Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 28 Feb 2005 (Monday) 00:32
Prev/next
Poll"Vote for your Favorite Wildlife Prime lens"
EF 600mm f/4[color=red]L[/color] IS
207
13%
EF 500mm f/4[color=red]L[/color] IS
255
16%
EF 500mm f/4.5[color=red]L[/color] (used)
23
1.4%
EF 400mm f/2.8[color=red]L[/color] IS
265
16.6%
EF 400mm f/4[color=green]DO[/color]
44
2.8%
EF 400mm f/5.6[color=red]L[/color]
241
15.1%
EF 300mm f/2.8[color=red]L[/color] IS
189
11.8%
EF 300mm f/4[color=red]L[/color] IS
162
10.2%
EF 200mm f/2.8[color=red]L[/color]
84
5.3%
EF 135mm f/2[color=red]L[/color]
54
3.4%
Sigma 800mm f/5.6 EX HSM
22
1.4%
Sigma 500mm f/4.5 EX HSM
30
1.9%
EF 800mm f/5.6L IS *NEW
9
0.6%
EF 200mm f/2L IS *NEW
11
0.7%

1332 voters, 1596 votes given (any choice choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

-=Top 10=- Recommended wildlife Primes

 
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
44,236 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Joined Apr 2003
Rhode Island USA
Feb 28, 2005 00:32 |  #1

-=Top Ten=- Recommended Wildlife Prime Lenses

The Third in a series of -=Top Ten=- recommended lens lists.

We move on to the best Prime lenses for wildlife photography.

We broke Wildlife lenses into seperate "Prime" and "Zoom" catagories,. as we could not fit all our favorites into one group of ten.

Here in the EOS forum some of the most often asked questions are what lenses work best for a specific task.

After research into dozens of past threads and some further discussion,
...these are the lenses that were selected by our forum members as -=Top 10=- Recommended Wildlife Prime Lenses


Please vote,.. feel free to add to the thread why you like the lenses you do in the list,. and or add in an additional lens if it is not on the list and say why!

-=More Lens Polls=-

F.Y.I. This is a Public POLL. This means that if you click on one of the numbers in the poll,. you will be able to see who voted for what lenses. This may or may not seem helpfull to you. But it may be a benefit for various reasons.

This "Thread" is a forum informational thread and subject to extreme editing and deleting. Any OT discussion, issues etc should be taken via PM or another thread.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
CyberDyneSystems
THREAD ­ STARTER
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
44,236 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Joined Apr 2003
Rhode Island USA
Feb 28, 2005 02:08 |  #2

Reminder, you can vote for more than one! ;)


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Arsonist ­ lolol
Member
Arsonist lolol's Avatar
182 posts
Joined Jan 2005
California, USA
Feb 28, 2005 02:11 |  #3

Thanks so much for posting this CDS, I plan on doing wildlife in college, and for career. I've been hoping for something like this so I can ideas as to what glass to buy! Hoping to get rid of this 75-300 and move to an L...guess I'll have a better idea of what to look for when I see some poll results hehe. But so far it looks like it's just going to be the most expensive ones :lol: Hah, oh well.


Canon EOS 20D
Canon EOS 300D
Canon 550EX
LumiQuest 80/20 Adapter
Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8
Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro
Canon 18-55mm f/3.5-5
Canon 50mm f/1.8
DeviantArtexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Scottes's Avatar
12,842 posts
Joined Nov 2003
A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
Feb 28, 2005 04:26 |  #4

400mm f/5.6 L - small and light so very portable and easily hand-held. Wickedly fast AF, sharp enough to handle the addition of a TC for extra reach.

600mm f/4 - just because it's probably the ultimate wildlife life lens on a tripod.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Infoexternal link
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

LOG IN TO REPLY
scottbergerphoto
Cream of the Crop
scottbergerphoto's Avatar
5,429 posts
Joined Jun 2003
Brooklyn, NY, USA
Feb 28, 2005 06:45 as a reply to Scottes's post |  #5

Scottes wrote:
400mm f/5.6 L - small and light so very portable and easily hand-held. Wickedly fast AF, sharp enough to handle the addition of a TC for extra reach.

600mm f/4 - just because it's probably the ultimate wildlife life lens on a tripod.

I agree with the 400 f/5.6 As to the 600 f/4, I'll just have to wait for the Lottery. I've been very happy with the Sigma 500 f/4.5 EX APO HSM. On a Wemberley it just floats.
Scott


One World, One Voice Against Terror,
Best Regards,
Scott
ScottBergerPhotography

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Jon's Avatar
69,628 posts
Joined Jun 2004
Bethesda, MD USA
Feb 28, 2005 12:02 |  #6

Misread one. I clicked on the 200 f/2.8 instead of the 300 f/2.8 I'd intended.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

LOG IN TO REPLY
foxbat
Goldmember
foxbat's Avatar
2,429 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Essex, UK.
Feb 28, 2005 15:12 as a reply to Scottes's post |  #7

Scottes wrote:
400mm f/5.6 L - small and light so very portable and easily hand-held. Wickedly fast AF, sharp enough to handle the addition of a TC for extra reach.

The 400mm f/5.6L is a fantastic chunk of focal length for the cash, I bought one and am very impressed with the results. Fits snugly in my microtrekker 200 and then there's the built-in hood, perfect!

...and can you all please stop voting for the 600mm, I know you've all never owned one! :lol:


Andy Brown; South-east England. Canon, Sigma, Leica, Zeiss all on Canon DSLRs. My hacking blogexternal link.

LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
THREAD ­ STARTER
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
44,236 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Joined Apr 2003
Rhode Island USA
Feb 28, 2005 17:23 as a reply to foxbat's post |  #8

foxbat wrote:
...and can you all please stop voting for the 600mm, I know you've all never owned one! :lol:

:lol: ROFL

This is why I voted for the 500mmL instead,. that one I have at least SEEN!


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Scottes's Avatar
12,842 posts
Joined Nov 2003
A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
Feb 28, 2005 17:34 |  #9

I've had 3 chances to use a 600mm, and passed on every one. As well as the two chances to use a 500mm L, and the Sigma 500mm.

I am just too darned afraid of liking them so much that I'd buy one. ROFL!

While I *could* purchase any one of them it would be a stupid thing for me to do. As CDS and I say, "I have room on the credit card for one." And if that's the only way to afford one then it would be a bad thing to do...


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Infoexternal link
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

LOG IN TO REPLY
MDJAK
Cream of the Crop
MDJAK's Avatar
24,576 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Nov 2004
New York
Feb 28, 2005 17:38 |  #10

Other than zoo and aquarium pictures, I've never had the pleasure to shoot "wild"life. A friend at work recently went on a safari in Tanzania. She had only a point and shoot.

If I had my druthers, and the dough, I'd want the 500 or 600.




LOG IN TO REPLY
pcasciola
POTN SHOPKEEPER
pcasciola's Avatar
3,130 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Millstone Township, NJ
Feb 28, 2005 18:05 as a reply to MDJAK's post |  #11

I like the 300/4L IS over it's big brother, the 400/5.6L only because the IS makes the lens a little more versatile, and it's by far the most inexpensive IS lens on the list. On a 1.6x crop camera (10D/20D/300D/350D), the smaller sensor gives you a more of a crop making this lens feel even longer. You can add a 1.4x TC to the 300/4L and get a 420/5.6L with IS, and not give up much sharpness, and on a 1.6x crop camera you are talking about a 672mm apparent FOV with IS, for about $1300 including the TC.


Philip Casciola
Pro Camera Gearexternal link - POTN Shopexternal link
Canon 7D, EF 50/1.8, EF 85/1.8, EF 300/4L IS, EF-S 18-55, Tamron 28-75/2.8, EF 70-200/2.8L IS
Sigma 1.4x & 2x, Tamron 1.4x, Gitzo 2220 Explorer, 322RC2 grip

LOG IN TO REPLY
Anders ­ Östberg
Goldmember
Anders Östberg's Avatar
3,395 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Sweden
Mar 01, 2005 01:50 |  #12

For wildlife I voted 300/4 even though I own the 300/2.8. Reason being weight for handheld shots. I personally would still buy the 2.8 again as it's a beautiful lens and primarily a sports lens for me, used from a monopod.

On the longer end I chose the 500/4 over the 600/4, again because of weight (and price too). It's so much more useable to me - I can handhold it briefly, use a monopod, or crouch down and support my elbow on my knee. I can't see myself doing that with the 600mm. I'll work on my stalking skills to make up for the shorter reach.

If I only could have one wildlife prime it would be the 500/4 or 400/5.6, but only if I also could keep the 100-400 for the wider focal range. Otherwise I'd go with the zoom only.


Anders Östberg - Mostly Canon gear - My photosexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Joined Jan 2003
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Mar 01, 2005 02:58 |  #13

I haven't used any of the lenses featured in the poll.
However, I voted for the Sigma 500/4, because I've seen the great examples that CDS and Scottberger have posted here and think that it's a real bargain in this lens lineup (if you work out regularly :lol: ).

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

LOG IN TO REPLY
radar-eclipse
Member
176 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Rockland County, NY
Mar 06, 2005 22:05 |  #14

I bought the 500mm f/4 because it's a few pounds less than the 400 and 600mm plus around a grand less. The 200mm 1.8 on a 20D is a dream (320mm 1.8); if you are close enough to what you are shooting.


1DS Mark II, 20D's, Kirk, Wimberly, RRS, Gitzo's, Lowe Pro's, Kinesis Photogear, Pelican cases, Lee filters, Hensel monolights, 15 2.8, Sigma 20 1.8 EX DG, 35 1.4 L,
50 1.4, 60 EF-S Macro, 85 1.8, 100 2.8 Macro, 135 2.0L, EF-S 10-22,16-35 2.8 Lv2, 24-70 2.8L, 70-200 2.8 IS L, 200 1.8 L, 300 2.8 IS L, Pentax 6x7, Photoflex and Chimera.

LOG IN TO REPLY
mikeivan
Senior Member
mikeivan's Avatar
Joined Aug 2005
houston
Aug 22, 2005 16:30 |  #15

I voted for the 400 f/4 DO, because it is my dream lens, to replace my 300 f/4 IS, which is a great lens for what I do, hand held birding, but I am just never quite close enough, even with my 1.4 TC. I have seen some big young guys hand holding the 500 and even 600, but not for me. However, I have read some criticism of the DO, lack of contrast etc. Some feedback would be great, I am selling some stuff to raise the dough for the DO.


MIKEIVAN

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

48,399 views & 0 likes for this thread
-=Top 10=- Recommended wildlife Primes
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00269 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is vikingjul458
781 guests, 488 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5577, that happened on Mar 02, 2016