LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Tamron SP AF 180mm f/3.5 Macro

FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 12 Aug 2008 (Tuesday) 23:02   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
beepclick
Goldmember
beepclick's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
1,850 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

You don't hear much about this lens. I bought one today. I have the Canon 60 and 100 macros, but I wanted this lens for one reason only - butterflies. I went to the local butterfly exhibit several times this summer, and found the 60 got too close, often disturbing the butterflies. And the 300L with 1.4x needed too much room in a very cramped setting.

Then, on my 3rd or 4th trip there, I saw another guy shooting, and he looked like he knew what he was doing. He had those knee pads you slip one, a 5D, a big lens and a macro ring lite. As I approached him, I recognized the Tamron design of his lens. It was the 180 Macro. I asked him if he would be posting his images on the internet (in hopes of getting a link so I could see the results), but he was rather vague about it, so I didn't press it. Anyway, I've been thinking of getting this lens ever since, and finally pulled the trigger this week.

No butterflies around, but thought I'd share some images of the lens, since many here are probably not familiar with it. It got good reviews at photozone except for the micro-motor AF and no limit switch. Over at fredmiranda, many users complained of AF noise/hunting. For my first shots today, I used manual, set the distance window close to 1:1, moved in with my 40D till the focus hit, then set up my tripod.

Based on the size of today's subject, and dried sunflower, I think it may work out OK for butterflies - need to get over there soon before the exhibit closes for the year.

The build on this lens is very nice, IMO. There seems to be some conflict on the weight of this lens. I get 1020g on my postal scale with the tripod ring. The lens has a nice finish, and the case is about on a level of the case for my 300 4L, though not as good-looking.

IMAGE: http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c358/vectorcafe/Lenses/IMG_6470web.jpg


IMAGE: http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c358/vectorcafe/Lenses/IMG_6475web.jpg


IMAGE: http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c358/vectorcafe/Lenses/IMG_6477web.jpg


IMAGE: http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c358/vectorcafe/Lenses/IMG_6484web.jpg


IMAGE: http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c358/vectorcafe/Lenses/IMG_6485web.jpg


IMAGE: http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c358/vectorcafe/Lenses/IMG_6379.jpg

A couple quick shots. I didn't even see the fine hairs in the viewfinder (my vision's not so good). I will need some practice, no doubt.
IMAGE: http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c358/vectorcafe/Lenses/IMG_6507web.jpg



IMAGE: http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c358/vectorcafe/Lenses/IMG_6509web.jpg

Post #1, Aug 12, 2008 23:02:07


Gear http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=635450

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Greg_C
Cream of the Crop
Greg_C's Avatar
Joined Nov 2005
12,609 posts
Brisbane, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

Congrats on the new lens. Looks good.

Post #2, Aug 13, 2008 01:41:16


Greg
Blogexternal link | Photogalleryexternal link | 1DmkIV + other stuff
Sanity is a madness put to good use.



LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Tee Why's Avatar
Joined Feb 2006
10,595 posts
Pasadena, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

Yea, looks like a nice lens. I'm thinking one reason for it not being as popular is that Sigma also has a 150mm macro for a bit less with HSM AF to boot.

I think both are nice lenses.

Post #3, Aug 13, 2008 02:24:36


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/external link

http://groups.yahoo.co​m/group/LAShooters/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
fWord
Goldmember
fWord's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
2,637 posts
Melbourne, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

If I ever bought another macro lens, the Tamron 180mm and Sigma 150mm would be the two biggest contenders. Reason why you don't hear too much about the Tamron 180mm is because as a macro lens, it's starting to get long and fairly specialized. Bearing in mind that most people are using APS-C cameras such as the likes of the 40D, 180mm is very long indeed.

Post #4, Aug 13, 2008 05:26:57 as a reply to Tee Why's post 3 hours earlier.


