Canon Digital Photography Forums  

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Sharing Knowhow' section > Talk About Photography > Urban Life & Travel Talk
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 4th of October 2008 (Sat)   #1
TheLaird
Senior Member
 
TheLaird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Inverness, Scotland
Posts: 1,856
Default Is this inappropriate ?

I do not know the whole story, only what is seen here. Was he fairly convicted or not? I suppose it depends on what state (condition) she was in and how obvious he was. Asking her permission may have "ruined" the shot.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/...st/7651107.stm

I am perhaps more wary now of pointing my camera at somebody.
TheLaird is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 4th of October 2008 (Sat)   #2
Pete
Moderator
Prime Mover
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 38,607
Default Re: Is this inappropriate ?

I think it's pretty clear about what's appropriate and what's not. If you see someone in the street who's obviously in distress, then it's just not on to stand there and photograph them in that state.

Having a camera doesn't give you the moral right to photograph everything you see.
__________________
Pete
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th of October 2008 (Sat)   #3
joedlh
Goldmember
 
joedlh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Long Island, NY, North America, Sol III, Orion Spur of the Milky Way galaxy.
Posts: 4,399
Default Re: Is this inappropriate ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete View Post
Having a camera doesn't give you the moral right to photograph everything you see.
Seconded.
__________________
Joe

Gear: Kodak Instamatic, Polaroid Swinger
http://photo.joedlh.net
joedlh is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 4th of October 2008 (Sat)   #4
HSK
Senior Member
 
HSK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,124
Default Re: Is this inappropriate ?

"The woman had been drinking with friends in an Omni Centre bar when she felt unwell and went outside for air." "taking a photo of another view of Edinburgh"

- let me guess, she was drunk & wasted, and went outside to vomit?
__________________

HSK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th of October 2008 (Sat)   #5
gjl711
human (barely) and bribable
 
gjl711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
Posts: 47,161
Default Re: Is this inappropriate ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete View Post
...Having a camera doesn't give you the moral right to photograph everything you see.
There is a big difference between moral right and legal right. I cant see how the guy got fined. Taking a picture of someone on the street shouldn't be against the law. She gets drunk, staggers out into the street to throw up and expects the right to privacy? Makes no sense.
__________________
Not sure why, but call me JJ.

I wondered why the baseball was getting bigger, then it hit me
.
::Flickr::
::Gear::
gjl711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th of October 2008 (Sat)   #6
milorad
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Melbourne, AU
Posts: 515
Default Re: Is this inappropriate ?

so what, now we can only shoot people who aren't in distress? and then what? only smiling people?... only if we catch their good side?

come on, lets be realistic for a minute, people in distress are the most interesting kind. If her arm had fallen off you'd help her first (then shoot her), but if she's just a lush throwing up her liquid dinner, then I see nothing wrong with it whatsoever.

Wanna make a spectacle of yourself in public? Expect attention.
__________________
Gear List - Yeah baby.
milorad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th of October 2008 (Sat)   #7
milorad
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Melbourne, AU
Posts: 515
Default Re: Is this inappropriate ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gjl711 View Post
I cant see how the guy got fined.
he was dumb enough to plead guilty (probably under the promise that pleading guilty would 'make it all go away')
__________________
Gear List - Yeah baby.
milorad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th of October 2008 (Sat)   #8
gjl711
human (barely) and bribable
 
gjl711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
Posts: 47,161
Default Re: Is this inappropriate ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by milorad View Post
he was dumb enough to plead guilty (probably under the promise that pleading guilty would 'make it all go away')
That could be it. Is it really against the law to be un-chivalrous? What if you had stuck your tongue out. Thats not chivalrous. Is that a fineable offense?
__________________
Not sure why, but call me JJ.

I wondered why the baseball was getting bigger, then it hit me
.
::Flickr::
::Gear::
gjl711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th of October 2008 (Sat)   #9
nwa2
Senior Member
 
nwa2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 1,113
Default Re: Is this inappropriate ?

Was the woman charged for drunk & disorderly!!!!

People have to take responsibility for themselves, and if she got herself in a state she was ashamed off she should not take it out on the passer-by.. camera or not...
__________________
Canon 7D; 40D:
There are many tomorrows', but only one today!!
[size=1][color=Black]

http://imagesix.wordpress.com/
nwa2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of October 2008 (Mon)   #10
Lester Wareham
Moderator
 
Lester Wareham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dazed and Confused - Hampshire UK
Posts: 17,673
Default Re: Is this inappropriate ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gjl711 View Post
There is a big difference between moral right and legal right. I cant see how the guy got fined. Taking a picture of someone on the street shouldn't be against the law. She gets drunk, staggers out into the street to throw up and expects the right to privacy? Makes no sense.
He was prosecuted under the law of "behavior likely to cause a breach of the peace".

This is one of many UK laws that are, to put it kindly, very broadly defined, as such they can be used and abused to cover many situations based on the judgement of the officer on the ground.

