Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS News & Rumors Camera Rumors and Predictions
Thread started 29 Jun 2008 (Sunday) 17:00
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

50D @ Photokina 2008

 
John_TX
Goldmember
1,466 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Texas
Jun 29, 2008 17:00 |  #1

Anyone think we'll see the new 50D at Photokina 2008 (Sept. 23-28)?

Current 40D pricing seems pretty low at the moment. Less than a $50 difference if you buy the 40D kit & sell the 28-135IS when compared to the 450D/XSi body.


5D Mark III | 17-40L | 24-105L IS | 70-200L f4 IS | 100-400L IS | Sigma 20 f/1.4 ART | EF 1.4x II | EF 2x II | 480EX II |
-SmugMug- (external link)
-Gear List-

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
sth_
Senior Member
sth_'s Avatar
811 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Europe
Jun 29, 2008 18:48 |  #2

Very unlikely since it would break the ~18 month release cycle they had since the 10d.


Flickrexternal link :: Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
sandpiper
Cream of the Crop
sandpiper's Avatar
7,127 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Aug 2006
Merseyside, England
Jun 29, 2008 19:45 |  #3

John_TX wrote in post #5816216external link
Current 40D pricing seems pretty low at the moment. Less than a $50 difference if you buy the 40D kit & sell the 28-135IS when compared to the 450D/XSi body.

Hardly a fair comparison though. You need to compare like with like to see the true difference in price. Either take both as kits and sell the lens, or both as body only. Making the comparison you did makes the two seem much closer in price than they really are.

I just checked the body only prices in the UK, at my regular supplier, and the 40D is £607 with the 450D only £430, a whopping £177 difference (about $350).




LOG IN TO REPLY
John_TX
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,466 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Texas
Jun 29, 2008 20:27 as a reply to sandpiper's post |  #4

Bodies to bodies, your still only looking at a $171 USD difference ($892 vs $721). That's a pretty small difference IMHO, especially seeing as they're completely different lines.


5D Mark III | 17-40L | 24-105L IS | 70-200L f4 IS | 100-400L IS | Sigma 20 f/1.4 ART | EF 1.4x II | EF 2x II | 480EX II |
-SmugMug- (external link)
-Gear List-

LOG IN TO REPLY
cyrn
Senior Member
cyrn's Avatar
340 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Singapore
Jun 29, 2008 20:45 |  #5

Given Canon's current innovation, as more and more lines are being introduced, the differences between them gets compressed... that is, until they can come out with something innovative to widen the gap without feature crippling, cuz competitions would the gap in product line to their advantage and gain market share.

We might be looking at the Eeepc of digital cam soon or has it already happened with the 1000D, and look at the development of Eeepc, they are catching up with mainstream laptops in features.


Photoevangelexternal link - Spreading the Good photography.

LOG IN TO REPLY
kevEOS
Senior Member
282 posts
Joined Jan 2008
nyc
Jun 30, 2008 02:55 |  #6

PMA 2009


30D | 50D | 7D | 5D III | 24L | 40STM | 50L | 135L | 2470L | 2470L II

LOG IN TO REPLY
aliflack
Senior Member
aliflack's Avatar
401 posts
Joined Aug 2004
York, UK
Jun 30, 2008 07:11 |  #7

John_TX wrote in post #5817262external link
Bodies to bodies, your still only looking at a $171 USD difference ($892 vs $721). That's a pretty small difference IMHO, especially seeing as they're completely different lines.

I make that a 24% difference and the UK price more like 40%...that seems like quite a difference to me ;)


40D, 16-35L F2.8, 24-70L F2.8, 70-300mm IS, 100mm F2.8, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.8, Elinchrom D-Lites, Mid Octa, 580 EX
My Portfolio: Alistair Flack Photographyexternal link
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Feudal1
Senior Member
Feudal1's Avatar
583 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Frederick, MD
Jun 30, 2008 07:47 |  #8

Wouldn't surprise me in the least to see Canon announce both a 50D and a replacement for the 5D. Nikon did it earlier this year with the D300 and D3. The price of the 40D has taken a tumble recently, and the introduction of models at the low end (Rebel XSi, XS) with arguably better sensors than the 40D would seem to put the 40D in a rather uncompetitive light. This becomes especially true when comparing it to the Nikon D300. I don't think Canon can stick to their past 18 month schedule - if they do, they're going to get their clocks cleaned by Nikon.

