Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk
Thread started 20 Sep 2008 (Saturday) 09:48
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1.6 X focal length=min shutter speed

 
bl4scott
Senior Member
bl4scott's Avatar
258 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Sep 20, 2008 09:48 |  #1

I understand this but why is this so??? What is the benefit? If you are shooting for ambient light, then most of the time you are breaking this rule.

Just wondering...

Blessings,

Brian


5D MkII * 7D gripped * / Canon 85 1.8 / Canon 24-70 L / Canon 70-200 2.8 L / Sigma 30 1.4

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
gasrocks's Avatar
13,431 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Portage, Wisconsin USA
Sep 20, 2008 10:02 |  #2

I guess I do not understand what the question is.


GEAR LIST
_______________

LOG IN TO REPLY
ImRaptor
Goldmember
ImRaptor's Avatar
1,448 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Humboldt, SK Canada
Sep 20, 2008 10:13 |  #3

The benefit is to avoid blur from camera shake.
Its not so much a rule, but a rule of thumb.


http://imraptor.devian​tart.com/external link
Why yes, I am a jerk. Thank you for asking.

LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
SkipD's Avatar
20,426 posts
Joined Dec 2002
Southeastern WI, USA
Sep 20, 2008 10:23 |  #4

The rule-of-thumb is the thread title divided into one.

1 / (focal length) is the formula accepted for 35mm film cameras, and

1 / (focal length * 1.6) is the equivalent formula for APS-C cameras.

The rule-of-thumb, Brian, provides the slowest shutter speed that the average photographer should use when hand-holding a camera to avoid camera-shake blur. Some photographers can hand-hold slower shutter speeds just fine while others require a faster shutter speed. Technique and the individual photographer play important parts in the results, of course.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
JeffreyG's Avatar
15,175 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Joined Jan 2007
Detroit, MI
Sep 20, 2008 10:26 |  #5

Faster shutter speed = less blur from camera motion and less blur from subject motion.

Subject motion varies by subject speed, but handholding (camera motion) is going to be a factor of focal length and photographer steadiness.

The old focal length rule works for most people shooting images they intend to print at about 8x10. If you plan to print bigger or view at 100% on a monitor then you may see some motion blur at speeds almost twice as fast.

For 4x6 prints you might be able to handhold much slower.

Also keep in mind that photographer streadiness and technique are factors.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII

LOG IN TO REPLY
John_B
Cream of the Crop
John_B's Avatar
Joined Sep 2006
Hawaii
Sep 20, 2008 10:54 |  #6

bl4scott,
I believe its so because us photographers have hearts and we breath too. Yea and those things keep beating and filling up and emptying while holding the camera! Good thing too...

Honestly the heart beating along with other things like us breathing affect a camera movement when holding it in our hands. The slower shutter speeds usually show this. The longer the lens the more it can be seen thus the faster shutter speed is recommended. As each person is different (we all don't have the same size heard and lungs) its used as a general majority use suggestion. That is why some can shoot slower and some need to shoot faster.


Sony A6500, A6000, Lenses, DMC-ZS40 & Apeman A80 <-- click to see (external link)
JohnBdigital.com (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
bl4scott
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
bl4scott's Avatar
258 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Sep 20, 2008 16:18 as a reply to John_B's post |  #7

awesome guys!!!

Thanks for the description. Totally makes sense. I figured it was something like that.

Brian


5D MkII * 7D gripped * / Canon 85 1.8 / Canon 24-70 L / Canon 70-200 2.8 L / Sigma 30 1.4

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

4,415 views & 0 likes for this thread
1.6 X focal length=min shutter speed
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00381 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is Thinky
987 guests, 442 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016