So although this woman was in a public place, because she was "ill" the court judged based on the principle of "a reasonable expectation of privacy", this clearly creates case law where this principle overrides the principle of "freedom of vista" in some situations.

There have been other such cases such as journalists doorstepping celebrates leaving drink/drug abuse clinics.

So to the ethics. I think I agree with the court that in this case the photographer was being unchivalrous. I base this on the assumption there is a reasonable doubt that the woman had been overindulging in some way.

So what about the bunch of tanagers that have gone out on a bender and are being sick in the gutter (one could say have sought this state deliberately). Do they have a reasonable expectation of privacy or are they fair social comment?
__________________
Springwatch presenter Chris Packham attacks Malta's bird slaughter of protected birds
My Photography Home Page RSS Feed
MP-E, EF 100mm, EF 180mm : The Macro Dark Unholy Trinity : Bow down before their darkness and despair!
Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV
Lester Wareham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of October 2008 (Mon)   #11
Lester Wareham
Moderator
 
Lester Wareham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dazed and Confused - Hampshire UK
Posts: 17,673
Default Re: Is this inappropriate ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by milorad View Post
he was dumb enough to plead guilty (probably under the promise that pleading guilty would 'make it all go away')
I suspect the fact he was a foreign national may have had some effect, perhapse his visa was at risk.
__________________
Springwatch presenter Chris Packham attacks Malta's bird slaughter of protected birds
My Photography Home Page RSS Feed
MP-E, EF 100mm, EF 180mm : The Macro Dark Unholy Trinity : Bow down before their darkness and despair!
Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV
Lester Wareham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of October 2008 (Mon)   #12
anonyymi
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northamptonshire, UK
Posts: 24
Default Re: Is this inappropriate ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by HSK View Post
"The woman had been drinking with friends in an Omni Centre bar when she felt unwell and went outside for air." "taking a photo of another view of Edinburgh"

- let me guess, she was drunk & wasted, and went outside to vomit?
Just because it's 11.30pm doesn't mean she was "drunk & wasted", and I suggest that if she and her friends were, then the photographer was lucky to escape without a beating and smashed equipment.

More likely that was was ill and her friends were sober(ish) which is why the poilce were called. I'm sure if she was wasted the police wouldn't have taken it as far as the courts.
anonyymi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of October 2008 (Mon)   #13
anonyymi
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northamptonshire, UK
Posts: 24
Default Re: Is this inappropriate ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lester Wareham View Post
I suspect the fact he was a foreign national may have had some effect, perhapse his visa was at risk.
As a Polish passport holder he doesn't need a visa. His country is a member of the EU and he has every right to live and work in the UK.
anonyymi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of October 2008 (Tue)   #14
mij
Member
 
mij's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London (SW), UK
Posts: 500
Default Re: Is this inappropriate ?

Sheriff Hogg!

Technically it is a correct application of the law, behaviour which would be considered immoral and that causes distress constitutes a breach of the peace. It all comes down to the attitude of the judge though, in this case Sheriff Hogg seemed to be on a bit of a crusade.

At the same time, I am fairly sure the statement that "the lady concerned was entitled to her privacy" has no legal standing, and in my opinion would probably have made for good grounds for an appeal had he not pleaded guilty. The crime here was his actions which were considered detrimental to the state, not that her rights were being violated.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete View Post
I think it's pretty clear about what's appropriate and what's not. If you see someone in the street who's obviously in distress, then it's just not on to stand there and photograph them in that state.
What if he was a photojournalist? What of those who report on accidents or wars shooting people in distress? Surely it depends on what you do with the photos, does moral right differs if you are going for art or documentary rather than something more youtube-esque?

I am not saying that those necessarily apply here, only that it is not such a black and white issue.

And what even constitutes distress anyway? According to the story she only went out for air, is that distress? How do you tell that from someone just leaning back against a wall waiting for someone? There really is not enough information in that story for any of us to be able to make a judgement on the situation.

But still, Sheriff Hogg!

Michael.
__________________
Comments, bribes, criticism, bribes, irrelevant anecdotes, and bribes always welcome.
EXIF is available inside all my photos, though bribes are still recommended anyway.

You could visit my sparse South West 16 web site and rarely updated flickr stream...
...or you can check out my slightly more frequent London iPhone Twitter flickr. Sometimes in colour!
mij is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of October 2008 (Tue)   #15
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
 
FlyingPhotog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
Posts: 57,558
Default Re: Is this inappropriate ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gjl711 View Post
There is a big difference between moral right and legal right. I cant see how the guy got fined. Taking a picture of someone on the street shouldn't be against the law. She gets drunk, staggers out into the street to throw up and expects the right to privacy? Makes no sense.
Exactly.

Anything less and we'd never have had "Girls Gone Wild..."
__________________
"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.
FlyingPhotog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are some ballheads inappropriate for Monopods? smorter Accessories & Storage 8 7th of September 2008 (Sun) 00:42


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.