Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 18 Feb 2005 (Friday) 15:06
Prev/next
Poll"Vote for your favorite Portrait lens"
EF 50mm f/1.8
717
15.6%
EF 50mm f/1.4 USM
659
14.4%
EF 85mm f/1.8 USM
632
13.8%
EF 85mm f/1.2[color=red]L[/color]
748
16.3%
EF 100mm f/2
90
2%
EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro
200
4.4%
EF 135mm f/2[color=red]L[/color]
414
9%
EF 135mm f/2.8 Soft focus
35
0.8%
EF 24-70mm f/2.8[color=red]L[/color]
362
7.9%
EF Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 XR DI
129
2.8%
200mm f/2.8[color=red]L[/color]
56
1.2%
EF 70-200mm f/2.8[color=red]L[/color] (IS)
432
9.4%
EFS 60mm F2.8 Macro
67
1.5%
EF 50mm f/1.2L
29
0.6%
SIGMA 30mm f/1.4
20
0.4%

3744 voters, 4590 votes given (any choice choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

-=Top 10=- Recommended Portrait Lenses

 
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
44,105 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Joined Apr 2003
Rhode Island USA
Feb 18, 2005 15:06 |  #1

-=Top Ten=- Recommended Portrait Lenses

The second in a series of -=Top Ten=- recommended lens lists.

We move on to the best choices for portrait work (o-kay so there's twelve! ;) )

Here in the EOS forum some of the most often asked questions are what lenses work best for a specific task.

After research into dozens of past threads and some further discussion,
...these are the lenses that were selected by our forum members as -=Top 12=- Recommended Portrait Lenses


Please vote,.. feel free to add to the thread why you like the lenses you do in the list,. and or add in an additional lens if it is not on the list and say why!

-=More Lens Polls=-

F.Y.I. This is a Public POLL. This means that if you click on one of the numbers in the poll,. you will be able to see who voted for what lenses. This may or may not seem helpfull to you. But it may be a benefit for various reasons.

This "Thread" is a forum informational thread and subject to extreme editing and deleting. Any OT discussion, issues etc should be taken via PM or another thread.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
wintoid
Senior Member
wintoid's Avatar
609 posts
Joined Feb 2004
London, UK
Feb 18, 2005 15:20 |  #2

I voted for the Tamron 28-75. The other lens on that list I've had is the 50mm f1.4 but I find the Tamron zoom to be sharper, even if the prime had better colours and bokeh.


Regards,
Simon

LOG IN TO REPLY
timmyquest
Goldmember
4,172 posts
Joined Dec 2003
Outside of Chicago
Feb 18, 2005 15:29 |  #3
banned

I know it's long, but the 135 f/2 has created some portraits that have simply made the bottom of my chin sore from it hitting my desk.

I also had to put the 50mm f/1.8 in there because i've gotten my best portraits from this lens, and it's pocket change.


Capturing life a fraction of a second at a time

LOG IN TO REPLY
Longwatcher
obsolete as of this post
Longwatcher's Avatar
3,905 posts
Joined Sep 2002
Newport News, VA, USA
Feb 18, 2005 16:02 as a reply to timmyquest's post |  #4

For me it depends,
For APS-C format the 50/1.4 wins in the studio (the 50/1.8 should be almost as good)
for FF format the 85/1.2 or 135/2 will win when I can get them and compare.

For location and until I can get the 85 and/or 135, I love my 70-200/2.8L IS as it gives me a great lens with flexability. On location you can't always pick exactly where you need to be to get that great shot. But with a zoom, where you need to be is a much larger area.

But just my opinion,

Update (19 Dec 2006): I now have the 85/1.2 and it is the best portrait lens I have producing beautiful pictures (have had for a year now)


"Save the model, Save the camera, The Photographer can be repaired"
www.longwatcher.comexternal link
1DsMkIII as primary camera with f2.8L zooms and the 85L
http://www.longwatcher​.com/photoequipment.ht​mexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
flyfisher
Senior Member
flyfisher's Avatar
Joined Nov 2004
Ma, USA
Feb 18, 2005 16:28 |  #5

I agree with Longwatcher for pretty much the same reasons but I like the 85 for studio work and the zoom for location.


Steve

LOG IN TO REPLY
cactusclay
Goldmember
1,610 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Feb 18, 2005 16:33 |  #6

What about the 17-40, not so much for studio stuff, but gets a lot of use at weddings.




LOG IN TO REPLY
HKFEVER
Goldmember
HKFEVER's Avatar
1,592 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Hong Kong
Feb 18, 2005 18:01 as a reply to cactusclay's post |  #7

Hard to choose between 85 f1.2 L & 135 f2.

85 has the perfect distance but the AF is a bit slow, heavy, it render creamy & sharp picture.

135 is abit too long but first AF, razer sharp also render creamy picture.