LightWorks Portfolioexternal link
Night Photography Tutorial: Basics & Minutiaeexternal link
Gear List (Past & Present)
The Art of Composition IS the Art of Photography.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Mrvile
Senior Member
Mrvile's Avatar
Joined Jun 2007
541 posts
Cleveland, OH
[MORE/SHARE]

The Tamron 180 is probably one of the "prettiest" looking lenses around, IMO. I've been lusting for one ever since I started shooting long macro, even though I never actually had the need for one (the Sigma 150 treated me well for years).

Post #5, Aug 13, 2008 07:15:25


Eric
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Review

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
fiveFPS
Goldmember
Joined Sep 2007
1,169 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

must be a better deal than canon

Post #6, Aug 13, 2008 07:28:04


Canon XTI | Canon 430ex | Crumpler 7MDH | 18-55mm

LOG IN TO REPLY
beepclick
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
beepclick's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
1,850 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

One from today. SOOC, sharpness bumped in DPP, convert/resize JPG.
STill getting the hang of it.

IMAGE: http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c358/vectorcafe/Lenses/IMG_6900.jpg

Post #7, Aug 13, 2008 14:39:14 as a reply to fiveFPS's post 7 hours earlier.


Gear http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=635450

LOG IN TO REPLY
LW ­ Dail
Senior Member
Joined May 2007
697 posts
Where the wind comes sweeping down the plain!
[MORE/SHARE]

I got to shoot with one of these this weekend at the Tamron workshop in OKC. NICE lens!

Did great with butterflies and flowers and did a great job on caged birds. Really well with the birds. Nice DOF. I was pleasantly surprised that it handled both situations nicely.

The fixed length takes some getting used to and the AF is klugy and loud, especially coming off of L glass, but once it's found it's focus it's not as annoying.

Post #8, Aug 18, 2008 09:33:43 as a reply to beepclick's post 4 days earlier.


Canon 5D: 24-105mm L IS, 100-400mm L IS (currently in VA, at the hospital!). Canon AE-1: FD 50mm, 80-200mm. Holga 120N.
"Photography is my one recreation, and I think it should be done well." Lewis Carroll

LOG IN TO REPLY
davebreal
Senior Member
davebreal's Avatar
Joined Jul 2007
713 posts
new jersey, usa
[MORE/SHARE]

figured i would bump this thread. i've been an owner of the Tamron 180mm for Canon for a few months now. I was out in the field a couple of days ago, and a friend let me try his 180mm Canon L 1:1.

The autofocus on the Canon definitely blows the Tamron out of the water. It is much smoother. My Tamron hunts fairly often even with good lighting. The autofocus on the Tamron is also rather noisy compared to the silent motor on the Canon. I didn't run any controlled test shows so I'm not qualified to compare IQ's. However, I'd imagine both are very acceptable.

Don't get me wrong, I do like my Tamron 180mm. But right now I am autofocusing 99% of the time for macros (wrongly?) and was amazed at the difference. I haven't seen anyone else post here with first-hand experience with both lenses before so I figured I'd report back. I haven't gotten my hands on the Sigma 180mm, but would like to try some test shots with that also.

anyways, here's one of my better insects shot... Tamron 180mm on an Xti w/ Kenko tubes

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/davidraymond/27​15582999/

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3118/2715582999_9b7aa687d2_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.flickr.com .../davidraymond/27155​82999/]external link

Post #9, Oct 28, 2008 10:20:50


Dave
flickr external linkTwitter external linkWordpress Blogexternal link YouTubeexternal link
My Gear--> my free eBookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
formula4speed
Senior Member
Joined Apr 2005
903 posts
Delaware
[MORE/SHARE]

I like my Tamron 180 a lot, however I find the autofocus to be just slightly better than useless. I personally manually focus all my macro work anyway.

Post #10, Oct 28, 2008 10:59:54


I'm taking pictures of everything, so go ahead and take this place away from me.

