LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


-=Top 10=- Recommended Starter Lenses

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 04 Feb 2005 (Friday) 16:08   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
Poll"Vote for your Favorite -=Starter Lens=-"

EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
772
15.4%
Tamron 28-75mmf/2.8 XR LD IF DI
433
8.6%
EF 50mm f/1.8 II OR f/1.4 USM
1428
28.5%
EF 17-40mm f/4[color=red]L[/color] USM
478
9.5%
EF 70-200mm f/4[color=red]L[/color] USM
463
9.2%
Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX HSM
99
2%
EF 85mm f/1.8 USM
236
4.7%
EF-S 17-85MM f4-5.6 IS USM
578
11.5%
EF 35mm f/2
90
1.8%
EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
137
2.7%
EF 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
54
1.1%
Sigma 18-125 mm f/3.5-5.6 DC lens
87
1.7%
Sigma 24-70 f2.8 EX DG Macro
154
3.1%

4076 voters, 5009 votes given (any choice choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
 
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
Joined Apr 2003
40,772 posts
Providence RI
[MORE/SHARE]

-=Top Ten=- Recommended Starter Lenses

The first in a series of -=Top Ten=- recommended lens lists.

We start with the Basics,. the "starter lens"

Here in the EOS forum one of the most asked questions comes from the brand new,
first time SLR user asking "what's the best lens to start with??"

They are usually on a budget,. and often looking for "one lens to do most everything"

After research into dozens of past threads and some further discussion, with a budget of under $700.00 U.S.
...these are the lenses that were selected by our forum members as -=Top Ten=- Recommended Starter Lenses


Please vote,.. feel free to add to the thread why you like the lenses you do in the list,. and or add in an additional lens if it is not on the list and say why!

-=More Lens Polls=-

F.Y.I. This is a Public POLL. This means that if you click on one of the numbers in the poll,. you will be able to see who voted for what lenses. This may or may not seem helpfull to you. But it may be a benefit for various reasons.

This "Thread" is a forum informational thread and subject to extreme editing and deleting. Any OT discussion, issues etc should be taken via PM or another thread.

Post #1, Feb 04, 2005 16:08:52


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
My POTN Share Threads
Jake Hegnauer Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
AcuraFan
Senior Member
Joined Jan 2005
162 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

def the 28-135IS and the 50 1.4/1.8, those were my original starter lens before i got 'L's

Post #2, Feb 04, 2005 16:22:40


enjoying motorsports and wildlife...
5d3/1d3,
16-35L, 28-70L, 70-200L 2.8,
70-300DO; 15FE, 24L, 35L, 50L, 85L, 300L 2.8, 50[COLOR=black]0L

LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
THREAD ­ STARTER
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
Joined Apr 2003
40,772 posts
Providence RI
[MORE/SHARE]

Reminder ;)

As explained in the post above,. these are the Top 10 recommended starter lenses,. not our favorite lenses.

The budget was set at $700.00 U.S. and under,.

also,. please note the last sentence in bold print.
... add in an additional lens if it is not on the list and say why!

So feel free to add to the mix if we missed something ;)

Post #3, Feb 04, 2005 16:48:30


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
My POTN Share Threads
Jake Hegnauer Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
klynam
Goldmember
klynam's Avatar
Joined Oct 2004
1,237 posts
Photopolis
[MORE/SHARE]

My 2c...

Personally, a 'starter' lens is: inexpensive, decent quality, good flexibility. Thus for quite a while I've been quite satisfied with the 18-55 kit lens and a basic EF 75-300 - no IS, no USM, bought with my original Canon Rebel 35mm years ago. In fact I only 'upgraded' to a 50mm 1.8 prime last week - and that just to get better portraits.

Now that I'm learning more (mainly from this forum) about shooting, and realizing what my 'starter' lenses are NOT doing for me (or even doing against me), I've been looking...no, scratch that...saving for better glass. Don't know that I'll ever be able to stomach $1K+ for a lens though.

However: I thought I snagged a real bargain last week with a Canon 600mm L, IS, USM for $500 on eBay. (!!!) Then eBay cancelled all the bids because a scammer had hacked this guys account and was conning buyers out of their money. An $8000 lens for $500 would have qualified as a 'starter' lens in my book!!! :-)

Post #4, Feb 04, 2005 16:57:32 as a reply to AcuraFan's post 34 minutes earlier.


