LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Filters, Filters, Filters...Advice Needed

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories
Thread started 22 Aug 2008 (Friday) 10:38   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
Poll"Which type of filter should I buy?"

Polarizer
29
78.4%
Graduated Neutral Density
4
10.8%
Neither, it's not worth it
4
10.8%

37 voters, 37 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
 
Nistelrooydude
Goldmember
Nistelrooydude's Avatar
Joined Feb 2008
1,495 posts
Detention Block AA 23 Non-Profane Posts: 16
[MORE/SHARE]

I have just (and am continuing) to learn about this aspect of photography. Right now I have UV Haze protective filters for all my lenses, but I am looking into more "advanced" filters. I have decided between getting a graduted neutral density or a polarizer. I realize the latter of the two is more expensive but I'll deal. I am looking for your input into which I should get and would appreciate any suggestions as to what brand/model I should choose. I would like to keep it under $120 for either and I'm getting one for my 24-70L (77mm thread).

Thanks in advance,
Henry

Post #1, Aug 22, 2008 10:38:13


Henry
Check out my site: HRE Photoexternal link
Gear List
"Every picture of you is when you were younger." - Mitch Hedberg RIP

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Qwest905
Senior Member
Qwest905's Avatar
Joined Aug 2008
242 posts
Canada (Mississauga)
[MORE/SHARE]

www.hvstar.netexternal link

for all your filter needs..

very good pricing

Post #2, Aug 22, 2008 10:40:16


Canon g10

LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott_Quier
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2006
888 posts
Newport News, VA
[MORE/SHARE]

Purchasing filters are like making any other purchse - get what you need just before you need it (that's optimal, anyway). So the question really becomes, "What type of photography are you doing where you would need one or the other?" When you answer that question, you will be much better advice.

Post #3, Aug 22, 2008 10:52:15


Scott
Operation: Love Reunitedexternal link
Check out my blogexternal link Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
Vendee
Senior Member
Vendee's Avatar
Joined May 2007
288 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Nistelrooydude wrote in post #6156359external link
I have just (and am continuing) to learn about this aspect of photography. Right now I have UV Haze protective filters for all my lenses, but I am looking into more "advanced" filters. I have decided between getting a graduted neutral density or a polarizer. I realize the latter of the two is more expensive but I'll deal. I am looking for your input into which I should get and would appreciate any suggestions as to what brand/model I should choose. I would like to keep it under $120 for either and I'm getting one for my 24-70L (77mm thread).

Thanks in advance,
Henry

I think you should first learn the difference between a GND and a CP filter. They are used for different purposes so you should really state what type of photography you are wanting the filters for. What is it you want to achieve?

Post #4, Aug 22, 2008 10:54:23


| EOS 6D| EOS 3 |EF 24-105mm f/4L |EF 40mm f/2.8 STM | EF 50 II | Speedlite 430EX II |Pentax MX |Pentax ME Super|Pentax K1000|Kiev 4A|Yashica 24
My stuff:- www.giverin.co.ukexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
human (barely) and bribable
gjl711's Avatar
Joined Aug 2006
48,195 posts
Deep in the heart of Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

I’ll say get the polarizer even if you’re not sure how to use it. It is the one that photoshop still can’t emulate and once slapped onto a lens takes about 30 seconds to figure out. With the GND, there are photoshop techniques that give you exactly what a GND does and are way more flexible as well. Though I have a GND all I ever use it for is my 10-22 as a polarizer just does not work as well on a wide angle.

Post #5, Aug 22, 2008 10:59:48


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I wondered why the baseball was getting bigger, then it hit me
.
::Flickr::external link
::Gear::

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
gjl711
human (barely) and bribable
gjl711's Avatar
Joined Aug 2006
48,195 posts
Deep in the heart of Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

BTW, I'll second HVSTAR. I don't know why anyone would get a filter they sell somewhere else.

Post #6, Aug 22, 2008 11:00:33


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I wondered why the baseball was getting bigger, then it hit me
.
::Flickr::external link
::Gear::

LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
condyk's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
20,848 posts
Birmingham, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

Think long term and seek to get a CP now from HVstar, as mentioned above, and later get a Lee holder (ideally professional version) and a .3, .6, and .9 ND Soft edge Grad set and maybe a .6 hard edge. Hitech filters are cheaper than Lee and just as good IMO if you want to save money. Don't waste money on the screw in NDG's. The Hoya Super multi-coated pro 1 and B+W MRC are both good and nothing between them IMO other than price.

Post #7, Aug 22, 2008 11:05:35


http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​203740

LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Lester Wareham's Avatar
Joined Jul 2005
19,888 posts
Hampshire, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

The GND and a polarizer have very different uses, so the best way of deciding which to go assuming tight funds, is usage. I'll move this to accessories which will be a better home for it.

1. GND:

Used mostly for landscapes to correct balance between bright and dark areas, ie sky and land. Normally best as square filters so the position and angle of the graduation can be adjusted. Normally you get a set of different graduation strengths and hard or soft graduation.

Alternatives: Shoot using a tripod, take 2 or more shots at different exposures and combine in photoshop using layers (Sometimes it is enough to make two different conversions from a single RAW image): Advantages of this is more control over the effect, downside is more processing. Problems: Combining the two separate shots can be an issue if scenic elements are moving around the graduation line, ie trees in the wind, rapidly moving clouds.

