Index  •   • New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras
Thread started 24 Oct 2002 (Thursday) 18:51
PREV/NEXT

I have a little problem, could somebody please help me out h

 
Braveheart
Member
126 posts
Joined Sep 2002
MORE INFO

I added a Conversion lens adapter (CANON LA-DC58 ) to my G2, I them connected a 58mm UV filter to it, and topped it all off with a nice Canon Lens hood (LH-DC58 )

Now the problem is all these additions seem to block parts of the flash because they are wide and far out, so when I take indoor pictures with flash, one corner/side of the picture is darker, significantly and it somewhat ruins the picture.

Is this normal? I mean does that mean if I shoot indoors, I always have to take all these things off the camera?

Oct 24, 2002 18:51



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
dn7elson
Senior Member
819 posts
Joined Apr 2002
MORE INFO

It's normal to the extent that anything projecting in the path of the flash will block its illumination.

You will need to go with an external flash, or remove the tube to avoid this.

Oct 24, 2002 19:15



LOG IN TO REPLY
Braveheart
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
126 posts
Joined Sep 2002
MORE INFO

I see, and how much would an external flash cost for G2? the cheaper one.

Oct 24, 2002 19:16



LOG IN TO REPLY
dn7elson
Senior Member
819 posts
Joined Apr 2002
MORE INFO

It looks like the Canon Speedlite 220EX runs about $150 and the 420EX around $200.

Unless you plan to use the flash a lot, it is probably simpler to just remove the lens tube for flash shots, or perhaps use the zoom to reduce the width of the image.

Oct 24, 2002 20:14



LOG IN TO REPLY
Braveheart
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
126 posts
Joined Sep 2002
MORE INFO

Yeah, it's probably a better idea to remove all the add ons when shooting inside.

Thanks for your help.

Oct 24, 2002 20:56



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
mjmcgarry
Member
94 posts
Joined Aug 2002
MORE INFO

I disagree. Mostly because I think the built in flash is inadequate for good indoor photography. I bought the 420EX and the ability to bounce the flash off the ceiling makes a world of difference in the quality of the picture, IMHO. I would still remove all the extra attachments, though.

Braveheart, if you have not already spent all the money you got back when you returned your first G2 [and subsequently received a G2 as a gift] I would recommend the 420EX. It is worth its price.

Oct 25, 2002 06:25



LOG IN TO REPLY
japeterson
Hatchling
6 posts
Joined Apr 2001
MORE INFO

I agree about the deficiency of the on-board flash, inherent with all such is the closeness to the lens for great "redeye" "silhouette shadows" along with weakness and poor fill.
I often use the 220ex with the Canon off-camera cable extension. The 220ex doesn't have a swivel head for bounce, but this way I hold the flash in my left hand and direct it where ever seems a good bounce location. It's not always the ceiling. The 220ex seems to have plenty of power for bounce for most of my indoor shots, and I feel I have much more control and flexibility with it off-camera.

Nov 12, 2002 15:34



LOG IN TO REPLY

1,594 views & 0 likes for this thread
I have a little problem, could somebody please help me out h
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF    •   JUMP TO FORUM    •   FORUM RULES    •   Index    •   New Posts    •   RTAT    •   "Best Of"    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.1version 1.1
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.0014 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.01s
Latest registered member is VulvaC30
888 guests, 543 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014