LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


New 400 2.8 IS ?

FORUMS News & Rumors Lens Rumors and Predictions
Thread started 02 Nov 2008 (Sunday) 20:17   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
str8six
Senior Member
str8six's Avatar
Joined Dec 2007
664 posts
Calgary
[MORE/SHARE]

The current 400 2.8 IS is almost 10 years old. I'm considering taking advantage of the instant rebate on this lens. Do you guys think it will be updated any time soon? Thank you.

Post #1, Nov 02, 2008 20:17:43


Regards, Len B
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Bubble
Goldmember
Bubble's Avatar
Joined Jul 2006
3,382 posts
Yorba Linda , CA
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

what wrong with the current lens?

Post #2, Nov 02, 2008 20:35:51


Canon 5D II, 7D | 16-35L II | 24-70L | 24-105L | 50L | 85L II |  iMac 27 | Redrock Micro DSLR Cinema Bundle | Elinchrom Ranger RX-AS Kit| Elinchrom Digital Style 1200RX/600RX | Turbo SC |

LOG IN TO REPLY
TAZorich
Senior Member
Joined Feb 2008
237 posts
Middletown, DE
[MORE/SHARE]

Bubble wrote in post #6611699external link
what wrong with the current lens?

1. It's heavy.
2. It's got Image Stabilization. ;)

Post #3, Nov 02, 2008 20:54:55


5DM2 | 7D | 600/4.0 IS | 50/1.4 | 24-70/2.8 | 70-200/2.8 | 580EXII (x2) | Quantum Qflash | Sekonic L-358 | Photogenic monolights | Tamrac bags | Bogen/Manfrotto supports

LOG IN TO REPLY
watchtherocks
Senior Member
watchtherocks's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
579 posts
Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

I couldn't imagine the weight being decreased significantly without the cost skyrocketing. More special elements means less weight but a helluva increased cost.

Post #4, Nov 02, 2008 21:02:02


Anyone know anything anywhere anymore?

LOG IN TO REPLY
Persephone
Goldmember
Persephone's Avatar
Joined May 2008
1,122 posts
CA
[MORE/SHARE]

I have a question, why do you need IS? Can you handhold a 400mm?

Post #5, Nov 02, 2008 21:04:35


Gear list
"Do you think it was my choice to wed a man I did not love? Live a life I did not choose? I was betrayed by the very gods that once saw me as their own. But no more." - Περσεφόνηexternal link, God of War

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Palladium
Goldmember
Joined Dec 2005
3,895 posts
Not the Left Coast but the Right Coast - USA
[MORE/SHARE]

hbdragon88 wrote in post #6611905external link
I have a question, why do you need IS? Can you handhold a 400mm?

If you want to handhold get the 400mm 5.6

If you want to use the 400mm 2.8 IS for more that 10 minutes at a time get a Gitzo monopod or Tripod.

Yeah it's that's good but it's that heavy :lol:

Post #6, Nov 02, 2008 21:10:08


For Sale: Gitzo GT3541LS & 3 Lens Sigma 24mm, Sigma 50mm, Canon 28mm http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​391911

LOG IN TO REPLY
watchtherocks
Senior Member
watchtherocks's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
579 posts
Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

You don't need IS, no you cannot handhold a 400 all that successfully unless you came at least 3rd in a national body building championship.

Post #7, Nov 02, 2008 21:10:59


Anyone know anything anywhere anymore?

LOG IN TO REPLY
str8six
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
str8six's Avatar
Joined Dec 2007
664 posts
Calgary
[MORE/SHARE]

I don't think there is anything wrong with the current lens. I haven't used it but hear nothing but good things about it. I do know that it is heavy.

I was just thinking now that they put IS4 on the 200 f2.0 that they might update this lens and perhaps the 300 while they were at it. Canon seems to be coming out with a number of II versions lately. The 85mm f1.2, was there anything wrong with the original?? 24mm II, 16-35 II ??

I don't want to buy something that could be replaced real soon, so I thought I'd ask the question in the rumors section. Thanks for the replies guys.

