Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 04 Feb 2005 (Friday) 16:08
Prev/next
Poll"Vote for your Favorite -=Starter Lens=-"
EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
777
15.4%
Tamron 28-75mmf/2.8 XR LD IF DI
433
8.6%
EF 50mm f/1.8 II OR f/1.4 USM
1439
28.6%
EF 17-40mm f/4[color=red]L[/color] USM
478
9.5%
EF 70-200mm f/4[color=red]L[/color] USM
463
9.2%
Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX HSM
99
2%
EF 85mm f/1.8 USM
236
4.7%
EF-S 17-85MM f4-5.6 IS USM
580
11.5%
EF 35mm f/2
90
1.8%
EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
138
2.7%
EF 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
54
1.1%
Sigma 18-125 mm f/3.5-5.6 DC lens
88
1.7%
Sigma 24-70 f2.8 EX DG Macro
156
3.1%

4094 voters, 5031 votes given (any choice choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

-=Top 10=- Recommended Starter Lenses

 
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000), Honorary Member: Kill Team: Alpha
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
44,787 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Joined Apr 2003
Rhode Island USA
Feb 04, 2005 16:08 |  #1

-=Top Ten=- Recommended Starter Lenses

The first in a series of -=Top Ten=- recommended lens lists.

We start with the Basics,. the "starter lens"

Here in the EOS forum one of the most asked questions comes from the brand new,
first time SLR user asking "what's the best lens to start with??"

They are usually on a budget,. and often looking for "one lens to do most everything"

After research into dozens of past threads and some further discussion, with a budget of under $700.00 U.S.
...these are the lenses that were selected by our forum members as -=Top Ten=- Recommended Starter Lenses


Please vote,.. feel free to add to the thread why you like the lenses you do in the list,. and or add in an additional lens if it is not on the list and say why!

-=More Lens Polls=-

F.Y.I. This is a Public POLL. This means that if you click on one of the numbers in the poll,. you will be able to see who voted for what lenses. This may or may not seem helpfull to you. But it may be a benefit for various reasons.

This "Thread" is a forum informational thread and subject to extreme editing and deleting. Any OT discussion, issues etc should be taken via PM or another thread.


Selling my 200mm f/2L or 1.8L
GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
AcuraFan
Member
162 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Feb 04, 2005 16:22 |  #2

def the 28-135IS and the 50 1.4/1.8, those were my original starter lens before i got 'L's


enjoying motorsports and wildlife...
5d3/1d3,
16-35L, 28-70L, 70-200L 2.8,
70-300DO; 15FE, 24L, 35L, 50L, 85L, 300L 2.8, 50[COLOR=black]0L

LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
THREAD ­ STARTER
Admin (type T-2000), Honorary Member: Kill Team: Alpha
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
44,787 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Joined Apr 2003
Rhode Island USA
Feb 04, 2005 16:48 |  #3

Reminder ;)

As explained in the post above,. these are the Top 10 recommended starter lenses,. not our favorite lenses.

The budget was set at $700.00 U.S. and under,.

also,. please note the last sentence in bold print.
... add in an additional lens if it is not on the list and say why!

So feel free to add to the mix if we missed something ;)


Selling my 200mm f/2L or 1.8L
GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
klynam
Goldmember
klynam's Avatar
1,237 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Photopolis
Feb 04, 2005 16:57 as a reply to AcuraFan's post |  #4

My 2c...

Personally, a 'starter' lens is: inexpensive, decent quality, good flexibility. Thus for quite a while I've been quite satisfied with the 18-55 kit lens and a basic EF 75-300 - no IS, no USM, bought with my original Canon Rebel 35mm years ago. In fact I only 'upgraded' to a 50mm 1.8 prime last week - and that just to get better portraits.

Now that I'm learning more (mainly from this forum) about shooting, and realizing what my 'starter' lenses are NOT doing for me (or even doing against me), I've been looking...no, scratch that...saving for better glass. Don't know that I'll ever be able to stomach $1K+ for a lens though.

