![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Whyalla, South Australia
Posts: 7
|
Hi,
I'm thinking about getting the Lowepro Slingshot 100AW. The functions (as they appear on the video on the Lowepro site) suit the way I want to use a bag, as I want to be able to have it on my back, but easy to use. I'm going for the small one because basically I only want to have a light kit with a body+lens and maybe two lenses with me (+batteries and cards) that can easily sit on my lap on public transport. I'll be leaving the charger and computer cables etc at home... Basically a tight compact way of getting round the city. I've read a couple of reveiws that said it was good in design and function, but build quality was not good, mainly around the main shoulder strap and stitching. I was wondering if anyone has used one? Or if there are comparable bags that I could use instead (similar function and price)? |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
|
I have the 200 and 300 and love them. You can take loads of stuff in the 300 because it has a load belt.
I can't speak about the 100 but the 200 and 300 seem as well made as any other of the lowepro bags I have. It is difficult to advise you more without knowing what you intend to carry in it. For a body and two or three lenses a small shoulder bag would probably be enough. I sometimes use a Rizo 170 AW for a body and a couple of lenses; but it feels much heavier than twice as much or more in the SS200 does. Some shots of my bags are here for you if that is any help http://www.zen20934.zen.co.uk/photography/mybags.htm.
__________________
My Photography Home Page RSS Feed MP-E, EF 100mm, EF 180mm : The Macro Dark Unholy Trinity : Bow down before their darkness and despair! Gear List FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters Macrophotography by LordV |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
I have one and use it.
It has proven to be exactly what it says it is, but it is just a little small at times. Not always, but ..... It seems solid, works in that you an swing it around and get access, but it is small, so I sometimes cram it full, and then it becomes a sort of "lump" on your back that is not great. I use it mostly for things like a bike ride, or X-Country skiing where all I really want is to be able to carry a camera and lens, and maybe another lens. Then it works great. Good protection in some rough handling (including a couple of falls, skiing) and easy access if you want a shot. But it's small. I think I would now have bought the 200. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 437
|
Quote:
__________________
5DC+35+85+135L |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Goldmember
|
i've had the 100 and currently use the 200.
awesome bags. I use it anytime i'm hiking or riding my quad.
__________________
Gear- 7d, 24-70L, sigma 70-200, Sigma 120-400, canon 50 1.4, Canon 100 2.0,sigma 10-20, Sigma 24mm 1.8 and a canon G11. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 17
|
I have the 100AW but wish I had purchased something a little bigger. It was my first bag and I love it but at times you need a little more. Looking for another one now also.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Zatox
Posts: 183
|
I love my slingshot 100. I've only had it for about 6 weeks or so, but I haven't had any quality issues even though I've crammed it full of stuff. I usually carry the camera with a lens on it, and then 2 or 3 additional lenses.
Like others have said, I'm now considering the 200 for a little bigger size. But I plan to continue to use the 100 when I can, most of the time it's big enough. Good luck on your choice. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
Posts: 1,778
|
zeto.
I would suggest the 200 for the number of lenses you have currently. You may add more equipment in the future. I also have the 200 and the 300 for additional space when needed.
__________________
Canon 7D x2,BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 10-22, 17-55 f/2.8 IS, 24-105 f/4 L IS, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 100-400 f/4.5- 5.6 L IS, Canon 1.4 Extender, 3 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitter |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 78
|
I orginally purchased the 200 but returned it because it was too small for my tastes and have been using the 300 for over a year now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
TD's worst nightmare!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Puyallup -- Don't worry. Nobody else can pronounce it either.
Posts: 6,484
|
Which body and which lenses? It can make a significant difference.
I've had a 200 for more than 2 years, and for the most part, it's been great. I used it extensively with a 20D + 24-105 mounted, a 580EX, 70-200 f/4, and some combination of two other smaller lenses. That's probably more than I should carry in it, not for size, but for weight. After a long day of shooting and running around, the single shoulder strap can be uncomfortable. After a long weekend, it's particularly noticeable. The Slingshot bags function best when they're not crammed full. You want to have room to access everything quickly, without a whole lot of juggling and shuffling other stuff around. Sure, you can cram more stuff into one, but then you lose the quick and easy convenience they provide. I've looked at the 300 and, for me, that's too big for a bag of this style. The 200 seems about perfect, and the 100 could be a bit tight.
__________________
-David "David raises a good point. . ." -- CDS "Once again, David Raises a good point! Gear List | Proof I Use The Gear In My Gear List (not necessarily proof I use it well) |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Whyalla, South Australia
Posts: 7
|
Thanks for your help, guys.
I'm probably going to go for the 100 to start because i need something light and compact to take on a plane, and my kit is small right now. Later when i need to (read: when I buy more lenses and toys) i'll get the larger one and have two bags to switch between depending on what I'm doing that day. Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
-POTN's Three legged Support-
|
I didnt really like them. Had the 300 and sold it. IMO is was too difficult to get the camera in and out "quickly" like they advertise. I perfer the Flipside backpacks more as I can access the entire bag contents without taking the bag off. I Currently have the flipside 400 AW but liked the 300 a lot too.
__________________
[ Gear List | Flickr | My Reviews ] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection /|\ GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
"Thrown under the bus."
|
I had the 200 and did not really like it. It was a great bag but I had to take it off to get to some of my lenses. I went to the lowepro flipside 300 and Love it.
__________________
I never, Not once claimed to read your post... |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
Posts: 1,778
|
Midnight.
Don't you have to take off the Flipside to access the storage area?
__________________
Canon 7D x2,BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 10-22, 17-55 f/2.8 IS, 24-105 f/4 L IS, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 100-400 f/4.5- 5.6 L IS, Canon 1.4 Extender, 3 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitter |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
-POTN's Three legged Support-
|
Quote:
This is the back of the bag (the part that touched your back while wearing it): ![]()
__________________
[ Gear List | Flickr | My Reviews ] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection /|\ GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Has anyone used the lowepro slingshot series. | ATBphotography | Accessories & Storage | 55 | 18th of May 2008 (Sun) 01:42 |
| Which LowePro Slingshot for me? | Graphyfotoz | Accessories & Storage | 7 | 15th of September 2007 (Sat) 10:27 |
| Lowepro CompuDaypack experiences? | topeju | Accessories & Storage | 1 | 29th of March 2006 (Wed) 05:08 |
| Experiences with the Lowepro Road Runner Mini AW | Rud-gr | Accessories & Storage | 0 | 6th of July 2005 (Wed) 07:00 |