LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Best Cheerleader Shots (HS)

FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Sports
Thread started 03 Sep 2008 (Wednesday) 15:36   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
AdamLewis
Goldmember
AdamLewis's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
4,097 posts
San Francisco, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

Magic 24 wrote in post #6305031external link
No...I don't think she is doing anything wrong but like Dan said, "over protective society". I have on similar except the leg is about 80 degrees verticle. I won't post them with the previous exception so there is no chance
of someone saying that I'M inappropriate and get banned from the school grounds like another OP I know.

Thats ridiculous.

I guess that means 99% of gymnastic shots are inappropriate? Swimming? Diving? Womens Lacrosse?
How else are you supposed to get a picture of a cheerleader doing certain things? Youre not taking pictures of their underwear. They wear bloomers for a reason...

If it is a good shot, take it.
If it is junk, junk it.
If you get banned over a good shot, fight it.

Post #16, Sep 14, 2008 14:02:08


http://www.alewisphoto​.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
AdamLewis
Goldmember
AdamLewis's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
4,097 posts
San Francisco, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

Dan-o wrote in post #6305116external link
It kind of sucks the way it has gotten. I shot my first Fri. night high school game and watched the cheerleaders in between some time outs and such and never snapped a shot. I just picked up this gig and didn't want to chance anything inappropriate. I never have encountered any problems but I've read about so many on this forum.

Why is it OK for you to watch them but inappropriate to take the pictures?

Post #17, Sep 14, 2008 14:03:01


http://www.alewisphoto​.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
J.Napier
Senior Member
J.Napier's Avatar
Joined Aug 2007
885 posts
Washington State
[MORE/SHARE]

I agree 100% with Adam, this shot and others are NOT inappropriate. I have been shooting cheer for 5 years now its what they do, as well as gymnast and other sports. They do where "Spankys" for this reason and they are designed to stay put for the most part. That being said I have choosen to destroy some very good photos just bescuse they are questionable. Society has gotton way out of line sometimes with its over protecting.
I am including a couple from this week here in PNW area. Its nice to have some outdoor light for these instead of the notoriuos indoor gym light once the season starts.
pacdzyne

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

Post #18, Sep 14, 2008 14:19:12


Jeff
Gear List
www.jni-ss.com /external linkBlogexternal link
Sportshooterpageexternal link / Maxprepsexternal link
Facebook external link/

LOG IN TO REPLY
liam5100
Senior Member
liam5100's Avatar
Joined Sep 2007
944 posts
Kansas
[MORE/SHARE]

AdamLewis wrote in post #6304842external link
Is she doing something inappropriate?

What?? I hope you dont have to do any volleyball games and post the shots.

Post #19, Sep 14, 2008 14:21:39


Bill -
Equipment : Quaker Oatmeal box with a little tiny hole in it... and a 400 2.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
cstewart
Goldmember
cstewart's Avatar
Joined Jan 2008
1,829 posts
Victoria, B.C. Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

AdamLewis wrote in post #6305469external link
Thats ridiculous.

I guess that means 99% of gymnastic shots are inappropriate? Swimming? Diving? Womens Lacrosse?
How else are you supposed to get a picture of a cheerleader doing certain things? Youre not taking pictures of their underwear. They wear bloomers for a reason...

If it is a good shot, take it.
If it is junk, junk it.
If you get banned over a good shot, fight it.

Lets of course also add women's tennis, beach volleyball, regular volleyball (because those shorts are waaaay too tight), triathalon, track and field,....et., etc.

These folks are all performing at a public sporting event and I think it can be reasonably expected and anticipated that they will be getting their photo taken. Yes while some shots may catch them in awkward or embarrassing poses (I recall a shot of one of the US women beach volleyball players celebrating their win that was very "risque" so to speak) it is still a moment in time of their performance and has every right to be published or shown as needed. I agree that you don't want to really embarrass the person, but if the shot is needed to tell the story, then the shot is needed to tell the story.

Now, if you are purposely shooting subjects like this to GET shots that are embarrassing or inappropriate, then I argue that you are no longer a sports photographer but instead have joined the ranks of the scummy paparazzi group.

