Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras 
Thread started 23 Oct 2008 (Thursday) 12:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Luminous Landscape G10 to Medium Format Comparison

 
lungdoc
Goldmember
Avatar
2,101 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: St. Catharines, Ontario Canada
     
Oct 23, 2008 12:41 |  #1

Interesting reading. Just recommended a G10 to my niece who's a keen 13 year old photographer and will be her first "serious" camera - this article should make her happy.

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/​kidding.shtml (external link)

For those not wanting to follow the link he took same shot of a fall foliage shot with G10 and a Hasselblad with digital back 39MP. On 13x9 prints a large group of experts couldn't pick which camera had taken which picture. Obviously all usual caveats apply but fairly impressive for a compact camera.


Mark
My Smugmug (external link) Eos 7D, Canon G1X II, Canon 15-85 IS, Canon 17-85 IS, Sigma 100-300 EX IF HSM, Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 85mm 1.8, Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro, Sigma 50-150 2.8, Sigma 1.4 EX DG , Sigma 24-70 F2.8 DG Macro, Canon EF-S 10-22, Canon 430EX,

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
bsmotril
Goldmember
Avatar
2,504 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 197
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Austin TX
     
Oct 23, 2008 13:10 |  #2

Great read. Thanks for the link !!


Gear List
Galleries: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/smopho/ (external link) --- http://billsmotrilla.z​enfolio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
5Dmaniac
Goldmember
Avatar
1,302 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
     
Oct 23, 2008 13:31 |  #3

Great- I am expecting my G10 today - can't wait to take it out for a test drive. This should be fun!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alexpix
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Boston
     
Oct 23, 2008 14:57 as a reply to  @ 5Dmaniac's post |  #4

I have had mine about a week and everything said is on the mark. Sure wish Aperture could handle the RAW files.

Enjoy yours,
Steven




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
verdantsound
Senior Member
Avatar
271 posts
Joined Sep 2008
     
Oct 23, 2008 15:35 as a reply to  @ post 6548678 |  #5

yeah but was that an easy landscape or a low light action shot. Not that I'm saying a landscape is easy, but there are stuff that the G10 can't do.


T2i
Sigma 30mm f1.4, Canon 80-200mm f/2.8L, Tamron 17-50mm, Canon 100mm f2.0 550 EX Flash
Budget: College Kid

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lefturn99
Senior Member
Avatar
820 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma USA
     
Oct 23, 2008 15:47 as a reply to  @ post 6548678 |  #6

Easy landscape. It was an interesting experiment under ideal conditions. I don't think we need to read more than that into it, but it makes a good thread starter, huh?


6D, 5D Mk III, 60D, EOS M, Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,039 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Dec 2005
     
Oct 23, 2008 15:54 as a reply to  @ post 6548678 |  #7

You don't even need a G10 to do an easy landscape in ideal conditions...


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
olz
Senior Member
Avatar
701 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Århus, Denmark
     
Oct 23, 2008 16:57 |  #8

That's such a weird comparison, and I don't really see the point! And those pictures?


Cheers
Kristian @ www.kindanatural.com (external link)
Fuji X-Pro1 | Fujinon XF18mmF2 R | Fujinon XF35mmF1.4 R

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jethro790
Goldmember
Avatar
2,193 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Southern New Hampshire
     
Oct 23, 2008 17:05 |  #9

olz wrote in post #6549157 (external link)
That's such a weird comparison, and I don't really see the point! And those pictures?

There was no point- UNTIL he started comparing, and it appears that there ABSOLUTELY is a point! I'm going out to buy a G10 tomorrow, can't wait to throw my Hassy H2 in the river!


If you must know...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lungdoc
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,101 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: St. Catharines, Ontario Canada
     
Oct 23, 2008 17:07 |  #10

I think the point is fairly simple: that a modern quality compact camera is capable of extremely good output that even experts cannot distinguish (at a reasonably large print size) from the best equipment money can buy. Granted this is in bright conditions without handling issues, cropping etc. but the mere fact of the comparison is still fairly amazing - and I'd say unimaginable a few years ago or in the film era.


Mark
My Smugmug (external link) Eos 7D, Canon G1X II, Canon 15-85 IS, Canon 17-85 IS, Sigma 100-300 EX IF HSM, Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 85mm 1.8, Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro, Sigma 50-150 2.8, Sigma 1.4 EX DG , Sigma 24-70 F2.8 DG Macro, Canon EF-S 10-22, Canon 430EX,

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
olz
Senior Member
Avatar
701 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Århus, Denmark
     
Oct 23, 2008 17:32 |  #11

I know - perhaps I'm just surprised that he's surprised, and perhaps he's just better at judging and reviewing images (and equipment) than taking them.

And Jethro - just throw that Hassy my way instead. :)


Cheers
Kristian @ www.kindanatural.com (external link)
Fuji X-Pro1 | Fujinon XF18mmF2 R | Fujinon XF35mmF1.4 R

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roli_bark
Senior Member
Avatar
918 posts
Joined Oct 2005
     
Oct 24, 2008 01:07 |  #12

13 x 9 prints, if printed at 300 DPI, are 3900 x 2700 pixels [10.5MP]. The G10 is a near 15MP pixel camera. So , at this pixel print resolution [3900 x 2700] all depends on the quality of the external Printing SW, i.e. - its interpolation process quality. Not on camera's.

All-in-all - nothing surprises me here. IMHO - Medium size camera are still superior at larger print size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roli_bark
Senior Member
Avatar
918 posts
Joined Oct 2005
     
Oct 24, 2008 01:39 |  #13

At a 2nd look at Michael Reichman site, it looks that the prints size used were 13 * 19.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roli_bark
Senior Member
Avatar
918 posts
Joined Oct 2005
     
Oct 24, 2008 01:40 |  #14

lungdoc wrote in post #6547699 (external link)
.... On 13x9 prints a large group of experts couldn't pick which camera had taken which picture. Obviously all usual caveats apply but fairly impressive for a compact camera.

Wrong ! - the print size used for the comparison were 13 * 19 !!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lungdoc
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,101 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: St. Catharines, Ontario Canada
     
Oct 24, 2008 07:49 |  #15

Sorry - my bad. I suspect relatively few of us make prints larger than that very often.


Mark
My Smugmug (external link) Eos 7D, Canon G1X II, Canon 15-85 IS, Canon 17-85 IS, Sigma 100-300 EX IF HSM, Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 85mm 1.8, Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro, Sigma 50-150 2.8, Sigma 1.4 EX DG , Sigma 24-70 F2.8 DG Macro, Canon EF-S 10-22, Canon 430EX,

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

12,208 views & 0 likes for this thread
Luminous Landscape G10 to Medium Format Comparison
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is mason.snipes
750 guests, 395 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.