Canon Cameras & Lenses | Masterworks Photographyexternal link | God is Light
"Until you can do better, copy." Tony Gresham

LOG IN TO REPLY
JAZZ ­ D.P.G.
Suffering Keyboard in Mouth desease
JAZZ D.P.G.'s Avatar
Joined Oct 2004
1,932 posts
Ottawa, Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

28-135 f/3.5 - 5.6 IS USM.

Bang for the buck, gives a good range for the beginner. Not a major investment for a good range and will work for most styles of shooting.

It was a great lens to determine what else I needed to complete my kit. (Wider an Longer, not heavy etc.)

Still my favorite walking lens.

Post #5, Feb 04, 2005 18:49:45


Jim
1DsMKIII, 1DMKIII, D60, L's, DO, USM, other lens, flashes, studio gear (but no studio!)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Mark_Cohran's Avatar
Joined Jul 2002
15,545 posts
Portland, Oregon
[MORE/SHARE]

A good, decent lens that's fairly sharp across it's zoom range, has good contrast and saturation, but won't cost an arm and a leg is the 24-85mm zoom. That would be my recommended starter lens, along with the 50mm prime.

Post #6, Feb 04, 2005 19:24:42


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Thirty-five years of shooting and still learning.
My G&N Blogexternal link (NSFW)- My Complete Gear Listexternal link - Mac-Photo Websiteexternal link - My Tumblr Siteexternal link (NSFW)
G&N FORUM EARLY ACCESS & IMAGE POSTING RULES

LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark ­ Kemp
Goldmember
Joined Jul 2003
1,059 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I would also consider a 28-300 'superzoom' as an early purchase (Sigma or Tamron) not for quality but for light weight and versatility. Especially if I was planning to do a lot of travel photography.

Like a lot of kit choices the most suitable lens depends on what you plan to do. A good wide angle for landscapes a long zoom for sports and wildlife etc. etc.

Post #7, Feb 05, 2005 04:55:32




LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
ssim's Avatar
Joined Apr 2003
10,884 posts
southern Alberta, Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

When I got my first DSLR I was damned excited that I bought without alot of investigation. I got the 24-85 f/3.5-4.5 and the 100-300. As started lenses they were pretty good and worked best around f8. I moved on because they lacked that additional quality I was looking for. My son still uses them.

In US pricing you should be real close to 700.00 for both of them. Again, great for starter lenses or casual shooters that do want the large investment in glass or don't need that additional quality. I had printed up to 8X10 from my 10D using both lenses and they were great.

I like the idea of this sticky, maybe it will help with those "help me buy my next lens questions".

Post #8, Feb 05, 2005 05:07:39 as a reply to Mark Kemp's post 12 minutes earlier.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Galleryexternal link | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

LOG IN TO REPLY
Cadwell
Cream of the Crop
Cadwell's Avatar
Joined Jan 2004
7,333 posts
Hampshire, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

Mmm... well I'm going on the assumption that this is going to be someones "first and only lens" - at least for a little while. Based on that, for me it has to come down to one of the "walkaround" lenses and I see the Canon EF 28-135mm and the Tamron 28-75mm as the two choices for that. I know if I'm doing the tourist bit it's one of those I put on my camera...

Now, since I loathe the 28-135mm with a passion (biggest waste of money of all my lens purchases) and I love the Tamron 28-75mm my vote becomes obvious. So, the Tamron it is.

Post #9, Feb 05, 2005 05:24:52 as a reply to Mark Kemp's post 29 minutes earlier.


Glenn
My Pictures: Motorsportexternal link/Canoe Poloexternal link/Other Stuffexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Longwatcher
obsolete as of this post
Longwatcher's Avatar
Joined Sep 2002
3,905 posts
Newport News, VA, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

I recommended the 28-135 IS
first because it is my favorite non "L" lens. The reason, very good quality, sharp, light weight (at least compared to "L"). I also frequently recommend this lens because of its reasonable cost versus what you get.

Second I recommended the 50/1.8, got to have a 50 if you have nothing else. Good to learn on, very low cost while still haveing quality. It will also allow you to shoot in low light situations where you might not otherwise be able to get a picture.

Third, I went with the 75-300 IS as I personaly like the lens have gotten great results from it and unless you can afford both the 70-200/4 and a 1.4 or 2x extender, gives you the most range.

I avoided wide angle lenses because the kit lens will get you by until you know what you are doing.