However: I thought I snagged a real bargain last week with a Canon 600mm L, IS, USM for $500 on eBay. (!!!) Then eBay cancelled all the bids because a scammer had hacked this guys account and was conning buyers out of their money. An $8000 lens for $500 would have qualified as a 'starter' lens in my book!!! :-)


Canon Cameras & Lenses | Masterworks Photographyexternal link | God is Light
"Until you can do better, copy." Tony Gresham

LOG IN TO REPLY
Grumps ­ Photo
Suffering Keyboard in Mouth desease
Grumps Photo's Avatar
2,005 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Ottawa, Canada
Feb 04, 2005 18:49 |  #5

28-135 f/3.5 - 5.6 IS USM.

Bang for the buck, gives a good range for the beginner. Not a major investment for a good range and will work for most styles of shooting.

It was a great lens to determine what else I needed to complete my kit. (Wider an Longer, not heavy etc.)

Still my favorite walking lens.


Grumps
(aka Jim or JAZZ D.P.G.)
1DsMKIII, 1DMKIII, T6s, D60, L's, DO, USM, other lens, flashes, studio gear (but no studio!) Olympus TG3
grumpsphoto.com

LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Mark_Cohran's Avatar
15,556 posts
Joined Jul 2002
Portland, Oregon
Feb 04, 2005 19:24 |  #6

A good, decent lens that's fairly sharp across it's zoom range, has good contrast and saturation, but won't cost an arm and a leg is the 24-85mm zoom. That would be my recommended starter lens, along with the 50mm prime.


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Thirty-five years of shooting and still learning.
My Tumblr Siteexternal link (NSFW)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark ­ Kemp
Goldmember
1,064 posts
Joined Jul 2003
Feb 05, 2005 04:55 |  #7

I would also consider a 28-300 'superzoom' as an early purchase (Sigma or Tamron) not for quality but for light weight and versatility. Especially if I was planning to do a lot of travel photography.

Like a lot of kit choices the most suitable lens depends on what you plan to do. A good wide angle for landscapes a long zoom for sports and wildlife etc. etc.




LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
ssim's Avatar
10,884 posts
Joined Apr 2003
southern Alberta, Canada
Feb 05, 2005 05:07 as a reply to Mark Kemp's post |  #8

When I got my first DSLR I was damned excited that I bought without alot of investigation. I got the 24-85 f/3.5-4.5 and the 100-300. As started lenses they were pretty good and worked best around f8. I moved on because they lacked that additional quality I was looking for. My son still uses them.

In US pricing you should be real close to 700.00 for both of them. Again, great for starter lenses or casual shooters that do want the large investment in glass or don't need that additional quality. I had printed up to 8X10 from my 10D using both lenses and they were great.

I like the idea of this sticky, maybe it will help with those "help me buy my next lens questions".


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Galleryexternal link | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

LOG IN TO REPLY
Cadwell
Cream of the Crop
Cadwell's Avatar
7,333 posts
Joined Jan 2004
Hampshire, UK
Feb 05, 2005 05:24 as a reply to Mark Kemp's post |  #9

Mmm... well I'm going on the assumption that this is going to be someones "first and only lens" - at least for a little while. Based on that, for me it has to come down to one of the "walkaround" lenses and I see the Canon EF 28-135mm and the Tamron 28-75mm as the two choices for that. I know if I'm doing the tourist bit it's one of those I put on my camera...

Now, since I loathe the 28-135mm with a passion (biggest waste of money of all my lens purchases) and I love the Tamron 28-75mm my vote becomes obvious. So, the Tamron it is.


Glenn
My Pictures: Motorsportexternal link/Canoe Poloexternal link/Other Stuffexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Longwatcher
obsolete as of this post
Longwatcher's Avatar
3,905 posts
Joined Sep 2002
Newport News, VA, USA
Feb 05, 2005 10:04 |  #10

I recommended the 28-135 IS
first because it is my favorite non "L" lens. The reason, very good quality, sharp, light weight (at least compared to "L"). I also frequently recommend this lens because of its reasonable cost versus what you get.

Second I recommended the 50/1.8, got to have a 50 if you have nothing else. Good to learn on, very low cost while still haveing quality. It will also allow you to shoot in low light situations where you might not otherwise be able to get a picture.

Third, I went with the 75-300 IS as I personaly like the lens have gotten great results from it and unless you can afford both the 70-200/4 and a 1.4 or 2x extender, gives you the most range.

I avoided wide angle lenses because the kit lens will get you by until you know what you are doing.

