Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS News & Rumors Lens Rumors and Predictions 
Thread started 02 Nov 2008 (Sunday) 20:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

New 400 2.8 IS ?

 
str8six
Senior Member
Avatar
672 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Calgary
     
Nov 02, 2008 20:17 |  #1

The current 400 2.8 IS is almost 10 years old. I'm considering taking advantage of the instant rebate on this lens. Do you guys think it will be updated any time soon? Thank you.


Regards, Len B
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Bubble
Goldmember
Avatar
3,382 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Yorba Linda , CA
     
Nov 02, 2008 20:35 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

what wrong with the current lens?


Canon 5D II, 7D | 16-35L II | 24-70L | 24-105L | 50L | 85L II |  iMac 27 | Redrock Micro DSLR Cinema Bundle | Elinchrom Ranger RX-AS Kit| Elinchrom Digital Style 1200RX/600RX | Turbo SC |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TAZorich
Member
237 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Middletown, DE
     
Nov 02, 2008 20:54 |  #3

Bubble wrote in post #6611699 (external link)
what wrong with the current lens?

1. It's heavy.
2. It's got Image Stabilization. ;)


5DM2 | 7D | 600/4.0 IS | 50/1.4 | 24-70/2.8 | 70-200/2.8 | 580EXII (x2) | Quantum Qflash | Sekonic L-358 | Photogenic monolights | Tamrac bags | Bogen/Manfrotto supports

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watchtherocks
Senior Member
Avatar
579 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Australia
     
Nov 02, 2008 21:02 |  #4

I couldn't imagine the weight being decreased significantly without the cost skyrocketing. More special elements means less weight but a helluva increased cost.


Anyone know anything anywhere anymore?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Persephone
Goldmember
Avatar
1,122 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: CA
     
Nov 02, 2008 21:04 |  #5

I have a question, why do you need IS? Can you handhold a 400mm?


Gear list
"Do you think it was my choice to wed a man I did not love? Live a life I did not choose? I was betrayed by the very gods that once saw me as their own. But no more." - Περσεφόνη (external link), God of War

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Palladium
Goldmember
3,905 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Not the Left Coast but the Right Coast - USA
     
Nov 02, 2008 21:10 |  #6

hbdragon88 wrote in post #6611905 (external link)
I have a question, why do you need IS? Can you handhold a 400mm?

If you want to handhold get the 400mm 5.6

If you want to use the 400mm 2.8 IS for more that 10 minutes at a time get a Gitzo monopod or Tripod.

Yeah it's that's good but it's that heavy :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watchtherocks
Senior Member
Avatar
579 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Australia
     
Nov 02, 2008 21:10 |  #7

You don't need IS, no you cannot handhold a 400 all that successfully unless you came at least 3rd in a national body building championship.


Anyone know anything anywhere anymore?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
str8six
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
672 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Calgary
     
Nov 02, 2008 21:52 |  #8

I don't think there is anything wrong with the current lens. I haven't used it but hear nothing but good things about it. I do know that it is heavy.

I was just thinking now that they put IS4 on the 200 f2.0 that they might update this lens and perhaps the 300 while they were at it. Canon seems to be coming out with a number of II versions lately. The 85mm f1.2, was there anything wrong with the original?? 24mm II, 16-35 II ??

I don't want to buy something that could be replaced real soon, so I thought I'd ask the question in the rumors section. Thanks for the replies guys.


Regards, Len B
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamJL
Goldmember
Avatar
4,365 posts
Likes: 12
Joined May 2006
Location: 'Straya
     
Nov 06, 2008 05:26 |  #9

str8six wrote in post #6612202 (external link)
I don't think there is anything wrong with the current lens. I haven't used it but hear nothing but good things about it. I do know that it is heavy.

I was just thinking now that they put IS4 on the 200 f2.0 that they might update this lens and perhaps the 300 while they were at it. Canon seems to be coming out with a number of II versions lately. The 85mm f1.2, was there anything wrong with the original?? 24mm II, 16-35 II ??

I don't want to buy something that could be replaced real soon, so I thought I'd ask the question in the rumors section. Thanks for the replies guys.

I hope they don't update the 300 2.8.. I only bought it a little while ago! :p


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HarrisonClicks
Goldmember
Avatar
1,113 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Mid-Atlantic USA
     
Nov 10, 2008 09:30 |  #10

AdamJL wrote in post #6633601 (external link)
I hope they don't update the 300 2.8.. I only bought it a little while ago! :p

I'm with you on that brother. I got mine last month!


Adam
Gear List Temporarily Removed

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
szekiat
Member
76 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Nov 10, 2008 10:09 as a reply to  @ HarrisonClicks's post |  #11

i think the 85 was overdue for an update to get a faster USM onto it. Its a really old design from the first gen of EF L lenses if i'm not mistaken. Same with the 50mm

Not sure about the 24 but the 16-35 mk1 really is rubbish in terms of distortion and edge sharpness and canon desperately needed something that could at least compete with the N17-35 let alone the 14-24. The 16-35 mk2 seems to at least be better than the old in that respect.

The 300 and 400 are well established industry leaders and i don't think they'll be replaced all that soon. As for IS, well, unless u use it on a tripod, the 400 will need IS on a monopod for better stability. YMMV...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keith ­ R
Goldmember
2,856 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Blyth, Northumberland, NE England
     
Nov 16, 2008 15:22 |  #12

AdamJL wrote in post #6633601 (external link)
I hope they don't update the 300 2.8.. I only bought it a little while ago! :p

What's the problem? Will your lens suddenly stop working or something?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jms_uk
Senior Member
Avatar
410 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: UK
     
Nov 16, 2008 16:08 |  #13

szekiat wrote in post #6658780 (external link)
i think the 85 was overdue for an update to get a faster USM onto it. Its a really old design from the first gen of EF L lenses if i'm not mistaken. Same with the 50mm

i thought that 50L was an update of 50mmF1.0L?


Canon EOS 1DMk3 / EF 17-40L f4 /  / EF 70-200L f4 / Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Vascilli
Goldmember
1,474 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
     
Nov 16, 2008 16:08 |  #14

Keith R wrote in post #6698874 (external link)
What's the problem? Will your lens suddenly stop working or something?

:lol:

I hope they put IS on the 400/4.5.


Flickr (external link) | Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamJL
Goldmember
Avatar
4,365 posts
Likes: 12
Joined May 2006
Location: 'Straya
     
Nov 16, 2008 16:15 |  #15

Keith R wrote in post #6698874 (external link)
What's the problem? Will your lens suddenly stop working or something?

yes, what's it to you? :rolleyes:


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,914 views & 0 likes for this thread
New 400 2.8 IS ?
FORUMS News & Rumors Lens Rumors and Predictions 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MsDeen
755 guests, 390 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.