LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Sigma APO 120-400mm F4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM

FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 20 Jul 2008 (Sunday) 10:44   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
Alexei ­ TND
Senior Member
Alexei TND's Avatar
Joined Jun 2008
776 posts
Switzerland Lucerne
[MORE/SHARE]

As the title says, i wanna see you photos taken with the sigma 120-400mm
If you got some with TC theyd be great aswell

here are some to start it off:


IMAGE: http://fc03.deviantart.com/fs31/f/2008/202/b/0/Shore_by_TND_Photography.jpg
IMAGE: http://fc06.deviantart.com/fs32/f/2008/202/f/e/Surfin_by_TND_Photography.jpg

IMAGE: http://fc04.deviantart.com/fs31/f/2008/201/2/c/Bird_E_by_TND_Photography.jpg
IMAGE: http://fc01.deviantart.com/fs31/f/2008/202/d/e/Gull_1_by_TND_Photography.jpg
IMAGE: http://fc01.deviantart.com/fs31/f/2008/193/8/f/Stray_by_TND_Photography.jpg
IMAGE: http://fc01.deviantart.com/fs28/f/2008/176/9/5/The_Moon_by_TND_Photography.jpg
IMAGE: http://fc02.deviantart.com/fs26/f/2008/169/6/a/Rose_by_TND_Photography.jpg

Post #1, Jul 20, 2008 10:44:25


|My Flickrexternal link| EOS 5D, EOS 7D
Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS, 24-70L, 400 5.6L
Sigma 50 1.4, 12-24, 20 1.8
SpaceArtexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Overkill
Goldmember
Overkill's Avatar
Joined Jul 2006
1,062 posts
Amsterdam Netherlands
[MORE/SHARE]

Alexei TND wrote in post #5947118external link
As the title says, i wanna see you photos taken with the sigma 120-400mm
If you got some with TC theyd be great aswell

here are some to start it off:

QUOTED IMAGE
QUOTED IMAGE

QUOTED IMAGE
QUOTED IMAGE


The last two pictures show the power of PS..... in combination with the 120-400 (moon is a bit dissapointing and the last one is superb)!

Post #2, Jul 20, 2008 11:13:11


Canon EOS 40D Gripped / 20D Gripped, EF 70-200 2.8L, [COLOR=black]EF 100-400 IS USM L, EF-S 17-55 2.8 IS USM, EF-S 10-22 USM, Sigma 105mm 2.8 EX Macro, Kenko 2XTC DG Kenko 1.4TC DG, Kenko Extension Tubes DG 12-20, Canon Speedlite 580EX, Manfrotto Tripod!

LOG IN TO REPLY
Alexei ­ TND
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Alexei TND's Avatar
Joined Jun 2008
776 posts
Switzerland Lucerne
[MORE/SHARE]

Overkill wrote in post #5947274external link
The last two pictures show the power of PS..... in combination with the 120-400 (moon is a bit dissapointing and the last one is superb)!

the flower had less PS that you would think
ony some adjustements in the initial Photoshop raw opener and some tone correction

I assume you mean the odd creamy blur on the petals?
that part really popped when i slid the "recovery" bar to the right :)

Post #3, Jul 20, 2008 11:15:42


|My Flickrexternal link| EOS 5D, EOS 7D
Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS, 24-70L, 400 5.6L
Sigma 50 1.4, 12-24, 20 1.8
SpaceArtexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Roy ­ P
Senior Member
Joined Feb 2005
183 posts
Cambridgeshire England
[MORE/SHARE]

Just a couple of quick shots from my 120-400. First is a Dragonfly/Damselfly that caught my eye this morining while waiting for test match to start, sitting on fence warming up.

Second is what appears to be a sneaky beaky 135 (served 25 yrs in RAF but afraid do not know correct designation of this one) on its way home to Mildenhall last evening, they occasionally are friendly enough to fly over backyard.

Dragonfly was 1/125sec, f9, 400mm, 200iso, OS mode 1, handheld. 400D/xti

135 was 1/500sec, f8, 323mm, 200iso, OS mode 1. 400D/xti

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

Post #4, Jul 30, 2008 10:09:14 as a reply to Alexei TND's post 9 days earlier.


Roy
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
jenningsphoto
Member
Joined Mar 2008
59 posts
Roseville, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

When I first posted about this lens this pic had a positive reaction.
400mm, 1/80, f/5.6, ISO1600, handheld with available (window) light w/ OS engaged. I touched up levels and added a bit of sharpening.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://Jennings.zenfol​io.com/img/v1/p2279056​18-4.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED

Post #5, Jul 30, 2008 12:10:08




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Alexei ­ TND
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Alexei TND's Avatar
Joined Jun 2008
776 posts
Switzerland Lucerne
[MORE/SHARE]

very nice

sadly my sigma's image stabilizer has failed and im gonna be sending it in :'(

the whole image starts rotating like crazy and the lens rumbles when i pan diagonally with IS on

Post #6, Jul 30, 2008 13:11:45


|My Flickrexternal link| EOS 5D, EOS 7D
Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS, 24-70L, 400 5.6L
Sigma 50 1.4, 12-24, 20 1.8
SpaceArtexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ricky8587
Hatchling
ricky8587's Avatar
Joined Jun 2008
8 posts
Seattle Washington
[MORE/SHARE]

The OS will do that while panning diagonally or horizontally I've noticed in OS 1 mode, I found the problem went away changing to OS 2 setting .

Post #7, Aug 10, 2008 19:15:49




LOG IN TO REPLY
planters
Hatchling
Joined Jul 2008
6 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I like most of the shots here and am pleasantly surprised, they seem to be better than some of the Sigma 150-500 that I have seen. But I must ask, why use a lens like this, for flower and portrait shots? I think many lenses up close perform decently and a long range telephoto wouldn't be your best choice for those 2 types of photography. Would you post more examples at further distances? Myself and probably other interested buyers would be interested.

