![]() |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 372
|
I've tested both 40D and 50D in AutoISO. I don't know how's good AutoISO on 5D, but here are the results of AutoISO testing of 40D and 50D, back-to-back. I set Av mode, F 4.0, focal range 35mm, spot metering, central point, Sigma 24-60/2.8, AutoISO on both. I am in the room with 4 lamps on, 3 on the ceiling and one on the table lighting the wall.
First is the 40D. Aim on far wall - ISO 800, T=1/10 Aim on a lamp - ISO 400, T=1/6400 (what ?)Aim on lighted near wall - ISO 400, T=1/640 (too bad!). Aim on worse lighted wall - ISO 400, T=1/160 Same, but focal is 50mm - ISO 400, T=1/200 (ah, whatever...) 50D, everything is the same: Aim on far wall - ISO 1600, T=1/20 (expectable) Aim on a lamp - ISO 100, T=1/1000 (!!!!! GREAT!) Aim on lighted near wall - ISO 100, T=1/80 (!!!!). Aim on worse lighted wall - ISO 160, T=1/50 Same, but focal is 50mm - ISO 250, T=1/80 (wow!) Need I say more? AutoISO on 40D actually knows just two values - 400 and 800 and in fact is unusable. 50D shows a HUGE improvement here and I would use AutoISO on 50D with no hesistation.
__________________
7D | 5D classic | EF-S 10-22 | EF 24-105 L IS | EF 70-300 IS USM | EF 85/1.8 | EF 50/1.8 II | Sigma 24-60/2.8 | Tamron 90/2.8 | 580EXII | 2x 420EX | 055XPro + 488RC2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 372
|
Well, at least it seems so.
__________________
7D | 5D classic | EF-S 10-22 | EF 24-105 L IS | EF 70-300 IS USM | EF 85/1.8 | EF 50/1.8 II | Sigma 24-60/2.8 | Tamron 90/2.8 | 580EXII | 2x 420EX | 055XPro + 488RC2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Burlington, Ontario
Posts: 46
|
I'm loving the auto ISO option. It seems to work well, I've had few situations where it is not pretty much picking the ISO I would normally have to set.
__________________
Gear List Canon 7D Tokina 12-24 Canon 24-70L Nifty Canon 70-200 4L*430 EX |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,147
|
The auto ISO on the 40D was and still is a gimmick.
Auto ISO on the 50D is what the 40D should have been. Honestly, in many aspects the 50D is what the 40D should have been. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 116
|
dont tell that to the 40D owners who just bought their cameras before the 50D was announced!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 372
|
If you shoot in Av + AutoISO then exposure correction dial will change ISO first and only if this is not enough it will change the shutter speed. So, you may correct the ISO easily, if you don't like the one AutoISO picked.
__________________
7D | 5D classic | EF-S 10-22 | EF 24-105 L IS | EF 70-300 IS USM | EF 85/1.8 | EF 50/1.8 II | Sigma 24-60/2.8 | Tamron 90/2.8 | 580EXII | 2x 420EX | 055XPro + 488RC2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 372
|
Even after, since changes in AutoISO were not advertised at all....
__________________
7D | 5D classic | EF-S 10-22 | EF 24-105 L IS | EF 70-300 IS USM | EF 85/1.8 | EF 50/1.8 II | Sigma 24-60/2.8 | Tamron 90/2.8 | 580EXII | 2x 420EX | 055XPro + 488RC2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
|
hahahaa... good one!
Nervous... nice write up on the sample iso test |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,123
|
Quote:
__________________
1D Mk III | 5D Mk II Canon 580EX II Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L | 24mm f/3.5L | 28-70mm f/2.8L | 24-105mm f/4.0L | 50mm f/1.4 | 85mm f/1.8 | 100mm f/2.0 | 100mm f/2.8 Macro | 135mm f/2.8 SF | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS | 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
User is banned from forums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 372
|
40D was built this way, since even manual says that in Av mode AutoISO works only in 400-800 range.
__________________
7D | 5D classic | EF-S 10-22 | EF 24-105 L IS | EF 70-300 IS USM | EF 85/1.8 | EF 50/1.8 II | Sigma 24-60/2.8 | Tamron 90/2.8 | 580EXII | 2x 420EX | 055XPro + 488RC2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
this is the reason i was surprised to see the 50d do this, since it has to calculate 1/focal length x 1.6 crop factor. according to nervous, it looks like it does indeed perform this, and he did this with a zoom, so im assuming the new 5d wil work with zooms also. good implementation by canon, but still not quite up to the auto ISO of nikon. i agree, MUCH better than any other canon iteration thus far. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 116
|
whats funny is that a simple firmware upgrade SHOULD take care of this issue, but it seems canon doesnt think its worthy of it...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| High ISO: 5DII vs. 50D. | AeroSmith | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 0 | 17th of October 2008 (Fri) 15:01 |
| 50D at ISO 3200 | SunTsu | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 9 | 14th of October 2008 (Tue) 13:29 |
| 50D Auto Modes | elwood58 | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 4 | 12th of October 2008 (Sun) 23:32 |
| Some more 50D High ISO samples | willz75 | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 34 | 10th of October 2008 (Fri) 15:39 |
| 50D Low ISO vs High | Jack_C | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 4 | 3rd of October 2008 (Fri) 13:07 |