![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
..for professional work? I'm mean for PJ, sports and weddings?
__________________
50D & 5DMKII 17-40 / 28 / 50 / 85 / 24-105 / 70-200 / 60 580 / 430 II / ST-E2 / PW PLUS II |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Once an ugly duckling
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chimping around Brazil since 1973! (Sometimes NYC)
Posts: 3,358
|
I see a lot of wedding pros use 30D/40D. Sports pro almost exclusively using 1D series. PJ requires a sturdy body, so again, most likely 1D body. Obviously, any camera can work at any job, some works better than others.
__________________
Ellery Bann Fuji X100 E-PL2 | 14-42 | 20/1.7 7D | 24-70 ƒ2.8L | 70-200 ƒ2.8L IS | TS-E 24 ƒ3.5L | 85 ƒ1.2L 270EX | 2x 580EX | ST-E2 | Sekonic L-408 | MacBook Pro |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 2,498
|
It's not a question of if the camera body is good enough for professional work, it is a question of if the person behind the camera body is good enough for professional work.
Yes the XXD series won't be as limiting as your current XXXD series cameras, but you'll find that the XD cameras have even more features that make it easier on the photographer. PJ and sports shooters regularily submit their gear to harsh environments so something built like a 1D is more desirable. Really... you just need to know your gear and know it well. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
|
I know pros who use XXXD cameras because they appreciate the size...
Though I admit, they are rare XXD is considered good enough for any pro who doesn't need the resolution of FF and the build quality of a 1D MkX
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
|
I am a wedding photographer and my wife and I used a 30d and 20d up until a few weeks ago when we got a 5d for its low light capabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Goldmember
|
I keep trying to find that damn profit button on my 30D. My 5D doesn't have one either, but it does have a narrow damn dof wheel.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
|
Here's the way I see it... if you need 10 fps, go with a 1-series body. If you need thin DOF, go full-frame. Otherwise, a xxD body should do the trick. Personally, I wouldn't let high ISO performance be a deciding factor since it's such a close race now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
I feel thoroughly satisfied
|
Yes. I know quite a few wedding shooters who use a XXD body. Sports.... the 1-series hold up a little better thanks to the superior AF, generally.
The vast majority of the time it's the photographer that's the limiting factor, not the body |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
Another part to the answer is the final output. For a PJ who works at a paper, an XT actually is more than fine as far as IQ goes. The images will be halftoned. And halftoning is the death of images.
__________________
Keep in mind "Its not the camera, its the photographer" works just as well for bad pictures as it does for good ones. ![]() www.the6by6frame.wordpress.com |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New wireless/wired remote option for xxD series owners | mindsink | Accessories & Storage | 1 | 6th of June 2008 (Fri) 12:53 |
| good series | ceriltheblade | General Photography Talk | 4 | 28th of February 2008 (Thu) 16:39 |
| 'L' series glass - How good is it really? | Mishkin1986 | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 27 | 15th of May 2007 (Tue) 01:28 |
| What's so good about L series? | Burodsx | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 29 | 8th of September 2005 (Thu) 03:05 |