2. Polarizer

Can be useful in a wide range of applications but the effect can be subtle. You must get a circular polarizer. A linear polarizer will mess-up the camera autofocus.

a) Increase colour saturation of the sky: Only effective at 90 degree angles from the sun, effect is a bit of a cliché.

b) Improve colour saturation of some objects. This works by reducing reflections off the surface of some objects (all reflection introduces a degree of polarisation). This can be very subtle to the point it is not really doing much for you.

c) Increase or reduce reflections in water and glass. This can be a strong effect.

Available for a square filter systems so you can use the same filter on all lenses (with a different adaptor). Also available as a traditional screw in round filter, normally with better quality coatings. The Hoya SHMC ones are very good and HMC pro 1 Digitals are OK. B+W MRC are also very good. Both B+W and Heliopan do more expensive hermetically sealed versions as well as the basic, these might be worth it for the tropics.

Alternatives: None. Can't be emulated in processing.
Disadvantages: I find I hardly ever use mine. Also typically cause a 2 stop light loss, not a problem if working from a tripod.

Post #8, Aug 22, 2008 11:12:52


How to embed images from flickr so AMASS can retrieve the exif by Levina
My Photography Home Pageexternal link RSS Feedexternal link
Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV

LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
Joined Aug 2007
10,050 posts
San Jose, California
[MORE/SHARE]

The "protection" filters you have on your lenses all the time are the biggest waste of money and, possibly and under some circumstances, image quality.

Circular polarizers are the most useful to me, and I think to nearly all photographers.

You can mimic the effects of a graduated ND filter in post-processing.

You can't even come close to replicating with your computer all that a C-Pol can do. It's the one filter there's really no software equivalent for.


You won't get a quality C-Pol in 77mm for $120 or less. Last time I looked the cheapest was roughly $150: a B+W MRC (multi-coated). It' probably $20-25 more for their "Kaesemann" C-Pol which is also multi-coated but upgraded in a few other ways. The next more expensive was a Heliopan SH-PMC. The most expensive by far among the top three brands was the Hoya Pro 1 Super HMC.

I don't really get that. I'd buy a Heliopan or B+W over a Hoya any day of the week.

Post #9, Aug 22, 2008 16:25:50


Alan Myers
"Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7D(x2), 50D(x3) & other cameras, various lenses/access. - FLICKRexternal link - PRINTROOMexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Nistelrooydude
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Nistelrooydude's Avatar
Joined Feb 2008
1,495 posts
Detention Block AA 23 Non-Profane Posts: 16
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks to everyone for all your advice. I am now decided upon the C-Pol. And from all your other suggestions, this is the one I'll get: http://hvstar.net ...ction=VIEWPROD&Prod​ID=731external link

Thanks again.

Post #10, Aug 22, 2008 16:36:52 as a reply to amfoto1's post 11 minutes earlier.


Henry
Check out my site: HRE Photoexternal link
Gear List
"Every picture of you is when you were younger." - Mitch Hedberg RIP

LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
condyk's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
20,848 posts
Birmingham, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

amfoto1 wrote in post #6158325external link
The "protection" filters you have on your lenses all the time are the biggest waste of money and, possibly and under some circumstances, image quality.


You won't get a quality C-Pol in 77mm for $120 or less. Last time I looked the cheapest was roughly $150: a B+W MRC (multi-coated). It' probably $20-25 more for their "Kaesemann" C-Pol which is also multi-coated but upgraded in a few other ways. The next more expensive was a Heliopan SH-PMC. The most expensive by far among the top three brands was the Hoya Pro 1 Super HMC.

I don't really get that. I'd buy a Heliopan or B+W over a Hoya any day of the week.

I use UV as protection in Africa on safari and they are needed IMO and so I don't consider them a waste of money, even though good ones are pricey. For day to day I wouldn't bother personally, but then I wouldn't make a blanket judgement saying they were a waste of money either. It all depends ...

I just checked and found it hard to get a 'quality' Hoya or B+W CP for more than $150, but I guess I am looking in the right places :lol::lol:

Post #11, Aug 22, 2008 16:47:07


http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​203740

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
jr_senator
Goldmember
jr_senator's Avatar
Joined Sep 2006
4,861 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

amfoto1 wrote in post #6158325external link
The "protection" filters you have on your lenses all the time are the biggest waste of money...

While I agree that routine full time use of protection filters is not a good idea I disagree that they are a waste of money. Although I can't recall the last time I felt the need to use one I have a UV filter to fit each of my lenses just in case I find myself needing one.

Post #12, Aug 22, 2008 22:18:18



LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Lester Wareham's Avatar
Joined Jul 2005
19,888 posts
Hampshire, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

amfoto1 wrote in post #6158325external link
The "protection" filters you have on your lenses all the time are the biggest waste of money and, possibly and under some circumstances, image quality.

For those coming late to this debate (which we have several times a week sometimes). Please read the protective filter FAQ linked below.

This covers a lot of the pros and cons as well as providing links to tests and filter technical data.

Any conclusion is a matter of opinion of course - so there is no one answer; just the facts.

Post #13, Aug 23, 2008 01:36:03


How to embed images from flickr so AMASS can retrieve the exif by Levina
My Photography Home Pageexternal link RSS Feedexternal link
Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
1,749 views & 0 likes for this thread
Filters, Filters, Filters...Advice Needed
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00094 for 5 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1079 guests, 799 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is Billzo

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.