![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Goldmember
|
Alright.
It's time to make my decision. The Speedlite 550EX can be had locally, used, for $100 more than the Sigma EF500DG Super (brand new, after shipping, duties, taxes). Is the 550EX better than the Sigma? Oh, and the 550EX also comes with a sto-fen omnibounce, lol. Worth the $100?
__________________
Too much gear... take nothing but pictures .... kill nothing but time .... leave nothing but footprints |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ajax for the work week and on weekends, south of Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 530
|
Possibly. The Omnibounce is about $30 Cdn. shipped and is certainly useful.
I have the Sigma (several of them actually) and have also owned/used a 380 and 420EX. The Sigma has the same feature set, slightler lower GN, does not have provision for external power pack and some would say a slightly lower build quality. $70 difference is a year's warranty and the slight differences noted above. But unless the Canon was heavily used, warranty should not be a big issue. Maybe you buy it, and then when you want more flashes in your setup at a later date, you can go for the Sigma, as they will work together?
__________________
Cheers, Bruce Watson My Camera Bag Overfloweth................. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Behind a viewfinder.
Posts: 1,504
|
Hey KEV
The Canon is slightly better, but it being worth the $100 is debatable. I would buy the Sigma over the Canon any day, especially if I am on a tight budget. Cheers
__________________
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 2,252
|
I have a 550EX, a pair of 420EX and the new Sigma. The Sigma works fine, but it is a long way from the build quality of the Canon 550EX. If you are going to use it a lot and maybe want to use an external power source, then go for the Canon. I don't think the Sigma will stand up to much use/abuse.
__________________
Ken Professional Motorsport Photographer 2 x 1D MK-II, 7D, 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200 2.8L IS, 100-400L, 300 2.8L IS, 500 4.0L IS, 85 1.8, 50 1.4, 1.4 & 2.0 MK-II TC. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Wait, all that time and all I get is "Cream of the Damn Crop" ?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
As Kenny says,. probably the biggest difference is build quality,.
I decided to get a used 550ex for the onboard flash for it's robust-ness, with the intention that if I wanted to build a fleet of off camera slaves,. I would turn to the Sigma's for that purpose. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Goldmember
|
Hm. External power source and build quality. Sounds like enough to warrant the purchase. And if I ever do sell it off, it should retain it's value better than the Sigma, no? Well... the 580EXs are replacing it.. sooo I duno.
External power source is what makes me interested though. I can use it sorta like in a studio setup? Shooting it into an umbrella?
__________________
Too much gear... take nothing but pictures .... kill nothing but time .... leave nothing but footprints |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Used sigma 500 super or 550ex? | turbodude | Small Flash and Studio Lighting | 21 | 23rd of March 2007 (Fri) 04:54 |
| Canon 550ex or Sigma 500DG Super? | 762x51 | Small Flash and Studio Lighting | 13 | 16th of June 2006 (Fri) 14:31 |
| Canon 550ex -vs- Sigma 500 Super DG | C.S.I. | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 19 | 20th of December 2004 (Mon) 14:18 |
| Sigma 500 Super DG or Canon 550EX | sp00g3 | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 12 | 29th of April 2004 (Thu) 06:11 |
| Can the Canon 550EX or Sigma 500 Super DG Work as Master Whe | bnsfr | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 7 | 4th of October 2003 (Sat) 20:18 |