LOG IN TO REPLY
schmoelzel
Lord of the Holy Trinity
1,889 posts
Joined Aug 2001
London (Canada)
Feb 18, 2005 18:15 as a reply to HKFEVER's post |  #8

This one is easy for me......135F2 L; yes, it's long but the sharpness, contrast, colour, and bokeh is truly amazing. I've recently started using the 85F1.8 and while it is very good, I like the length of the 135F2......to each his own I guess!! For those who don't own this lens (135F2), do yourself a BIG favour and get it!!:lol:




LOG IN TO REPLY
gulogulo1970
Mostly Lurking
gulogulo1970's Avatar
14 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Fort Worth, Texas
Feb 18, 2005 18:29 as a reply to schmoelzel's post |  #9

I love my EF 85mm f1.8. It is fast, quiet and not that expensive.

I've never taken a picture with it and thought, "I wish this image was sharper." It does what I need with a moderate price.




LOG IN TO REPLY
MarkH
Senior Member
MarkH's Avatar
431 posts
Joined Jun 2003
New Zealand
Feb 18, 2005 20:40 |  #10

You can't beat the 50 f1.8 for the money, best budget portrait lens for those that are poor after buying the D-SLR.

Of course the 50 f1.4 and 85 f1.8 are great value for those that have a higher budget and want higher quality.

I don't think you can go wrong with any of the lenses in the list as long as you bear in mind the suitablility of the focal length of each lens and the slow AF on the Tamron 28-75 and the really slow AF on the Canon 85 f1.2L


Mark Heyes (New Zealand)
See my pics at www.gigatech.co.nzexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Alexandre ­ Gabriel
Member
Alexandre Gabriel's Avatar
110 posts
Joined Mar 2004
São Paulo, Brazil
Feb 18, 2005 21:31 |  #11

Nifty fifty. Why?
Because it's my only portrait lens ;) and because it's a wonderful lens given the price. Period.


G3 with some accesories
EOS 30, 28-90, 50 f/1.8, 75-300
Almost buying a Rebel XT ;)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Sydor25
Goldmember
Sydor25's Avatar
2,356 posts
Joined Feb 2005
North Texas
Feb 18, 2005 21:34 as a reply to Alexandre Gabriel's post |  #12

I went with the 50mm f/1.8 because it is the only one that I have. I don't really like taking portrait pictures, but the 50mm is so cheap that my wife bought it for our anniversary.


1D Mark III, 5D Mark III, EF 17-40 f/4, EF 24-105 f/4 IS, EF 70-200 f/2.8 IS, EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6, EF 24 f/1.4, EF 300 f/4 IS, EF 100 f/2.8 Macro & EF-S 10-22
- James
jt-digital-photography Photo Galleriesexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
roanjohn
Goldmember
roanjohn's Avatar
3,791 posts
Joined Dec 2003
New York, NY
Feb 18, 2005 21:51 |  #13

OMG!!! NOthing beats the 85 f1.8 in terms of speed/value/sharpness/​bokeh/build. If you guys have any doubt..............DON​T!!! GO ahead and get it!!!

Ro1




www.pbase.com/roanjohnexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
pcasciola
POTN SHOPKEEPER
pcasciola's Avatar
3,130 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Millstone Township, NJ
Feb 18, 2005 22:05 |  #14

I'm very happy with my 85 f/1.8 and 50 f/1.8 for portraits, given their low cost. But since price was not mentioned, I just want to add that if I needed a better portrait lens, I'd probably go with 85 f/1.2 or 135 f/2L, although the 135 might be a little long on the 20D. The portraits I see see done with those two L lens just make my jaw drop. Both are sharp as a razor and have excellent bokeh.


Philip Casciola
Pro Camera Gearexternal link - POTN Shopexternal link
Canon 7D, EF 50/1.8, EF 85/1.8, EF 300/4L IS, EF-S 18-55, Tamron 28-75/2.8, EF 70-200/2.8L IS
Sigma 1.4x & 2x, Tamron 1.4x, Gitzo 2220 Explorer, 322RC2 grip

LOG IN TO REPLY
Sydor25
Goldmember
Sydor25's Avatar
2,356 posts
Joined Feb 2005
North Texas
Feb 18, 2005 22:27 as a reply to pcasciola's post |  #15

If someone would like to buy me the Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L USM, I'm sure I could find a use for it. ;)


1D Mark III, 5D Mark III, EF 17-40 f/4, EF 24-105 f/4 IS, EF 70-200 f/2.8 IS, EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6, EF 24 f/1.4, EF 300 f/4 IS, EF 100 f/2.8 Macro & EF-S 10-22
- James
jt-digital-photography Photo Galleriesexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

214,166 views & 0 likes for this thread
-=Top 10=- Recommended Portrait Lenses
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00252 for 5 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is Sal Anthony
593 guests, 590 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5577, that happened on Mar 02, 2016