Post #20, Sep 14, 2008 14:37:25


Please Check Out My Work at:
Independent Sports Newsexternal link -- Sports Shooterexternal link --Web Siteexternal link -- Facebookexternal link -- iStockphoto.comexternal link--Twitterexternal link
Gear: 1DX; 1D4; 70D gripped; 40D gripped; ; EFS10-22; EFS 17-55; EF 16-35; EF 135; EF 70-200 II; EF 300; EF 1.4X II Extender, 580 EX II Flash

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
AdamLewis
Goldmember
AdamLewis's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
4,097 posts
San Francisco, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

liam5100 wrote in post #6305533external link
What?? I hope you dont have to do any volleyball games and post the shots.

I think you missed the point..

Post #21, Sep 14, 2008 14:54:04


http://www.alewisphoto​.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamLewis
Goldmember
AdamLewis's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
4,097 posts
San Francisco, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

cstewart wrote in post #6305596external link
Lets of course also add women's tennis, beach volleyball, regular volleyball (because those shorts are waaaay too tight), triathalon, track and field,....et., etc.

These folks are all performing at a public sporting event and I think it can be reasonably expected and anticipated that they will be getting their photo taken. Yes while some shots may catch them in awkward or embarrassing poses (I recall a shot of one of the US women beach volleyball players celebrating their win that was very "risque" so to speak) it is still a moment in time of their performance and has every right to be published or shown as needed. I agree that you don't want to really embarrass the person, but if the shot is needed to tell the story, then the shot is needed to tell the story.

Now, if you are purposely shooting subjects like this to GET shots that are embarrassing or inappropriate, then I argue that you are no longer a sports photographer but instead have joined the ranks of the scummy paparazzi group.

Very well said.

Post #22, Sep 14, 2008 14:54:26


http://www.alewisphoto​.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ezpass
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
Joined Jan 2008
29 posts
Lexington, Ky.
[MORE/SHARE]

Sept 12

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

Post #23, Sep 14, 2008 15:33:47 as a reply to AdamLewis's post 39 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
HotShots
Senior Member
HotShots's Avatar
Joined Apr 2007
158 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Great job on the back flip.

I haven't quite gotten my settings dialed in yet to get one that crisp and clear.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

Post #24, Sep 14, 2008 15:48:25 as a reply to ezpass's post 14 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan-o
Goldmember
Dan-o's Avatar
Joined Apr 2006
3,531 posts
So. Cal.
[MORE/SHARE]

I agree with all of you, I don't find them inappropriate. I'm just saying the way society is getting photographing minors period has gotten controversial. Do a search there are countless threads about photogs getting shouted down by parents for shooting there kids.

Why is it OK for you to watch them but inappropriate to take the pictures?

Does this even need to be answered. Again I'm not trying to say there is anything wrong with these. I shoot youth sports, gymnastics, dance and also have two teenage daughters so it is something I read a lot about. Society as a whole has gotten a bit nuts. Sometimes I fill like packing up and go live in a bus in Alaska. :)

Post #25, Sep 14, 2008 15:58:11


Danny.
DMunsonPhotoexternal link
Cycling Illustratedexternal link
FaceBook Pageexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
CatchingUp
Goldmember
CatchingUp's Avatar
Joined Jul 2006
1,700 posts
Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

Someone asked the difference between watching them perform vs. snapping a picture. Well, the obvious thing that comes to mind is when you see the performance, that 'crotch shot' may last but for a split second. But a photographic image of it 'freezes' the shot.

Not sure if anyone saw it, but during the olympics, the Dallas Morning News ran two shots over the course of several days of the girls gymnastics and the one shot that they ran was pretty huge and it was one of the US girls on the uneven parallel bars in mid air with her legs just spread wide open. I remember thinking at the time how that shot might be uncomfortable for some. And like I said, when you are watching the performance, it all happens so fast that your mind is not drawn to any one particular aspect of the performance or the performer.

I guess what I'm saying is I can appreciate the sensitivity to the poster who errs on the side of caution.

Post #26, Sep 14, 2008 15:59:30


Tony
I use Canon gear...have several bodies and lenses and am quite pleased with them.

"A person's gift will make room for itself."

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
_aravena
isn't this answer a stickie yet?
_aravena's Avatar
Joined Feb 2007
12,401 posts
Back in the 757
[MORE/SHARE]

Need to get out and go to either the local high school or the one all my cousins attend and my almsot entire family's old school.....odd man out.

