Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Pets Talk 
Thread started 29 Sep 2008 (Monday) 09:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Pet Photography - what lenses

 
mineymole
Senior Member
380 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Rhinebeck, New York
     
Sep 29, 2008 09:19 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

I have a Rebel XSi. What lenses do you all recommend for shooting pets - natural light, candid.



Canon XSi • Canon 30D -- for sale
Canon EFS 17-55 f/2.8, 35L, 85 1.8, 135L, Speedlight 580ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
TheHoff
Don't Hassle....
Avatar
8,804 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Sep 29, 2008 09:23 |  #2

If you have a helper managing the pet you can get further back like 50mm or 85mm on your crop but if it is mostly just you, you need to be fairly wide so you can also keep their attention and manage the location. You already have like 4 or 5 lenses that could be used for it; are you looking for another?

85mm on full frame (since I wanted a thin depth of field):

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3046/2307402827_e05fb2fc0d.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://flickr.com …s/alexfirmani/2​307402827/  (external link)

••Vancouver Wedding Photographer  (external link)••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mineymole
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
380 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Rhinebeck, New York
     
Sep 29, 2008 09:25 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

TheHoff wrote in post #6402292 (external link)
If you have a helper managing the pet you can get further back like 50mm or 85mm on your crop but if it is mostly just you, you need to be fairly wide so you can also keep their attention and manage the location. You already have like 4 or 5 lenses that could be used for it; are you looking for another?

85mm on full frame (since I wanted a thin depth of field):

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: http://flickr.com …s/alexfirmani/2​307402827/  (external link)

Fantastic shot!

I have used my 50 1.4 and 85 1.4.... I am wondering if a zoom would be better - but obviously one that focuses fast!

One question - forgive me because I am NEW to this - is your dog shot done with natural light or was it lit? If so, what was your setup? Thanks in advance for the info.



Canon XSi • Canon 30D -- for sale
Canon EFS 17-55 f/2.8, 35L, 85 1.8, 135L, Speedlight 580ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheHoff
Don't Hassle....
Avatar
8,804 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Sep 29, 2008 09:32 |  #4

mineymole wrote in post #6402306 (external link)
Fantastic shot!

I have used my 50 1.4 and 85 1.4.... I am wondering if a zoom would be better - but obviously one that focuses fast!

One question - forgive me because I am NEW to this - is your dog shot done with natural light or was it lit? If so, what was your setup? Thanks in advance for the info.

Thanks; it was some natural light plus a bounced flash. There is a big window to my left, I had a 580 on the hotshoe, bounced back and to the left to accentuate it and then I had a modeling lamp on the background... really pretty simple, this was done before I bought more lighting gear.

I would say a zoom would be better assuming you have enough light and are going to stop it down or use f/4+. If, however, you're aiming for natural light photos with thin depth of field, you'll need something faster in aperture and quick focusing. That can be a zoom... my 16-35 is super fast in focus and sharp at all apertures and would make a good lens for it, but for less depth of field you'll want a longer focal length and a larger aperture.

And then you're going to have focus issues because pets just don't stay put... so you're asking for a tough setup. Using flash and stopping down the lens will get you more keepers.. so if you do use the natural light and wide apertures you'll need to shoot a lot of frames.


••Vancouver Wedding Photographer  (external link)••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,431 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Sep 29, 2008 09:38 |  #5

I get the best results when I stay back a ways and give them space and freedom to do their thing. 200mm or 300mm.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheHoff
Don't Hassle....
Avatar
8,804 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Sep 29, 2008 09:40 |  #6

Yup, that is a good point, too (assuming you're outside and not meaning window light).


••Vancouver Wedding Photographer  (external link)••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
egordon99
Cream of the Crop
10,247 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philly 'burbs
     
Sep 29, 2008 10:50 |  #7

You already have some excellent lenses. How do you find them lacking? What a zoom would give you is more flexibility in framing/composition and keep you from having to change lenses as often.

I do most of my "people" shooting with my 30mm and 85mm f/1.8, and I'm totally spoiled by the image quality, that it's worth it for me to deal with "zooming with my feet" and more lens changes. From my research, the Canon 24-70L might approach the quality of these two primes (albeit a bit slower @f/2.8) so that would probably be MY only choice if I were to switch to a zoom for the 24-85 range.

mineymole wrote in post #6402306 (external link)
I have used my 50 1.4 and 85 1.4.... I am wondering if a zoom would be better - but obviously one that focuses fast!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 218
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Sep 29, 2008 11:00 |  #8

Indoors, usually the 24-70 and 70-200. Outdoors, more the 70-200.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'

Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mineymole
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
380 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Rhinebeck, New York
     
Sep 29, 2008 11:23 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

egordon99 wrote in post #6402799 (external link)
You already have some excellent lenses. How do you find them lacking? What a zoom would give you is more flexibility in framing/composition and keep you from having to change lenses as often.