I would love to see a 50D with an upgraded sensor (improved low-light performance (especially above ISO 1600), improved image quality, a bump to 12 megapixels), improvements to focusing, and a higher-resolution LCD screen like the D300. Replacement of the direct-print button with something more useful would also be very nice.


-- Chris --
(gear list and POTN feedback)
flickrexternal link | SmugMugexternal linkhttp://cwhite.smugmug.​comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sth_
Senior Member
sth_'s Avatar
811 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Europe
Jun 30, 2008 08:04 |  #9

Feudal1 wrote in post #5819866external link
models at the low end (Rebel XSi, XS) with arguably better sensors than the 40D

What makes you think so? The XSI has more megapixels but the resolution increase is pretty negligible and the 40d beats it in High-ISO.


Flickrexternal link :: Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
Feudal1
Senior Member
Feudal1's Avatar
583 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Frederick, MD
Jun 30, 2008 08:44 |  #10

sth_ wrote in post #5819948external link
What makes you think so? The XSI has more megapixels but the resolution increase is pretty negligible and the 40d beats it in High-ISO.

That's why I said arguably. :)

From the DPReview review of the XSi/450D (http://www.dpreview.co​m/reviews/canoneos450d​/page34.asp):external link

"The new sensor is superb, and from a resolution point of view puts the EOS 40D to shame without losing any of the high ISO performance that has been Canon's trump card for so long."

Don't get me wrong - I love my 40D. I just think that Canon needs to refresh the 40D in the near future, otherwise they risk losing more market share to Nikon.


-- Chris --
(gear list and POTN feedback)
flickrexternal link | SmugMugexternal linkhttp://cwhite.smugmug.​comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sadatk
Goldmember
sadatk's Avatar
1,392 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Atlanta
Jun 30, 2008 08:48 |  #11

Feudal1 wrote in post #5820146external link
That's why I said arguably. :)

From the DPReview review of the XSi/450D (http://www.dpreview.co​m/reviews/canoneos450d​/page34.asp):external link

"The new sensor is superb, and from a resolution point of view puts the EOS 40D to shame without losing any of the high ISO performance that has been Canon's trump card for so long."

Don't get me wrong - I love my 40D. I just think that Canon needs to refresh the 40D in the near future, otherwise they risk losing more market share to Nikon.

2MP isn't quite a measure for "shame". With that point of view, you could use the same argument for the 1D Mark III. :/




LOG IN TO REPLY
form
"inadequately equipped"
form's Avatar
4,928 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Henderson, NV
Jun 30, 2008 13:27 |  #12

The shame is in the fact that the more consumer-grade XSi is capturing significantly more fine detail than the more semi-pro-grade 40D in RAW. It's not the megapixels, it's the detail being picked up.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Juan ­ Zas
Goldmember
Juan Zas's Avatar
1,511 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Madrid - ESP
Jun 30, 2008 15:45 |  #13

form wrote in post #5821625external link
The shame is in the fact that the more consumer-grade XSi is capturing significantly more fine detail than the more semi-pro-grade 40D in RAW. It's not the megapixels, it's the detail being picked up.

But at the cost to have moire as it´s reported .... the antialiasing filter over the sensor is "less agresive" ... but the results are there ... perhaps Canon has to change or improve this filter for the comming new cameras ....


Cheers
Juan
_______________
My Gear
My Photo Galleryexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
form
"inadequately equipped"
form's Avatar
4,928 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Henderson, NV
Jun 30, 2008 16:33 |  #14

No moire is as bad as the moire I saw on the Nikon D70; that in itself was one of the image quality-related reasons why I chose the Rebel XT at that time. Other reasons were more megapixels and higher actual sensitivity, the latter especially needed when I started because I was shooting action sports.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
352McCoy
Senior Member
352McCoy's Avatar
326 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Washington State
Jul 06, 2008 21:28 |  #15

I thought the 40D topped out at 3200 ISO.


352McCoy;)
Using the Canon xti, 85mm f1.8 and the 70-200mm f/2.8 L

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

18,501 views & 0 likes for this thread
50D @ Photokina 2008
FORUMS News & Rumors Camera Rumors and Predictions


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00095 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is Kmanifest
682 guests, 596 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016