Index  •   • New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS News & Rumors Lens Rumors and Predictions
Thread started 02 Nov 2008 (Sunday) 20:17
PREV/NEXT

New 400 2.8 IS ?

 
str8six
Senior Member
str8six's Avatar
664 posts

Joined Dec 2007

Calgary
MORE INFO

The current 400 2.8 IS is almost 10 years old. I'm considering taking advantage of the instant rebate on this lens. Do you guys think it will be updated any time soon? Thank you.

Nov 02, 2008 20:17

Regards, Len B
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Bubble
Goldmember
Bubble's Avatar
3,382 posts

Joined Jul 2006

Yorba Linda , CA
MORE INFO
banned

what wrong with the current lens?

Nov 02, 2008 20:35

Canon 5D II, 7D | 16-35L II | 24-70L | 24-105L | 50L | 85L II |  iMac 27 | Redrock Micro DSLR Cinema Bundle | Elinchrom Ranger RX-AS Kit| Elinchrom Digital Style 1200RX/600RX | Turbo SC |

LOG IN TO REPLY
TAZorich
Member
237 posts
Joined Feb 2008

Middletown, DE
MORE INFO

Bubble wrote in post #6611699external link
what wrong with the current lens?

1. It's heavy.
2. It's got Image Stabilization. ;)

Nov 02, 2008 20:54

5DM2 | 7D | 600/4.0 IS | 50/1.4 | 24-70/2.8 | 70-200/2.8 | 580EXII (x2) | Quantum Qflash | Sekonic L-358 | Photogenic monolights | Tamrac bags | Bogen/Manfrotto supports

LOG IN TO REPLY
watchtherocks
Senior Member
watchtherocks's Avatar
579 posts

Joined Mar 2008

Australia
MORE INFO

I couldn't imagine the weight being decreased significantly without the cost skyrocketing. More special elements means less weight but a helluva increased cost.

Nov 02, 2008 21:02

Anyone know anything anywhere anymore?

LOG IN TO REPLY
Persephone
Goldmember
Persephone's Avatar
1,122 posts

Joined May 2008

CA
MORE INFO

I have a question, why do you need IS? Can you handhold a 400mm?

Nov 02, 2008 21:04

Gear list
"Do you think it was my choice to wed a man I did not love? Live a life I did not choose? I was betrayed by the very gods that once saw me as their own. But no more." - Περσεφόνηexternal link, God of War

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Palladium
Goldmember
3,896 posts
Joined Dec 2005

Not the Left Coast but the Right Coast - USA
MORE INFO

hbdragon88 wrote in post #6611905external link
I have a question, why do you need IS? Can you handhold a 400mm?

If you want to handhold get the 400mm 5.6

If you want to use the 400mm 2.8 IS for more that 10 minutes at a time get a Gitzo monopod or Tripod.

Yeah it's that's good but it's that heavy :lol:

Nov 02, 2008 21:10

For Sale: Gitzo GT3541LS & 3 Lens Sigma 24mm, Sigma 50mm, Canon 28mm http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​391911

LOG IN TO REPLY
watchtherocks
Senior Member
watchtherocks's Avatar
579 posts

Joined Mar 2008

Australia
MORE INFO

You don't need IS, no you cannot handhold a 400 all that successfully unless you came at least 3rd in a national body building championship.

Nov 02, 2008 21:10

Anyone know anything anywhere anymore?

LOG IN TO REPLY
str8six
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
str8six's Avatar
664 posts

Joined Dec 2007

Calgary
MORE INFO

I don't think there is anything wrong with the current lens. I haven't used it but hear nothing but good things about it. I do know that it is heavy.

I was just thinking now that they put IS4 on the 200 f2.0 that they might update this lens and perhaps the 300 while they were at it. Canon seems to be coming out with a number of II versions lately. The 85mm f1.2, was there anything wrong with the original?? 24mm II, 16-35 II ??

I don't want to buy something that could be replaced real soon, so I thought I'd ask the question in the rumors section. Thanks for the replies guys.