I do most of my "people" shooting with my 30mm and 85mm f/1.8, and I'm totally spoiled by the image quality, that it's worth it for me to deal with "zooming with my feet" and more lens changes. From my research, the Canon 24-70L might approach the quality of these two primes (albeit a bit slower @f/2.8) so that would probably be MY only choice if I were to switch to a zoom for the 24-85 range.

None lacking. Just wondering if the 17-55 IS or the 24-80 would be better.
I'm very grateful for all the advice.



Canon XSi • Canon 30D -- for sale
Canon EFS 17-55 f/2.8, 35L, 85 1.8, 135L, Speedlight 580ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mineymole
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
380 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Rhinebeck, New York
     
Sep 29, 2008 11:23 |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

TheHoff wrote in post #6402344 (external link)
Thanks; it was some natural light plus a bounced flash. There is a big window to my left, I had a 580 on the hotshoe, bounced back and to the left to accentuate it and then I had a modeling lamp on the background... really pretty simple, this was done before I bought more lighting gear.

I would say a zoom would be better assuming you have enough light and are going to stop it down or use f/4+. If, however, you're aiming for natural light photos with thin depth of field, you'll need something faster in aperture and quick focusing. That can be a zoom... my 16-35 is super fast in focus and sharp at all apertures and would make a good lens for it, but for less depth of field you'll want a longer focal length and a larger aperture.

And then you're going to have focus issues because pets just don't stay put... so you're asking for a tough setup. Using flash and stopping down the lens will get you more keepers.. so if you do use the natural light and wide apertures you'll need to shoot a lot of frames.

Thank you so much for your advice.



Canon XSi • Canon 30D -- for sale
Canon EFS 17-55 f/2.8, 35L, 85 1.8, 135L, Speedlight 580ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
egordon99
Cream of the Crop
10,247 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philly 'burbs
     
Sep 29, 2008 11:49 |  #11

I'm going to assume you mean the 24-70L.....

I've been debating this in my mind - I'd LOVE a 24-70L for event work, and one way to fund it would be to sell my two primes. I'd lose about two stops of light, but it would be more versatile. I've yet to see someone offer a definete opinion on the IMAGE QUALITY of the L vs. the two excellent primes. But everytime I snap a shot of my five month old son with my 85mm f/1.8, I give up the idea.

mineymole wrote in post #6402992 (external link)
None lacking. Just wondering if the 17-55 IS or the 24-80 would be better.
I'm very grateful for all the advice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mineymole
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
380 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Rhinebeck, New York
     
Sep 29, 2008 11:52 |  #12
bannedPermanent ban

egordon99 wrote in post #6403148 (external link)
I'm going to assume you mean the 24-70L.....

I've been debating this in my mind - I'd LOVE a 24-70L for event work, and one way to fund it would be to sell my two primes. I'd lose about two stops of light, but it would be more versatile. I've yet to see someone offer a definete opinion on the IMAGE QUALITY of the L vs. the two excellent primes. But everytime I snap a shot of my five month old son with my 85mm f/1.8, I give up the idea.

Yes I have been giving some thought to the 24-70L or the Sigma 24-70.



Canon XSi • Canon 30D -- for sale
Canon EFS 17-55 f/2.8, 35L, 85 1.8, 135L, Speedlight 580ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rushnp774
Member
Avatar
142 posts
Joined Oct 2008
     
Oct 11, 2008 18:41 |  #13

By far, my best pet portraits are from my "nifty fifty" f/1.8 lens. Check out my pics on Flickr if you'd like to see them. I only have that lens and a crappy Sigma 28-105, so I tend to leave the 50mm on there most of the time.


Metavo Photo (external link) - Photoshop, Lightoom, and Photoshop Elements Tutorials

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ultimate ­ CC
Goldmember
Avatar
1,480 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Oct 25, 2008 22:11 |  #14

70-200 2.8IS outdoors is my go to lens now but i used to love the 100-400L

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED

My Gear And For Sale Items
www.danhonovich.com (external link)
www.danhonovich.blogsp​ot.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mineymole
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
380 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Rhinebeck, New York
     
Oct 26, 2008 08:23 |  #15
bannedPermanent ban

rushnp774 wrote in post #6478886 (external link)
By far, my best pet portraits are from my "nifty fifty" f/1.8 lens. Check out my pics on Flickr if you'd like to see them. I only have that lens and a crappy Sigma 28-105, so I tend to leave the 50mm on there most of the time.

How do I find you on flickr?



Canon XSi • Canon 30D -- for sale
Canon EFS 17-55 f/2.8, 35L, 85 1.8, 135L, Speedlight 580ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

55,878 views & 13 likes for this thread
Pet Photography - what lenses
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Pets Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is psloan297
667 guests, 293 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.