Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS News & Rumors Lens Rumors and Predictions
Thread started 02 Nov 2008 (Sunday) 20:17
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

New 400 2.8 IS ?

 
str8six
Senior Member
str8six's Avatar
672 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Calgary
Nov 02, 2008 20:17 |  #1

The current 400 2.8 IS is almost 10 years old. I'm considering taking advantage of the instant rebate on this lens. Do you guys think it will be updated any time soon? Thank you.


Regards, Len B
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Bubble
Goldmember
Bubble's Avatar
3,382 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Yorba Linda , CA
Nov 02, 2008 20:35 |  #2
banned

what wrong with the current lens?


Canon 5D II, 7D | 16-35L II | 24-70L | 24-105L | 50L | 85L II |  iMac 27 | Redrock Micro DSLR Cinema Bundle | Elinchrom Ranger RX-AS Kit| Elinchrom Digital Style 1200RX/600RX | Turbo SC |

LOG IN TO REPLY
TAZorich
Member
237 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Middletown, DE
Nov 02, 2008 20:54 |  #3

Bubble wrote in post #6611699external link
what wrong with the current lens?

1. It's heavy.
2. It's got Image Stabilization. ;)


5DM2 | 7D | 600/4.0 IS | 50/1.4 | 24-70/2.8 | 70-200/2.8 | 580EXII (x2) | Quantum Qflash | Sekonic L-358 | Photogenic monolights | Tamrac bags | Bogen/Manfrotto supports

LOG IN TO REPLY
watchtherocks
Senior Member
watchtherocks's Avatar
579 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Australia
Nov 02, 2008 21:02 |  #4

I couldn't imagine the weight being decreased significantly without the cost skyrocketing. More special elements means less weight but a helluva increased cost.


Anyone know anything anywhere anymore?

LOG IN TO REPLY
Persephone
Goldmember
Persephone's Avatar
1,122 posts
Joined May 2008
CA
Nov 02, 2008 21:04 |  #5

I have a question, why do you need IS? Can you handhold a 400mm?


Gear list
"Do you think it was my choice to wed a man I did not love? Live a life I did not choose? I was betrayed by the very gods that once saw me as their own. But no more." - Περσεφόνηexternal link, God of War

LOG IN TO REPLY
Palladium
Goldmember
3,902 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Not the Left Coast but the Right Coast - USA
Nov 02, 2008 21:10 |  #6

hbdragon88 wrote in post #6611905external link
I have a question, why do you need IS? Can you handhold a 400mm?

If you want to handhold get the 400mm 5.6

If you want to use the 400mm 2.8 IS for more that 10 minutes at a time get a Gitzo monopod or Tripod.

Yeah it's that's good but it's that heavy :lol:


For Sale: Gitzo GT3541LS & 3 Lens Sigma 24mm, Sigma 50mm, Canon 28mm http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​391911

LOG IN TO REPLY
watchtherocks
Senior Member
watchtherocks's Avatar
579 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Australia
Nov 02, 2008 21:10 |  #7

You don't need IS, no you cannot handhold a 400 all that successfully unless you came at least 3rd in a national body building championship.


Anyone know anything anywhere anymore?

LOG IN TO REPLY
str8six
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
str8six's Avatar
672 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Calgary
Nov 02, 2008 21:52 |  #8

I don't think there is anything wrong with the current lens. I haven't used it but hear nothing but good things about it. I do know that it is heavy.

I was just thinking now that they put IS4 on the 200 f2.0 that they might update this lens and perhaps the 300 while they were at it. Canon seems to be coming out with a number of II versions lately. The 85mm f1.2, was there anything wrong with the original?? 24mm II, 16-35 II ??

I don't want to buy something that could be replaced real soon, so I thought I'd ask the question in the rumors section. Thanks for the replies guys.


Regards, Len B
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamJL
Goldmember
AdamJL's Avatar
4,317 posts
Joined May 2006
'Straya
Nov 06, 2008 05:26 |  #9

str8six wrote in post #6612202external link
I don't think there is anything wrong with the current lens. I haven't used it but hear nothing but good things about it. I do know that it is heavy.

I was just thinking now that they put IS4 on the 200 f2.0 that they might update this lens and perhaps the 300 while they were at it. Canon seems to be coming out with a number of II versions lately. The 85mm f1.2, was there anything wrong with the original?? 24mm II, 16-35 II ??

I don't want to buy something that could be replaced real soon, so I thought I'd ask the question in the rumors section. Thanks for the replies guys.

I hope they don't update the 300 2.8.. I only bought it a little while ago! :p


Gear
coming soonexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
HarrisonClicks
Goldmember
HarrisonClicks's Avatar
1,113 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Mid-Atlantic USA
Nov 10, 2008 09:30 |  #10

AdamJL wrote in post #6633601external link
I hope they don't update the 300 2.8.. I only bought it a little while ago! :p

I'm with you on that brother. I got mine last month!


Adam
Gear List Temporarily Removed

LOG IN TO REPLY
szekiat
Member
76 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Nov 10, 2008 10:09 as a reply to HarrisonClicks's post |  #11

i think the 85 was overdue for an update to get a faster USM onto it. Its a really old design from the first gen of EF L lenses if i'm not mistaken. Same with the 50mm

Not sure about the 24 but the 16-35 mk1 really is rubbish in terms of distortion and edge sharpness and canon desperately needed something that could at least compete with the N17-35 let alone the 14-24. The 16-35 mk2 seems to at least be better than the old in that respect.

The 300 and 400 are well established industry leaders and i don't think they'll be replaced all that soon. As for IS, well, unless u use it on a tripod, the 400 will need IS on a monopod for better stability. YMMV...




LOG IN TO REPLY
Keith ­ R
Goldmember
2,856 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Blyth, Northumberland, NE England
Nov 16, 2008 15:22 |  #12

AdamJL wrote in post #6633601external link
I hope they don't update the 300 2.8.. I only bought it a little while ago! :p

What's the problem? Will your lens suddenly stop working or something?




LOG IN TO REPLY
jms_uk
Senior Member
jms_uk's Avatar
410 posts
Joined May 2007
UK
Nov 16, 2008 16:08 |  #13

szekiat wrote in post #6658780external link
i think the 85 was overdue for an update to get a faster USM onto it. Its a really old design from the first gen of EF L lenses if i'm not mistaken. Same with the 50mm

i thought that 50L was an update of 50mmF1.0L?


Canon EOS 1DMk3 / EF 17-40L f4 /  / EF 70-200L f4 / Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Vascilli
Goldmember
1,474 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Calgary
Nov 16, 2008 16:08 |  #14

Keith R wrote in post #6698874external link
What's the problem? Will your lens suddenly stop working or something?

:lol:

I hope they put IS on the 400/4.5.


Flickrexternal link | Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamJL
Goldmember
AdamJL's Avatar
4,317 posts
Joined May 2006
'Straya
Nov 16, 2008 16:15 |  #15

Keith R wrote in post #6698874external link
What's the problem? Will your lens suddenly stop working or something?

yes, what's it to you? :rolleyes:


Gear
coming soonexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,654 views & 0 likes for this thread
New 400 2.8 IS ?
FORUMS News & Rumors Lens Rumors and Predictions


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.0017 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is atlbraves1177
737 guests, 482 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016