all much darker. the bright blue water is washed out and not very bright. i will get a calibrator program this week and give that a try. the pics are not unsharpe looking but more that they don't "pop" like on the monitor.
__________________
Gripped 5D Canon 400 5.6L, 135L, 85 1.8, 35-80 converted to macro, strobe lights, modifiers, 430EX Flash Manfrotto tripod, grip head, giottos ball head |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
From Rene's sig. information. He has a lot of good information.
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...d.php?t=296149 Tom
__________________
mark iin; mark iid(S); 7d; G10: Canon 17-40, nifty 50, Canon 24-70L, Canon 10-22, Canon 70-200/2.8 L II, 300 2.8, 400/5.6, L 135, Canon 85/1.8: Canon 100 macro, tubes, Canon 1.4 tele conv. =======>>> play W.A.I.N. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
"brain damaged old guy"
|
c-bass... I certainly agree with Lowner's practical advice. Another thing to watch is whether you're "double color managing", where BOTH the editing application and your printer are trying to manage the color. This usually results in poor prints.
For example, I use an entry level printer (HP B8350) and when printing from DPP I get better and brighter print results by letting the printer manage the colors. In the DPP printing dialog window, I select "none" for a printing profile choice. Also... viewing your image file at about 25% size on your monitor screen will give you a more accurate idea of what it will look like when printed. The final output sharpening you applied while viewing at 100% may not look so sharp at 25%.
__________________
Chas P "It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!" Last edited by ChasP505 : 29th of June 2008 (Sun) at 20:09. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Moderator
|
No it won't.
Quote:
The only place to use your monitors profile is in the OS. And you tell DPP where to find it. You don't use it anywhere in PS! Have a read in the link from my sig about printing with ICC profiles, and softproofing...
__________________
"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams Why Color Management. Color Problems? Click here. MySpace Get Colormanaged PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
Monitor needs to be profiled also the printer needs to be profiled for the paper you are using or use the profiles that come with the printer. Often, they are pretty close.
What you see is never what you get, simply because a monitor displays using transmitted light, a print we look at with reflected light. They will never appear to have the same contrast or "brightness" but you can get them close.
__________________
Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong. Gear List Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer Flickr |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
There's Moderators under there....
|
Of course not. I could have written it better. Embed correct color profile in file. Calibrate monitor to get accurate colors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
|
thanks. i bought a hp d 7360 yesterday that has each individual ink cartridge and i am never going to walgreens, wolf photo, or any other printer again for smaller than 8x10. i don't care if i do spend a little more money it is worth it. i am still playing with the profile and do neet to figure out how to make photos a little brighter in print with out appearing too bright on screen. seriously though i may have to get one of those 5 or 7 hundred dollar ones for christmas if they are better than this. blown away.
__________________
Gripped 5D Canon 400 5.6L, 135L, 85 1.8, 35-80 converted to macro, strobe lights, modifiers, 430EX Flash Manfrotto tripod, grip head, giottos ball head |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Screen to Print | mdaddyrabbit | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 2 | 15th of November 2007 (Thu) 22:04 |
| What am i doing wrong? Any crop and i cant print 8x10 | yup talon | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 16 | 19th of July 2007 (Thu) 09:10 |
| screen vs. print image | canon shooter | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 5 | 23rd of April 2006 (Sun) 10:22 |
| USM for screen and print | jads | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 0 | 2nd of March 2005 (Wed) 16:11 |
| DRebel LCD screen is WRONG - why? | klynam | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 14 | 22nd of January 2005 (Sat) 23:26 |