![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sandpoint, ID
Posts: 214
|
Say if I put a roll of ISO 400 in, but I change the ISO on the camera to something else, does this adversely effect the photo or can it be done without harm. Say like in an environment that calls for maybe 100 ISO or maybe 800-1600 ISO etc etc...
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
Posts: 10,802
|
Depends on film, if you're developing it yourself your can just increase/decrease development and the film is still going to be fine.
That's called pushing and pulling the film - google it. With color films you'll need to pay extra if they pro lab can even do it, many won't.
__________________
I have typed this from Ubuntu. Vent: One lens, two lenses. Advice=what you seek; advise=what we do. Then="at that time" or "subsequently"; than="compared to". Aperture, not aperature. Their="owned by them"; there="at that place"; they're="they are". Its="owned by it"; it's="it is". Your="owned by you"; you're="you are"; ur="primitive". |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
As far as I know if you put a roll of 100 ISO in and set the camera to 800, you would under-expos, and vice-versa.
Test it: Put your digital camera in M, set ISO to 100, correct other settings, now change the ISO to 800, see what happens.
__________________
5D MKII w/Grip, 40D w/ Grip, 400D w/ Grip, EFs 18-55mm, 17-40 F4L, 70-200 2.8 ISL, EF 75-300 III USM, EF 50mm 1.8, EF 100mm 2.8 Macro, Pentacon Six 45mm Tilt, Composer Lens Baby, 430EX, 580EXII,....and big dreams. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Goldmember
|
Assuming you're using a film camera that reads the DX coding on the 35mm canister: you'll underexpose or overexpose the film, depending on how you switch the settings. Your average one-hour minilab probably won't be able to deal with that and you'll get a wrongly exposed negative.
A little more explanation: years ago, when film was king, photographers would deliberately do that with something called "push processing," where they would underexpose film by one stop, then overdevelop the film by leaving it in the developer chemical for a longer time. That usually resulted in a properly exposed negative, but one that was grainier than if the film was handled at its native ISO. Some photographers say switching the ISO settings on digital cameras is just an electronic form of push processing, except that the results are usually less grainy than with film. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: S. E. Michigan
Posts: 64,305
|
You can also "Pull process". Over expose & under develop for some nice color shifts & contrast variations. We would shoot 4X5 & 8X10 sheets at -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, and another at 0 EC. Then process one 0 exposure & adjust processing on the other 5 sheets based on that.
Sometimes we'd shoot several frames of small format on the start of a roll to cut off (Clips) to check developing time before the rest of the roll was processed.
__________________
FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything... Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers. www.FrankCizek.com Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET! Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch? Last edited by PhotosGuy : 12th of November 2008 (Wed) at 07:28. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 15,543
|
Will it adversely effect the image quality? Yes, it will. But by what amount depends on how much you under or over-expose it and how competent the lab is in pushing or pulling the development.
__________________
Mark ----- Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together. Thirty-five years of shooting and still learning. My G&N Blog (NSFW)- My Complete Gear List - Mac-Photo Website - My Tumblr Site (NSFW) G&N FORUM EARLY ACCESS & IMAGE POSTING RULES |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
|
I am not sure what you are trying to do. The ISO setting on the camera will just change how the internal light meter reads the scene. If you really want to over expose everything for some reason then just tell the camera you have slower film than what you actually put in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
"I'm the original idiot"
|
Stocky,
In the days of film I've seen wonderful images using push or pull processing. I never managed to achieve anything that was not best put straight in the waste bin, but some of the effects by masters of the art could be dramatic. Remember, this fear of noise in an image, and wanting a very "plastic" look is a modern attitude. Film users actually often wanted to increase grain and contrast for the effect they wanted. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Shutter speed - Film speed - Focal length - Sports photography | ddlj81 | Sports Talk | 6 | 11th of November 2007 (Sun) 20:00 |
| ISO: Think Tank's Speed Demon or Speed Freek | Palladium | Classifieds: Buy | 0 | 24th of August 2007 (Fri) 17:46 |
| Changing from film to digital | laidbackman | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 21 | 29th of September 2006 (Fri) 16:37 |
| Digital EOS ISO vs Film ISO | DocFrankenstein | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 5 | 2nd of November 2004 (Tue) 09:11 |
| Changing Parameters to match film | carnagex2000 | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 1 | 1st of July 2003 (Tue) 16:43 |