Nice shots people! I've been busy with football leagues and swim. Cheerleaders look like fun, in the sense they flip, jump, get tossed, etc.

IMAGE: http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/images/smilies/uhoh.gif
:D

Post #27, Sep 14, 2008 16:15:16


Last Shot Photography
My Siteexternal link ~ Gear List ~ Bag Reviews

LOG IN TO REPLY
cevad
Member
cevad's Avatar
Joined Oct 2006
98 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

No, I don't think the photo is inappropriate at all. If you had composed or cropped the photo so that her crotch area was the main focus of the photo, then it would be inappropriate. The photo you posted just shows a cheerleader/dancer doing a typical pose for her activity. The "spankys" under the skirt are part of the uniform and they are worn to cover parts of the body that will be willingly and openly exposed because of the various moves the wearer will make during her routine. She is also wearing tights that are like pantyhose which completely cover her private areas under the spankys as well as her legs, (much like ice skaters wear). This girl is covering more of her body than a gymnast or swimmer.

Catching a glimpse, (or a photo for that matter), of a performer/athlete like this is not like looking up a girl's skirt at the mall. Anyone wearing a dress or skirt has the reasonable right to privacy concerning her body under the garment. The girl at the mall does not intend to have that part of her body visible to the people around her, therefore an upskirt photo in that case is not only inappropriate but unlawful. The girl in your photo as well as her parents, her coach and her school all fully know that her crotch and butt are going to show during her performance and all of them apparently consent to that and are satisfied that she is reasonably covered.

Still, I do agree that some photos may be questionable as to good taste and common decency. If a photo is unflattering or tends to accentuate a feature in a way that the subject would most likely find uncomfortable, I think it is not only appropriate but necessary to either not publish/share the photo or to correct the blemish. For example, on two different occasions I have taken the liberty to use the healing brush in pp to save a good photo, both were girl volleyball players. Once, to hide the "foot of a humped, desert dwelling mammal" and the other to smooth out a white jersey that was a bit too bumpy. No one ever noticed the fix and I saved the shots.

Just my two cents. I don't care to argue my points but I thought I would still share them.

Post #28, Sep 14, 2008 17:14:55




LOG IN TO REPLY
Kiddo
Goldmember
Kiddo's Avatar
Joined Jan 2007
2,243 posts
Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

First time shooting Cheerleaders... Hoping to get much better pictures next week... The ones in this thread are great...

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

Post #29, Sep 14, 2008 21:00:09 as a reply to cevad's post 3 hours earlier.


http://www.tanyaeveret​tphotography.com/external link
http://tanyaeverettpho​tography.blogspot.com/external link

Canon 30D, Canon 10D, Canon SXi, Canon EFS 18-55mm Lens, Canon EF 28-80mm Lens, Canon 75-300mm EF Lens, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8LUSM Lens, Speedlite 540EZ

LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamLewis
Goldmember
AdamLewis's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
4,097 posts
San Francisco, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

CatchingUp wrote in post #6305980external link
Not sure if anyone saw it, but during the olympics, the Dallas Morning News ran two shots over the course of several days of the girls gymnastics and the one shot that they ran was pretty huge and it was one of the US girls on the uneven parallel bars in mid air with her legs just spread wide open. I remember thinking at the time how that shot might be uncomfortable for some. And like I said, when you are watching the performance, it all happens so fast that your mind is not drawn to any one particular aspect of the performance or the performer.

Seriously, IMO, the "inappropriateness" is caused by people who look at the picture and cant appreciate it for the picture that it is and feel they HAVE to look at the nether-regions of any particular athlete. Ive seen many pictures just as youve described and they are some of the best gymnastics pictures Ive ever seen (uneven bars at least...).

Its the people who see that picture and think, "Gee..Look at her legs spread wide open" and cant appreciate the athleticism involved or the photographers skill that are the problem.

Just my two cents on the situation.

P.S. Thats not to say that there arent perverts out there who aim to capture those type of pictures.

Post #30, Sep 14, 2008 22:14:45


http://www.alewisphoto​.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
69,264 views & 0 likes for this thread
Best Cheerleader Shots (HS)
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Sports



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00265 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
846 guests, 817 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is mm\'s

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.