Thanks for posting your samples.

Post #8, Aug 10, 2008 19:44:03 as a reply to ricky8587's post 28 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
ricky8587
Hatchling
ricky8587's Avatar
Joined Jun 2008
8 posts
Seattle Washington
[MORE/SHARE]

This set is all shot with the 120-400 OS HSM,

http://www.flickr.com ...k/sets/721576057373​80708/external link

Post #9, Aug 11, 2008 08:13:15




LOG IN TO REPLY
irishlad
Member
Joined Mar 2008
59 posts
Belfast
[MORE/SHARE]

i am thinking of this lens as the replacement to my 75-300mm is. ricky8587 cracking work this lens, how do you find the auto focus on this lens?

more pics would be a great help

Post #10, Aug 11, 2008 12:30:44


canon 400d, 170-500mm, 18-55mm, 70-200mm f4 L + 1.4X PRO 300
wanted
Bigma

www.voltphoto.co.ukexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Alexei ­ TND
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Alexei TND's Avatar
Joined Jun 2008
776 posts
Switzerland Lucerne
[MORE/SHARE]

autofocus is great

its not the sharpest lens out there but then again sharpness isnt everything
the IS is very effective and it focuses fast and silent thanks to the HSM

Post #11, Aug 11, 2008 12:36:18


|My Flickrexternal link| EOS 5D, EOS 7D
Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS, 24-70L, 400 5.6L
Sigma 50 1.4, 12-24, 20 1.8
SpaceArtexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
ancistrus
Senior Member
Joined Aug 2008
233 posts
Derbyshire, U.K.
[MORE/SHARE]

Just trying out the 120 - 400. All comments gratefully received.

40D

Swan : Handheld 1/320 f/9.0 ISO 200. 235 mm.

Crop of approx 1/3 of original shot.

Gull: Handheld 1/800 f/8.0 ISO 640. 400mm

Taken on an awful day (typical of this summer). Windy, thick low cloud, slight drizzle. First shots with lens so still getting used to it. (Still am).

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

Post #12, Aug 19, 2008 15:15:25




LOG IN TO REPLY
KayakPhotos
Goldmember
KayakPhotos's Avatar
Joined May 2008
2,674 posts
Naples, FL
[MORE/SHARE]

Good to see a thread on this lens! I am looking into getting a telephoto for wildlife photography and was pretty excited with the new Sigma lineup came out. What turned me off of the 150-500mm was the fact that it was at f/6.3 from 300mm on. To me, this would just be unacceptable.

The 120-400 would be a little bit lighter and shorter, as well as faster at the 300-400mm range. Sadly, nobody has really been saying anything about it, so I figured it was a dud. I would like to see more pics so I can decide on this lens vs. the Canon 100-400. Anyone has used both, feedback would be great. I can buy a brand new one of these for $300 cheaper than a used 100-400 with the old 1-2 stop IS vs. the Sigma 3-4 stop OS. Decisions decisions....

Post #13, Aug 19, 2008 15:26:15 as a reply to ancistrus's post 10 minutes earlier.


Just a thought from Daniel
Gear
Picturesexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
MGW172
Senior Member
Joined Nov 2006
503 posts
Tennessee
[MORE/SHARE]

40Driggs wrote in post #6139169external link
Good to see a thread on this lens! I am looking into getting a telephoto for wildlife photography and was pretty excited with the new Sigma lineup came out. What turned me off of the 150-500mm was the fact that it was at f/6.3 from 300mm on. To me, this would just be unacceptable.

The 120-400 would be a little bit lighter and shorter, as well as faster at the 300-400mm range. Sadly, nobody has really been saying anything about it, so I figured it was a dud. I would like to see more pics so I can decide on this lens vs. the Canon 100-400. Anyone has used both, feedback would be great. I can buy a brand new one of these for $300 cheaper than a used 100-400 with the old 1-2 stop IS vs. the Sigma 3-4 stop OS. Decisions decisions....

I really wanted to like this lens too. I bought one of the first ones I could find, but it had focus issues. After TWO trips to Sigma, it finally came back and was pretty darn good. However, by that point I had purchased a 100-400 because I was going on a trip and needed something with IS in this range. When I got back from my trip I compared the two to see which to keep and which to sell. The Sigma was very close in sharpness, but the Canon had better contrast (by quite a bit) and the colors were more saturated and lacked that warm tone charactistic of Sigma lenses. Also, while the Sigma had a much more stable OS system than the Canon (you could tell this through the viewfinder), it was very "jerky", jumping sometimes at random. I like the fact that the Canon IS was smooth in operation even if not as effective as the Sigma.

In the end, I kept the Canon and haven't regretted it (although it was hard to spend the money at first).

Post #14, Aug 19, 2008 18:50:36


7D | 20D | Canon 10-22 | Canon 15-85 | Canon 70-300 L | Canon 100-400 L

LOG IN TO REPLY
KayakPhotos
Goldmember
KayakPhotos's Avatar
Joined May 2008
2,674 posts
Naples, FL
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks for the post. I think that I am going to bite the bullet and go with the 100-400 as well. A good copy of the canon is known to be superb. I just have not seen enough good things about the Sigma to go that route.

Post #15, Aug 20, 2008 12:32:28 as a reply to MGW172's post 17 hours earlier.


Just a thought from Daniel
Gear
Picturesexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
85,366 views & 0 likes for this thread
Sigma APO 120-400mm F4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00092 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
740 guests, 540 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is LudeMurph

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.