5DII, 16-35mm f/2.8L II, ZE 28mm f/2, 35mm f/1.4L, ZE 50mm f/1.4, 100mm f/2.8L IS, 580 EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
davebreal
Senior Member
davebreal's Avatar
Joined Jul 2007
713 posts
new jersey, usa
[MORE/SHARE]

formula4speed wrote in post #6576999external link
I like my Tamron 180 a lot, however I find the autofocus to be just slightly better than useless. I personally manually focus all my macro work anyway.


any samples you'd like to share?

was this your first macro lens?

Post #11, Oct 28, 2008 11:11:07


Dave
flickr external linkTwitter external linkWordpress Blogexternal link YouTubeexternal link
My Gear--> my free eBookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
beepclick
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
beepclick's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
1,850 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

davebreal: I agree with you on the AF shortcomings of the Tamron. I did a lot of research beforehand, and a vast majority of Canon 180 users lauded it's AF performance. What sold me was resolving power - the Tamron had better numbers at photozone.de. You just have to work a lot harder for them.

Moneywise, I'm glad I went with the Tamron, because I've gotten away from macro and close-up shooting, so don't use it much these days. Still, the Tamron has very fine optics, but it's mechanicals aren't the best. Built very solid though.

Post #12, Oct 31, 2008 23:05:27


Gear http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=635450

LOG IN TO REPLY
angryhampster
"Got a thick monopod?"
angryhampster's Avatar
Joined May 2006
3,850 posts
Iowa
[MORE/SHARE]

fWord wrote in post #6098534external link
If I ever bought another macro lens, the Tamron 180mm and Sigma 150mm would be the two biggest contenders. Reason why you don't hear too much about the Tamron 180mm is because as a macro lens, it's starting to get long and fairly specialized. Bearing in mind that most people are using APS-C cameras such as the likes of the 40D, 180mm is very long indeed.


Sigma's 180 is a stellar lens as well, with slightly higher MTF numbers than the 150. However, the 150's AF is really good for a macro lens. I wouldn't hesitate to say that it is the best lens that I've ever worked with.

Post #13, Nov 01, 2008 04:25:20


Steve Lexa
http://photography-on-the.net ...p?t=597688&highligh​t=mintIowa City Wedding Photographyexternal link
Lights, Cameras, Lenses, Empty pockets.

LOG IN TO REPLY
davebreal
Senior Member
davebreal's Avatar
Joined Jul 2007
713 posts
new jersey, usa
[MORE/SHARE]

beepclick wrote in post #6601492external link
Moneywise, I'm glad I went with the Tamron, because I've gotten away from macro and close-up shooting, so don't use it much these days. Still, the Tamron has very fine optics, but it's mechanicals aren't the best. Built very solid though.

I'm outside taking wildlife pics all the time (long lens), so I lug around a 2nd body with the Tamron Macro attached to handle all incidental butterflies and dragonflies. I'm always happy with the end results and I personally do need the "long" length of the 180mm for these critters. Thus I'm not tossing mine in the dumpster just yet ;)

However, if someone offered to straight up trade my a good copy of the Canon 180mm macro I may not resist! Sigma, not sure, I haven't tried it yet.

Another shot from the Tamron:
http://www.flickr.com ...in/set-72157600985744723/external link

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm4.static.fl​ickr.com ...69029720_e402cd569f​_b.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Post #14, Nov 01, 2008 07:42:42


Dave
flickr external linkTwitter external linkWordpress Blogexternal link YouTubeexternal link
My Gear--> my free eBookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
puttekula
Member
Joined Nov 2008
31 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Just got my lens the other day. gotta say I love it. That sharpness is absolutely 1:st class.... Here´s a sample. Absolutely nothing done with the pic´s. Just cropping. Canon 5D, still going strong...:cool:

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img213.imagesha​ck.us/img213/6770/img1​706ro2.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img238.imagesha​ck.us/img238/6652/img1​706v2tj1.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

Post #15, Feb 04, 2009 13:45:49 as a reply to davebreal's post 3 months earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
13,305 views & 0 likes for this thread
Tamron SP AF 180mm f/3.5 Macro
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00087 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
816 guests, 569 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is ozaero

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.