Nov 02, 2008 21:52

Regards, Len B
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamJL
Goldmember
AdamJL's Avatar
4,317 posts

Joined May 2006

'Straya
MORE INFO

str8six wrote in post #6612202external link
I don't think there is anything wrong with the current lens. I haven't used it but hear nothing but good things about it. I do know that it is heavy.

I was just thinking now that they put IS4 on the 200 f2.0 that they might update this lens and perhaps the 300 while they were at it. Canon seems to be coming out with a number of II versions lately. The 85mm f1.2, was there anything wrong with the original?? 24mm II, 16-35 II ??

I don't want to buy something that could be replaced real soon, so I thought I'd ask the question in the rumors section. Thanks for the replies guys.

I hope they don't update the 300 2.8.. I only bought it a little while ago! :p

Nov 06, 2008 05:26

Gear
coming soonexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
HarrisonClicks
Goldmember
HarrisonClicks's Avatar
1,112 posts

Joined Mar 2007

Mid-Atlantic USA
MORE INFO

AdamJL wrote in post #6633601external link
I hope they don't update the 300 2.8.. I only bought it a little while ago! :p

I'm with you on that brother. I got mine last month!

Nov 10, 2008 09:30

Adam
Gear List Temporarily Removed: FOR SALE: 1Ds Mark III (sold); 1D Mark III (sold); Olympus EP-2 + Accessories (click here)

LOG IN TO REPLY
szekiat
Member
76 posts
Joined Mar 2007
MORE INFO

i think the 85 was overdue for an update to get a faster USM onto it. Its a really old design from the first gen of EF L lenses if i'm not mistaken. Same with the 50mm

Not sure about the 24 but the 16-35 mk1 really is rubbish in terms of distortion and edge sharpness and canon desperately needed something that could at least compete with the N17-35 let alone the 14-24. The 16-35 mk2 seems to at least be better than the old in that respect.

The 300 and 400 are well established industry leaders and i don't think they'll be replaced all that soon. As for IS, well, unless u use it on a tripod, the 400 will need IS on a monopod for better stability. YMMV...

Nov 10, 2008 10:09 as a reply to HarrisonClicks's post 38 minutes earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Keith ­ R
Goldmember
2,856 posts
Joined Aug 2006

Blyth, Northumberland, NE England
MORE INFO

AdamJL wrote in post #6633601external link
I hope they don't update the 300 2.8.. I only bought it a little while ago! :p

What's the problem? Will your lens suddenly stop working or something?

Nov 16, 2008 15:22



LOG IN TO REPLY
jms_uk
Senior Member
jms_uk's Avatar
410 posts

Joined May 2007

UK
MORE INFO

szekiat wrote in post #6658780external link
i think the 85 was overdue for an update to get a faster USM onto it. Its a really old design from the first gen of EF L lenses if i'm not mistaken. Same with the 50mm

i thought that 50L was an update of 50mmF1.0L?

Nov 16, 2008 16:08

Canon EOS 1DMk2N / EF 17-40L f4 /  / no £s / Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Vascilli
Goldmember
1,474 posts
Joined Jul 2008

Calgary
MORE INFO

Keith R wrote in post #6698874external link
What's the problem? Will your lens suddenly stop working or something?

:lol:

I hope they put IS on the 400/4.5.

Nov 16, 2008 16:08

Flickrexternal link | Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamJL
Goldmember
AdamJL's Avatar
4,317 posts

Joined May 2006

'Straya
MORE INFO

Keith R wrote in post #6698874external link
What's the problem? Will your lens suddenly stop working or something?

yes, what's it to you? :rolleyes:

Nov 16, 2008 16:15

Gear
coming soonexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY

1,379 views & 0 likes for this thread
New 400 2.8 IS ?
FORUMS News & Rumors Lens Rumors and Predictions

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF    •   JUMP TO FORUM    •   FORUM RULES    •   Index    •   New Posts    •   RTAT    •   "Best Of"    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.1version 1.1
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00138 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is sanyam.sdsu
685 guests, 513 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014