Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 22 Aug 2008 (Friday) 10:38
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Which type of filter should I buy?"
Polarizer
29
78.4%
Graduated Neutral Density
4
10.8%
Neither, it's not worth it
4
10.8%

37 voters, 37 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Filters, Filters, Filters...Advice Needed

 
Nistelrooydude
Goldmember
Avatar
1,495 posts
Joined Feb 2008
     
Aug 22, 2008 10:38 |  #1

I have just (and am continuing) to learn about this aspect of photography. Right now I have UV Haze protective filters for all my lenses, but I am looking into more "advanced" filters. I have decided between getting a graduted neutral density or a polarizer. I realize the latter of the two is more expensive but I'll deal. I am looking for your input into which I should get and would appreciate any suggestions as to what brand/model I should choose. I would like to keep it under $120 for either and I'm getting one for my 24-70L (77mm thread).

Thanks in advance,
Henry




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Qwest905
Member
Avatar
242 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Canada (Mississauga)
     
Aug 22, 2008 10:40 |  #2

www.hvstar.net (external link)

for all your filter needs..

very good pricing


Canon g10

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott_Quier
Senior Member
888 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Newport News, VA
     
Aug 22, 2008 10:52 |  #3

Purchasing filters are like making any other purchse - get what you need just before you need it (that's optimal, anyway). So the question really becomes, "What type of photography are you doing where you would need one or the other?" When you answer that question, you will be much better advice.


Scott
Operation: Love Reunited (external link)
Check out my blog (external link) Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Vendee
Senior Member
Avatar
355 posts
Likes: 60
Joined May 2007
     
Aug 22, 2008 10:54 |  #4

Nistelrooydude wrote in post #6156359 (external link)
I have just (and am continuing) to learn about this aspect of photography. Right now I have UV Haze protective filters for all my lenses, but I am looking into more "advanced" filters. I have decided between getting a graduted neutral density or a polarizer. I realize the latter of the two is more expensive but I'll deal. I am looking for your input into which I should get and would appreciate any suggestions as to what brand/model I should choose. I would like to keep it under $120 for either and I'm getting one for my 24-70L (77mm thread).

Thanks in advance,
Henry

I think you should first learn the difference between a GND and a CP filter. They are used for different purposes so you should really state what type of photography you are wanting the filters for. What is it you want to achieve?


| EOS 6D| EOS 3 |EF 24-105mm f/4L|EF 70-200mm f/4L IS |EF 40mm f/2.8 STM | EF 50 f/1.8 II | Speedlite 430EX II |Pentax MX |Pentax ME Super|Pentax K1000|Kiev 4A|Yashica 24
My stuff:- www.giverin.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
They have pills for that now you know.
Avatar
53,891 posts
Likes: 1494
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Aug 22, 2008 10:59 |  #5

I’ll say get the polarizer even if you’re not sure how to use it. It is the one that photoshop still can’t emulate and once slapped onto a lens takes about 30 seconds to figure out. With the GND, there are photoshop techniques that give you exactly what a GND does and are way more flexible as well. Though I have a GND all I ever use it for is my 10-22 as a polarizer just does not work as well on a wide angle.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
They have pills for that now you know.
Avatar
53,891 posts
Likes: 1494
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Aug 22, 2008 11:00 |  #6

BTW, I'll second HVSTAR. I don't know why anyone would get a filter they sell somewhere else.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,886 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Aug 22, 2008 11:05 |  #7

Think long term and seek to get a CP now from HVstar, as mentioned above, and later get a Lee holder (ideally professional version) and a .3, .6, and .9 ND Soft edge Grad set and maybe a .6 hard edge. Hitech filters are cheaper than Lee and just as good IMO if you want to save money. Don't waste money on the screw in NDG's. The Hoya Super multi-coated pro 1 and B+W MRC are both good and nothing between them IMO other than price.


http://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Avatar
26,339 posts
Gallery: 2177 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 7657
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Aug 22, 2008 11:12 |  #8

The GND and a polarizer have very different uses, so the best way of deciding which to go assuming tight funds, is usage. I'll move this to accessories which will be a better home for it.

1. GND:

Used mostly for landscapes to correct balance between bright and dark areas, ie sky and land. Normally best as square filters so the position and angle of the graduation can be adjusted. Normally you get a set of different graduation strengths and hard or soft graduation.

Alternatives: Shoot using a tripod, take 2 or more shots at different exposures and combine in photoshop using layers (Sometimes it is enough to make two different conversions from a single RAW image): Advantages of this is more control over the effect, downside is more processing. Problems: Combining the two separate shots can be an issue if scenic elements are moving around the graduation line, ie trees in the wind, rapidly moving clouds.