Post #8, Nov 02, 2008 21:52:10


Regards, Len B
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamJL
Goldmember
AdamJL's Avatar
Joined May 2006
4,317 posts
'Straya
[MORE/SHARE]

str8six wrote in post #6612202external link
I don't think there is anything wrong with the current lens. I haven't used it but hear nothing but good things about it. I do know that it is heavy.

I was just thinking now that they put IS4 on the 200 f2.0 that they might update this lens and perhaps the 300 while they were at it. Canon seems to be coming out with a number of II versions lately. The 85mm f1.2, was there anything wrong with the original?? 24mm II, 16-35 II ??

I don't want to buy something that could be replaced real soon, so I thought I'd ask the question in the rumors section. Thanks for the replies guys.

I hope they don't update the 300 2.8.. I only bought it a little while ago! :p

Post #9, Nov 06, 2008 05:26:22


Gear
coming soonexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
HarrisonClicks
Goldmember
HarrisonClicks's Avatar
Joined Mar 2007
1,112 posts
Mid-Atlantic USA
[MORE/SHARE]

AdamJL wrote in post #6633601external link
I hope they don't update the 300 2.8.. I only bought it a little while ago! :p

I'm with you on that brother. I got mine last month!

Post #10, Nov 10, 2008 09:30:21


Adam
Gear List Temporarily Removed: FOR SALE: 1Ds Mark III (sold); 1D Mark III (sold); Olympus EP-2 + Accessories (click here)

LOG IN TO REPLY
szekiat
Member
Joined Mar 2007
76 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

i think the 85 was overdue for an update to get a faster USM onto it. Its a really old design from the first gen of EF L lenses if i'm not mistaken. Same with the 50mm

Not sure about the 24 but the 16-35 mk1 really is rubbish in terms of distortion and edge sharpness and canon desperately needed something that could at least compete with the N17-35 let alone the 14-24. The 16-35 mk2 seems to at least be better than the old in that respect.

The 300 and 400 are well established industry leaders and i don't think they'll be replaced all that soon. As for IS, well, unless u use it on a tripod, the 400 will need IS on a monopod for better stability. YMMV...

Post #11, Nov 10, 2008 10:09:03 as a reply to HarrisonClicks's post 38 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Keith ­ R
Goldmember
Joined Aug 2006
2,856 posts
Blyth, Northumberland, NE England
[MORE/SHARE]

AdamJL wrote in post #6633601external link
I hope they don't update the 300 2.8.. I only bought it a little while ago! :p

What's the problem? Will your lens suddenly stop working or something?

Post #12, Nov 16, 2008 15:22:22




LOG IN TO REPLY
jms_uk
Senior Member
jms_uk's Avatar
Joined May 2007
410 posts
UK
[MORE/SHARE]

szekiat wrote in post #6658780external link
i think the 85 was overdue for an update to get a faster USM onto it. Its a really old design from the first gen of EF L lenses if i'm not mistaken. Same with the 50mm

i thought that 50L was an update of 50mmF1.0L?

Post #13, Nov 16, 2008 16:08:23


Canon EOS 1DMk2N / EF 17-40L f4 /  / no £s / Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Vascilli
Goldmember
Joined Jul 2008
1,474 posts
Calgary
[MORE/SHARE]

Keith R wrote in post #6698874external link
What's the problem? Will your lens suddenly stop working or something?

:lol:

I hope they put IS on the 400/4.5.

Post #14, Nov 16, 2008 16:08:23


Flickrexternal link | Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamJL
Goldmember
AdamJL's Avatar
Joined May 2006
4,317 posts
'Straya
[MORE/SHARE]

Keith R wrote in post #6698874external link
What's the problem? Will your lens suddenly stop working or something?

yes, what's it to you? :rolleyes:

Post #15, Nov 16, 2008 16:15:00


Gear
coming soonexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
1,292 views & 0 likes for this thread
New 400 2.8 IS ?
FORUMS News & Rumors Lens Rumors and Predictions



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00076 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
735 guests, 498 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is johntorcasio

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.