![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
Ok, for reasons that are unclear to me I decided to shoot this star trail in one hour long exposure rather than smaller ones. I've done it before and the noise levels have been easily correctable when using the long exposure noise reduction, but the noise here is foul. I turned the camera off by mistake while it was still processing which I don't think helped much, and my sensor was particularly dirty as I was out in the desert, which didn't help. We thought we were going to die finding this place and got stuck in the desert and had to be rescued, so I'll go to any lengths to save this shot as it means alot to me.
Anyone got any ideas? Here's the shot, followed by a close up of the noise: ![]() ![]() Doesn't look too bad small, but I wanna put it in my exhibition next week at A2 size. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
|
I have noise Ninja BTW. It'd be good if there as a way to selectively remove the black speckles from the while sky without degreading of softening the rest. I don't know of a technique to do that. I've tried selecting the highlights, inversing, gaussian blurring te rest and then deleting the highlights to leave the stars underneath, which kind of works, but I lost some of the stars....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
I have Noiseware Pro and it does a good job for me but with your shot, unfortunately you're gonna lose a bit of detail using a noise reduction plugin or technique. I guess the trick is knowing when too much is too much. The fact that you have the full sized image to work on may make it easier. Amazing shot btw.
__________________
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Moderator
Prime Mover Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 34,273
|
Try a variation on my edge detection sharpening technique
http://www.the-aperture.com/EdgeMaskSharpen.htm But at step 7, don't inverse the mask. Instead of running a sharpen pass, run the noise reduction instead. You should find (if you've got your mask well defined) that the noise reduction will only apply to the background. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
|
Interesting thanks guys
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
|
Think I prefer this one anyway. Not sure the star trails are even neccessary:
![]() The sky on a clear night in the Utah desert really is jaw dropping. No photo can do it justice. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
|
I prefer that one too. Nice shot.
__________________
At the beginning of time there was absolutely nothing. And then it exploded! Terry Pratchett Canon PowerShot G2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
|
I like the one with the star trails better - it adds drama to your picture. Try printing it before you give up -once you downsize the picture it might very well print OK - even with the noise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
I feel thoroughly satisfied
|
I use Noise Ninja and find it to be excellent. You might be surprised at how it prints, though.. give it a shot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
|
Beautiful shots.
__________________
- Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once. www.soleraphotography.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Light Bringer
|
I can see barely any noise even on the 100% crop. Stop looking at 100% crops, look at prints or whatever your output format will be.
__________________
NZIPP Qualified Professional wedding photographer.
Camera and Lens Reviews ~ Wellington Wedding Photographer Wellington Wedding Photographer (site2) ~ Wellington Wedding Photographer (site3) Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc) |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 29 Palms, Ca.
Posts: 1,468
|
Had a photo just recently with noise but when printed 90% of it blended in with the texture of the paper. Some papers hide it better then others so as Tim stated, focus on your output.
__________________
Semper Fi "Whatever you can do to avoid Photoshop is worth it" Digital Rebel XT, EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, EF 70-200mm f/4L USM, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 USM (Kit) Rick's Digital Desert |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 5,322
|
Very nice, indeed. Looks like you got the Milky Way, too. OCF or light painting?
__________________
Fine Art Landscape Photography . Do you have a website? Want to exchange mutual links? Email or IM me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
"Mine is very small"
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sitting atop the castle, Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 2,920
|
Quote:
Dont pixel peep. Concentrate on what the image looks like in "real life" on the print. When printing the colours tend to bleed slightly which may reduce the visibility of the noise |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Noise reduction approach changing to favor lower noise and more loss of detail? | form | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 10 | 24th of September 2008 (Wed) 19:46 |
| Noise Reduction Noise Ninja v Neat Image | Chris Nicola | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 9 | 18th of July 2007 (Wed) 21:05 |
| Noise Ninja vs CS2 noise reduction | **luvmygirlz** | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 4 | 31st of July 2006 (Mon) 11:30 |
| Noise Reduction | barich16cmu | Small Compact Digitals by Canon | 17 | 24th of February 2006 (Fri) 00:00 |
| Noise Reduction | Jim G | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 3 | 22nd of August 2005 (Mon) 13:07 |