LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


50D @ Photokina 2008

FORUMS News & Rumors Camera Rumors and Predictions
Thread started 29 Jun 2008 (Sunday) 17:00   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
John_TX
Goldmember
Joined Oct 2007
1,464 posts
Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

Anyone think we'll see the new 50D at Photokina 2008 (Sept. 23-28)?

Current 40D pricing seems pretty low at the moment. Less than a $50 difference if you buy the 40D kit & sell the 28-135IS when compared to the 450D/XSi body.

Post #1, Jun 29, 2008 17:00:28


5D Mark II | 40D | 17-40L | 24-105L IS | 70-200L f4 IS | 100-400L IS | EF 1.4x II | EF 2x II | 480EX II |
-SmugMug-external link
-Gear List-

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
sth_
Senior Member
sth_'s Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
811 posts
Europe
[MORE/SHARE]

Very unlikely since it would break the ~18 month release cycle they had since the 10d.

Post #2, Jun 29, 2008 18:48:14


Flickrexternal link :: Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
sandpiper
Cream of the Crop
sandpiper's Avatar
Joined Aug 2006
7,000 posts
Merseyside, England
[MORE/SHARE]

John_TX wrote in post #5816216external link
Current 40D pricing seems pretty low at the moment. Less than a $50 difference if you buy the 40D kit & sell the 28-135IS when compared to the 450D/XSi body.

Hardly a fair comparison though. You need to compare like with like to see the true difference in price. Either take both as kits and sell the lens, or both as body only. Making the comparison you did makes the two seem much closer in price than they really are.

I just checked the body only prices in the UK, at my regular supplier, and the 40D is £607 with the 450D only £430, a whopping £177 difference (about $350).

Post #3, Jun 29, 2008 19:45:21




LOG IN TO REPLY
John_TX
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Joined Oct 2007
1,464 posts
Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

Bodies to bodies, your still only looking at a $171 USD difference ($892 vs $721). That's a pretty small difference IMHO, especially seeing as they're completely different lines.

Post #4, Jun 29, 2008 20:27:45 as a reply to sandpiper's post 42 minutes earlier.


5D Mark II | 40D | 17-40L | 24-105L IS | 70-200L f4 IS | 100-400L IS | EF 1.4x II | EF 2x II | 480EX II |
-SmugMug-external link
-Gear List-

LOG IN TO REPLY
cyrn
Senior Member
cyrn's Avatar
Joined Mar 2006
340 posts
Singapore
[MORE/SHARE]

Given Canon's current innovation, as more and more lines are being introduced, the differences between them gets compressed... that is, until they can come out with something innovative to widen the gap without feature crippling, cuz competitions would the gap in product line to their advantage and gain market share.

We might be looking at the Eeepc of digital cam soon or has it already happened with the 1000D, and look at the development of Eeepc, they are catching up with mainstream laptops in features.

Post #5, Jun 29, 2008 20:45:54


Photoevangelexternal link - Spreading the Good photography.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
kevEOS
Senior Member
Joined Jan 2008
282 posts
nyc
[MORE/SHARE]

PMA 2009

Post #6, Jun 30, 2008 02:55:09


30D | 50D | 7D | 5D III | 24L | 40STM | 50L | 135L | 2470L | 2470L II

LOG IN TO REPLY
aliflack
Senior Member
aliflack's Avatar
Joined Aug 2004
401 posts
York, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

John_TX wrote in post #5817262external link
Bodies to bodies, your still only looking at a $171 USD difference ($892 vs $721). That's a pretty small difference IMHO, especially seeing as they're completely different lines.

I make that a 24% difference and the UK price more like 40%...that seems like quite a difference to me ;)

Post #7, Jun 30, 2008 07:11:37


40D, 16-35L F2.8, 24-70L F2.8, 70-300mm IS, 100mm F2.8, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.8, Elinchrom D-Lites, Mid Octa, 580 EX
My Portfolio: Alistair Flack Photographyexternal link
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Feudal1
Senior Member
Feudal1's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
577 posts
Frederick, MD
[MORE/SHARE]

Wouldn't surprise me in the least to see Canon announce both a 50D and a replacement for the 5D. Nikon did it earlier this year with the D300 and D3. The price of the 40D has taken a tumble recently, and the introduction of models at the low end (Rebel XSi, XS) with arguably better sensors than the 40D would seem to put the 40D in a rather uncompetitive light. This becomes especially true when comparing it to the Nikon D300. I don't think Canon can stick to their past 18 month schedule - if they do, they're going to get their clocks cleaned by Nikon.