Just my opinion,


"Save the model, Save the camera, The Photographer can be repaired"
www.longwatcher.comexternal link
1DsMkIII as primary camera with f2.8L zooms and the 85L
http://www.longwatcher​.com/photoequipment.ht​mexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
THREAD ­ STARTER
Admin (type T-2000), Honorary Member: Kill Team: Alpha
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
44,787 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Joined Apr 2003
Rhode Island USA
Feb 05, 2005 12:49 |  #11

The numbers are pretty amazing at this point,.
The 50mm's the clear leader,. with the two "normal zooms" next in line,.

There is one surprise to me.

Time was that the 28-135mm was recomended evry time,. so I expected it to do well,. thing is in thae last year,. 6 months even more so,. we see the Tamron mentioned FAR mroe often than the EF 28-135mm. Last night these two lenses were nearly neck and neck,. a day later,. the 28-135mm has more than DOUBLE the votes of the Tamron! :shock: what happened? Where did all those Tamron recomendations go?

The 17-40mm f/4L is curently TIED with the Tamron? Wow.


Selling my 200mm f/2L or 1.8L
GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
HJMinard
Goldmember
HJMinard's Avatar
2,319 posts
Joined Jan 2004
Port Huron, Michigan, U.S.A.
Feb 05, 2005 13:06 |  #12

I voted for the 70-200/4L because I think it's just such a flippin' bargain for a very high quality lens. If afforded two votes, I would have also voted for the Tamron 28-75. Those two lenses together provide a sub $1000 starter kit with incredible sharpness and great (Canon) and good (Tamron) quality. Additionally (and obviously) their focal ranges are well matched.

Edit ... Duh, missed the multiple choice notification. (Can I vote again?)


~ Jay ~
Canon EOS 20D ... lenses and stuff
Without the Way, there is no going; Without the Truth, there is no knowing; Without the Life, there is no living. <><
Help remove children from poverty: Compassionexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
mbze430
Goldmember
mbze430's Avatar
2,454 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Chino Hills
Feb 05, 2005 19:15 as a reply to HJMinard's post |  #13

Definately the 50mm either MKI or MKII or the f/1.4. Anyone starting out in photography should learn on the 50mm


Gear List

My Hub to my personal workexternal link (just click on the banners)

LOG IN TO REPLY
GeneMan88
Goldmember
GeneMan88's Avatar
1,108 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Portland, OR U.S.A.
Feb 05, 2005 22:07 |  #14

This poll came out at a really good time for me... I presently own a Pro1 & a 420EX, & I just picked up a used 10D (body only). I've been lurking about this forum for a bit, just to see what you folks with DSLRs are using for lenses. I would love a L series lens, but they are way expensive & I'm trying to get the best at a reasonable amount of $$$. This poll has been so informative & has helped me shorten the list of lenses I've chosen on my own. I think I'm gonna pick up a EF 28-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS USM because it seems most like the lens on my Pro1 (at least when comparing focal length values), & a good "overall" type of lens. And having seen some of the photos taken by various people here, the 50mm f1.4 USM seems like a logical choice, too. I'm trying to stay within Canon, but not totally opposed to 3rd party lenses. I'm not a newbie at using a camera, but when it comes to DSLRs, I'm finding that it's totally different in that "I" have to make the choice of what lens to use... vs point & shoots which come with the lens that is permanent & pre-determined by the manufacturer. A very good & informative poll IMO.


1D MKI + 1Ds MKI + 5D MKI Kit - EF17-35 f2.8L | EF24-70 f2.8 L | EF 100-400L IS | EF15 f2.8 | EF35L | EF50 f1.4 | EF85 f1.8 | EF135L | 580EX II | 580EX I | 270EX II | G12
PDX/Vancouver Photography Meetup Groupexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
THREAD ­ STARTER
Admin (type T-2000), Honorary Member: Kill Team: Alpha
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
44,787 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Joined Apr 2003
Rhode Island USA
Feb 05, 2005 22:15 |  #15

Gene,

I am glad it is helpfull,. this is exactly what we had in mind! :)


Selling my 200mm f/2L or 1.8L
GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

222,251 views & 0 likes for this thread
-=Top 10=- Recommended Starter Lenses
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00553 for 5 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is Roy.Allman
932 guests, 578 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016