2. Polarizer

Can be useful in a wide range of applications but the effect can be subtle. You must get a circular polarizer. A linear polarizer will mess-up the camera autofocus.

a) Increase colour saturation of the sky: Only effective at 90 degree angles from the sun, effect is a bit of a cliché.

b) Improve colour saturation of some objects. This works by reducing reflections off the surface of some objects (all reflection introduces a degree of polarisation). This can be very subtle to the point it is not really doing much for you.

c) Increase or reduce reflections in water and glass. This can be a strong effect.

Available for a square filter systems so you can use the same filter on all lenses (with a different adaptor). Also available as a traditional screw in round filter, normally with better quality coatings. The Hoya SHMC ones are very good and HMC pro 1 Digitals are OK. B+W MRC are also very good. Both B+W and Heliopan do more expensive hermetically sealed versions as well as the basic, these might be worth it for the tropics.

Alternatives: None. Can't be emulated in processing.
Disadvantages: I find I hardly ever use mine. Also typically cause a 2 stop light loss, not a problem if working from a tripod.


My Photography Home Page (external link) RSS Feed (external link)
Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,242 posts
Likes: 72
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Aug 22, 2008 16:25 |  #9

The "protection" filters you have on your lenses all the time are the biggest waste of money and, possibly and under some circumstances, image quality.

Circular polarizers are the most useful to me, and I think to nearly all photographers.

You can mimic the effects of a graduated ND filter in post-processing.

You can't even come close to replicating with your computer all that a C-Pol can do. It's the one filter there's really no software equivalent for.


You won't get a quality C-Pol in 77mm for $120 or less. Last time I looked the cheapest was roughly $150: a B+W MRC (multi-coated). It' probably $20-25 more for their "Kaesemann" C-Pol which is also multi-coated but upgraded in a few other ways. The next more expensive was a Heliopan SH-PMC. The most expensive by far among the top three brands was the Hoya Pro 1 Super HMC.

I don't really get that. I'd buy a Heliopan or B+W over a Hoya any day of the week.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII(x2), 7D(x2) & other cameras. 10-22mm, Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5 Macro, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS (x2), 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, studio strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link) - EXPOSUREMANAGER (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nistelrooydude
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,495 posts
Joined Feb 2008
     
Aug 22, 2008 16:36 as a reply to  @ amfoto1's post |  #10

Thanks to everyone for all your advice. I am now decided upon the C-Pol. And from all your other suggestions, this is the one I'll get: http://hvstar.net …ction=VIEWPROD&​ProdID=731 (external link)

Thanks again.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,886 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Aug 22, 2008 16:47 |  #11

amfoto1 wrote in post #6158325 (external link)
The "protection" filters you have on your lenses all the time are the biggest waste of money and, possibly and under some circumstances, image quality.


You won't get a quality C-Pol in 77mm for $120 or less. Last time I looked the cheapest was roughly $150: a B+W MRC (multi-coated). It' probably $20-25 more for their "Kaesemann" C-Pol which is also multi-coated but upgraded in a few other ways. The next more expensive was a Heliopan SH-PMC. The most expensive by far among the top three brands was the Hoya Pro 1 Super HMC.

I don't really get that. I'd buy a Heliopan or B+W over a Hoya any day of the week.

I use UV as protection in Africa on safari and they are needed IMO and so I don't consider them a waste of money, even though good ones are pricey. For day to day I wouldn't bother personally, but then I wouldn't make a blanket judgement saying they were a waste of money either. It all depends ...

I just checked and found it hard to get a 'quality' Hoya or B+W CP for more than $150, but I guess I am looking in the right places :lol::lol:


http://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jr_senator
Goldmember
Avatar
4,861 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Aug 22, 2008 22:18 |  #12

amfoto1 wrote in post #6158325 (external link)
The "protection" filters you have on your lenses all the time are the biggest waste of money...

While I agree that routine full time use of protection filters is not a good idea I disagree that they are a waste of money. Although I can't recall the last time I felt the need to use one I have a UV filter to fit each of my lenses just in case I find myself needing one.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Avatar
26,339 posts
Gallery: 2177 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 7657
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Aug 23, 2008 01:36 |  #13

amfoto1 wrote in post #6158325 (external link)
The "protection" filters you have on your lenses all the time are the biggest waste of money and, possibly and under some circumstances, image quality.

For those coming late to this debate (which we have several times a week sometimes). Please read the protective filter FAQ linked below.

This covers a lot of the pros and cons as well as providing links to tests and filter technical data.

Any conclusion is a matter of opinion of course - so there is no one answer; just the facts.


My Photography Home Page (external link) RSS Feed (external link)
Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,814 views & 0 likes for this thread
Filters, Filters, Filters...Advice Needed
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is mason.snipes
747 guests, 395 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.