I would love to see a 50D with an upgraded sensor (improved low-light performance (especially above ISO 1600), improved image quality, a bump to 12 megapixels), improvements to focusing, and a higher-resolution LCD screen like the D300. Replacement of the direct-print button with something more useful would also be very nice.

Post #8, Jun 30, 2008 07:47:53


-- Chris --
(gear list and POTN feedback)
flickrexternal link | SmugMugexternal linkhttp://cwhite.smugmug.​comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sth_
Senior Member
sth_'s Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
811 posts
Europe
[MORE/SHARE]

Feudal1 wrote in post #5819866external link
models at the low end (Rebel XSi, XS) with arguably better sensors than the 40D

What makes you think so? The XSI has more megapixels but the resolution increase is pretty negligible and the 40d beats it in High-ISO.

Post #9, Jun 30, 2008 08:04:41


Flickrexternal link :: Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
Feudal1
Senior Member
Feudal1's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
577 posts
Frederick, MD
[MORE/SHARE]

sth_ wrote in post #5819948external link
What makes you think so? The XSI has more megapixels but the resolution increase is pretty negligible and the 40d beats it in High-ISO.

That's why I said arguably. :)

From the DPReview review of the XSi/450D (http://www.dpreview.co​m/reviews/canoneos450d​/page34.asp):external link

"The new sensor is superb, and from a resolution point of view puts the EOS 40D to shame without losing any of the high ISO performance that has been Canon's trump card for so long."

Don't get me wrong - I love my 40D. I just think that Canon needs to refresh the 40D in the near future, otherwise they risk losing more market share to Nikon.

Post #10, Jun 30, 2008 08:44:19


-- Chris --
(gear list and POTN feedback)
flickrexternal link | SmugMugexternal linkhttp://cwhite.smugmug.​comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sadatk
Goldmember
sadatk's Avatar
Joined Aug 2007
1,392 posts
Atlanta
[MORE/SHARE]

Feudal1 wrote in post #5820146external link
That's why I said arguably. :)

From the DPReview review of the XSi/450D (http://www.dpreview.co​m/reviews/canoneos450d​/page34.asp):external link

"The new sensor is superb, and from a resolution point of view puts the EOS 40D to shame without losing any of the high ISO performance that has been Canon's trump card for so long."

Don't get me wrong - I love my 40D. I just think that Canon needs to refresh the 40D in the near future, otherwise they risk losing more market share to Nikon.

2MP isn't quite a measure for "shame". With that point of view, you could use the same argument for the 1D Mark III. :/

Post #11, Jun 30, 2008 08:48:04




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
form
"inadequately equipped"
form's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
4,924 posts
Henderson, NV
[MORE/SHARE]

The shame is in the fact that the more consumer-grade XSi is capturing significantly more fine detail than the more semi-pro-grade 40D in RAW. It's not the megapixels, it's the detail being picked up.

Post #12, Jun 30, 2008 13:27:01


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Juan ­ Zas
Goldmember
Juan Zas's Avatar
Joined Aug 2005
1,511 posts
Madrid - ESP
[MORE/SHARE]

form wrote in post #5821625external link
The shame is in the fact that the more consumer-grade XSi is capturing significantly more fine detail than the more semi-pro-grade 40D in RAW. It's not the megapixels, it's the detail being picked up.

But at the cost to have moire as it´s reported .... the antialiasing filter over the sensor is "less agresive" ... but the results are there ... perhaps Canon has to change or improve this filter for the comming new cameras ....

Post #13, Jun 30, 2008 15:45:04


Cheers
Juan
_______________
My Gear
My Photo Galleryexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
form
"inadequately equipped"
form's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
4,924 posts
Henderson, NV
[MORE/SHARE]

No moire is as bad as the moire I saw on the Nikon D70; that in itself was one of the image quality-related reasons why I chose the Rebel XT at that time. Other reasons were more megapixels and higher actual sensitivity, the latter especially needed when I started because I was shooting action sports.

Post #14, Jun 30, 2008 16:33:45


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
352McCoy
Senior Member
352McCoy's Avatar
Joined Jan 2008
326 posts
Washington State
[MORE/SHARE]

I thought the 40D topped out at 3200 ISO.

Post #15, Jul 06, 2008 21:28:18


352McCoy;)
Using the Canon xti, 85mm f1.8 and the 70-200mm f/2.8 L

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
16,152 views & 0 likes for this thread
50D @ Photokina 2008
FORUMS News & Rumors Camera Rumors and Predictions



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00087 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1109 guests, 805 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is jdunker

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.