LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


are multi-coated filters worth double the price of non MC filters?

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories
Thread started 09 Feb 2005 (Wednesday) 17:50   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
johnathanesper
Junior Member
Joined Feb 2005
21 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

are the double prices for Hoya's HMC (multi-coated) filters worth the extra money?
Thanks!
Johnathan Esper
www.wildernessphotogra​phs.comexternal link

Post #1, Feb 09, 2005 17:50:48




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Tom W's Avatar
Joined Feb 2003
12,743 posts
Chattanooga, Tennessee
[MORE/SHARE]

Yes. Here's a post I made in a previous thread. I purposely set up an extreme situation to show the effects of a cheap filter on flare.

Tom W wrote:
The context of this thread, and another thread on another web site (I'm cheating on y'all) provoked me to take this series of images. All were shot with a very bright flashlight shining into the camera lens, just off to the left. Granted, its a worst-case situation, but I think it demonstrates the effects of filters on flare.

first, the lens without filter:
QUOTED IMAGE



Now, the inexpensive Canon UV/Haze filter (note the drastic increase in flare):
QUOTED IMAGE



And finally, with a Hoya Super HMC multicoated UV filter (note that it is very close to the unfiltered image):
QUOTED IMAGE

Post #2, Feb 09, 2005 18:10:05


Tom
5D III, 70D, & various lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
johnathanesper
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
Joined Feb 2005
21 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

thanks! that was very helpful!

Post #3, Feb 09, 2005 18:12:10




LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
tim's Avatar
Joined Nov 2004
49,501 posts
Wellington, New Zealand
[MORE/SHARE]

From that, if you bother to get a filter, get a good one. I recently took the expensive hoya filter off my Tamron, I figured it wasn't doing any good, but I might put it back on now... or at least do a few tests myself.

Post #4, Feb 09, 2005 18:17:06


NZIPP Qualified Professional wedding photographer.
Wellington Wedding Photographerexternal link ~ Camera and Lens Reviewsexternal link ~ Photographers Tech Supportexternal link
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Huckaback ­ Photo
Senior Member
Huckaback Photo's Avatar
Joined Jan 2005
683 posts
South Wales. u.k.
[MORE/SHARE]

Yes is the correct answer. best Hoya HMC or B & W quallity filters are great.

Post #5, Feb 09, 2005 18:18:31


Old photographers never die. They just go out of focus

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
pcasciola
POTN SHOPKEEPER
pcasciola's Avatar
Joined Sep 2004
3,129 posts
Millstone Township, NJ
[MORE/SHARE]

I recently bought a Hoya Super Multicoated UV filter from Adorama for my 85mm, like the one Tom W showed above. The salesman called me and said he could sell me a Tiffen 3 filter kit for $10 more than just the UV I had just ordered. When I said I'd rather have one good filter than three cheap-o ones, he said, "Ok, that's your business. I was just trying to be helpful".

Post #6, Feb 09, 2005 18:24:32


Philip Casciola
Pro Camera Gearexternal link - POTN Shopexternal link
Canon 7D, EF 50/1.8, EF 85/1.8, EF 300/4L IS, EF-S 18-55, Tamron 28-75/2.8, EF 70-200/2.8L IS
Sigma 1.4x & 2x, Tamron 1.4x, Gitzo 2220 Explorer, 322RC2 grip

LOG IN TO REPLY
ijohnson
Goldmember
ijohnson's Avatar
Joined Nov 2003
1,646 posts
Whiteriver, AZ
[MORE/SHARE]

I have never paid to much attention to the difference. I always buy the most expensive one because I can't bring myself to put $30 glass in front of my $1000 lens. It just doesn't make sense. I don't like using them at all but I do because I couldn't bear to see the Canon glass scratched.

Post #7, Feb 09, 2005 18:39:26


www.trickoflight.netexternal link
http://www.pbase.com/i​tj12345external link
Original 5D still ROCKS!!!

LOG IN TO REPLY
12345Michael54321
Senior Member
Joined Jun 2003
559 posts
Baltimore County, Maryland, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

Multi-coating is better in a fair percentage of situations. It's very rarely worse.

If you're willing to pay hundreds or thousands of dollars for your camera, and hundreds or thousands of dollars more for your lenses, does it really make sense to run a non-trivial risk of compromising image quality in order to save $20-60 (that being the typical price difference between multi-coated and non-multi-coated filters)?

I mean, final image quality is the result of a "chain" of factors (proper focus, proper exposure, steadiness of camera support, lens quality, etc.), where a single weak "link" can significantly impair the ultimate outcome. Spending a few extra bucks on a top qualilty filter can turn a potentially weak link into a strong one. Seems like a no brainer kind of decision to me.

Post #8, Feb 09, 2005 19:33:11 as a reply to ijohnson's post 53 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
13,915 views & 0 likes for this thread
are multi-coated filters worth double the price of non MC filters?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00073 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1054 guests, 903 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is pearcie

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.