Just my opinion,

Post #10, Feb 05, 2005 10:04:19


"Save the model, Save the camera, The Photographer can be repaired"
www.longwatcher.comexternal link
1DsMkIII as primary camera with f2.8L zooms and the 85L
http://www.longwatcher​.com/photoequipment.ht​mexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
THREAD ­ STARTER
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
Joined Apr 2003
40,772 posts
Providence RI
[MORE/SHARE]

The numbers are pretty amazing at this point,.
The 50mm's the clear leader,. with the two "normal zooms" next in line,.

There is one surprise to me.

Time was that the 28-135mm was recomended evry time,. so I expected it to do well,. thing is in thae last year,. 6 months even more so,. we see the Tamron mentioned FAR mroe often than the EF 28-135mm. Last night these two lenses were nearly neck and neck,. a day later,. the 28-135mm has more than DOUBLE the votes of the Tamron! :shock: what happened? Where did all those Tamron recomendations go?

The 17-40mm f/4L is curently TIED with the Tamron? Wow.

Post #11, Feb 05, 2005 12:49:59


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
My POTN Share Threads
Jake Hegnauer Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
HJMinard
Goldmember
HJMinard's Avatar
Joined Jan 2004
2,319 posts
Port Huron, Michigan, U.S.A.
[MORE/SHARE]

I voted for the 70-200/4L because I think it's just such a flippin' bargain for a very high quality lens. If afforded two votes, I would have also voted for the Tamron 28-75. Those two lenses together provide a sub $1000 starter kit with incredible sharpness and great (Canon) and good (Tamron) quality. Additionally (and obviously) their focal ranges are well matched.

Edit ... Duh, missed the multiple choice notification. (Can I vote again?)

Post #12, Feb 05, 2005 13:06:06


~ Jay ~
Canon EOS 20D ... lenses and stuff
Without the Way, there is no going; Without the Truth, there is no knowing; Without the Life, there is no living. <><
Help remove children from poverty: Compassionexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
mbze430
Goldmember
mbze430's Avatar
Joined Feb 2005
2,454 posts
Chino Hills
[MORE/SHARE]

Definately the 50mm either MKI or MKII or the f/1.4. Anyone starting out in photography should learn on the 50mm

Post #13, Feb 05, 2005 19:15:47 as a reply to HJMinard's post 6 hours earlier.


Gear List

My Hub to my personal workexternal link (just click on the banners)

LOG IN TO REPLY
GeneMan88
Goldmember
GeneMan88's Avatar
Joined Jan 2005
1,108 posts
Portland, OR U.S.A.
[MORE/SHARE]

This poll came out at a really good time for me... I presently own a Pro1 & a 420EX, & I just picked up a used 10D (body only). I've been lurking about this forum for a bit, just to see what you folks with DSLRs are using for lenses. I would love a L series lens, but they are way expensive & I'm trying to get the best at a reasonable amount of $$$. This poll has been so informative & has helped me shorten the list of lenses I've chosen on my own. I think I'm gonna pick up a EF 28-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS USM because it seems most like the lens on my Pro1 (at least when comparing focal length values), & a good "overall" type of lens. And having seen some of the photos taken by various people here, the 50mm f1.4 USM seems like a logical choice, too. I'm trying to stay within Canon, but not totally opposed to 3rd party lenses. I'm not a newbie at using a camera, but when it comes to DSLRs, I'm finding that it's totally different in that "I" have to make the choice of what lens to use... vs point & shoots which come with the lens that is permanent & pre-determined by the manufacturer. A very good & informative poll IMO.

Post #14, Feb 05, 2005 22:07:15


1D MKI + 1Ds MKI + 5D MKI Kit - EF17-35 f2.8L | EF24-70 f2.8 L | EF 100-400L IS | EF15 f2.8 | EF35L | EF50 f1.4 | EF85 f1.8 | EF135L | 580EX II | 580EX I | 270EX II | G12
PDX/Vancouver Photography Meetup Groupexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
THREAD ­ STARTER
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
Joined Apr 2003
40,772 posts
Providence RI
[MORE/SHARE]

Gene,

I am glad it is helpfull,. this is exactly what we had in mind! :)

Post #15, Feb 05, 2005 22:15:41


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
My POTN Share Threads
Jake Hegnauer Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
212,616 views & 0 likes for this thread
-=Top 10=- Recommended Starter Lenses
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00098 for 5 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
887 guests, 779 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is Alex3uerfuer

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.